Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) review

Well… this film has had quite a history. Practically ever since it was first announced, the second installment of Disney’s line of Star Wars spin-off films separate from the new trilogy of The Force Awakens, The Last Jedi, and next year’s Episode IX has been subjected to some of the worst luck to ever befall a film production in recent years. Right out the gate, several Star Wars fans were hesitant over the idea of there being a dreaded ‘prequel/origin story’ film centered on one of the most beloved characters in the entire saga, Han Solo. It certainly didn’t help matters when it was made clear that, given the context of the story, Han wouldn’t be played by Harrison Ford this time around, effectively putting tons of pressure on whoever ended up taking on the role to live up to what Ford had done with it. Thankfully, some of these fears were alleviated when the duo of Phil Lord and Christopher Miller were brought in to direct. Over the course of the past decade, Lord and Miller have become well-known for helming highly successful projects that, at first glance, seemed like they wouldn’t amount to anything special. They turned a very simple children’s book, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, into one of the most visually vibrant and hilarious animated films in recent memory. They turned the obscure television show 21 Jump Street, known only at the time for being the show that launched Johnny Depp’s career, into one of the funniest comedies of its year. This was then followed by a sequel, 22 Jump Street, which went on to become one of the rare comedy sequels that was not only ‘as good’ as its predecessor, but arguably better. And they turned what could’ve been a massively blatant cash grab, The LEGO Movie, into a charming and fantastically animated adventure that paid loving tribute to the product that it was based on. Thus, with the two of them behind the camera, it seemed as if things would go quite smoothly for this new Star Wars film…

…that is, until June 20^th, 2017, when all hell broke loose. In a stunning development, Lord and Miller announced that they were stepping down from the film’s production despite there being a few weeks left of filming due to creative differences with Lucasfilm. Not long afterward, it was then revealed that the two were basically ‘fired’ from the film due to the overtly comedic direction that they were taking with it, with producer Kathleen Kennedy reportedly being at odds with them since the start of filming. And while Lucasfilm quickly rebounded from this dilemma by hiring the legendary Ron Howard to step in and finish the film, the damage was already done at that point. Despite being an industry mainstay, as well as being no stranger to the studio having starred in George Lucas’ 1973 classic American Graffiti, many deemed Howard as being ‘too safe’ of a choice to take over for the likes of Phil Lord and Chris Miller. Simply put, Solo: A Star Wars Story basically became the equivalent of Marvel Studios’ Ant-Man, which also went through an infamous directorial shakeup when Peyton Reed took over for Edgar Wright, who backed out of the project due to, you guessed it, ‘creative conflicts with the studio’. And while the Star Wars franchise’s run under the Disney banner has led to three critical/commercial hits so far, the equally scandalous production of the previous spin-off film, Rogue One, and the borderline hostile polarizing reaction to The Last Jedi did not put the studio in as high of a regard amongst those on the internet compared to Marvel Studios. But let’s just ignore all that noise for now and just look at the film itself now that it’s finally hitting theaters, because despite such a notorious production behind it, Solo is a highly entertaining foray into the Star Wars universe.

Like Rogue One, Solo: A Star Wars Story takes place in-between the events of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith and Episode IV: A New Hope at a time where the Imperial Empire is in complete control of the galaxy. It is in this war-torn world where we meet Han Solo (Alden Ehrenreich), a brash, young wannabe pilot who manages to escape his rough living conditions on the planet Corellia. After a brief, disastrous stint in the Imperial Navy, Han crosses paths with a band of criminals led by Tobias Beckett (Woody Harrelson), who ends up recruiting Han for a heist on a shipment of valuable hyper fuel. During the process, Han also meets and befriends a Wookiee named Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo), who ends up tagging along with him on the mission. However, when the heist ends up being a bust, Han, Chewie, and Beckett find themselves in hot water with their ‘superiors’, a criminal syndicate known as Crimson Dawn led by Dryden Vos (Paul Bettany). To appease Vos, Han boldly suggests an alternate plan to acquire the hyper fuel, which involves them acquiring it in an ‘unprocessed’ form from the planet Kessel. Given the seemingly impossible nature of the mission, Vos has his top subordinate Qi’ra (Emilia Clarke), who happens to be Han’s former lover who he was forced to leave behind on Corellia, accompany them on the operation to help ensure that it goes smoothly. As a means of procuring a ship for the mission, the group also recruits the notorious smuggler Lando Calrissian (Donald Glover), owner of the Millennium Falcon, the fastest ship in the galaxy.

Since the whole directorial shakeup, much speculation has been made over how much of the film was reworked under Howard’s direction. By most accounts, it appears as if he re-shot about 70% of the film, meaning that it’s likely that there are still some parts in the final film that were done by Lord and Miller. Thankfully, there’s no real indication of inconsistency between their directorial visions in the final product. For all intents and purposes, it seems as if Howard did his best to match what Lord and Miller were going for in a manner that would make the production run a lot smoother (e.g. not relying heavily on improvisation). And as for the film itself, it’s a fun ride from beginning to end. If there’s one major advantage that it has over Rogue One, it’s better pacing. As I noted a few years back in my review of that film, Rogue One started off on a bit of a slow note but eventually found its groove by the end, highlighted by its big action-packed finale on the planet Scarif. By comparison, Solo gets things rolling right out of the gate and doesn’t relent for the rest of its near two-and-a-half-hour run-time. Sure, it maybe loses just a bit of steam at the end, but that doesn’t prevent this film from having some of the best pacing in the entire franchise. But as for how the film handles the origin story of one of the saga’s most iconic characters, one’s mileage may vary over how effectively it’s handled. As for me, though, I personally enjoyed all the ways in which the film set up Han’s character. The scene where he first meets Lando Calrissian? Awesome. The scene where he first meets Chewbacca? Heartwarming. The scene where him and Chewie co-pilot the Millennium Falcon for the first time and make the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs? So. Damn. Satisfying! Sure, this is easily one of the simplest plotted outings to come out of the franchise, but what is there is handled nicely.

Alden Ehrenreich obviously went into this film having to deal with some of the most intense pressure that an actor has ever experienced due to him having to take on a role that Harrison Ford had turned into an iconic part of cinema thanks to Episodes IV through VII. Thankfully, Ehrenreich slips into the role with ease, conveying all of Han’s notable quirks, including his tendency to make things up as he goes along, with charisma that almost nearly equals that of Ford’s. At the same time, Ehrenreich also has terrific chemistry/camaraderie with each of his main co-stars. It all begins, of course, with Chewie, as Joonas Suotamo continues to be a worthy successor to Peter Mayhew in the role of Han’s trusted sidekick. Then, there’s Donald Glover as arguably the film’s biggest standout, the younger Lando Calrissian. Granted, Lando surprisingly doesn’t factor into the film as much as one might expect going in (he’s honestly only in about a third of it), but Glover is practically pitch-perfect in terms of replicating the same swagger that Billy Dee Williams brought to the role back in the original trilogy. Ehrenreich also has great chemistry with Emilia Clarke as the film’s main female lead, Qi’ra. Obviously, most Star Wars fans know how this relationship is going to turn out given Han’s relationship with Leia in the other films, but the ways in which they develop Qi’ra for a potential follow-up or two are quite fascinating. Closing out the main core group is Woody Harrelson, perfectly sly as Han’s mentor figure in this film, and Phoebe Waller-Bridge as the franchise’s newest memorable droid character, L3-37, who’s a fun mix of the energy of BB-8 and the sarcastic wit of Alan Tudyk’s K-2SO from Rogue One as Lando’s primary co-pilot on the Millennium Falcon.  

Now with all this said, I know damn well that this film is shaping up to be one of the most polarizing installments of the Star Wars saga. Hell, most people have clearly already made up their minds about this film before they even saw it because they’re still upset about the whole Lord and Miller fiasco. And that’s a damn shame because the film is ultimately not the disaster that a lot of its critics thought it was going to be. Sure, the fact that Phil Lord and Chris Miller were kicked off the production in the middle of filming instead of during pre-production may have seemed problematic, but Ron Howard does a damn fine job of taking over for them and keeping the final product from being a disheveled mess. And as for the film itself, it’s a fun little sci-fi adventure through the Star Wars universe. Is it the franchise’s best outing? No, not at all, but that’s by no means a criticism given the quality of the Star Wars films that have been made since Disney took over. Simply put, Solo: A Star Wars Story succeeds at being a neat little foray into the past exploits of the franchise’s iconic protagonist. Granted, not everyone will like the ways in which it handles Solo’s backstory, but casual Star Wars fans like myself will no doubt get a kick out of seeing how Han met Chewbacca for the first time and the first time that the two stepped foot in the Millennium Falcon, amongst other things. And to his credit, Alden Ehrenreich manages to live up to a lot of the expectations that were thrust upon him by being a wonderful successor to Harrison Ford as everyone’s favorite ‘stuck up, half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf herder’ (“Who’s scruffy-looking?”). Now, would I’ve loved to have seen what Lord and Miller might have done with this story? Yes, but as was also the case with Edgar Wright and Ant-Man, that’s all in the past now. I’m not going to debate about this film being a case of a studio limiting their filmmakers’ creative vision. Instead, I’m just going to sit back and enjoy the ride because, contrary to what some on the internet may claim, the Star Wars franchise is doing totally fine now despite some of its most scandalous behind-the-scenes dilemmas.

Rating: 5/5!

Deadpool 2 (2018) review

Calling the 2016 superhero film Deadpool a hit would be a massive understatement. Upon its release in February of that year, the X-Men spin-off broke all sorts of box-office records. Not only did it become the highest grossing X-Men film to date worldwide, but it also set various opening weekend records as A.) an R-rated superhero film B.) an R-rated film in general and C.) a film that was released in the supposedly ‘dead’ month of February, and that’s just to name a few. Simply put, audiences were delighted by this raunchy installment of the superhero genre, especially due to its more faithful take on the fan-favorite titular anti-hero after his infamous first live-action appearance in 2009’s X-Men Origins: Wolverine. And thus, everyone’s favorite fourth-wall breaking mutant is back in Deadpool 2 which, as promised in the previous film’s post-credits scene, sees the introduction of Deadpool’s most famous ally from the comics, Cable. This time around, though, former VFX artist Tim Miller is not back to direct after he backed out of the project early in its development due to creative conflicts with lead Ryan Reynolds over the direction that it was going in. Thankfully, a badass replacement was found rather quickly in long-time stunt coordinator David Leitch. Since 2014, Leitch has begun to transition into directing and has managed to make quite a name for himself in the process, having co-helmed the 2014 modern action classic John Wick alongside fellow stunt veteran Chad Stahelski and then making a solid solo directorial debut with last year’s action thriller Atomic Blonde. Ultimately, though, one question still stands. From the perspective of someone who admittedly ‘liked, but not loved’ the first Deadpool film, does this one manage to outshine its predecessor and truly live up to its mantle as an unrelenting, R-rated, meta-fueled superhero extravaganza?

Two years since he first started to operate as the mercenary Deadpool, cancer survivor Wade Wilson (Ryan Reynolds) continues to do what he does best; killing all the bad guys, constantly breaking the fourth wall (primarily to complain about how fellow mutant Wolverine always steals his thunder) and wooing his girlfriend Vanessa (Morena Baccarin). However, Deadpool soon finds himself crossing paths with Cable (Josh Brolin), a cybernetic soldier from the future. Having traveled back in time from his dystopian world, Cable is hellbent on eliminating a young mutant boy named Russell Collins (Julian Dennison), who calls himself ‘Firefist’ due to his ability to shoot fire from his hands, whom Deadpool ends up meeting during a ‘mission’ with his old X-Men ‘pals’ Colossus (Stefan Kapičić) and Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Brianna Hildebrand). As Deadpool soon learns, Cable’s primary reasoning for hunting Russell is that he will end up killing those who had abused him at a ‘Mutant Re-Education Center’ orphanage, which will then lead to him becoming a killer years later with Cable’s own future wife and daughter being two of his victims. And despite Cable proving to be a highly imposing threat, Deadpool, fueled by his desire to have a family of his own with Vanessa, decides to take on the responsibility of protecting Russell. To do so, he ends up forming a superhero team of his own known as X-Force, which includes the likes of EMP disrupter Bedlam (Terry Crews), acid-spewing Zeitgeist (Bill Skarsgård), and luck manipulator Domino (Zazie Beetz) to deal with the time-traveling warrior who looks a lot like the main antagonist from Avengers: Infinity War.

Despite a change in director, Deadpool 2 does not lose any of the spirit that helped make the first film such a worldwide phenomenon, as it still provides audiences with plenty of great fourth wall jokes that liven up the mood when paired against some of its graphically violent action sequences. But perhaps the best thing that this film does is that it truly lives up to its designation as an unfiltered, balls-to-the-wall (figuratively and literally with emphasis on the latter) R-rated superhero film when compared to the first Deadpool. As I noted a few years back in my review of the first film, while I did genuinely enjoy it thanks in large part to its well-handled humor, I didn’t quite see it as the ‘superhero genre game-changer’ that everyone regarded it as. Despite its various ways of subverting and poking fun at some of the genre’s most widely mocked tropes, its ‘origin story’ narrative ended up covering much of that ground anyway. Plus, the film’s lower budget compared to the likes of other films in the genre did end up rearing its ugly head at times, like during its obviously watered-down finale despite it being set on an MCU-style Helicarrier of all places. To be fair, though, this wasn’t technically the film’s fault as it was just a case of it being an ‘untested venture’ for the studio. Thankfully, that’s not as big of an issue with Deadpool 2, which sports a budget that’s almost double that of the first’s. Because of this, the film takes way more chances when it comes to satirizing the superhero genre that ends up leading to plenty of highly satisfying comedic payoffs. Really, the only thing holding it back is one key plot twist early on that affects some of the main characters. This twist, influenced by one of the genre’s most infamous tropes, ironically helps to give the film more of an emotional core than the first film while still robbing it of the most notable contribution to its predecessor’s most poignant moments while also causing a few instances of tonal inconsistency in the process.

Through it all, though, the film is undoubtedly bolstered by Ryan Reynolds’ phenomenal turn in the titular role, as his comedic timing is just as strong as it was in the first film. This is then balanced excellently with Josh Brolin in his second major role in a comic book film this year after he blew everyone away as Thanos in Avengers: Infinity War. While there are instances where Cable proves to be just as generally imposing as Thanos, here he is mostly used as the butt of several jokes from Deadpool, who of course is a constant thorn in his sides. Sadly, Morena Baccarin is once again heavily underused as Vanessa despite her genuinely wonderful chemistry with Reynolds. In fact, it’s quite frankly even worse here than in the first film (remember that ‘infamous trope’ I mentioned in the last paragraph? Yeah, it affects her the most…). Thankfully, this is ‘somewhat’ alleviated by the film’s other main female lead, Zazie Beetz as Domino. As soon as the character first appears on-screen, she is immediately established as a badass heroine (despite Deadpool’s claims that her ‘luck-based’ powers aren’t very cinematic) who more than manages to hold her own against Deadpool’s tomfoolery. Julian Dennison is also a major standout as the young mutant Russell as he unabashedly partakes in some of the film’s most risqué bits of humor. And because parts of the film have him utilized as an ‘antagonist’, that technically makes him a better villain than those from the previous film, especially when he partners up with [identity of the second villain in this film redacted due to spoilers; I will say, though, that just like how the first film redeemed Deadpool, this villain’s appearance in this film redeems his previous one]. Finally, you also have plenty of the great supporting roles returning from the first film, including the duo of Colossus and Negasonic Teenage Warhead (who don’t necessarily get as much to do this time around but still manage to have their own standout moments) and Karan Soni as Deadpool’s happy-go-lucky cab driver friend Dopinder.  

In conclusion, to answer the question that I laid out in the early parts of this review, I’m pleased to say that I did like Deadpool 2 more than the first film. Now again, this isn’t meant as a slight against the first Deadpool, which is still an enjoyable (and, most importantly, hilarious) entry in the superhero genre that allowed Ryan Reynolds the chance to give the titular character the proper film adaptation that he deserved. It’s just that, at the end of the day, Deadpool 2 doesn’t have to deal with the pressure of being an untested anomaly for both Fox and the superhero genre in general. After all, when the first Deadpool hit theaters in early 2016, it was at a time when R-rated superhero films weren’t yet considered as being ‘commercially viable’ ventures. But now that Fox has basically become the top purveyor of R-rated superhero films at this point thanks to both it and Logan, that means that Deadpool 2 is able to go above and beyond in terms of truly going ‘out there’ with its satirical takes on the genre, which it does with utter delight. This, in turn, allows Deadpool 2 to have some of the most consistently terrific humor to come out of a superhero film to the point where it even rivals the MCU’s trademark sense of humor. And just like the first film, this is then strengthened further by an excellent ensemble cast that’s headlined by Ryan Reynolds once again proving why his recent turns as the Merc with the Mouth have made him one of the genre’s most pitch-perfect casting decisions. With all this said, though, I’ll admit that I still don’t necessarily consider this to be the ‘best’ superhero film of the year as it does sort of suffer from a major plot twist that, from a narrative perspective, ironically also does a few good things in the process. But as far as being one of the most ‘fun’ installments of the genre, Deadpool 2 is certainly near the top of that list.

Rating: 4.5/5

Jim Henson Double Feature

Back in January 2015, I did a big retrospective on the eight theatrically-released films from one of the most famous franchises in pop-culture history, the Muppets. The Muppets, of course, were the creation of Jim Henson, who first conceived the characters along with his wife Jane Nebel in 1955 as part of their show Sam and Friends. In the years since, these characters have gone onto become some of the most beloved icons of both the big and small screen. However, this isn’t the only major franchise that Jim Henson was known for, as he and his titular company, the Jim Henson Company, were also responsible for hit shows like Fraggle Rock, Dinosaurs, and Bear in the Big Blue House just to name a few. And, of course, Henson was also famous for playing a major part in the development of one of the most iconic kids shows of all-time, Sesame Street. But today on Rhode Island Movie Corner, in anticipation of his company’s upcoming film The Happytime Murders that will be hitting theaters this August, we’ll be focusing on the feature films that Henson himself directed. And because we’ve already looked at his feature-length directorial debut, 1981’s The Great Muppet Caper, we’ll instead be looking at the two other feature films that he directed, which happen to have one major thing in common. While neither film was a major critical/commercial success upon their initial releases, both have gone onto become some of the biggest cult classics from the 80’s to the point where ‘follow-ups’ to both are currently in development. Thus, it’s time to ‘remind you all of the babe (“What babe?”) the babe with the power (“What power?”) the power of voodoo (“Who do?”) you do (“Do what?”) remind me of the babe!’… ahem, sorry… as we look at the two films that Jim Henson directed in the 80’s that weren’t about his most iconic creation, the Muppets.

THE DARK CRYSTAL (1982)

One year after he made his official feature-length directorial debut with The Great Muppet Caper, Jim Henson teamed up with fellow Muppet performer Frank Oz to co-direct The Dark Crystal. In this dark fantasy (no pun intended), two young elf creatures known as ‘Gelflings’ named Jen and Kira embark on a journey to restore a powerful crystal that had split 1000 years ago and led to the creation of two species, the wise Mystics and the terrifying vulture-like creatures known as Skeksis. And I do mean it when I refer to this film as a ‘dark fantasy’ because it is very much an example of an 80’s PG-rated film that far exceeded the boundaries of what one would normally see from a film that’s targeted towards younger audiences. Whether it’s through a scene where one of the Skeksis crumbles into dust or another where a young creature known as a Podling has his life essence sucked out of him, it’s easy to see how this film left quite a psychological impact on kids back in the 80’s. And while I personally don’t have any major nostalgic connections to this film, that doesn’t mean that I don’t appreciate the visual mastery that is on display here. While some of the film’s blue-screen effects have aged a bit, the puppetry and animatronic work to create its wide array of creatures is superb, which is then paired perfectly with the film’s excellent visual designs that come courtesy of illustrator Brian Froud. Really, the only thing holding this film back is that while its visuals are impressive, the writing is a little more problematic. Some scenes feel a little unfocused and drag on a bit while character development is rather light. Still, for what its worth, The Dark Crystal is an engaging and imaginative fantasy adventure, and I am interested in seeing how this universe will be explored further courtesy of an upcoming prequel series on Netflix directed by Louis Leterrier.

Rating: 3.5/5

LABYRINTH (1986)

Just like the 3-D short film Captain EO that was produced for Disney parks, Labyrinth was a huge collaboration between three titans from the world of pop culture. Not only was the film directed by Jim Henson, but it was also executive-produced by George Lucas and starred ‘Ziggy Stardust’ himself, David Bowie, in the role of the main antagonist, Jareth the Goblin King. Plus, it served as another collaboration between Henson and illustrator Brian Froud, who once again worked as the film’s main conceptual designer. Sadly, upon its initial release, the film was not a big hit with critics and it bombed at the box-office. This proved to be an extremely demoralizing moment for Henson and it was ultimately the last feature film that he ever directed before his death in 1990. However, just like Dark Crystal, Labyrinth has gone on to amass a sizable cult following; in fact, Labyrinth’s fandom is arguably even bigger than Dark Crystal’s. It got a manga sequel in 2006, Return to Labyrinth, and an official film sequel is currently in the works that is set to be helmed by Evil Dead reboot director Fede Alvarez. But as for the original Labyrinth, while I once again don’t have as big of a personal nostalgic connection to this film compared to those who grew up in the 80’s, I do appreciate it just as much as I do Dark Crystal when it comes to its visuals. Sure, this film also has a few visual effects that haven’t aged well (e.g. the sequence involving the ‘Fireys’ that even Henson wasn’t fully satisfied with), but the puppetry and animatronic work from Henson’s crew is still top-notch all around. And whereas Dark Crystal truly lived up to the first half of its name as an extremely ‘dark’ fantasy, Labyrinth sports a much lighter tone by comparison that’s very much in the vein of classic films like The Wizard of Oz and Alice in Wonderland. This ultimately produces a lot of Muppet-esque humor that is handled effectively enough to keep the film’s proceedings from becoming ‘too goofy’.

But, of course, the biggest highlight of the film is David Bowie in the lead role of Jareth the Goblin King. Simply put, the same great stage presence and charisma that made the late performer the icon that he still is today is on full display here, as he perfectly embodies the role of the film’s seductive villain. He also wrote much of the music for this film, which paves the way for some enjoyable musical numbers highlighted by the iconic ‘Magic Dance’ (which I alluded to in the intro to this post). Jennifer Connelly is solid as well in one of her earliest film roles as the film’s main protagonist Sarah, a young girl who embarks on a journey within Jareth’s labyrinth when he kidnaps her baby brother Toby. Admittedly, Connelly is a tad bit wooden in the film’s early moments, though this quickly fades once Sarah enters the labyrinth. She’s joined along the way by an entertaining collection of side characters, including a lovable beast named Ludo and a grumpy dwarf named Hoggle. All of this makes up for the film’s only real shortcoming in that, like Dark Crystal, it does suffer from the occasional narrative lull. That and the film’s ending is, without spoiling anything for those who haven’t seen it before, rather anti-climactic. At the same time, though, the film also does a great job of handling its coming-of-age plot in what is a rare instance of a female-led fantasy story. Thus, while both films are enjoyable in their own unique ways, Labyrinth does sport a tighter narrative compared to Dark Crystal with the added benefit of a great lead performance from David Bowie. And even though this is the first time that I’ve ever watched the film in full, it’s easy to see why this delightfully weird fantasy adventure has spawned the following that it has. Jim Henson may not have lived to see this happen but, per his son Brian, he was at least aware of it before he passed away.     

Rating: 4/5

And that concludes this little ‘retrospective’ on the work of one of the film industry’s most beloved visionaries, Jim Henson. Thanks for following along and be sure to sound off in the comments below with your own personal memories of these 80’s cult classics.