Saturday, July 27, 2019

The Lion King (2019) review


James Earl Jones and JD McCrary in The Lion King (2019)

In 1991, Walt Disney Animation began production on two different films that would be the studio’s next big projects after the one-two punch of that year’s Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin the following year. Of the two films, the one that the studio ended up placing most of its focus on was an adaptation of the story of the Native American woman known as Pocahontas, and because it ended up attracting most of Disney’s prominent animators, the other film was primarily developed by the studio’s ‘B-Team’. Ironically, though, the B-Team would end up producing the more critically acclaimed affair; we, of course, know their project… as The Lion King. When it was released in the summer of 1994, The Lion King quickly became one of the biggest films of its time. It currently stands as the highest-grossing traditionally animated film of all-time at over $968 million worldwide, which also means that it was Disney Animation’s highest-grossing film for nearly two decades until it was ultimately out-grossed by Frozen in 2013. It’s also notably the best-selling VHS title of all-time with over 32 million copies sold. But now it’s joined the ranks of other Disney classics as the latest in Disney’s line of live-action remakes… however, calling this one ‘live-action’ would technically be false. Instead, this new version of The Lion King is a CGI remake of the original as it mirrors the style of the 2016 remake of The Jungle Book through its use of photorealistic environments and characters. The two films even share the same director in Jon Favreau AKA the man who effectively launched the MCU with the original Iron Man and is also responsible for modern classics like Elf and Chef. And while this one is sure to be a controversial release because of how it ultimately ‘remakes’ its predecessor, fans of the original Lion King will still probably find this to be an incredibly fun and gorgeously animated interpretation of an all-time Disney classic.

In the vast kingdom that is the Pride Lands of Africa, Mufasa, the King of Pride Rock (voiced by James Earl Jones) and his queen Sarabi (voiced by Alfre Woodard) celebrate the birth of their son, Simba. As he begins to grow up, Simba (voiced as a child by JD McCrary and as an adult by Donald Glover) eagerly anticipates the day when he will take his father’s place as King. However, unbeknownst to Simba, his uncle Scar (voiced by Chiwetel Ejiofor) secretly plots to get rid of both him and his father so that he can take over the Pride Lands. To do so, Scar puts Simba in increasingly terrifying situations that eventually results in a devastating tragedy, and when Scar has Simba fooled into thinking that the accident was his fault, Simba ends up running away from his home. After a while, he meets the happy-go-lucky duo of Timon the Meerkat (voiced by Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa the Warthog (voiced by Seth Rogen), who end up taking him in and showing him the benefits of their carefree lifestyle. But as Simba matures into adulthood, his childhood friend Nala (voiced as a child by Shahadi Wright Joseph and as an adult by Beyoncé) comes back into his life to warn him that Scar’s takeover of the Pride Lands has led it to ruin. Thus, Simba must now overcome the demons of his past to save his home from his diabolical uncle and to properly take his place as the new king of Pride Rock.

This new take on The Lion King is easily the closest that any of the recent Disney remakes have gotten when it comes to closely replicating their original counterparts. This isn’t a case like Maleficent, which retold the story of Sleeping Beauty from the titular villain’s perspective, or Pete’s Dragon, which nixed the original’s musical numbers in favor of a more traditional narrative. For all intent and purposes, this is the same exact story from the 1994 film with the same exact outcome. The only major differences from a narrative perspective come from minor deviations in dialogue and a different intro for Nala after she’s become an adult. As such, this could quite arguably be the most controversial Disney remake yet because of how tightly it adheres to the original film without really doing anything differently. And yet, at the same time, because it’s still The Lion King, it could potentially be argued that, at the very least, the film does maintain the original’s strong script and hits the biggest emotional moments just as effectively (i.e. that one scene that we always remember from this story). Nothing significant from the story is lost and nothing is added in that would drastically change anything. Ultimately, though, the biggest selling point of this film is its visuals. As noted in the intro, this film carries over the same method that Favreau used on The Jungle Book in which everything in it (save for Mowgli) was digitally created. And while some may take issue with the fact that the overall drive for realism results in certain moments from the original being toned down, it’s still an impressive feat of VFX work from the same team that won an Oscar for their work on Jungle Book.

Another key aspect of this film is its voice cast, as Jon Favreau selected a top-notch voice cast to portray these iconic characters. JD McCrary and Donald Glover (who have notably worked together before) headline the project excellently as Simba as a young cub and adult lion, respectively, thanks in large part to the terrific camaraderie/chemistry that they have with their co-stars. McCrary and Shahadi Wright Joseph are phenomenal together as young Simba and Nala, and while adult Nala’s role in the story isn’t really expanded upon too much when compared to the original film, Beyoncé does do a solid job in the role. Meanwhile, Chiwetel Ejiofor is a damn good replacement for Jeremy Irons in the role of Scar as he perfectly maintains that same, great sinister persona that was pivotal in making Scar such an iconic Disney villain. But as for Mufasa, the filmmakers clearly knew that there was no way you could replace the legendary voice that portrayed the character in the original film. Yes, James Earl Jones is back once again to reprise his role as the King of Pride Rock, and he is still just as commanding and awesome as he was in the original film. And to close out the main cast, we have Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen, who serve as phenomenal replacements for Nathan Lane and Ernie Sabella in the roles of Timon and Pumbaa. As many others have noted, they’re the biggest standouts of the film and their riffing is the primary source of the remake’s new material, whether it’s an entertaining fourth-wall gag or a downright brilliant homage to another Disney classic.

I have the feeling that this is the one Disney remake that some people were expecting me to be completely against. After all, the original Lion King still stands as my favorite Disney animated film of all-time. Well, to that I say… you’ve read my reviews of the other recent Disney remakes, right? If I haven’t made it clear before, I’m perfectly fine with this new trend of live-action remakes of classic Disney films (even though this one technically isn’t ‘live-action’) because I recognize that the old films will still be there when all’s said and done. More importantly, their legacies won’t be tarnished by a ‘lousy’ remake because they’re quite frankly better than they’re often given credit for. However, even with that said, I fully recognize that I won’t even remotely be able to convince any of the ‘live-action remake’ critics that this one is worthwhile because it’s almost literally the same as its traditionally-animated counterpart save for a CGI makeover. And because the CG is highly intent on maintaining a sense of realism, this means that this version of The Lion King is a lot more grounded compared to its predecessor (e.g. don’t expect Timon to don a hula skirt and ask some hyenas if they’re “aching for some bacon”). Despite this, Jon Favreau does do an excellent job of maintaining the same spirit of the original even with a different visual aesthetic. And at the end of the day, that visual aesthetic is the main reason to watch this film because it’s clear that the visual effects team went above and beyond to create an impressively photorealistic-looking film to the point where it could potentially pass as some kind of nature documentary. As such, while some may view this as the most pointless Disney remake yet, there’s no denying that it’s one of the best-looking films of 2019.

Rating: 5/5!

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) review


Spider-Man: Far from Home (2019)

(Disclaimer: I apologize in advance, folks, but due to the nature of this being the first MCU film after Avengers: Endgame, I will have to address what is easily the biggest of that film’s spoilers. I have the feeling that most of you reading this have already watched the film (it did just become the highest-grossing film of all time, after all…), but in the slim chance that you haven’t seen it yet, all I can recommend at this point is that you watch Endgame first.)

When we last left the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it had just reached the culmination of its legendary run up to this point with Avengers: Endgame. It goes without saying that the film was a true epic in every sense of the word, effectively providing the franchise’s dedicated fanbase with a satisfying conclusion to what has now officially been designated as ‘the Infinity Saga’. However, as it turns out, it ultimately wasn’t going to be the final installment of this saga. Instead, that honor goes to the follow-up to 2017’s Spider-Man: Homecoming, Spider-Man: Far From Home. As most of you know, Spider-Man’s inclusion in the MCU ultimately came courtesy of a deal between Marvel Studios and Sony. While the latter has held the character’s film rights for the past several decades, the lackluster performance of the Amazing Spider-Man reboot series led to this deal that would see both parties working together to develop a new iteration of the character, who made a phenomenal debut in Captain America: Civil War. Thus, just like Homecoming, Far From Home is an interesting release in terms of its distribution because while Marvel Studios is currently under the Disney banner, both Homecoming and Far From Home are officially Sony productions. And yet, because of Kevin Feige and co.’s involvement in the production, it’s still technically an MCU film at the end of the day, with Homecoming director Jon Watts returning to direct along with most of the main cast from the previous film. And because of this, Far From Home is yet another superb outing for the MCU that brilliantly handles the ramifications of the epic, emotional finale of its immediate predecessor while also giving us a taste of what’s to come for this legendary franchise.

Not long after the events of Endgame, teenager Peter Parker (Tom Holland) returns to his hometown of Queens to resume his duties as the friendly neighborhood web-slinger, Spider-Man. At the same time, though, Peter has struggled to overcome the death of his mentor/father figure Tony Stark. Thus, when Midtown High organizes a summer vacation to Europe, Peter signs up for it, eager to take a break from the superhero lifestyle and hopeful that this trip will give him a chance to reveal the blossoming feelings that he has for his classmate Michelle AKA MJ (Zendaya). Unfortunately for Peter, his superhero life quickly follows him to Europe, and he ends up being approached with a mission by Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders). The two inform him that due to the cosmic implications of ‘the Snap’, four creatures from another dimension known as the Elementals have arrived on Earth and have caused mass destruction wherever they go. Luckily for them, they have gained a new ally in Quentin Beck (Jake Gyllenhaal), an illusion-based superhero who is also from the Elementals’ dimension and is promptly given the nickname ‘Mysterio’ by the media. Thus, as Peter now finds himself struggling once again to balance his responsibilities as Spider-Man with his desire for a stress-free vacation, he must also grapple with the biggest question of them all; can he live up to the expectations that have been set upon him and become ‘the next Iron Man’?

In the past, I’ve noted that Marvel Studios does a great job when it comes to the kind of films that they do right after the big ensemble pieces that are the Avengers films. The original Ant-Man followed the grand spectacle of Avengers: Age of Ultron with a refreshingly small-scaled affair (no pun intended) while Ant-Man and the Wasp allowed for some well-earned levity after the devastating finale of Avengers: Infinity War. The same situation applies to Far From Home, but in this case, its effectiveness as the immediate follow-up to Avengers: Endgame stems from the fact that the events of Endgame’s finale directly affect this film’s plot. Simply put, the death of Tony Stark is felt throughout, right down to the fact that tributes to him can be seen in practically every European country that Peter visits. Without spoiling anything from the plot, this film is all about Tony’s legacy and how Peter must now work to maintain it, and as one can only expect from an MCU film, this is where the franchise’s phenomenal sense of emotional poignancy comes into play because of how closely tied the MCU’s version of Peter has been to Tony. Another key aspect of this film is its European setting since Far From Home is the first main Spider-Man film (not counting Spidey’s trip to Germany in Civil War since that’s a Captain America film) that’s not primarily set in New York, and because of this, the new locales offer some fantastic imagery that’s even more amazing when viewed in IMAX. All this helps to bolster everything else that you’ve come to expect from an MCU film; I would elaborate on what that stuff is further but, let’s be frank, I’ve already done that in my previous MCU film reviews.  

Like Homecoming, Far From Home primarily revolves around its younger cast members to great effect. Of course, it’s all headlined by Tom Holland, who continues to be a wonderful iteration of Spider-Man. Not only does Holland perfectly embody the combination of Spider-Man’s wisecracking persona with Peter Parker’s endearing awkwardness, but he also brilliantly handles all the emotional turmoil that Peter’s been going through since Tony Stark’s death. He also continues to have excellent camaraderie with Jacob Batalon as Peter’s best friend Ned, who gets his own little subplot via a budding romance with their classmate Betty Brant (Angourie Rice), as well as some wonderful chemistry with Zendaya as the MCU’s ‘MJ’. As alluded to in the plot synopsis, the film begins to develop a relationship between the two that, in turn, does allow Zendaya to have a larger role this time around. After that, there’s the always reliable supporting characters like Jon Favreau as Happy Hogan, Marisa Tomei as Aunt May, and Samuel L. Jackson and Cobie Smulders as Fury and Maria Hill. Finally, there’s quite arguably the most anticipated addition to the cast, Jake Gyllenhaal as Mysterio, and sure enough, he is fantastic in the role thanks in large part to the excellent camaraderie that he forms with Holland. Now for those who are aware of Mysterio’s traditional role in the comics… yes, this film goes exactly the way you think it does when it comes to his overall characterization. Still, the way in which it translates this to tie him into the MCU’s lore is a brilliant method of subverting expectations.

Marvel Studios has been on a roll as of late when it comes to producing sequels that are superior to their already excellent predecessors. That was the case with films like Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, and Ant-Man and the Wasp, just to name a few. And sure enough, that trend continues with Spider-Man: Far From Home, which has quite possibly become my new favorite Spider-Man film. Now don’t get me wrong, Spider-Man: Homecoming was a terrific outing for the web-slinger that perfectly encapsulated the character arc of the MCU’s rendition of the character; a young kid who wants to join the Avengers but quickly has to grapple with the reality that he’s still just a kid in a much larger universe. But then you have Far From Home, which takes everything great from Homecoming and amplifies it even further with better action sequences, better visuals, and a tightly-written script which sees Peter Parker now having to face the burden of proving exactly why Tony Stark made him an Avenger. In other words, while I’m sure that I’ve said this plenty of times before when it comes to the MCU, this truly is one of those films that is a pitch-perfect representation of everything great about this franchise. Thus, it ends up being a perfect epilogue to Marvel Studios’ ‘Infinity Saga’, which is quite arguably the most impressive run that any franchise has had in the history of film. And considering all the exciting films and TV shows that Marvel Studios announced at Comic-Con this past weekend, it’s undeniably clear that they’re not even remotely done yet.    

Rating: 5/5!

Friday, July 19, 2019

2019 Midyear Recap



We’re now halfway through 2019 and despite the increasingly frustrating actions of modern fandom that continue to paint the film fan community in a negative light, the time has come for Rhode Island Movie Corner’s annual Midyear Recap. For those who are new to this site, the title of this post speaks for itself. Simply put, it’s just me going over every new film that I’ve seen so far this year from worst to best… in other words, it’s basically the equivalent of going through the annual rankings lists that I make on the film fan website Letterboxd. As is always the case, these current rankings are not officially set in stone, meaning that, for example, my current pick for ‘worst of the year’ probably won’t still be what it is by year’s end (I’ll be honest, though, my ‘best of the year’ will be… I’ll explain later…). Still, the one major advantage that these ‘Midyear Recap’ posts provide is that they’re the only posts that I do in a year (aside from the fan-based ‘Favorite Films of Summer’ polls) that allow me to truly go over everything that I’ve seen rather than just highlighting a select few. That, of course, is what always happens with my ‘Best of the Year’ and ‘Worst of the Year’ lists, which only focus on the 10 films (12 in the case of the ‘Best of’ lists) that I list and a select few Honorable Mentions. Thus, without further ado, it’s time to reflect upon the first six months of 2019 and the various films that have hit theaters in that timespan. With that in mind, I welcome you, ladies and gentlemen, to the 2019 installment of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s Midyear Recap.   

WORST OF THE YEAR (SO FAR)

GODZILLA: KING OF THE MONSTERS

Godzilla and King Ghidorah in Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019)

I really wanted to like this film. As someone who ‘liked’ the 2014 American adaptation of Godzilla, I was hoping that this new film would fix some of the issues that quite a few people had with its predecessor. Namely, the hope was that it would give more screen-time to Godzilla, especially after it was revealed that the film would also feature several of his iconic monster co-stars, including Mothra, Rodan, and perhaps his most famous adversary, King Ghidorah. And yet, at the end of the day, it still feels like Godzilla’s playing more of a supporting role in his own franchise. Like the previous film, King of the Monsters places a lot of emphasis on its human characters, and while a lot of people harped on the 2014 film for doing this, at least that one didn’t have to juggle an extremely large ensemble cast. And because of this, this film’s cast is wasted considerably despite the best efforts of folks like Kyle Chandler, Vera Farmiga, and Millie Bobby Brown. At the very least, when the film does showcase Godzilla doing what he does best (i.e. fighting other monsters), those parts are well-handled even if these new Godzilla films could benefit greatly from having some more action sequences that are set during the day. Ultimately, though, Godzilla: King of the Monsters is a bit too serious for a film of this nature. Yes, the previous Godzilla film was incredibly serious as well, but you can arguably view that as director Gareth Edwards’ way of paying tribute to the original Godzilla film from 1954.

Now admittedly, Godzilla: King of the Monsters has been the only 2019 film that I’ve seen so far that I ‘didn’t like’. Usually, the next category in this post would be the other films that I wasn’t too big on, hence the category’s name, Other Notable ‘Stoinkers’. And yes, as some of you might have guessed, I basically borrowed the ‘stoinker’ term from the popular film review series Schmoes Know. Thus, given my current situation, I’m doing something a little different this year by creating a new category that focuses on the films that I found to be just ‘okay’.

MIDDLE OF THE ROAD

MEN IN BLACK: INTERNATIONAL

Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson in Men in Black: International (2019)

Since I’m not someone who usually dings a film for being ‘unnecessary’ (since that term can practically be applied to any film and, to be perfectly blunt, is starting to get a bit overused this year), that didn’t affect my views on this year’s rather disastrous spin-off of the classic Men in Black franchise. However, as I noted in my review for it, Men in Black: International endured a generally hellish production due to frequent creative clashes between director F. Gary Gray and producer Walter F. Parkes. Parkes reportedly ended up winning this conflict and the film that was ultimately released in theaters was his intended version of it rather than Gray’s, which would’ve been a lot timelier with its narrative. Parkes’ cut, by comparison, ends up being a basic rehash of the previous Men in Black films, from a twist reveal that surrounds its primary McGuffin to a finale that’s set at a notable historic landmark. And because it’s so intent on playing things ‘by the book’, the film rarely lives up to the opportunities that it had to showcase how the world of Men in Black operates outside of New York, hence the International in its title. At the very least, the film does benefit from a solid pair of performances from Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson as Agents H and M, respectively. The strong chemistry that made them such a dynamic duo in Thor: Ragnarök is on full display here and it also helps that they do end up providing a different dynamic when compared to J and K from the original trilogy. Ultimately, though, this (plus a scene-stealing turn from Kumail Nanjiani as a tiny alien named Pawny who joins H and M on their adventures) isn’t exactly enough to prevent Men in Black: International from being an underwhelming entry in this long-running franchise. It’s not ‘terrible’, per se, but it goes without saying that it could’ve been a heck of a lot better.

THE UPSIDE

Bryan Cranston and Kevin Hart in The Upside (2017)

After spending a few years plagued by distribution issues, The Upside, an Americanized remake of 2011’s French hit The Intouchables, finally hit theaters this past January. And while this does mean that the film is exactly what you would expect from a January release, it still manages to be a decent little crowd-pleaser. Like its source material, the film follows a recently paroled man who ends up becoming the caretaker for a quadriplegic millionaire. As such, what follows is your basic comedic misadventure about two incredibly mismatched characters who, despite their differences, end up getting along and help each other become better people in the process. And yet, despite its simplistic narrative, the film does a decent enough job with its humor thanks in large part to its excellent lead duo of Kevin Hart and Bryan Cranston. These two have excellent comedic chemistry, with Hart’s usual animated persona mixing greatly with Cranston’s dry wit. At the same time, though, the film also has some very effective emotional moments, and while we know that Cranston’s got plenty of experience when it comes to dramatic material (Breaking Bad, anyone?), Hart gets a prime chance to flex his own acting chops as well. Because of all this, I can safely say that while The Upside isn’t really anything special, it’s still an enjoyable dramedy that, if anything, is better than most of the films that come out in January.

WORTHWHILE RECOMMENDATIONS

DUMBO

Eva Green in Dumbo (2019)

Dumbo is the very definition of a harmless family flick… which is a statement that I’m sure some of you will find questionable given that this is another one of Disney’s recent live-action remakes. Not only that, it’s a remake of one of the studio’s earliest animated features directed by a filmmaker who, despite having a very prestigious resume, has become a lot more polarizing in recent years. Still, there are quite a few things to love about this new rendition of the lovable elephant whose large ears allow him to fly. Under the direction of Tim Burton, this film is yet another showcase of his trademark visual style. In this instance, Burton eschews his traditional gothic visuals for a heartfelt tribute to the classic Americana of yesteryear. This is especially apparent from the film’s grand locales, including the lavish theme park named Dreamland where most of the film’s second half takes place. Really, this film’s only major shortcoming is that the new stuff that it adds to expand upon the original film’s story is quite simplistic in terms of its execution. Granted, the original Dumbo had a simplistic plot as well (after all, it is literally only an hour long), but while the new film goes as far as to cover every key moment of the animated film in just the first half-hour so that it can delve into a new plot revolving around a corrupt business tycoon, the new human characters don’t exactly get a lot to work with. However, for what it’s worth, this film’s cast (which is primarily made up of Burton regulars like Danny DeVito, Eva Green, and Michael Keaton) does do solid enough jobs with what they’re given. As such, while I’m not saying that the new Dumbo is better than its animated counterpart, it’s still a generally entertaining film whose heart is very much in the right place.

POKEMON: DETECTIVE PIKACHU

Ryan Reynolds and Justice Smith in Pokémon Detective Pikachu (2019)

To reiterate a statement that I made in my review of this film, I am genuinely impressed by everything that Pokémon: Detective Pikachu has managed to accomplish. To date, it is the best-reviewed live-action film based on a video game and the only one to boast a ‘Fresh’ rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Granted, its RT score is only in the high 60’s, but then again, most films of this genre tend to have an RT score that’s 30% or lower. How did this film manage to avoid that terrible fate? Well, simply put, it did so by providing a very faithful take on its source material. In this instance, while the film is an adaptation of a spin-off of the Pokémon series instead of one of the main games, it is full of references and nods to the various other facets of the franchise that are sure to delight those who are amongst its devoted fanbase. And yet, at the same time, it also manages to appeal to those who aren’t as familiar with Pokémon thanks to a story with solid emotional depth via main protagonist Tim Goodman’s efforts to figure out what happened to his father with the help of a talking Pikachu. While the film’s primary mystery plot ends up yielding predictable results, the strong camaraderie between Tim and Pikachu (played excellently by Justice Smith and Ryan Reynolds, respectively) is the heart of the film. Plus, this film also proves that Reynolds isn’t just limited to Deadpool’s unabashedly raunchy style of humor, though with that said, he does manage to throw in some jokes that go under the radar for a film that’s primarily geared towards younger audiences. Ultimately, though, Pokémon: Detective Pikachu proves to be a very fun time, and while it’s far from perfect, it still deserves a lot of credit for all its success despite being part of one of the unluckiest genres in all of film.

DARK PHOENIX

James McAvoy in Dark Phoenix (2019)

To start things off, yes, I did like Dark Phoenix, the latest installment of the X-Men film franchise… that is also its worst-reviewed entry to date. I’ve gone on record stating that I’m a huge fan of the franchise’s First Class era as it was directly responsible for making me a fan of X-Men. X-Men: First Class and X-Men: Days of Future Past are two of my favorite non-MCU superhero films of all-time and I will still go on record saying that X-Men: Apocalypse was unfairly overlooked by most of the internet. As for Dark Phoenix, though, while I do think that it’s not even remotely as bad as its low RT score suggests, it still could’ve been a lot better. As its title suggests, the film is an adaptation of the popular Dark Phoenix Saga storyline from the comics in which X-Men team member Jean Grey’s telepathic powers begin to corrupt her physically and mentally. This storyline was previously adapted to, to put it lightly, ‘mixed’ results in 2006’s X-Men: The Last Stand, and while this new film does opt for a more faithful adaptation of its source material, it still doesn’t give this plotline the emotional gravitas that it deserves. Simply put, the story of Jean Grey going rogue is treated like your standard superhero/supervillain conflict, and the addition of a woefully underdeveloped bunch of antagonists in the alien race known as the D’Bari doesn’t help the matter. For what it’s worth, though, longtime series writer Simon Kinberg makes a respectable directorial debut thanks to his solid handling of the action sequences. And while many of the newer additions to the franchise don’t get much to work with this time around, James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender are still phenomenal as Xavier and Magneto. Ultimately, though, that didn’t prevent this film from underperforming with both critics and audiences, the latter of whom are clearly just waiting for the series to get rebooted so that the X-Men can join the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

GLASS

Samuel L. Jackson in Glass (2019)

When I saw M. Night Shyamalan’s 2017 effort Split in theaters, I hadn’t yet seen Unbreakable, which is quite arguably his most popular directorial effort. Still, I was at least aware of it enough to understand the film’s ending which, thanks to an unexpected Bruce Willis cameo, connected it to the world of Unbreakable. And thus, we now find ourselves with the finale of what has been referred to as the Eastrail 177 trilogy, Glass… which, after two straight hits that helped redeem his career, effectively put Shyamalan back in the same polarizing territory that he was in before 2015. As you might have guessed, this was mostly due to that trademark Shyamalan twist ending which, in this case, pulled a major bait and switch by teasing a potential clash between David Dunn and Kevin Wendell Crumb that ultimately didn’t happen. A few other sources of contention amongst critics and audiences were the big reveal regarding the intentions of new character Dr. Ellie Staple, who was revealed to be a member of a secret organization that hunts superpowered beings, and the extremely controversial ‘trivial’ death of David Dunn. However, while I do agree that the ‘secret organization’ reveal really could’ve been handled a lot better (namely, by having some actual set-up instead of it just randomly coming out of nowhere), the rest of the film does manage to be a solidly engaging finale to this unexpected trilogy.

Simply put, I at least understand what Shyamalan was going for with this film. Instead of being a big-budget blockbuster like the MCU films, Glass was intended to focus more on the psychological aspects of a world of superpowered beings. That was very much the case with Unbreakable, which presented a grounded take on a traditional superhero origin story, and while Split was more of a thriller by comparison that didn’t reveal its connection to Unbreakable until the very end, its psychological themes were still in line with what we got from the first film. Thus, Glass is basically a combination of the best elements of its two predecessors, limiting its biggest action set-pieces to the beginning and end of the film while filling the rest of the run-time with discussions about superhero behavior and character-driven moments of pure emotional poignancy. And on that note, the film also benefits greatly from the excellent trio of performances from the trilogy’s main leads. Bruce Willis continues to get a lot of this trilogy’s biggest emotional moments as David Dunn while Samuel L. Jackson fully revels in Elijah Price’s evolution into a full-blown criminal mastermind. Ultimately, though, the biggest standout of the bunch is James McAvoy who, just like in Split, fully commits (physically and mentally) to the role of Kevin Wendell Crumb, a man with 24 distinct personalities. And despite what I said before about the finale’s underdeveloped ‘secret organization’ twist, the film does sort of manage to bounce back from this thanks to a second twist that reveals that Elijah AKA Mr. Glass one-upped this organization and proved to the world that superheroes do exist. Thus, while I do understand why this film has proven to be quite the polarizing affair, I ultimately found myself amongst the crowd that did like it. I’m not saying that it’s the ‘best’ of the trilogy (that honor would have to go to Unbreakable), but I do think that it provides a fascinating conclusion to this story and the overall arcs of the three main characters who have headlined it excellently.

ALITA: BATTLE ANGEL

Rosa Salazar in Alita: Battle Angel (2019)

I got the chance to see Alita: Battle Angel early at the special fan screening that writer/producer James Cameron had set up at the end of January, and despite not having any experience with the original Battle Angel manga by Yukito Kishiro, I found Cameron and director Robert Rodriguez’s ambitious film adaptation to be quite solid. However, I do mean it when I say that this film is very ‘ambitious’ as Cameron described it as being an adaptation of the first four volumes of the manga. As such, it does often feel like the film is trying to tackle more than it can handle in a two-hour runtime. In other words, this is certainly one of those films that is hellbent on setting up a sequel, and while I personally don’t mind some of the things that it’s setting up, it also means that not every plotline for this film is given the attention that it should. Still, for what it’s worth, Rodriguez and Cameron certainly don’t skimp on the visuals, especially when it comes to bringing the title character to life. Despite some initial skepticism over the decision to give Alita large, anime-like eyes to honor the source material, this design does ultimately work in the final product. It also helps that Rosa Salazar does an excellent job in the title role, making Alita very sympathetic and handling the character’s arc from innocent cyborg girl to badass warrior very well. And while the rest of the cast doesn’t get as much solid material to work with as her, she’s still backed by some solid supporting roles from the likes of Christoph Waltz as Alita’s caretaker Dr. Ido and Ed Skrein as Zapan, a cocky cyborg bounty hunter who constantly crosses paths with her. Ultimately, though, it’s unclear right now if this will end up getting a sequel. Apparently, it did manage to break even at the box-office, but at the same time, this was one of those instances where it ended up getting saved by the worldwide box-office as it wasn’t that big of a hit here in the U.S. As such, I will note that while I am open to seeing where this franchise is going, right now we can only wait and see if it does indeed continue.

(P.S. It also would’ve been nice if this hadn’t become the film that misogynistic trolls rallied behind to spite a different film… but I’ll get to that in a little bit…)

ROCKETMAN

Taron Egerton in Rocketman (2019)

The Elton John biopic Rocketman is the second musical biopic revolving around a legendary musician from the U.K. in just two years that director Dexter Fletcher was involved with. The other film, of course, was last year’s Bohemian Rhapsody, even though that was an instance where Fletcher only came in to finish it after the whole ‘Bryan Singer incident’ and ultimately went uncredited for his work. But he takes full reign on Rocketman, resulting in a film that those who felt underwhelmed by Bohemian Rhapsody will probably find to be a lot better. Sure, like many of the other films in its genre, Rocketman does abide by several of the usual musical biopic tropes (e.g. a montage of drug/alcohol use that derails the main protagonist’s career). However, thanks to both A.) a strong visual style that perfectly honors Elton John’s knack for the eccentric flair, and B.) having a more honest spin on both his highs and lows, Rocketman manages to be one of the genre’s most authentic outings. But, of course, the biggest highlight of this film is Taron Egerton, who does a phenomenal job in the title role of ‘the Rocket Man’. We already knew that Egerton could do amazing renditions of Elton John’s music after his standout performance of ‘I’m Still Standing’ in the 2016 animated film Sing. And while this film does lead to his excellent takes on other classics like ‘Tiny Dancer’ and ‘Goodbye Yellow Brick Road’, he also fully succeeds in encapsulating Elton’s extravagant personality and, in the case of the more emotional moments of the film, his inner turmoil. With all this in mind (and at the risk of using an incredibly cheesy pun), Rocketman is truly a rockin’ time to be had thanks to its pitch-perfect portrayal of one of the most iconic figures of the music industry.  

JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 3 – PARABELLUM

Keanu Reeves in John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum (2019)

As many have pointed out, the John Wick franchise is practically the antithesis of all the issues that many have had with modern action films. Rather than a bunch of action sequences that are full of quick cuts and erratic camerawork, the action sequences in John Wick are wonderfully shot and tightly edited to showcase their amazing fight choreography. That was the case with the original John Wick from 2014 and its first sequel, Chapter 2, in 2017, and as you have might guessed, the franchise has now gone 3 for 3 thanks to its latest installment, Parabellum. Given that it takes place immediately after the events of Chapter 2, the film puts John Wick through some of his toughest challenges yet now that he’s been excommunicated from the hitman community after he broke the Cardinal Rule and killed his target on Continental Grounds. But as always, Keanu Reeves continues to shine as the legendary ‘Baba Yaga’ thanks in large part to his full-on dedication to doing his own stunts. And as usual, he’s backed by a solid supporting cast that includes series regulars like Ian McShane and Lance Reddick and excellent newcomers like Halle Berry and Mark Dacascos. Really, the only thing holding this film back when compared to its predecessors is that there are times where it feels like the plot’s being stretched a bit thin for a film that notably boasts the longest run-time of any film in the series. Mind you, it’s still a very well-written action film that naturally expands upon everything that we got from the previous films, but at the same time, it can be argued that the first two films had tighter scripts. Ultimately, though, John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum is another wonderful addition to this awesome new franchise and one that is already paving the way for a fourth film in 2021 that, given how great the last three films were, will surely be another stellar action flick.
   
CAPTAIN MARVEL

Brie Larson in Captain Marvel (2019)

It’s quite sad that Captain Marvel ended up becoming one of those films that has practically defined the worst parts of modern fandom even though it didn’t even remotely deserve any of the intense backlash that it got. I mean, it’s truly saying something when the first female-led installment of the Marvel Cinematic Universe ends up being the one to attract this much controversy before its release. To be clear, I’m not referring to the various bits of skepticism that were being thrown around due to the advertising (which, to be perfectly blunt, I have no idea why this was happening, but that’s another story…). Instead, I’m referring to when Brie Larson commented on the need for greater diversity when it comes to film critics. Despite this being a perfectly reasonable request that yours truly is very much supportive of, this got misconstrued by the same misogynistic jackoffs who continue to rage over Star Wars: The Last Jedi as ‘Oh, Brie Larson hates all white men’. Thus, they proceeded to flood YouTube with clickbait garbage to the point where, nowadays, looking up videos of anyone who’s deemed ‘dangerous’ in their eyes (e.g. Rian Johnson, Kathleen Kennedy, heck, even J.J. Abrams) fully bombards you with this dreck. They also tried to combat this film by showing support for Alita: Battle Angel… which totally must’ve been successful given that Captain Marvel out-grossed Alita in its entirety in just one weekend on its way to becoming the MCU’s seventh billion-dollar grosser. Seriously, all this… for a film that’s totally fine and another great addition to its legendary franchise.

Now, for the record, I’m not saying that this is one of the MCU’s ‘best’ installments. It does start on a rather slow note and the plot itself is a far more straightforward affair when compared to some of the MCU’s most recent outings. And while the big twist that reveals that the supposed main villain Talos is only trying to protect a band of Skrull refugees is solidly done (while also giving us one of Ben Mendelsohn’s best performances to date as Talos), it ends up having a negative impact on the real villains, Starforce, since their roles in the plot are quite limited. Jude Law’s Yon-Rogg does get a pass, though, since the film properly establishes his role as a mentor for Carol. And on that note, this film’s biggest selling point is Brie Larson, who does a phenomenal job in the role of Carol Danvers. While some apparently found her to be a bit too braggadocious, Larson perfectly encapsulates Carol’s snarky attitude and hard-boiled tenacity to the point where her proper evolution into becoming Captain Marvel results in one of the most satisfying ‘superhero origin’ stories in recent memory. She also has a wonderful camaraderie with Samuel L. Jackson, who’s great as always as Nick Fury in a film that even manages to show us some of his backstory since it takes place in 1995 before he became the head of S.H.I.E.L.D. With all this in mind, it goes without saying that I implore you to not listen to the sexist dumbasses online when it comes to this film as it’s another genuinely worthy addition to the MCU. While it may not be my favorite MCU film, I will defend it come hell or high water.

US

Lupita Nyong'o in Us (2019)

After hitting it big with his directorial debut Get Out in 2017, Jordan Peele delivered yet another phenomenal horror flick this year with Us and one of the best things about it is that it managed to be a much different kind of horror film when compared to Get Out. While its plot is a bit more streamlined when compared to Get Out, Us is just as well-written in terms of its strong themes and layered characters. Whereas Get Out was based around race relations, Us serves as a commentary on the class system, and while it is a bit of a slow burn at first before it gets to its biggest horror moments, it all leads to a very satisfying payoff that even gives Peele a chance to flex his comedic talents at times thanks to the characters’ witty banter. And because this is a film where the main characters find themselves facing off against their feral doppelgangers, everyone in the main cast does a phenomenal job handling the daunting task of playing two radically different characters. It’s all brilliantly headlined by Lupita Nyong’o as the protective mother Adelaide and her sinister counterpart Red AKA the leader of these doppelgangers who are known as ‘the Tethered’. And then there’s the brilliant final twist regarding a big secret about Adelaide and Red that is excellently built up so that it makes complete logical sense. With all this in mind, it’s easy to see why Jordan Peele has been regarded by many as one of the top figures behind the horror genre’s recent renaissance. While some say he’s the next Alfred Hitchcock, I’m in the camp who’d call him the next Rod Serling. After all, we are talking about the same guy who just revived Serling’s classic series The Twilight Zone a few months ago and one could easily describe both Get Out and Us as Twilight Zone type stories.

TOP 5 OF 2019 (SO FAR)

5. THE LEGO MOVIE 2: THE SECOND PART

Chris Pratt in The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part (2019)

Over the past five years, we’ve witnessed a great new franchise start to blossom in Warner Bros.’ LEGO franchise. It all started, of course, with Phil Lord and Chris Miller’s masterpiece effort The LEGO Movie in 2014 and was then followed by the one-two punch of the highly entertaining LEGO Batman spin-off and the quite underrated adaptation of LEGO Ninjago in 2017. But now we’ve returned to the world of the OG LEGO Movie for the official sequel, and while Lord and Miller technically aren’t the directors this time around, their influence is still felt throughout. The LEGO Movie 2 easily surpasses the first film when it comes to its rapid-fire humor and its cavalcade of brilliant fourth-wall gags. At the same time, though, it also matches the original’s strong emotional poignancy while still doing its own thing instead of just being a carbon-copy sequel. Whereas the first film celebrated the imagination of LEGO’s massive fanbase, LEGO Movie 2 is a tribute to teamwork in times of severe miscommunication. It even goes against the message of the first film’s iconic tune, ‘Everything is Awesome’, by pointing out that this isn’t true but, at the same time, accepting that there’s no such thing as perfection. And with the continually excellent performances of the original’s ensemble cast (along with its stellar newcomers) and that always terrific animation that pays tribute to the perpetual charm of stop-motion, LEGO Movie 2 is yet another successful outing for this awesome franchise. Thus, it’s quite a shame, then, that this film… didn’t do very well at the box-office. It didn’t even break $200 million worldwide, and while I won’t go into detail about it in this post, the argument that some are making about why this happened just makes me mad because, simply put, this is one of those films that doesn’t even remotely deserve to be so criminally overlooked.

4. ALADDIN

Will Smith and Mena Massoud in Aladdin (2019)

At the time of this post’s publication, Disney’s live-action remake of Aladdin is very close to grossing over $1 billion worldwide, and if you ask me, that’s a legitimately impressive feat for this film to accomplish. Granted, it wouldn’t be the first of Disney’s recent live-action remakes to do so since Alice in Wonderland and Beauty and the Beast have both managed to reach this historic mark while The Jungle Book was this close to making it. And yet, at the same time, you must remember that this was quite arguably the most controversial of the bunch as it faced tons of scrutiny before its release over everything from certain casting choices to the widespread mockery that followed the first reveal of Will Smith in Genie’s traditional blue form. Thus, I believe that this film’s financial success shows that while it wasn’t exactly a hit with critics, it seems like quite a few of its biggest skeptics were ultimately won over in the end. And as I’ve been saying repeatedly over the years, it’s another example of why these Disney remakes aren’t the ‘blights upon humanity’ that some say they are. No, I’m not saying that this new take on Aladdin is better than the original, but thanks to some solid direction from Guy Ritchie, it still manages to be a fun fantasy adventure complete with a trio of excellent performances from its leads. Despite all odds, Will Smith manages to overcome the pressure of having to follow in Robin Williams’ footsteps to deliver a fun, new spin on the Genie. Meanwhile, Mena Massoud brings the proper charisma to the role of Aladdin while also having wonderful chemistry with Naomi Scott, who fully revels in Jasmine’s new characterization that allows her to have a far more proactive role in the story. Because of all this, the new Aladdin is another fun addition to Disney’s ever-growing line of live-action remakes, and while I know damn well that I’m in the minority on this, I always look forward to seeing these new spins on Disney’s animated classics.

3. SHAZAM!

Asher Angel in Shazam! (2019)

It’s truly nice to see that DC has finally started to get back on track when it comes to its cinematic outings. Case in point, we have Shazam, a film that, to some, may just seem like DC directly copying the successful formula of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. However, when I say that Shazam is easily the closest that DC has ever gotten to making an MCU film, I don’t mean that only in the sense that it’s one of their most light-hearted outings to date. Instead, it’s because I believe that DC has finally begun to understand everything that has made the MCU the juggernaut that it is. Instead of just trying to be darker than the generally light-hearted MCU films (though granted, this film does get extremely dark in some places despite being geared towards younger audiences), Shazam is a superhero film that places greater emphasis on its story and characters rather than how much it tries to replicate iconic imagery from the comics. The transformation of foster kid Billy Batson from a self-seeking loner to a selfless hero who stays loyal to his friends and family is handled excellently, and Asher Angel and Zachary Levi do phenomenal jobs as Billy and his adult superhero self, respectively. They’re also backed by an excellent supporting cast that includes It breakout star Jack Dylan Grazer as Billy’s loyal foster brother/superhero enthusiast Freddy Freeman and Mark Strong as quite arguably the DCEU’s best villain to date as the sinister Dr. Sivana. Thus, as you might have guessed, all this makes Shazam my new favorite installment of the DC Extended Universe. As I’ve said before, this, Aquaman, and Wonder Woman are the kind of films that DC should’ve been making from the beginning instead of the likes of Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, and Justice League.

2. TOY STORY 4

Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Annie Potts, Keegan-Michael Key, and Jordan Peele in Toy Story 4 (2019)

It goes without saying that the internet didn’t exactly react positively to the announcement that there would be a fourth Toy Story film because, for many people, the series had already reached a perfect conclusion with the third film back in 2010. And yet, against all odds, Pixar managed to deliver yet another masterpiece with Toy Story 4. For starters, it’s quite arguably up there with Toy Story 3 when it comes to being one of the most emotional installments of the franchise, right down to its big emotional gut-punch of an ending. Whereas Toy Story 3’s ending was more about the conclusion of the toys’ relationship with their original owner Andy, Toy Story 4 truly serves as the last hurrah for these beloved characters, and it’s all backed by an excellent script that addresses the theme of finding one’s purpose in life. Granted, some may be disappointed by the lack of screen-time for several of the series’ main characters, but the film makes up for this thanks to solid new bits of character development for Woody and Buzz, the welcome return of Bo Peep in what is easily her largest role in these films to date, and plenty of fun new characters. I mean, how can you go wrong with characters like a handmade spork toy going through an existential crisis voiced by Tony Hale, an overly eager pair of plush toys voiced by Key and Peele, and a badass Canadian stuntman voiced by the equally badass Keanu Reeves? And because of all this, Toy Story 4 is just the latest and greatest masterpiece from Pixar that once again establishes why Toy Story is quite arguably the best animated franchise around.    

1. AVENGERS: ENDGAME


I’m just going to level with you, folks… this will most likely be my #1 at the end of the year. After all, the same situation occurred last year after I saw Avengers: Infinity War; it may have only been April, but it was immediately locked in as my favorite film of 2018. And as I always say when it comes to these films, can you blame me? Avengers: Endgame is a film that benevolently rewards its franchise’s devoted fanbase with what is easily the most epic installment of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. After Infinity War pulled off the most shocking finale in recent cinematic history, Endgame deftly continues onward to show how the Avengers work to overcome their biggest loss yet. It’s a film that is full of references to other installments of the MCU, whether it’s through a surprise cameo or a pivotal callback to a key moment from a previous film. It’s a film that boasts some of the most epic imagery in franchise history right down to a final battle that’s simply legendary. And just like Infinity War, it’s a film that’s one of the most emotionally charged installments of a franchise that has always been known for prioritizing strong character development over everything else. As such, it goes without saying that if you’ve been a longtime fan of the MCU, the ending of Endgame is guaranteed to break you because, above all else, it truly signifies the end of an era. Obviously, this won’t be the end of the MCU as it will undoubtedly continue to be the powerhouse franchise that it has been for the past decade. But as for Endgame, it was exactly the ending that it needed to be for the legendary run that Marvel Studios has now officially designated as ‘The Infinity Saga’.

And that concludes Rhode Island Movie Corner’s annual Midyear Recap. As we say farewell to the first half of 2019, we now look ahead to the rest of the year’s exciting new releases. There’s the final chapter of the Skywalker Saga, the second half of the Losers’ Club’s conflict with Pennywise the Clown, and the highly anticipated follow-up to a beloved modern classic from Disney Animation… and yes, that’s just to name a select few. Until then, thanks for following along and be sure to sound off in the comments below with your own personal Top 5 Favorite Films from the first half of this year.

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Toy Story 4 (2019) review


Tom Hanks, Keanu Reeves, Tim Allen, Annie Potts, Tony Hale, Christina Hendricks, Keegan-Michael Key, Ally Maki, and Jordan Peele in Toy Story 4 (2019)

In 1979, George Lucas’ production company Lucasfilm launched a new division that specialized in computer graphics known as The Graphics Group. This division would go on to be responsible for developing some of the groundbreaking visual effects work for films like Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Young Sherlock Holmes, though it was ultimately spun out into its own separate corporation in 1986. Now named after its revolutionary computer system known as the Pixar Image Computer, Pixar would begin to create a bunch of computer-animated short films that earned them much critical acclaim. This included the likes of Luxo Jr. and Tin Toy, and in 1995, what was originally conceived as a made-for-TV special/sequel for the latter ended up becoming Pixar’s first-ever feature-length film, Toy Story, and it goes without saying that the film was a massive hit upon its release. Critics loved it, audiences loved it, and it effectively jumpstarted Pixar’s legacy as one of the top animation studios in the industry. This tale of toys who come to life when their owners aren’t around would end up getting two follow-ups; Toy Story 2 in 1999 and Toy Story 3 in 2010. And against all odds, both sequels ended up attracting just as much critical acclaim as the original, with the latter providing fans of the franchise an emotionally cathartic finale to the adventures of their favorite toys. It also grossed over $1 billion worldwide and became the third animated film in history to earn a Best Picture nomination at that year’s Oscars. As it turns out, however, this wouldn’t be the end of the adventures of Sheriff Woody, Space Ranger Buzz Lightyear, and their friends. In 2014, Pixar announced that a fourth film was in development and despite much skepticism from fans of the original trilogy, this new film ends up being yet another masterpiece full of emotional poignancy and lovable characters.

It has been two years since Andy Davis gave away his beloved toys to a young girl named Bonnie Anderson (voiced by Madeleine McGraw), and ever since, the toys have happily readjusted to their new lives. When Bonnie begins Kindergarten, Woody (voiced by Tom Hanks) sneaks into her backpack to try and help her deal with the overwhelming stress of the situation, which eventually results in her crafting a handmade toy during arts and crafts that she names ‘Forky’. But to Woody’s surprise, Forky (voiced by Tony Hale) ends up coming to life and immediately starts attempting to get thrown away since he believes that he’s only trash. Thus, when Bonnie and her family end up going on a road trip, Woody now finds himself tasked with ensuring that nothing bad happens to Forky since he’s quickly become Bonnie’s new favorite toy. Eventually, though, Forky manages to jump out of the family’s RV, resulting in Woody having to leap out as well to get him back. And when the two find themselves in an antique store, they are confronted by Gabby Gabby (voiced by Christina Hendricks), a 1950s pull-string doll (like Woody) who looks to obtain Woody’s voice box since hers broke several years ago, thus preventing her from getting a new owner. She and her ventriloquist dummy allies then proceed to take Forky captive, effectively putting Woody and Buzz Lightyear (voiced by Tim Allen) in a race against time to get him back before Bonnie’s family leaves without them. In the process, the two even reunite with their old friend Bo Peep (voiced by Annie Potts), who had left the gang several years prior when the Davis family gave her away. And thanks to Bo’s newfound outlook on life, Woody soon finds himself re-evaluating the idea of what it truly means to be a toy.

Every Toy Story film has had a well-layered plot with strong themes, from the jealousy that Woody experiences when Buzz starts to steal his thunder in the first film to the simple fact that nothing lasts forever as exemplified in the second and third films (especially the latter given its rather infamous near-ending in an incinerator). The same can be said for Toy Story 4, which mainly grapples with the concept of finding one’s purpose in life. Whether it’s Forky trying to understand why he’s even alive in the first place or Bo Peep’s new characterization where she’s much more open to the ‘lost toy’ lifestyle, the film effectively continues the franchise’s brilliant knack of deftly finding the humanity within its various toy characters. And, of course, as one would normally expect from a Pixar film, Toy Story 4 more than delivers when it comes to its emotional gravitas. It’s quite arguably up there with Toy Story 3 when it comes to being one of the most emotional installments of the franchise, right down to an ending that shook both Tom Hanks and Tim Allen to the core. And yet, as is always the case with these films, all these great emotional moments are primarily meant to bolster what is already a delightfully charming animated adventure complete with Pixar’s always excellent animation. In fact, given that Toy Story is the franchise that made Pixar what it is today, these films serve as perfect benchmarks that truly highlight how much their animation style has evolved since 1995.

Now if there’s one aspect of this film that may disappoint fans of the franchise, it’s that most of the Toy Story gang ends up getting limited to minor supporting roles. Simply put, this film primarily focuses on Woody, Buzz, Bo Peep, and Forky, meaning that the rest of Andy/Bonnie’s toys spend most of their time with Bonnie and her family in their RV. They’re not outright ignored, for the record, but because of their limited screen-time, that means that you don’t get a lot of Jessie (voiced by Joan Cusack), Hamm (voiced by Pixar’s lucky charm John Ratzenberger), Mr. Potato Head (voiced by the late Don Rickles via archival recordings), etc. For what it’s worth, though, Tom Hanks and Tim Allen are just as fantastic as they’ve always been in these films and their wonderful camaraderie continues to make Woody and Buzz one of the best lead duos in recent film history. The two also get some great new material to work with in this one, with Woody having to overcome his frustrations of being neglected by Bonnie to ensure that nothing happens to Forky and Buzz trying (and somewhat struggling) to understand what it means to ‘listen to his inner voice’. Annie Potts, meanwhile, makes a very welcome return to the franchise as Bo Peep, who hasn’t played a major role in these films since Toy Story 2 two decades ago. And while Bo’s great new characterization does allow her to play a more proactive role in the plot this time, she still maintains the same sweet persona (not to mention her great chemistry with Woody) that made her such a lovable member of the gang in the previous films.

As has always been the case with these films, Toy Story 4 also introduces plenty of great new characters, many of whom help make this one of the funniest installments of the series. I mean, to be fair, would you expect anything less when you have two characters voiced by Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele in their first big collaboration together in at least three years? They play Ducky and Bunny, respectively, a pair of plush toys who get into a minor scuffle with Buzz when he inadvertently takes their spot as the top prize of a carnival game. Other major standouts include Ally Maki as Bo’s chipper new sidekick Giggle McDimples and the one and only Keanu Reeves as Duke Caboom, “Canada’s greatest stuntman” and a pitch-perfect personification of everything that has made Reeves the breathtaking figure that he is today. But at the end of the day, it’s ultimately Tony Hale who ends up stealing the whole show as Forky since the surreal existential crisis that this new toy goes through provides the film with plenty of its best humorous moments. At the same time, though, Hale also succeeds immensely in making Forky an instantly lovable character due in large part to his endearingly innocent nature. And lastly, the film also boasts an excellent foil to the main protagonists in its main antagonist, Christina Hendricks’ Gabby Gabby. Without giving anything away when it comes to how her role in the story pans out, she ends up being the most sympathetic of the franchise’s villains to the point where she even becomes involved in some of the film’s biggest emotional moments.

When this film was first announced, it goes without saying that the internet didn’t exactly react too positively towards it. Simply put, many felt that this was an outright terrible idea as Toy Story 3 provided a satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy, and if my past reviews of Pixar films weren’t enough of an indication, Pixar fans can be very strict when it comes to the idea of the studio doing sequels to their previous films. But lo and behold, Pixar ultimately manages to deliver yet another masterpiece that continues to emphasize why Toy Story is undoubtedly their definitive franchise. Just like the three films that came before it, Toy Story 4 boasts a phenomenal script that provides great new material for its wide array of characters, from those who we’ve followed for years to those who haven’t been seen for a while to the new characters that quickly become excellent additions to this legendary franchise. And through it all, the film maintains the same great sense of emotional poignancy that the franchise has always had, resulting in yet another animated adventure that’s 100% guaranteed to hit you with the feels. Case in point, this film’s ending does imply that it will truly be the final installment of the series (at least in terms of films, as a few spin-offs are in the works for Disney+). While it may have seemed like this was set to be the start of a new bunch of Toy Story films, its ending suggests otherwise, and all in all, it’s genuinely a wonderful place to end things. Whereas Toy Story 3’s ending concluded the story of the toys’ relationship with their original owner Andy, Toy Story 4 is ultimately the last hurrah for these characters that we’ve known and loved since 1995. And thanks to the four amazing films that they’ve appeared in, there’s no denying that the Toy Story films will forever stand the test of time or, to quote the franchise itself, ‘to infinity and beyond’.

Rating: 5/5!