Sunday, June 1, 2014

2014 Preview: June

Welcome back to Rhode Island Movie Corner’s year-long preview of the films set to come out during 2014. This is Part 5 of 11 (previously 12) and today we’ll be looking at the films that will be hitting theaters during the month of June. Of course, we are now officially in the ‘summer movie season’ but surprisingly, there aren’t a lot of wide releases coming out this month. Except for the last weekend of the month, only two new wide releases are coming out a week. Still, let’s take a look of what June has to offer at the movies.

JUNE 6- This week will feature a Tom Cruise sci-fi/action movie with a romantic drama based off of a best-selling book.


*Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt star in ‘Edge of Tomorrow’, directed by Doug Liman (‘The Bourne Identity’) and based off of the novel ‘All You Need Is Kill’ by Hiroshi Sakurazaka. Cruise stars as an officer who is sent into battle against an alien race despite being inexperienced in combat. However, he soon finds that he is continuously experiencing the same events over and over again as he begins to become a better fighter with the help of another warrior (Blunt).


*Based on the novel of the same name by John Green, ‘The Fault in Our Stars’ stars Shailene Woodley as a girl suffering from a terminal illness who falls in love with a boy with a prosthetic leg (Ansel Elgort) when the two of them meet at a cancer support group.

JUNE 13- Two highly anticipated sequels come out this weekend. One’s an R-rated comedy to one of the big surprise hits of 2012 and the other is an animated sequel to a much beloved film.


*2012’s ‘21 Jump Street’ was a surprise hit and this weekend, its sequel, ‘22 Jump Street’ hits theaters, once again directed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller (fresh off of ‘The Lego Movie’ earlier this year). Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum return as cops Schmidt and Jenko, who in this film go undercover as college students in order to deal with another drug ring. Ice Cube, Dave Franco, and Rob Riggle return for this film as well.


*Another big hit was 2010’s ‘How to Train Your Dragon’, based off of the book series of the same name by author Cressida Cowell. The DreamWorks production’s sequel, ‘How to Train Your Dragon 2’, hits theaters this weekend. Taking place five years after the events of the first film, dragons and Vikings now live in peace. While this is going on, Hiccup (Jay Baruchel), son of the Viking chief Stoick (Gerard Butler), and his friends deal with a new threat, a dragon hunter named Drago (Djimon Hounsou) and Hiccup also comes across his long-lost mother (Cate Blanchett). Baruchel, Butler, Craig Ferguson, and America Ferrera (among others) reprise their roles from the previous film and are joined in this one by Blanchett, Hounsou, and Kit Harington.

JUNE 20- A Clint Eastwood directed musical and another comedy sequel hit theaters this weekend.


*Clint Eastwood’s latest directorial effort, ‘Jersey Boys’, is based off of the Tony Award-winning musical of the same name. The movie (and play for that matter) is a dramatized account of the band known as ‘The Four Seasons’ detailing their formation, success, and ultimately their break-up. John Lloyd Young, Erich Bergen, Vincent Piazza, and Michael Lomenda play the four members of the band and the film also stars Christopher Walken as Gyp DeCarlo, a mob boss tied to the group.


*2012’s ‘Think Like A Man’, based off of the book ‘Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man’ by Steve Harvey, was a surprise hit when it was released in April 2012; it even ended ‘The Hunger Games’ 4-week run at the #1 spot at the US box office. The main members of the cast, including Kevin Hart, Michael Ealy, and Taraji P. Henson, return for the sequel, ‘Think Like a Man Too’, which sees the main group of couples heading to Vegas.

JUNE 27- The month closes out with a sole wide release this weekend; the fourth film in a very successful (if mostly just from a box office perspective) film franchise.


*Following 2007’s ‘Transformers’ and its sequels, 2009’s ‘Revenge of the Fallen’ and 2011’s ‘Dark of the Moon’ is ‘Transformers: Age of Extinction’, the fourth installment in this franchise once again directed by Michael Bay. However this film features almost entirely a new cast of characters, taking place four years after the events of the last film. Mark Wahlberg stars as a mechanic who, along with his daughter (Nicola Peltz), come across a broken-down Optimus Prime (once again voiced by Peter Cullen), but then find themselves at odds with the government, who have been trying to rid the planet of the Transformers. The new members of the human cast include Stanley Tucci, Kelsey Grammer, and Jack Reynor and the voice cast includes John Goodman, Ken Watanabe, and Frank Welker.

And those are the films that are set to come out during June 2014. Check back next month, when we’ll be halfway through 2014, for Part 6 where we’ll be looking at July’s lineup of films.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Video Game Review: Sly Cooper PS2 Trilogy


In the video game industry, a key aspect of debate that has been going on for years is the ‘console war’ between all of the major video game consoles released onto the market, like when the SNES faced off against the Sega Genesis or the PlayStation went up against the Nintendo 64. Nowadays, it’s between three consoles; the Wii U, the PlayStation 4, and the Xbox One. And I’m just going to come out and say it… I think that this whole ‘console war’ thing is really stupid and quite honestly rather pointless. So what if someone gets one of the three major consoles and it’s not the most popular one? Like what if they bought a Wii U but everyone else got a PS4 or an Xbox One? If they like it, then the more power to them. In my case, I’m a big Nintendo fan even though the company, while still playing a key part in the video game market, is now sort of in the back of the pack behind Sony and Microsoft. The Nintendo 64 was the first video game console I ever owned and most of my favorite video games of all time came from, you guessed it, Nintendo. I don’t own a Wii U at this time, but I’m considering possibly getting one in the future. For the record though, I have ventured out and bought a few non-Nintendo consoles over the years and probably the one that I’ve used the most aside from all Nintendo consoles was the PlayStation 2, which is currently the best-selling video game console of all time with over 155 million units sold since it was first released in 2000.


During its run, the PS2 (and basically Sony for that matter) may not have really had a definitive mascot like Mario with Nintendo or Master Chief from Halo for Xbox, but there were a lot of pretty good franchises released during the PS2 era, including series such as ‘Jak and Daxter’, ‘Ratchet and Clank’, and ‘Kingdom Hearts’. However, my personal favorite Sony franchise would have to be one that apparently wasn’t as successful as those franchises, but is still a really good series; the ‘Sly Cooper’ franchise, which was originally developed by Sucker Punch Productions before they moved on to the ‘Infamous’ franchise (Sanzaru Games took over after that, beginning with the PS3 re-mastered re-release of the original three games and then releasing the fourth main game in the series). Not only that, but there’s actually a full-length animated movie in the works slated for a 2016 release. But for now, we’ll be looking at the first three Sly Cooper games, all of which were released for the PlayStation 2; ‘Sly Cooper and the Thievius Raccoonus’, ‘Sly 2: Band of Thieves’, and ‘Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves’. I don’t own a PS3 at this time so this won’t include the most recent entry in the series, ‘Sly 4: Thieves in Time’ though I hope that one day I can finally play that one.


Taking place in a world fully inhabited by anthropomorphic creatures, the series focuses on the titular Sly Cooper, a raccoon whose family, the Cooper clan, is known for being world-famous master thieves. Each member of the family has passed down their techniques to each new generation through a book known as the ‘Thievius Raccoonus’. But before Sly is able to inherit the book, a gang of criminals known as the ‘Fiendish Five’ kill Sly’s father and steal the book. Sly ends up at an orphanage but while there, he meets his future partners in crime, tech genius Bentley the Turtle and muscle-man Murray the Hippo. Years later, they team up and travel the world, while also trying to avoid the law (primarily inspector Carmelita Fox, Sly’s nemesis/love interest), in order to stop the Fiendish Five so that Sly can take back his inheritance. In ‘Sly 2’ (don’t worry, I won’t spoil anything major from these games), Sly and the gang deal with another gang, the Klaww Gang, who have stolen some extremely valuable parts that could spell trouble if they’re put back together. Finally, in ‘Sly 3’, Sly, Bentley, and Murray round up a team of ‘specialists’ in order to help Sly get into the ‘Cooper Vault’, which contains his family’s entire fortune.


One of the things that I find really interesting about this series is that each game’s engine was built by improving on the engine from its predecessor. In short, each game got better as the series went on. Now while I’m basically saying that ‘Sly 2’ and ‘Sly 3’ were the best games in this trilogy, I’m not saying that the first ‘Sly Cooper’ game was bad; far from it in fact. It was a very enjoyable platforming game with solid controls and plenty of fun stealth elements thrown in. However, there are certain aspects about the game that were rather frustrating, with the most notable being that it operated on a ‘one-hit’ system. If Sly was hit just once, you’d lose a life and would have to start over either from the beginning of the level or a checkpoint (if you’ve reached one). You could find ‘lucky charms’ throughout the level (represented by horseshoes), which would give you extra hit points but at the most you could only get hit three times and that’s it. Some other problems included a bit too much repetition in certain areas and some missions that were… well, I won’t say ‘hard’ but they could get rather frustrating and in most cases that’s because of the whole one-hit problem that I mentioned earlier.

Thankfully, the two sequels removed the ‘one-hit’ system and instead gave the player a full life bar, which was definitely a welcome change. The hub worlds in both sequels were also much more expansive and offered a lot more chances for exploration whereas in the first game there wasn’t much to explore within the game’s hub worlds. But probably the best new change made with these games was that they offered much more variety in regards to the gameplay. You see, the first ‘Sly’ game had about only 3-4 mission types (not counting boss fights); stealth missions, driving missions, shooting missions, and one hacking mission. All of Sly’s stealth missions had the exact same objective; get to the end of the level and find a key that you use to unlock more of the hub world and ultimately to get to the boss and the other missions had you collecting keys as well. ‘Sly 2’ and ‘Sly 3’ offered much more variety in regards to the missions, referred to in these two games as ‘jobs’. Not only did you get more interesting missions to do, but you could also play as Bentley and Murray whereas in the first game you only got to play as them for brief moments in racing and hacking missions.

Overall, I think my personal favorite game of the three would have to be ‘Sly 3’, which might be because this was the first one of this series that I played even though I completed the other two games first. Also, I had to actually buy another copy of the game (along with another copy of ‘Sly 2’ for that matter) because both games had this odd problem where the game ‘froze’ but not in the usual case of a game freezing. The game still ran but the dialogue wasn’t progressing forward (It's kind of hard to explain, and unfortunately I can't provide a link to a video of this problem at the time I'm writing this). Anyway, back to ‘Sly 3’; the game had the best variety out of all of these three games in both the unique line-up of villains (no gang association this time) and the fact that in this game, Sly and the gang recruit a few new members into the game as well. Heck, they even team up with some of their enemies from previous games in the series. Of course, as it was common throughout the trilogy, each game featured some excellent writing/voice acting (though in the case of the latter, for some reason Carmelita was voiced by three different actresses in these games… and none of them even had the same accent), a full cast of memorable characters, and were just really fun to play.


So those were the first 3 Sly Cooper games, and out of all of the PS2 games that I’ve played over the years, these three games are definitely amongst my favorites. All 3 of the games had solid controls and fun stealth gameplay although I mostly prefer the second and third games due to the more frustrating elements of the first Sly Cooper. Again, I’m not saying that game was bad but it’s just that I wish that they had done something better than just having the whole game operate on a ‘one-hit’ health system, which really got annoying in certain areas. Thankfully, ‘Sly 2’ and ‘Sly 3’ got rid of that system. So now, it looks like this series is running again with ‘Sly 4’ for the PS3, which continued the series after the third one seemingly ended the story though had a bit of a cliffhanger at the end of the game. I’m interested in seeing where this series goes now and as for that movie coming out in two years, I’m hoping for the best. After all, video games and movies haven’t always worked well together but who knows? Maybe this could break that unlucky streak of video game movies… but only time will tell.

Ratings:

Sly 1: 4/5

Sly 2: 5/5!

Sly 3: 5/5!
 
 

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

X-Men: Days of Future Past: SPOILER Post

WARNING!!!

The following post contains spoilers for the film ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’. If you have not seen the film yet, please refer to my spoiler-free review of the film (link provided below) because I will be addressing key moments within the film. Continue at your own risk!




Like with pretty much every superhero film that comes out nowadays, there is quite a lot to talk about in regards to ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ that I just couldn’t talk about in a non-spoiler review… and I really mean it. Before I started writing this, I made a list of all of the points that I wanted to talk about in this post and there were at least 8 different elements of the film that I had listed that I wanted to talk about. So in that case, let’s not waste any time. Let’s delve further into what is no doubt the most anticipated film of the year for many people and why wouldn’t it be being that it’s an adaptation of an iconic ‘X-Men’ storyline, directed by the man who helmed the first two X-Men films (again like my previous review, I’m ignoring the allegations made against him because they don’t matter here), and stars a big ensemble cast of actors/actresses from both the original X-Men trilogy and the film ‘X-Men: First Class’ plus a few new additions as well. And at the end of the day, this film really delivers. Yes, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ is not only one of the best X-Men films to date, possibly even the best, but easily one of the best films of this year so far.


So of course, this film features a big ensemble cast but at the end of the day, it mainly focuses on four characters; Wolverine, being that he’s the one who goes back in time to try and set things right, and the ‘First Class’ iterations of Professor X, Magneto, and Mystique. But the good thing here is that Wolverine doesn’t overshadow the other three which I’m aware is what some people were worried about and I can see why because Wolverine has basically been the main character of the film franchise since the beginning (he’s literally been in every film). Now, that’s not entirely a bad thing as Hugh Jackman has been fantastic in the role but in the original trilogy of films, he did overshadow some other members of the cast, most notably James Marsden as Cyclops. Here, his role in the film is handled very well while still serving as one of the main characters; Jackman of course is excellent again but he’s not the ‘main’ character in this film. Instead, he lets James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, and Jennifer Lawrence lead the film. Plus, I have to say it is sort of funny how in a case like this where the X-Men of the future send someone back in time so that they can convince their younger selves to stop the dark future from happening, they end up sending the one member of the group who’s probably the least diplomatic out of all of them. Still, it fits well into the story considering that Wolverine, being the one who can heal himself, is the only one who could possibly survive going back many decades in time.


But of this cast, the biggest standout of the entire group would have to be James McAvoy as Xavier. In ‘X-Men: First Class’ the standout was easily Michael Fassbender as Magneto. Not only did he really channel Ian McKellen’s performance in the original X-Men trilogy through his own performance in that film, but it can be argued that ‘First Class’ was pretty much Magneto’s film as a lot of the story did revolve around him. Days of Future Past, on the other hand, is easily Xavier’s film. What I really love about both this film and ‘First Class’ is that this younger Xavier isn’t the Xavier from the original trilogy just yet. In ‘First Class’, he was a bit of a playboy before he ended up getting paralyzed and in ‘Days of Future Past’ it’s clear that everything that happened during the climax of the previous film has really hit him hard because he’s lost so much in the years since the whole Cuban Missile Crisis incident. He’s lost his best friend (Magneto), his foster sister (Mystique), and the use of his legs after a bullet deflected by Magneto ended up hitting him in his spine. However, in this film, we learn that because of a serum developed by Hank McCoy (Beast), he’s now able to walk again but he no longer has his telepathic powers. This, along with the closure of his school for gifted youngsters (partially due to the Vietnam War) has led to him giving up on his dream of humans and mutants living in harmony.


The writing for Xavier in this film is just fantastic as is McAvoy’s performance in the role. This Xavier has become a broken man after all that had happened to him in the previous film, meaning that he needs some guidance in order to get his life back on track and McAvoy perfectly captures the bitterness and frustration that the young Xavier is experiencing throughout this film. This film really shows the growth of Xavier as he slowly becomes the Xavier that we remembered from the previous trilogy. Speaking of which, let’s talk about that great scene between the Xavier of the past and the Xavier of the present/future (the latter of course being played by Patrick Stewart). This was just an excellent moment, mostly because the filmmakers weren’t trying to revel in the fact that they were able to get both Xaviers on screen together. It’s an effective character moment for the young Xavier as his future self inspires him to ‘hope again’ and this scene uses both the young and future Xaviers to great effect. Of course, as I said in my original review, Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen are sort of just making cameos in this film, but regardless it was still great to see to these legends back in these roles once again. After all, this might actually be ‘the’ last time we’ll be seeing these two in these movies. We don’t know if that’s true yet, but if that ends up being the case, then I believe that they both went out on a very good note.


So while this movie is more focused on Xavier than Magneto this time, Michael Fassbender is of course excellent once again in the role. Heck, Magneto has his own qualms against Xavier for not being there to help him protect their fellow mutants. It’s revealed through some dialogue and some documents that Mystique comes across in Bolivar Trask’s office that pretty much every other mutant from ‘First Class’ aside from Xavier, Magneto, Mystique, Beast, and Havok (who makes a brief appearance in the scene where Mystique infiltrates a military camp in Vietnam) was killed, some of them through ‘Project Wideawake’, a military operation led by Trask, so this of course is keeping in line with Magneto’s views that humans are the enemy and this does help give a lot of contrast to his relationship with Xavier as he accuses him of failing their fellow mutants. Also excellent here is Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique; in fact, even better than in ‘First Class’. Here, we see her starting to become more like the Mystique from the original trilogy (as portrayed by Rebecca Romjin) in terms of her ‘cold-blooded killer’ nature. But at the same time, while her new outlook has certainly been influenced by her joining Magneto at the end of ‘First Class’, she’s still torn between the bitter views on humanity of Magneto and the compassionate/optimistic outlook on the future that Xavier has.


So seeing how this film mainly focuses on Wolverine, Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique, that means that most of the other members of the cast don’t get much to do by comparison. Probably the one who gets the most to do out of all of them is Nicholas Hoult as Beast (on that note, the makeup for him as Beast is much better here than it was in ‘First Class’) but even then he’s mainly just there to assist Xavier and Wolverine. As I said in the review, there’s also not really a definitive villain; Bolivar Trask is mostly just a side character. Still, that shouldn’t be held against this movie as Trask is in the film enough and of course Peter Dinklage is excellent as he usually is. Despite all of this, this is not that much of a problem because A.) The film does focus on the right characters, B.) Every member of the cast serves their purpose to the story well and C.) There actually isn’t any weak link in the cast. This is probably the first X-Men film where everyone in the cast is terrific. Unfortunately, some of the other X-Men movies, despite having really good casts, have each had their own ‘weak link’ in its cast, like January Jones in ‘X-Men: First Class’ or Svetlana Khodchenkova in ‘The Wolverine’. Here though, every member of the cast does a good job, even if some of them are only on screen for like a few minutes or so.


But an even greater aspect about this film in regards to its ensemble cast, which really help the action sequences in this movie stand out even more, is how it handles what can very much be referred to as the crucial dynamic of the ‘X-Men’ franchise; teamwork. Now most of the action sequences in this movie occur in the future and it is there where you really get to see the X-Men working together as a team. This whole team dynamic is done better here than in any of the other X-Men films that came before this one. And on that note, the action sequences in this film are terrific, especially the one at the end, which is easily the best climax out of any X-Men film as we cut back and forth between the past and the future as Wolverine, Xavier, and Beast look to stop Mystique and Magneto in 1973 while the X-Men of the future try to prevent the Sentinels from finding Kitty Pryde and Wolverine so that Kitty can keep Wolverine’s mind in the past long enough for him to complete his mission; otherwise, the future will stay the same and nothing will have been changed because of it. As noted before Wolverine goes back in time, this is pretty much the last chance they have in ending this war before it ever began so as a result, the final action sequence here is just fantastic in pretty much every aspect (pacing, cinematography, music, etc…).


Though easily one of the best moments in the entire film is the sequence with Quicksilver (Evan Peters) when he helps Wolverine, Xavier, and Beast break Magneto out of prison. You really have to feel bad for Peters considering all of the flak he got before this film came out. First, a lot of people were complaining about his character’s costume once it was first revealed and then he appeared in a Carl’s Jr ad which probably got even more negative attention, though I’ll admit that I’m not too certain as to why this ad in particular was ‘that bad’ (now the one with Mystique… that one I get but Quicksilver’s? Not really…). Of course, all of those complaints ultimately became pointless because the character was well-executed in the film. Peters really captures the character’s fun-loving but also occasionally pain in the ass personality and the scene where he’s running through the Pentagon preventing the guards from firing at Xavier, Magneto, and Wolverine is both fun and funny at the same time (he gives one guard a wedgie, he has another guard punch himself in the face, and this is all while he has headphones on and listening to Jim Croce’s ‘Time in a Bottle’… and that’s not even listing everything that happens during this scene). Heck, he even alludes to who his father may be when he mentions to Magneto that his mother ‘knew someone who could move metal (hint hint). It’s like the Hulk in ‘The Avengers’… Quicksilver’s not in the film that much but his scenes are so great that we’re left begging for more.


Now of course, one of the big things about this film is how it alters the timeline so much that certain events from ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ and ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ never occurred. In other words, the filmmakers were looking to fix the many problems that plagued both films in terms of the series’ timeline and in short, they do succeed here. In regards to erasing the events of ‘X3’, that occurs at the end of the film. After Wolverine returns to the future after his mission is over, he awakens back in Xavier’s school and finds that all of the other X-Men (including Storm, Beast, and Xavier) are all alive, and that also includes Jean Grey and Cyclops (both Famke Janssen and James Marsden reprise their roles here), who had both died in ‘The Last Stand’. As for ignoring ‘Origins’, that occurs at the very end of the film before the credits start rolling. Back in 1973, during the climax sequence in Washington, Magneto had impaled Wolverine with metal and thrown him into the Potomac River. He’s then recovered from the river by William Stryker (Josh Helman; on that note, the first scene between the two is very well-done as Wolverine initially starts to suffer some emotional turmoil when he (more specifically his future conscious) remembers what will happen between him and Stryker years later) who is then revealed to be Mystique in disguise. How this will affect Wolverine in the future is unclear but this can definitely be seen as an effort to negate the events of that film, just like the filmmakers had did just a few moments earlier in regards to ‘X3’.



Finally, let’s talk about the post-credits scene that is intended to set up the main villain for the next film; Apocalypse. Now, this scene is sort of similar to the post-credits scene with Thanos in ‘The Avengers’ in that you might have to read up on who this character is otherwise you might not realize who he is at first, though of course unlike ‘The Avengers’ it’s already been confirmed beforehand that the next film is going to be ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ (set for a 2016 release) but one of my friends pointed out that the person featured in this post-credits scene doesn’t really look like Apocalypse from the comics (to quote him directly, he said that he looked like ‘some blue skinned 20 something in a robe’). Now, writer/producer Simon Kinberg has confirmed that an older actor will portray the character in the next film so we’ll just have to wait and see who will get cast in that role. Plus, comic book fans will no doubt note two things about this scene; that Apocalypse’s followers are calling him by his birth name (‘En Sabah Nur’) and that his servants, the Four Horsemen, are seen watching him from afar. And on that note, considering that Gambit is going to appear in the next film, maybe he’s one of them. Again, we’ll see how that turns out. 

Saturday, May 24, 2014

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) review

(Note: Before I start this review, I want to address the recent controversy surrounding the recent allegations made against director Bryan Singer. True or not, these charges have no connection to this film whatsoever so it will in no way affect the following review.)


I’m fairly certain that, for quite a lot of people, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ will be their most anticipated film of the year and there are quite a few reasons for why this is. It’s based on one of the most iconic storylines in the history of the X-Men comics, 1981’s ‘Days of Future Past’, written by Chris Claremont and John Byrne. Taking the director’s chair for this film is Bryan Singer, the same man who brought the film franchise to relevance in the first place with 2000’s ‘X-Men’ and 2003’s ‘X2: X-Men United’. It’s safe to say that when he left the franchise after that, the series began to go downhill with the extremely disappointing ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ and the god-awful ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’. Thankfully, Singer returned (albeit only as a producer/co-writer) for 2011’s ‘X-Men: First Class’, which was certainly a return to form for the franchise. Heck, Wolverine even got a far superior solo film, ‘The Wolverine’, and the post-credits scene for that film set up what was to come for this film. Finally, because of this film taking place in different time periods, this film features one heck of an ensemble cast, probably the largest to date in the history of the franchise, consisting of members from both the original trilogy and the ‘First Class’ cast. But at the end of the day, will this film be able to live up to expectations? In two words… Hell yea!

In the year 2023, the mutant race is on the verge of extinction as a group of sentient robots known as Sentinels are in control, exterminating mutants left and right and they are even persecuting any humans who try to help them. In order to end this war in which the mutants are very much outnumbered, Professor Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Magneto (Ian McKellen) form a plan, with the help of Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page), who has the ability to send a person’s conscious back in time, to send Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) back in time to the year 1973 when the defining moment that led to the beginning of this war occurred; the assassination of Bolivar Trask (Peter Dinklage), the creator of the Sentinels, carried out by Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence). Once back in time, Wolverine finds the young Xavier (James McAvoy) and the young Magneto (Michael Fassbender) as he attempts to have them team up so that they can all stop this dark future from happening before it even begins. But this won’t be that easy, as there quite a bit of bad blood between the two following the whole Cuban Missile Crisis debacle in ‘First Class’.

Now while this is a very big ensemble cast, at the end of the day the film mainly focuses on four characters; Wolverine and the three main stars of the First Class cast; the young iterations of Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique (though thankfully, Wolverine doesn’t overshadow any of them here). As for the rest of the mutants featured in this film, they’re mostly just cameos, though some do get a decent amount of screen time like Beast (Nicholas Hoult) and Quicksilver (Evan Peters), the latter of which has one of the best sequences in the entire film. There’s also not really a definitive villain here; sure, Bolivar Trask does play a key part in the film’s overall story but he’s actually more of a side character here. So even though the bulk of this film’s ensemble cast isn’t given as much attention as the main characters, this film still does a great job at not only having quite the variety of mutants on display but by also really showing the ‘team’ aspect that defines this franchise as evident through a lot of the very well done action sequences. Also, if you’re still pissed about ‘X3’ and ‘Origins’, then don’t worry because this film basically says ‘screw you’ to those films in regards to what happens in this film and from what I can tell, that was the filmmakers’ main goal; to right the wrongs (mostly in regards to continuity problems) from those two films and they do succeed in doing so.

In ‘First Class’, the standout member of the cast was Michael Fassbender as Magneto, though James McAvoy did an equally terrific job as Xavier in that film. Here, McAvoy’s the big standout, not only because this is easily McAvoy’s best performance in the role to date (even though this is only his second film appearance in the franchise) but the writing for this character and the arc that he goes through in this movie is just fantastic, as he continues to grow into the Xavier that we know from the original trilogy (on that note, Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen, like a lot of the other cast members in this film, are basically just doing cameos here but regardless of that, it’s really nice to see these two back). But of course, Fassbender is excellent once again as is Hugh Jackman (I’m not sure yet if this is his best performance in the role to date after his excellent turn in ‘The Wolverine’ but I’d say it’s definitely one of the best) and Jennifer Lawrence. In fact, the whole cast is great here; this is the first time in a while in regards to these movies where I can’t think of any ‘weak links’ in the cast (which unfortunately was the case with ‘First Class’ and ‘The Wolverine’, which both had one weak link in their casts).

Do you want to know how good this film was? It’s so good that I think that I’m actually becoming more of an X-Men fan than I had been before (I was a general fan of the movies but I haven’t read the comics or watched the 90’s TV series) because of it. This is definitely one of the finest X-Men films to date, if not the best. Not only does it erase the bad memories of ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ and ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ but in terms of its essence, this truly feels like an X-Men movie with plenty of mutant action and some excellent action sequences (this film also has the best climax in the entire franchise to date). I was hooked into this film almost immediately after it started and for what is certainly a lot of people’s most anticipated film of the year, this film really doesn’t disappoint. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… thank god Bryan Singer returned to this franchise because it’s clear that he understands this franchise and now thanks to this film, the series’ chronology is far more consistent following the whole debacle of ‘X3’ and ‘Origins’ and hopefully he’ll stay for good this time as the series will continue on. It’s already been announced (and is briefly hinted at in this film’s post credits scene) what’s happening next.


Rating: 5/5!

Monday, May 19, 2014

Godzilla (2014) review


Almost two decades ago in 1998, TriStar made the first major attempt at an American-produced ‘Godzilla’ film (not counting the American-produced cuts to a few of Toho’s original films)… and as we all know, that one didn’t turn out that well and it is pretty much universally despised. While I’m not as critical on it as a lot of people are (probably because I’m not that big of a Godzilla fan, having only seen the original film (after seeing the 1998 film first, for the record)), I too agree that quite frankly, it just wasn’t a ‘Godzilla’ film. Even Toho knew that the creature in that film wasn’t Godzilla and renamed it ‘Zilla’ when it was featured in 2004’s ‘Godzilla: Final Wars’, where the real Godzilla easily kicked its butt. That film was, at the time, the last Godzilla film… until a decade later. Now all eyes are on this new ‘Godzilla’ film, directed by Gareth Edwards, who had previously directed the independent flick ‘Monsters’. I haven’t seen that film, but with a title like that, Edwards definitely sounds like a good choice to helm this new ‘Godzilla’… and overall, he definitely delivers one heck of a monster film. I’m not going to say that it’s ‘perfect’, but at the end of the day, it’s easily miles above the 1998 film.

In 1999, seismic activity starts to occur at the Janjira nuclear plant near Tokyo, Japan resulting in the entire facility falling into ruin. While reports claim that this was caused by an earthquake, the plant’s former supervisor Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston), who lost his wife Sandra (Juliette Binoche) during the accident, believes that something else was the cause of it and 15 years later, he and his son Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), an explosive ordinance disposal officer with the U.S. Navy, return to the area to investigate further into the matter. There, they discover that the real cause for the accident wasn’t an earthquake, but a giant winged creature referred to as a ‘Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organism’ (MUTO for short). The MUTO ends up escaping, along with a second MUTO, resulting in the military trying to figure out a way to destroy the creatures before they completely ravage the United States. But they soon find out that something else is hunting the MUTOs and this creature could possibly be the only thing that can stop them, and that creature is… Godzilla!

Fans of the franchise might be a little disappointed that Godzilla doesn’t show up until an hour in and that the film itself focuses more on the human characters (more on that in a bit). But overall, Edwards really delivers when it comes to monster vs. monster action… though I wish that during the first few fights between Godzilla and the MUTOs, the film wouldn’t cut away from it. Seriously, there are at least two different times during this film when a fight between Godzilla and the MUTOs is about to occur… and then it cuts away. That scene in the trailer where Godzilla is roaring as a shelter’s doors are about to close? Well, in the film, the doors close during an actual fight. Thankfully, that’s not a problem during the later fights and with that in mind the action was excellent and was pretty solidly-lit considering that most of the fights do take place at night. Overall this film’s Godzilla certainly fits the description of the character quite well and even though it is all CGI… damn that CGI is really good. As for the other monsters, the MUTOs, they look good too but they’re kind of lackluster compared to the other monsters in the Godzilla film franchise and I wish the filmmakers would’ve pitted him against something like Mothra or Rodan.

I’m finding that the general consensus for this film is similar to that of ‘Pacific Rim’ last year; great action but lackluster character development. Well, just like with that film, I ask this… why is that necessarily a problem? Because, again like that film, this film delivers on what it promises; Godzilla and monster fights. In fact, while I haven’t seen any of the other Godzilla film aside from the original, from what I can gather… that’s sort of the point with these films in the first place… though like I said earlier, this one sort of focuses more on the human characters. To the writers’ credit, they at least gave a decent amount of character development… nothing really noteworthy, mind you, but it’s not like this film is completely ‘devoid’ of character. For that matter, the cast is fairly solid; some unfortunately don’t get much to do, like the two main actresses, Elizabeth Olsen and Sally Hawkins (especially in Olsen’s case as the wife of Ford Brody), but there’s also some really good performances from Ken Watanabe and Bryan Cranston. For the record though, Cranston’s only in the film for about 10-15 minutes but even then he does make the most out of his short screen-time. The movie instead focuses on his son, Ford, and while I will agree that he’s not the most compelling lead, Aaron Taylor-Johnson does a fair job here.

If you’re still having bad memories of the 1998 American ‘Godzilla’ film, I believe you’re going to be more satisfied with this take on the character. It certainly is far more fitting to bear the title ‘Godzilla’ than that other film. Godzilla himself looks fantastic, he definitely has the qualities that the character is known for, and the film itself certainly delivers on some fantastic monster action. My only complaint though would be that the film cuts away from the fights quite a lot early on, which wouldn’t be a problem if it was just done once but it’s actually done a few times. But even with that in mind, this is definitely a pretty solid addition to the Godzilla franchise and I’m definitely looking forward to a sequel (they just announced one, so it looks like it is happening). If so, I hope that this next one gives us more monster action and heck, maybe another one of Godzilla’s famous fellow monsters (there’s a pretty neat Mothra reference in here so it’s possible). Also, maybe Toho can be a bit more involved in this one seeing how they are the company responsible for this franchise in the first place? Still, overall, this film serves as a really nice, and much deserved, return to form for the ‘King of the Monsters’.


Rating: 4/5