Showing posts with label X-Men: Days of Future Past. Show all posts
Showing posts with label X-Men: Days of Future Past. Show all posts

Monday, January 5, 2015

BEST FILMS OF 2014: TOP 3

Welcome back to Rhode Island Movie Corner’s end-of-the-year Top 12 ‘Favorite Films of 2014’ list. We’ve come to the final part of this 4-part special and today I’m listing my Top 3 favorite films of this past year and my number 1 might surprise you but not in the way you think. So let’s get back to the list…

My favorite ‘biopic’ of the year takes the spot at Number 3 as it tells the story of a man who for years never got the recognition that he truly deserved… until recently…

3. THE IMITATION GAME


Whereas ‘The Theory of Everything’ was a sad but fairly uplifting biopic, ‘The Imitation Game’ is a much more heartbreaking story. It’s the true story of computer scientist Alan Turing who, during World War II, developed a device known as the bombe in order to decrypt the German Enigma Code. It was a success and as some predict, not only did it save countless lives but it also shortened the war by about two years. And yet, for the longest time, no one ever knew anything about it because it was kept secret and in 1952, Turing was prosecuted for gross indecency, all because he was a homosexual which at the time was illegal in the U.K. and even today, not every state in the U.S. has legalized same-sex marriage. And it wasn’t until last year (technically two years ago since it happened in 2013) when his work was finally revealed to the public and was given the proper recognition that he deserved that he unfortunately never got when he was still alive as he died just two years after his arrest as a result of suicide. This story truly hits you on an emotional level as you really sympathize with this man who was unjustly prosecuted just for being gay, which quite frankly makes it one of the most important films to come out this year. But at the same time, it’s also a great World War II ‘political’ thriller.

It covers all aspects of Turing’s life, from his early days as a young lad when he both constantly got bullied by his peers and also had a friendship with another boy named Christopher that unfortunately didn’t last as a result of Christopher’s early death to his tenure with MI5 and his development of the bombe to his final years and his arrest and the film balances all of this really well. And at times it’s also a very thrilling race against time as we see Turing and his team trying to break the Enigma Code because they only have a certain amount of time each day to crack it before the code changes at the end of each day. One of my favorite scenes of this year comes during the scene where the bombe finally works because despite the fact that they can now figure out all of the secret messages that Germany is sending out, they can’t really do much about it. At first, they look to help out a bunch of civilian ships that are about to be attacked by German U-Boats but Turing points out that they can’t because otherwise the Germans will figure out that they cracked the code and would resort to a new method of keeping their messages secret meaning that this whole operation would end up being entirely worthless and despite the pleads from one of Turing’s co-workers, who has a brother on one of the targeted ships, the others soon realize Turing is right. It’s a very hard-hitting scene where the characters realize that even though they broke new boundaries, it comes at a cost and I guess you can say that’s probably the reason why Turing’s work was kept hidden for so many years.

Benedict Cumberbatch gives one of the best performances of the year in the role of Turing. As I noted before in my original review of the film, there’s a similar aspect of Cumberbatch’s performance as Turing to his turn as Sherlock Holmes in, well, ‘Sherlock’ in that both characters have this awkwardness to them. But whereas Sherlock is more confident in himself and his awkwardness comes from how he acts amongst other people, Turing is much more awkward in the sense that obviously he’s hiding a big secret from everyone, that being his homosexuality. There’s a scene in which Turing learns that one of his co-workers is secretly a Soviet spy but learns that if he reveals this to anyone, then the spy, being the only one that Turing has shared his secret with at this point in time, will then spill the beans about him being gay. Again, it’s all a case of Turing being in an incredibly tough and unfair situation in a time when people like him were looked down upon by everyone around them. It’s unclear whether or not Cumberbatch will actually win any major awards for his performance here giving how many other great performances we’ve gotten this year but it’s still one of the best performances of the year and the highlight of a very well-directed and well-acted biopic that will hopefully help continue to highlight the truly groundbreaking work that Turing did in his life and the fact that he sadly got prosecuted just for being homosexual is something that unfortunately is still fairly common today in certain ways.

My Number 2 pick is the latest, and more importantly, the best entry in the franchise to date. Who would’ve thought that a series that started to go into decline with its third installment would rise from the ashes to deliver another superb superhero film?

2. X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST


As we all know, in 2006 the X-Men film franchise started to go into a rapid decline after ‘X-Men’ and ‘X2’ director Bryan Singer decided not to come back to direct the third film. While admittedly I don’t think ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ is ‘as bad’ as some have put it out to be, it was still a major disappointment that didn’t do its famous comic storyline ‘Dark Phoenix’ justice. Things got even worse with the series’ first spin-off, ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’, which was just a mediocre superhero film in pretty much every single aspect. It wasn’t until 2011 when the series finally started to get back on track with ‘X-Men: First Class’ and one of the key reasons for the success of ‘First Class’ was the return of Bryan Singer to the franchise. He may not have directed the film, but he did co-write/produce it as X-Men: First Class, with its badass James Bond-esque 60’s atmosphere and terrific cast highlighted by James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender as the younger versions of Professor X and Magneto, respectively, was easily one of the best superhero films of the last few years. Wolverine also got a much better spin-off two years later with ‘The Wolverine’. And this year, Singer, for the first time in more than a decade, returns to the position of director with ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’, which is easily the best film in the series to date and his return to the series that he helped start in the first place is more than welcome.

This entry was based off of arguably the most famous ‘X-Men’ comics storyline to date, ‘Days of Future Past’, though technically it does stray quite a bit from the source material as shown from various changes like having Wolverine go back in time instead of Kitty Pryde, among other things. But that’s okay because the film is still very well-written. True, this series has been known (and not 100% in a good way) for emphasizing more on Wolverine than any other of the many mutant characters but here, Wolverine isn’t the main character in this entry. Instead, it focuses more on the younger versions of Professor X, Magneto, and Mystique. And sure, that still means that all of the other roles in this film are much smaller by comparison but everyone does their job in their various bits of screen-time. Whereas previous X-Men movies have had one weak link in their casts (like January Jones in ‘First Class’ or Svetlana Khodchenkova in ‘The Wolverine’), ‘Days of Future Past’ has the best ensemble cast of any film in the entire series with everyone doing an excellent job. This film, more than previous X-Men films, also is the first to really showcase the ‘team’ element of the series in the action sequences so really, this film is probably the closest in spirit to the comics.

In ‘First Class’, the biggest standout of the cast was Michael Fassbender as Magneto, which makes sense considering that ‘First Class’ is pretty much Magneto’s story. In ‘Days of Future Past’, though, it’s the other way around and the biggest standout is James McAvoy as Xavier in what is easily Xavier’s story. The first time he appears, we see that he’s become a shell of his former self after the whole incident with Magneto in Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis in ‘First Class’, which ended up with him both losing his legs and his ‘adoptive’ sister Mystique, who ended up going with Magneto. It’s fascinating to see Xavier at such an all-time low to the point where, with Beast’s help, he frequently takes an antidote that gives him the ability to walk again but at the same time also blocks his telepathic ability, which he’s completely fine with because he could no longer deal with the voices in his head. It’s only until Wolverine comes along to help guide him back to being the man that he once was, with a little help from his future self as well (on that note, it’s awesome to see Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen reprise their roles as Professor X and Magneto one last time and they go out on a high note; not only that, but the scene between young and old Xavier is one of the best scenes in the film). Of course, Michael Fassbender is once again excellent as young Magneto as well and Jennifer Lawrence, who was already excellent as young Mystique in ‘First Class’, is even better here.

Finally, let’s talk about the ending of the film, which of course did one crucial thing that altered the entire film franchise. After Wolverine’s journey back in time is complete, he returns to the future but now finds himself in an alternate reality where both Cyclops and Jean Grey are alive, thereby erasing the continuity of ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’. Not only that, but at the end we see that Wolverine in the past was picked up by Mystique posing as General Stryker; in other words, it looks like ‘Origins: Wolverine’ was erased as well. Some aren’t as big on this ending as it ‘messes up’ the entire continuity of the franchise but I don’t see why that’s such a big problem if it means we can now forget about the two weakest entries in the entire series. It’s clear that this is what the filmmakers were looking to do; fix the wrongs of the previous entries and quite frankly they succeed in doing so. After two straight duds as far as superhero films go, the ‘X-Men’ film franchise is now back on track and now ‘Days of Future Past’ stands tall as the best ‘X-Men’ film to date and a welcome return to the franchise for director Bryan Singer, who was sorely missed by all ‘X-Men’ fans. It’ll be interesting to see what happens next with this franchise when ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ hits theaters in 2016, apparently set to be the end of this ‘reboot trilogy’ of X-Men films that began back in 2011 with ‘First Class’.

And finally, we come to my Number 1 pick; my absolute favorite film of the year. My Number 1 pick is…


Yes, that’s right folks, for the first time ever, it’s a tie as I have not one but two films taking the Number 1 spot on this list. I couldn’t possibly pick one over the other as I loved them both equally and for their own unique reasons. The first of these two films was the most fun movie theater experience I’ve had this year.

1A. GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY


Comic-Con 2012; Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige announces that ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ is in production for a 2014 release. Like many people, my first reaction was similar to what Korath the Pursuer (Djimon Hounsou) says when Peter Quill (Chris Pratt) tells him his ‘other’ name; Star-Lord… “Who?” I had absolutely no idea who the ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ were and from what I can tell, not even many comic book fans knew either. I have to admit for a while I was actually questioning Marvel’s judgment for going with a relatively obscure series (a ‘d-list’ bunch of heroes as some might say) as the basis of one of their major ‘Cinematic Universe’ film... cut to today, where I’m so glad that I was wrong to question Marvel to the point where I now have complete faith in anything they do. That’s because ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ ended up being not only the best superhero film of 2014 but also the best film in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe to date. Yes, that’s right, I think that this film is even better than ‘The Avengers’, which definitely speaks big words to how great a film ‘Guardians’ was. Now don’t get me wrong, ‘Avengers’ is still a great film, but I feel that there are a few reasons as to why ‘Guardians’ is the better movie.

First of all, I think it’s much funnier than ‘Avengers’, which admittedly didn’t start getting into the humor up until Iron Man first appeared on screen. ‘Guardians’ is more consistent with the humor from beginning to end and also a bit more daring in its humor. I still can’t believe that a MCU movie under the Disney banner could get away with not only a joke about how Star-Lord’s ship would look like a Jackson Pollack painting if they had a black-light (which I’ll admit I did not get until a while after seeing the film twice) but also the line ‘they got my dick message’. But while ‘Guardians’ does have a lot of comedic dialogue/moments, that doesn’t mean that it’s 100% a comedy. It still gives time for some serious moments (more on that in a sec). ‘Avengers’ admittedly also has a rather simple story; Loki tries to take over the world with help from the Chitauri and the Avengers team up to stop him. There’s nothing wrong with that, for the record, but ‘Guardians’ has a much more complex story… and yes, I’m aware that some people criticized the movie for having a complicated story but really, I never noticed.

Finally, the biggest reason why ‘Guardians’ is better than ‘Avengers’ is because of its emotional resonance. This movie starts off not with a funny scene but a really damn sad scene where Peter Quill’s mom dies right in front of him. Definitely not your typical opener to a superhero film. But then after Quill is abducted by Yondu and his Ravagers and the Marvel Studios logo runs, it cuts to Quill dancing to ‘Come and Get your Love’ during the opening credits, a perfect way to showcase what kind of adventure we’re in for while also highlighting one of the best elements of the entire film; its soundtrack. It’s an adventure in which we care about the main characters, who may be, to quote one of the Nova Corps members, a ‘bunch of a-holes’, but in reality they’re just looking for a place where they belong and that place is with each other. True, this may be a light-hearted superhero adventure in the veins of ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Serenity’ but it also takes time for effectively emotional moments, from Quill seemingly sacrificing himself to save Gamora when she’s left floating in space to Groot sacrificing himself to save the others when Ronan’s ship crash-lands into Xandar. That scene where Rocket tries to stop Groot from doing it and Groot comforts Rocket by placing one of his twigs on his face… gets me every time, let me tell you.

Even though the film focuses on a five-person group as its heroes, it does an excellent job at balancing out their roles in the film and all five roles are perfectly cast. As soon as the first trailer hit for the film, it was immediately proven that Chris Pratt was perfectly cast in the role of the charming yet cocky Star-Lord. Zoe Saldana is also superb in the role of Gamora, who because she’s the most serious member of the group doesn’t get as many funny bits of dialogue but she still has a few great lines here and there, like when she laments about how she’s going to die surrounding by the biggest idiots in the galaxy or when she tells Star-Lord she won’t fall for his ‘pelvic sorcery’. The biggest surprise, though, is easily Dave Bautista as Drax. Like Gamora, Drax is also a very serious character but in his case this results in quite a lot of hilarity due to the fact that metaphors go over his head (even though he claims that nothing goes over his head as his reflexes are fast enough to catch it). It’s even more impressive considering that from what I read online before seeing the film, it seemed like Drax would be the least memorable of the group and yet it’s arguably the other way around. And of course, as everyone predicted beforehand, Groot and Rocket are easily the biggest standouts of the film with both Vin Diesel and Bradley Cooper, respectively, doing phenomenal jobs in the roles.

Now let’s talk about the villains, because like with almost every other MCU film that does not feature Loki, they’re regarded as the weakest parts of the movie. But I heavily disagree with that; in fact, I assure you that if I didn’t like this film’s villains then ‘Guardians’ wouldn’t have been this high up on the list and I wouldn’t have said that it was better than ‘Avengers’. I think Ronan’s a bad-ass villain for a few reasons. First of all, he does have a clear motive; he wants to eliminate his race’s mortal enemies, the Xandarians. If anything, that’s better than him just being evil. Second, he doesn’t go down so easily during the final battle. It actually takes the Guardians three tries just to defeat him and they do so in one of my favorite (and one of the most hilarious) finales to any superhero film that I’ve seen when Star-Lord distracts the big turd-blossom with a dance-off. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, HE DEFIES THANOS! We never saw Loki do that so if you ask me, Ronan and Nebula get major props in my book for actually having the guts to say ‘screw you’ to frigging Thanos. As for Nebula, in the first half of the film she unfortunately gets screwed by not getting much to do but if anything they make up for it in the second half of the film. Plus, unlike Ronan, she does survive the final battle so hopefully she’ll be back in the future and I know that in the comics she’s also an adversary of the Avengers and plays a part in the ‘Infinity War’ storyline so if you’re reading this Russo brothers… hint hint…

‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ is perhaps the most important superhero film yet in this current era of superhero films because it shows that Marvel is not afraid to go outside their comfort zone. Heck, this whole Marvel Cinematic Universe itself was a major gamble as nothing like it had ever been done before and now in 2014 Marvel Studios has established one heck of a cinematic universe. But ‘Guardians’ also shows that they’re willing to make a film even if the characters that well known. While DC has still not yet done any superhero film that didn’t primarily star Batman or Superman, Marvel Studios has done films for supposedly B-list characters like Iron Man and Thor, made two excellent movies featuring the supposedly bland Captain America, and of course, made a movie in which we cared so much about a frigging talking raccoon and a walking tree creature that could only say ‘I Am Groot’ in that order. Kudos to you Marvel for yet another excellent entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and one that expands upon the universe more than any other film in the franchise without even doing that much to connect it to the other MCU movies other than using Thanos (now played by Josh Brolin who despite being on screen for barely 3 minutes immediately makes quite the intimidating impression)… and that’s perfectly okay in my book. These ‘a-holes’ who are not ‘100% dicks’ managed to prove everyone wrong and now stand as part of the best Marvel Cinematic Universe movie to date.

As for my second Number 1 pick, this film just blew me away from beginning to end and really, would you ever expect anything less… from Christopher Nolan?

1B. INTERSTELLAR


If I haven’t already mentioned this before in a previous post, I’m a huge fan of ‘old-school’ blockbusters. By that, I mean when a big-budget film, in its execution, feels like a classic blockbuster from way back when, even with all of the modern film tricks, that is an absolute must-see in the theater, which is especially relevant now considering that the advancements in technology and services like Redbox and Netflix have led to some debate about the concept of going to the movie theaters possibly becoming ‘obsolete’, which I must say I would absolutely hate to see if it really happened. Some recent examples of this include ‘Captain America: The First Avenger’ and ‘Super 8’ and that is also the case with ‘Interstellar’. Hopefully you got the chance to see this film in theaters, especially if you got to see in both IMAX and in 70 mm projection. I unfortunately never got the chance to see Nolan’s last two Batman films in IMAX so I made a big effort to see this film in IMAX the first time and I was even luckier to have the chance to see it in 70 mm projection. I literally have no idea how long it has been since I’ve seen a movie projected in that way giving how most theaters have switched to digital projection and I must say, it actually looks much better when projected in this fashion. You could actually hear the projector running during some of the quiet parts of the movie. This is the very definition of pure cinematic nostalgia. I saw this movie twice in theaters and while I didn’t see it in IMAX the second time, I got the chance to see it in 35 mm at my local theater and it was just as awesome as it was the first time.

This film is a visual masterpiece with some truly amazing visuals and like in his ‘Dark Knight’ movies, Nolan made an effort to use as many practical effects as possible. The dust storms on Earth were real, the visuals in space were done beforehand and used during filming so that the actors didn’t have to do it in front of a green screen, and all of the new worlds that the characters travel to were all filmed in practical locations, which I did like as while the looks of the planets may have been very simple compared to worlds in other sci-fi films it still maintained that sense of realism that Nolan has such a knack for, and yes I say this even though it’s a sci-fi movie. Sometimes the simplest visuals yield the best results. The cinematography by Hoyte van Hoytema is superb (the absence of Wally Pfister is not that big of a loss) as is the score by Hans Zimmer… oh my god, the score was absolutely superb, especially in the scenes where Cooper leaves home as Murph runs out too late to say goodbye (‘Stay’) and of course as many people have already mentioned, the scene where Cooper and Brand try to dock with their ship after the incident with Dr. Mann resulted in it getting damaged (‘No Time for Caution’), which is easily one of the best scenes in the entire film. Some say that the music was too overpowering but I wouldn’t say that’s the problem. As noted before, it’s in the sound design which sometimes is overpowering to the point where it’s hard to hear any dialogue at times.

But at the same time, this movie also benefits from a lot of genuinely emotional resonance, which some feel Nolan’s work usually lacks. As I said in my Spoiler Post for the film, I don’t entirely agree on that because I feel that there is emotional depth in his movies, it’s just that it’s always reserved for the main character (like Dom in ‘Inception’, just to name an example). Technically that’s the case here too but here it’s done perfectly in terms of the relationship between Cooper and Murph. It’s a heartbreaking situation to see both of them having to deal with him being forced to leave her and her brother behind to go off on this mission and we see both of them struggle to deal with this on an emotional level. There were two scenes that really hit me on an emotional level. The first is when Cooper talks to Murph before leaving and, as noted earlier, he leaves off as Murph rushes out unfortunately unable to say goodbye as he leaves. The other is after Cooper has already spent many years away from home due to him and the other members of his crew spending too long on Planet Miller. He watches all of the video logs made by Tom as he grows up, marries, and has a kid and of course gets very emotional about it (in one of the most powerful scenes of the movie consisting of just a single shot of Cooper reacting to everything) and then Murph makes one video log (this being the first appearance of Jessica Chastain in the film) telling him that she’s now as old as he was when he left and she wishes he was home by now. Matthew McConaughey, Chastain, and Mackenzie Foy all do fantastic jobs in the roles of Cooper and older and young Murph, respectively. I also want to highlight Bill Irwin for his great turn as the robot TARS, who provides some very funny quips of dialogue in his back and forth with Cooper. Of course, as with any Nolan movie, the cast is superb from top to bottom including Anne Hathaway, Michael Caine, Wes Bentley, and David Gyasi. And yes, I liked the whole subplot with Matt Damon’s character, Dr. Mann. Did it detour from the main story? Yes, but at the same time I also found it very fascinating to have a character like Mann who becomes so dis-enchanted with trying to find a new home for the people of Earth that he cowardly tries to get back home, even if it means that he messing everything up for Cooper’s crew.

In short, ‘Interstellar’ was a movie I was anticipating ever since Nolan was hired to direct because as I’ve said before, Nolan in my opinion has yet to make a bad film. And I’m sure some of you are going to accuse me of being a Nolan fan boy and, sure enough, there have been plenty of comments made by these fan-boys attacking anyone who dared not to like this film just like what happened when ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ got released back in 2012. But like I said before, I’m not that stupid. I recognize that this film was very polarizing and it has its critics. But me personally, this film really impacted me on an emotional level and was truly a one-of-a-kind cinematic experience. Some say the idea of going to the cinema has become old-fashioned due to services like Redbox and Netflix but I’m not one of those people. I still enjoy going to the theater to see a new film and films like ‘Interstellar’ and ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ showcase why I love doing this. In the case of ‘Guardians’, it shows that I go the cinema to have fun (you starting to understand why this list was predominantly blockbusters now?) and in the case of ‘Interstellar’, it’s even better when a film is truly a must-see event in theaters, especially if you get the chance to see it on a big screen like IMAX and see it in the old-fashioned 70mm projection. Nolan’s a man of film and this is his love letter to it and that is why ‘Interstellar’ is one of my absolute favorite films of the year.


So that’s it folks, my Top 12 (or I guess you can say 13) favorite films of 2014. Thanks for reading and it’s time to start up a whole new year of movies.

Friday, September 5, 2014

Favorite Films of Summer 2014- As Voted by the Fans


A little over a week ago, I set up a poll on Surveymonkey.com and asked you guys to vote on what your favorite movie from Summer 2014 was and I’m really pleased with the amount of responses the poll got. In the end, 43 people submitted their votes so with that said I would like to thank all of those who voted. So now that the voting process is closed, it’s time for the fun part of all of this. Now you guys get to see which films earned your votes as your favorite films from these past four months of the year. Now despite what I said in my ‘End of Summer Announcement’ post, I’m ultimately not going to do a ‘Top 10’ list. The main reason for this is because ultimately 19 films earned votes from you all and a lot of them had similar amounts of votes (some had 2 votes each, some 3 each, etc…) so it’s actually rather impossible to do an official ‘Top 10’ list. So instead of doing that, I will be listing all of the films that got votes, going from those that earned the lowest amount of votes to the ones that got the highest. So without further ado, here are your favorite films from the Summer 2014 movie season.

9 FILMS EARNED ONE VOTE

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2


If this film hadn’t gotten a mixed reaction from both critics and audiences, I’d be more comfortable in saying that this was the best year for comic book movies yet. For the record, I do think this has been the best year so far for comic book movies mostly because of the other three superhero films that came out this year which all earned glowing reviews from both critics and audiences. But Spidey wasn’t as lucky as ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ pretty much became the ‘Man of Steel’ of the year as both critics and audiences were mixed on it though overall I’ve heard QUITE a lot more negative reviews than I have positive ones. I may be in the minority here, but I really loved this film. I may have been hesitant at first about these ‘Amazing Spider-Man’ movies due to their status of being a very rushed reboot (just five years after the Sam Raimi trilogy had ended) but after seeing these films, I actually find myself preferring these two to the Raimi trilogy because I like the characters in this series more, specifically Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone as Peter Parker/Spider-Man and Gwen Stacy, respectively.

The common complaint towards this film was that it was too overcrowded in both ideas and characters and while I do see where people are coming from with this, I didn’t really think it was that ‘bloated’. It’s clear that with this film the writers did not realize the major problem of ‘Spider-Man 3’ in that it had too many villains. Both films have three villains each but overall I feel that ‘Spider-Man 3’ is still the bigger mess in terms of its characters and plotlines. But even with that said, I don’t think that film is as bad as the entire internet is putting it out to be… and the same can be said for ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ as well. Despite the multiple villains, the film does clarify who the ‘main villain’ is, I found the story to be pretty self-contained, and while I’m not trying to compare the quality of the following films, the direction by Marc Webb is much more confident here than it was in the first film, similar to Christopher Nolan when he went from ‘Batman Begins’ to ‘The Dark Knight’. It’s clear that Sony wants to do a ‘Sinister Six’ movie and that is something that I do want to see. But if I did have any complaints about ‘Amazing Spider-Man 2’, it is that the lead-in for ‘Sinister Six’ is just a minor tease during the ending. Sony, if you want to make ‘Sinister Six’ happen, actually start making it happen!

CHEF


In between all of the summer blockbusters that came out this year was this charming little indie film from Jon Favreau about a chef who quits his job at a major restaurant when he feels that he is unable to express his culinary creativity. He also becomes infamous on social media when he berates a food critic both online and in person for criticizing his food (which was because he had to stick to the ‘classics’ and was forbidden from trying new things). It’s fairly clear that this film’s story mirrors Favreau’s own frustrations with the Hollywood system. After directing many big-budget summer blockbusters like ‘Cowboys and Aliens’ and the first two ‘Iron Man’ films, he returns to the more low-budgeted films where he got his start as a director. ‘Chef’ is an incredibly charming film, with an excellent message that stresses the importance of freedom of expression. I especially loved the sequence in this film when Favreau’s character, his son (Emjay Anthony), and his best friend (John Leguizamo) go on a road trip across the country in their new food truck. Now I can’t say that it’s the ‘best film’ of the year because I didn’t really find it as funny as a lot of people were saying it was but at the same time I still appreciated the charm of this film and its strong message. All in all, ‘Chef’ was a very pleasant change of pace from all of the summer blockbusters.

MILLION DOLLAR ARM


This film, released during the weekend that ‘Godzilla’ came out, is based on a true story about a sports agent who, looking to find new talent for the Major Leagues, establishes a new contest in India in order to find new talent. His first two contenders, Rinku Singh and Dinesh Patel) became the first two Indian men to sign U.S. pro sports contracts. Now I didn’t see the film but from what I’ve seen online, it looks like the film got pretty decent reviews from critics. To paraphrase the RT consensus, it’s a pleasant film that benefitted heavily from having Jon Hamm in the lead role while not really adding much to the ‘inspirational sports story’ formula that we’ve seen a lot of times. But really… I don’t really mind that at all. Being a sports fan myself, I grew watching films like ‘Rookie of the Year’, ‘Angels in the Outfield’, and ‘Remember the Titans’ and while I know they all share similar plot points, I still find a lot of them to be very entertaining. In fact, the same can be said about another sports film that came out this year, ‘Draft Day’, which I did see and I was rather surprised to find that I really liked it. I didn’t end up seeing ‘Million Dollar Arm’ in theaters, but I’ll probably watch it sometime soon.

EDGE OF TOMORROW


‘Edge of Tomorrow’ unfortunately ends up being one of the most criminally underrated films of this summer season. Now I’m not saying it’s ‘underrated’ from a critical perspective because it actually got really, really good reviews from critics (something that I did not expect to happen at all). I’m referring to how the film performed at the domestic box office where it fared pretty poorly commercially. It only grossed about $100 million here in the U.S., at least $78 million under its budget. Thankfully the international box office helped it at least make its money back but still it’s sad to see that this film didn’t fare so well here in the U.S. It seems like the biggest reason for the film’s poor performance was due to lackluster marketing which might have had some people thinking that it was just a rehash of star Tom Cruise’s most recent film ‘Oblivion’. However, ‘Edge of Tomorrow’ is far from that; it’s an incredibly well-made sci-fi action blockbuster with phenomenal performances from both Cruise and Emily Blunt. The first half of the film sees Cruise go against type as a general who isn’t trained in combat but forced into serving on the front lines while Blunt more than proves that she can be a Grade-A female action star. Hopefully this film’s poor performance at the U.S. box office won’t affect this film’s reputation too hard because it really was an excellent entry in the sci-fi genre.

DAWN OF THE PLANET OF THE APES


Speaking of excellent sci-fi films, now we come to ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’, the sequel to 2011’s surprise hit ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’. ‘Dawn’ is one of the rare sequels that actually manages to improve over its predecessor. Like ‘Rise’, it gives us characters that we really do care about but it also does a great job at immersing us in this ‘post-virus’ world where genetically-modified apes are living away from the human race, who is trying to survive after a virus wiped out millions of people. Andy Serkis is once again phenomenal as the lead ape Caesar but credit is also due for Toby Kebbell as the ape Koba. While he is the ‘villain’ of the film, at times you actually do sympathize with him because of how he was treated before the virus spread. The human cast is really great as well, including the fairly underrated Jason Clarke in the lead human role (the scenes between him and Serkis are phenomenal) and Gary Oldman in a role that, going in, might have had you thinking he’s the bad guy but instead they actually gave him a really good amount of depth. So all in all, director Matt Reeves delivered what could arguably be the best ‘Planet of the Apes’ movie to date; a film that is not only entertaining, but one that also quite a lot of emotional depth as well.

SEX TAPE


As the title suggests, this film centers on a couple (played by Cameron Diaz and Jason Segel) who film a sex tape in order to spice up their love life. However, instead of deleting the video when they are done, it ends up getting uploaded to ‘the cloud’ which is linked to a bunch of iPads that they gave to their friends, resulting in them trying to get them all back before anyone ever sees their video or, worse, it gets leaked to the internet. Now I didn’t see this film in theaters because of one main reason… it got TERRIBLE reviews from critics and considering that it got a C+ on CinemaScore, I’m guessing it didn’t fare too well with audiences either. My friend Matt saw it and he told me that it was ‘all right’ with the major highlight being a cameo by Jack Black as the owner of the website YouPorn. But despite that, I really have no interest in this film right now and am probably not going to bother with it.

THE PURGE: ANARCHY


2013’s ‘The Purge’ was one of those movies where, despite the fact that it didn’t fare well with critics (and from what I’ve seen online, even most audiences), it was still very successful from financial standpoint because it was filmed on a very small budget. So because of this, we got a sequel, ‘The Purge: Anarchy’. Now I didn’t see ‘The Purge’ so I didn’t see ‘Anarchy’ when it was in theaters. The general consensus seemed to be that while it still really wasn’t that good, it was at least an improvement over its predecessor. The main reason for this was because unlike the first film, this film took place in a city during the event known as ‘The Purge’, when all crime is made legal for 12 hours and all emergency services are shut down. The first film mainly took place within the home of the main characters which I’m guessing disappointed a lot of people who wanted to see a lot more of this ‘Purge’ thing but instead had to be stuck watching this family try to survive when they come into conflict with a group of Purgers. However at the same time, it seems like this film still had its fair share of stupid characters (I’m aware that most of what happened in the first film happened because of one incredibly stupid action committed by the main character’s son) and was really nothing more than a series of violent imagery trying to act like it’s smarter than it really is. But again, I haven’t seen either of these films so I don’t know how I would actually feel about these films.

LET’S BE COPS


I didn’t see ‘Let’s Be Cops’ for one main reason and it actually wasn’t because of the reviews which were pretty bad regardless. Believe it or not the main reason why I didn’t really have my interest in the film was because of what happened in one of my film classes. My professor had recently been to Los Angeles where he got to take a peek at some of 21st Century Fox’s upcoming films, including ‘X-Men’ and this film. He responded favorably to ‘X-Men’ but not so much for ‘Let’s Be Cops’. So you can chalk this up as another comedy this summer that I didn’t see.

LIFE ITSELF


Anyone who either is a film critic or wants to become one absolutely needs to see this film, a biopic on the life of famed movie critic Roger Ebert who, even more than a year since his tragic death in April 2013, is arguably still the most famous movie critic of all time. This film gives us a poignant look back on his life. It offers some facts that you might not have known, like how Ebert’s co-host on his show ‘Siskel and Ebert’, Gene Siskel, was once a part of Hugh Hefner’s posse or that Ebert actually wrote the screenplay for a film, ‘Beyond the Valley of the Dolls’. But in the end one thing is clear; as the title suggests, Ebert loved life and I’ll always admire how he continued to do his job and continue to write movie reviews even after losing his voice around 2006. Like many other film critics, both current and aspiring, Ebert had a major influence on my development as a film critic because I read his reviews and while I didn’t grow up with ‘Siskel and Ebert’, I have watched some of their old videos. One major thing I learned from watching him on ‘Siskel and Ebert’ and reading his written reviews is to always stand up for your opinion even if someone else disagrees with you and that is a philosophy that I still follow to this day.

R.I.P. Roger Ebert.

3 FILMS EARNED TWO VOTES

X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST


Talk about a franchise that has successfully redeemed itself after some very mediocre entries. After ‘X-Men’ and ‘X2’ director Bryan Singer left the franchise to go direct ‘Superman Returns’, the series really started to go downhill with the highly disappointing ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ and the god-awful ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’. The series managed to get back on track with ‘X-Men: First Class’ (which Singer produced) and Wolverine even got a much better solo outing with ‘The Wolverine’. And finally, Singer returned to the director’s chair with ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’, which I feel is the best X-Men film to date. The film of course is based off of the iconic X-Men storyline ‘Days of Future Past’ from the comics though from what I hear, the film doesn’t stay true to the original story that much but regardless of that, it is still a well-written film with the best ensemble cast of any X-Men film to date. Even though the film does focus on a select few of the cast, everyone does their job in this and I really have to highlight James McAvoy who is just phenomenal in this movie. Whereas Michael Fassbender stole the show in ‘First Class’, this movie belongs to McAvoy. I really like how they’ve been handing the character of young Professor X as he starts to mature more into the Professor X that we knew from the original film trilogy. But most importantly this film is pretty much the filmmakers’ apology to the fans for letting the series go the way it did with ‘Last Stand’ and ‘Origins’ as this film pretty much eradicates those films from the series’ timeline. Now we know that this series is back in the right hands now that Bryan Singer has returned to the franchise that he started back in 2000. I can’t wait for 2016’s ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’.

TAMMY


This was another summer comedy that I didn’t see in theaters. I wasn’t really interested in it before it came out and once I heard it got rather mediocre reviews, I just went to go see ‘Jersey Boys’ again during 4th of July weekend. As for ‘Tammy’, this is Melissa McCarthy’s newest film. She of course has been on a roll ever since she got nominated for an Oscar for ‘Bridesmaids’. In this, she stars as the titular Tammy, a woman who has a really bad day (she gets fired from her job, she finds out her husband is cheating on her, etc…) so she takes a road trip along with her grandmother (played by Susan Sarandon who, despite playing her grandmother in this, is actually not that much older than McCarthy). Anyway, so the reviews weren’t all that good for it but another reason why I didn’t see the film was because I hadn’t really seen a lot of McCarthy’s work. I’m sure she’s a very funny lady but for the most part, I haven’t really seen a lot of her recent big hits like ‘Bridesmaids’ and ‘The Heat’ so I didn’t really have much interest in ‘Tammy’.

THE EXPENDABLES 3


It’s kind of sad that the newest entry in ‘The Expendables’ franchise performed pretty badly at the box office during its opening weekend. Franchise fatigue might have been the main factor in this along with the filmmakers’ failed attempt at marketing this film towards a younger audience by having the film rated PG-13 (more on that in a second) but clearly a major factor for this poor performance was because of an incident where a Digital Copy of the film was leaked online weeks before the film was set to come out. I know that if the film wasn’t leaked early, it still was at risk at doing poorly at the box office but still it’s pretty sad because this film wasn’t that bad. I’ll admit to being a fan of ‘The Expendables’ films, especially the second one which I feel was a major improvement over the first film by not taking things as seriously and for having better action sequences. So now we come to this third film and it’s rated PG-13 following the first two which were both R-rated and well-deserving of that rating. This change in rating, though, isn’t entirely a bad thing. Yes, a lot of the action sequences are heavily edited but at the same time it eliminated the use of those digital blood squibs that I know a lot of people really hate so it’s not all bad. Plus, even under a PG-13 rating, this film is still pretty damn violent. Like the two that came before it, ‘The Expendables 3’ is cheesy and pretty stupid but I still found it to be pretty entertaining.

3 FILMS EARNED (IRONICALLY) THREE VOTES

NEIGHBORS


In terms of the comedies that came out these past few months, the summer movie season got off to a pretty nice start with ‘Neighbors’, in which Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne star as a couple who end up getting into a ‘turf war’ with a local fraternity when they move in next door. The main reason why I feel this movie worked as well as it did is because while this is about a prank war between the two main ‘parties’ of the film (family vs. frat), this film doesn’t have a ‘villain’. Sure, the film is primarily from the view of the couple and they are a likable couple (Rogen and Byrne do have really nice chemistry) but at the same time it doesn’t portray the members of the frat as ‘a-holes’. They have an admirable goal; become legends of their frat and their leader, Teddy, is doubtful about his future, which is a nice bit of contrast with Rogen and Byrne’s characters who want some more excitement in their lives. So in the end, the frat members aren’t portrayed as being the villains; if they were portrayed as such I feel that this movie could’ve ended up giving fraternities a bad name but it didn’t. Two of my fellow panelists on ‘The Feature Presentation’, Matt and Alex, are in a fraternity and they agree that this film did a really good job when it came to portraying fraternities so overall, this is a fun little comedy that may not be my pick for the funniest film of the year (that honor goes to a film that’s coming up in a few moments) but it is still an incredibly entertaining comedy that has its fair share of laugh-out-loud moments.

MALEFICENT


Disney’s latest live-action fantasy film, ‘Maleficent’, is a re-telling of  their classic animated film ‘Sleeping Beauty’ but told from the perspective of its villain, Maleficent, who is arguably the best animated Disney villain of all time. Fans of the character might be a little disappointed, however, that Maleficent is not the main villain here. Instead, she’s the protagonist but it still works because unlike the original film, this film actually does give her a motive for her revenge against the King whereas in the original her motivation for revenge was that she was uninvited to Princess Aurora’s christening. In this movie, she befriended a young boy when she was younger but years later when the boy has the chance to become king, he takes it and betrays Maleficent by cutting off her wings. We do sympathize with her character, even when she acts like the ‘bad guy’, and of course Angelina Jolie is phenomenal in the role. But probably my favorite part of this whole movie is the relationship between Maleficent and Aurora. There’s sort of this ‘mother-daughter’ relationship that develops between them and this really is the heart of the film. Of course the visuals are excellent and at just 97 minutes, the film never overstays its welcome. In terms of the recent big-budget live-action fantasy films that Disney has made in recent years, I still prefer last year’s ‘Oz the Great and Powerful’ but I will say that I did end up liking ‘Maleficent’ more than I did Tim Burton’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’. So far I’d say that Disney is doing a pretty good job in regards to these kinds of movies and I’m interested in seeing more of these kinds of films; live-action versions of their classic animated films.

TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES


Despite the fact that director Michael Bay’s newest film, ‘Transformers: Age of Extinction’, received some of the worst reviews of the year, it still became the highest grossing film of the year worldwide as it’s currently the only film this year that has grossed over $1 billion. Bay’s other major film this year, ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles’, has faced similar scrutiny with critics. Heck, the film was controversial ever since it was first announced and not just because Bay was producing it; there was the alleged change of the origin story, the casting of Megan Fox as April O’Neil, and much more controversial developments that caused many people to predict that this was going to be a disaster. Well, considering what the reviews have been like, I’m guessing many people feel like they were right… however I disagree with that. In fact, while I do understand the criticisms towards the ‘Transformers’ films, I really don’t get the hate towards this film. Now let me be clear; I don’t think that this movie is ‘great’. In fact, compared to the other movies that we got this summer, there’s really nothing about it that ‘stands out’. But regardless of that, I still managed to have a lot of fun with it. When the Turtles are on screen that is where the movie really shines; they had great camaraderie and while I know I’m in the minority on this, I didn’t mind their CGI design.

But I want to address a complaint that I’ve heard that’s being thrown around when talking about this movie and that is that some people feel like this film ruined the TMNT franchise the same way Bay’s ‘Transformers’ films ‘ruined the Transformers franchise’. Again, I get why people would say that about the ‘Transformers’ films but I call major B.S. on the idea that this new TMNT film ruined the franchise. The main reason why is because all of those supposed controversial changes that were allegedly going to happen (e.g. the ‘alien’ origins, William Fichtner being the Shredder, etc…) are not present in any way in this film. This does feel like a Ninja Turtles movie that stayed true to what made this franchise so famous in the first place, more so than Bay’s ‘Transformers’ films ever did. In fact, despite the fact that this is produced by Michael Bay and directed by a Michael Bay wannabe (Jonathan Liebesman), this doesn’t feel too much like a Bay film. For one thing, there aren’t millions of explosions happening every minutes. Plus, even with a PG-13 rating, this film is generally harmless for younger audiences. So in short, I strongly feel that the new ‘Turtles’ film isn’t as bad as the entire internet is putting it out to be. I’ve said the same thing about the ‘Transformers’ movies but this time, I stand by that belief.

THIS FILM EARNED FOUR VOTES

BOYHOOD


The most popular film of the write-in section, ‘Boyhood’ is the highest rated movie of the summer according to Rotten Tomatoes with a 99% Tomatometer score (Given how much a lot of people are loving this film, I’d really hate to be the two critics who gave it negative reviews right now). For those who haven’t heard about this film, here’s the basic rundown about it; the film was shot over a span of 11 years so that director Richard Linklater could properly tell a ‘coming of age’ story with the same kid actor (Ellar Coltrane) as he grew from childhood to adulthood. Just a quick disclaimer; I haven’t seen this film yet so I know a lot of people are going say that ‘I must see it’ so with that in mind I assure you that I will try and see it soon. But for now, it’s safe to say that ‘Boyhood’ is one of the most popular films from this summer as proven by the fact that it was the fourth most popular film on this poll.

AND NOW… THE THREE MOST POPULAR FILMS OF SUMMER 2014 (AS VOTED BY YOU, THE FANS) WITH FIVE VOTES EACH

THE FAULT IN OUR STARS


Here’s a funny little story about this film. My co-panelists on the ‘Feature Presentation’, Matt and Alex, were going to see ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’ but when they went into the theater they ended up coming in during the last few minutes of this movie making them wonder if they went to the wrong theater… thankfully, they didn’t. But anyway, back to ‘Fault in our Stars’, this being an adaptation of a popular novel of the same name by John Green about a young cancer patient (Shailene Woodley) who falls in love with an amputee (Ansel Elgort) when they meet at a cancer support group. I didn’t see the film but from what I’ve heard online, it’s actually pretty good. As embarrassing as it is to admit this, I wasn’t really that interested in this film because I thought it looked like another ‘chick flick’ but thankfully it looks like I was very much wrong about that. So with that said, I probably will see this movie sometime soon; I can’t make any promises but given the fact that I’ve heard a lot of good things about it, it’s more than likely I will end up seeing it in the near future.

22 JUMP STREET


I’m just going to come out and say it… ‘22 Jump Street’ is the best comedy sequel of all time. Now to some that may not be saying much given that most comedy sequels aren’t really that good but this is one of the rare exceptions of a film that is not only as good as the film that came before it (21 Jump Street, a film that I’m pretty sure none of us were expecting would be as good/hilarious as it was) but also better. This film is filled to the brim with meta humor that heavily plays up the fact that this film is pretty much note for note rehashing the exact same plot of the first film, a mistake that a lot of comedy sequels make. However, in this case it works because they continuously poke fun at this and like the last film, the writing is superb and the camaraderie between leads Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum is terrific. Admittedly there are some jokes in the film that come off as being incredibly awkward, such as when Hill’s character keeps getting called ‘Maya Angelou’, who had just died a few weeks before the film came out as well as a scene where Tatum’s character criticizes the fact that some people are still using the ‘other F-word’ in 2014, which comes off being really awkward considering Hill’s recent incident in which he used that exact same word on paparazzi. However, the film more than makes up for that with multiple gut-busting laugh-out-loud moments, including one of the best end credits sequences ever in which they do numerous fake sequels to the film. Simply put, ‘22 Jump Street’ is easily the funniest comedy of 2014 (so far), and directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller strike gold once again. At this point, having made 4 films that all seemed to be risky ventures at first but ended up being terrific, they really can do no wrong.

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY


It’s clear that we all got ‘hooked on a feeling’ with Marvel Studios’ latest, and strangest, film, ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’. Remember when everyone was saying that this would be a major risk for the studio given that odds are that most people were unfamiliar with these characters (myself included when the film was first announced)? Well, this ‘major risk’ ended up being the highest grossing film of the summer (stateside) and is currently the highest grossing domestic release of the year. Rightfully so, as it truly is a fantastic comic book film. The film feels self-aware about how this is a much more obscure franchise compared to something like ‘Iron Man’ or ‘Captain America’, resulting in an incredibly entertaining space film a la ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Serenity’. It’s also one of the funniest out of all the MCU films but at the same time it isn’t a straight-up comedy; it takes itself seriously when it needs to be but at the same time isn’t all gloomy and depressing (looking at you, DC, and your alleged ‘no jokes’ mandate). It has the best non-Avengers ensemble cast of the entire MCU with a great cast of leads and some pretty awesome villains.

But most importantly, this film really benefits from having a lot of emotional resonance because you really come to care about the ‘Guardians’. While they are criminals and, to quote a line in the film, ‘a bunch of a-holes’, they’re really just misfits trying to find their place in the universe. You really have to give Marvel a hell of a lot of credit for making us feel for a talking raccoon and a tree creature. It is because of this emotional resonance and the fact that I feel that ‘Guardians’ is actually the funniest MCU film to date (because it’s more consistent with its humor) that I feel that ‘Guardians’ is actually better than ‘The Avengers’. Now I know that’s an incredibly bold thing to say. Also, please don’t misinterpret me because ‘Avengers’ is still phenomenal but after just two viewings of ‘Guardians’, it’s now my new personal favorite MCU film because I feel it does a few things better than ‘Avengers’ (e.g. humor, emotional resonance, etc…). It’s clear that a lot of you share that same sentiment because as this poll shows, ‘Guardians’ was one of your top three favorite films of the summer.


So those are your picks for your favorite films from these past four months of this year. I’m not going to do a ‘Worst of Summer 2014’ poll, mostly because I can already tell which film(s) is/are going to win that argument. So once again, I’d like to thank all of those who voted on this poll and as the end result shows, there truly were a large number of great films that came out this summer based on the various responses you gave me.

I leave you with this... dancing Groot!

Groot

Thursday, July 3, 2014

2014 Midyear Recap

Well we are now officially halfway through 2014… and you know what that means. It’s time to do my annual Midyear recap of the year so far. If you’re new to this site, basically what I do here is that I just go through all of the films that I’ve seen this year so far. I don’t really do any rankings on this post, though I do basically go from worst to best. The only time I’m doing any film rankings is right at the end when I list my Top 5 of the year so far. So with that said, how has 2014 been so far in regard to the movies? Well, overall I’d say that 2014 has been a pretty solid year so far. Sure, as is every year I’ve definitely seen a couple of stinkers but so far the good has at least outweighed the bad, which is always a good thing in my opinion. Summer 2014 in particular has been really good so far. Out of all of the films I’ve seen so far this summer, there has been only one movie that, at worst, I was only ‘meh’ on. But now let’s not waste any more time and get onto the recap. This is how the first half of 2014 has been so far for me in regards to the movies that I’ve seen.

STINK-BOMBS

As that title suggests, these are my picks for the worst films of the year so far. And what’s the number one worst film I’ve seen so far, you ask?

WORST FILM OF THE YEAR SO FAR:

THE LEGEND OF HERCULES


I have a suggestion for a new title for this film; ‘Legendary Stinker’ because holy s*** was this one bad. It’s a film that tried to be the next ‘300’, especially in regards to its visual style, but failed to do so for multiple reasons. First of all, despite the fact that this is a ‘swords and sandals’ flick, the movie’s action is pretty much bloodless as the film’s rated PG-13. There’s some very violent action in this movie, but you really don’t see any bloodshed. Secondly, this movie’s visual effects are horrendous; seriously, they look more like they came from an old PlayStation 1 game; they’re some of the cheapest visual effects that I’ve seen in recent memory for a film with a fairly decent budget. Finally, the acting is pretty bad from all involved. I mean no offense to Kellan Lutz but right now this guy is not fit to be a leading man as he comes off as being very bland in the role of Hercules. The only positive thing I can say about this film is that from time to time Scott Adkins provides some entertainment as the main bad guy… but only because he’s so over-the-top. Do you want to know how bad this movie is? It’s so bad that I’m actually looking forward to a Brett Ratner film… that being the other ‘Hercules’ that is set to come out this year. If anything, hopefully that one will be much better than this turd.

OTHER DISHONORABLES

TRANSCENDENCE


Not only is this one of the worst films of the year so far, but it’s currently the most disappointing film this year for me because I was actually looking forward to this one. The main reason for this was because it was directed by Wally Pfister, Christopher Nolan’s long-time cinematographer and it looked like maybe Pfister’s experience working with one of the best directors working today would help him when it came to directing his own movie. But while I do still think that Pfister has potential as a director, ultimately the biggest problem with ‘Transcendence’ is that it’s a major snore-fest. Nothing really happens in this movie despite the fact that technically in regards to the plot things are happening (it’s kind of hard to explain but to put it quite simply, this movie is really boring). It may have some really excellent cinematography and a fairly solid cast (even though A.) most of the characters are very flat and uninteresting and B.) Some members of the cast don’t get much to do), but at the end of the day, this film unfortunately starts Pfister’s directorial career on a very, very low note. I don’t necessarily blame him for it, and I do hope that this won’t be his only foray into directing but quite frankly he definitely should have gone with a different first film than this one.

I, FRANKENSTEIN


Yet another stinker from January (which by this point is not at all surprising in the least given the usual slate of films that come during this month of the year), ‘I, Frankenstein’ tries to be the next ‘Underworld’ (it’s even based off of a graphic novel of the same name written by the co-creator of the ‘Underworld’ franchise, Kevin Grevioux) but ultimately comes off as a pretty dull fantasy action flick (Quick Disclaimer: I have not seen the ‘Underworld’ movies). The characters in this movie are incredibly bland as is the story and the action sequences sometimes feel a bit too over-bloated at times. None of them really stand out in anyway, and also on multiple occasions, the CGI is actually pretty bad, mostly in regards to the gargoyle and demon creatures in this movie. The only reasons why this isn’t my pick for the worst film of the year so far is that if anything else, Aaron Eckhart is at least trying in the lead role of Frankenstein’s Monster and the action sequences are at least not shot in the shaky cam style that currently dominates quite a lot of action movies these days. But aside from that, everything else about this movie is pretty mediocre.

‘MEH’-FLIX

These films are ones that I’m hoping won’t be in my ‘worst of’ list at the end of the year because while I don’t completely dislike these films, I’m not that positive about them either. So basically, these are the films that I think are just ‘okay’.

     A MILLION WAYS TO DIE IN THE WEST   

         
Seth MacFarlane’s second directorial effort does have a decent amount of laughs in it, but overall his last film ‘Ted’ was the funnier movie. This film’s biggest problem is that there are at least two-three instances where nothing funny is either happening or being said for a good 10-15 minutes. It is during these times where the film tries to develop its story and characters, namely the romantic relationship between MacFarlane and Charlize Theron’s characters, and while the two of them do have really nice chemistry, that still results in a severe lack of humor during these periods of time and that can’t justify a near two-hour run-time whereas ‘Ted’ had enough material and was only 10 minutes shorter than this film. The film has a good cast (MacFarlane does a pretty solid job for his first major on-screen performance) but overall ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’ could’ve been a whole lot funnier. To its credit, though, it’s much funnier than most of the comedies I saw last year.

JACK RYAN: SHADOW RECRUIT


The first major 2014 release I saw this year, this film was originally supposed to be released in December of 2013 but it ultimately got pushed back to January 2014 to make room for ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’. That made me worried that the film wasn’t going to turn out that good considering that it got pushed back to the usual ‘dead’ month of movie releases; January. But, after seeing it, I can safely say that I realized that it perfectly fit to have the film come out in January. It’s not a bad film by any means; it’s certainly better than most of the films that come out in January. But the thing is… this movie doesn’t really ‘wow’ you with anything. It’s a fun and entertaining little spy film and it does feature some really good performances from Chris Pine and Kevin Costner, among others, but overall aside from that nothing about the movie really stands out. This is only director Kenneth Branagh’s second action film after ‘Thor’ and I feel that he needs to work more when it comes to doing action sequences. I do feel that this franchise does have potential but if they do make a sequel, I think they should go with a much-more experienced action director. As for this film, I can only recommend it as a rental.

OCULUS


Not being a major horror film fan, I was actually sort of looking forward to ‘Oculus’; the premise looked interesting (partially thanks to the trailer), and the film was getting pretty good reviews from critics. But in the end, I found myself having very mixed opinions about it. It’s one of those cases where most of the best things about the movie also resulted in some of its major problems. This film has a terrific cast, including Karen Gillan, Katee Sackhoff, Brenton Thwaites, as well as some really standout performances from its two kid actors, Annalise Basso and Garrett Ryan. This film’s second half also featured some genuine creepy moments… but that was after a first half that, well, kind of dragged. The whole idea of the past and the present starting to mold together is interesting but at the same time also gets rather confusing at times. Finally, while the ending did catch me by surprise, it also feels more like sequel bait than anything else. I haven’t seen the original short film that this was based on, but overall I think I would’ve been better off with that. Again, I don’t think this film was bad, but really I’m just ‘meh’ on it.

WORTH-WHILES

Now we’re getting into the good stuff. Here are all of the films (excluding my Top 5 of the year so far) that I do recommend in one way or another.

300: RISE OF AN EMPIRE


While Zack Snyder may not be behind the camera this time for the follow-up to his hit film ‘300’, the same film that put the ‘Man of Steel’ director on the map, director Noam Murro does manage to maintain the original film’s style pretty well though this one doesn’t really have the same amount of mysticism as the original had. Really, if you liked the original ‘300’ then I think you will like this interquel (being that it’s mostly set around the same time as the original film though at times shows events that take place both before and after the events of ‘300’) because it does maintain the same visual style and is full of bloody action and Snyder-esque slow-motion. However, that does mean that this is sort of style over substance. Now the same could be said for the original ‘300’ but at the same time I did find that there were some really nice themes that went on in that film and sometimes the same thing occurred in this film as well. But for the most part, most of the main characters in this are fairly bland… save for one, Artemisia (played by Eva Green, who’s easily the standout in this film). If only because of Green’s great turn as this sexy but fierce villainess, I do feel that this movie is at least worth checking out. I mean, yes it’s not the best-written film ever but like its immediate predecessor it is still pretty entertaining and with these films, I wouldn’t have it any other way.

ROBOCOP


It’s safe to say that many people were not very happy about this film being made, seeing how it’s was a ‘remake’ of one of the best sci-fi films of all time, 1987’s ‘Robocop’; definitely a hard act to follow. But I was surprised to find that I actually really enjoyed this film. The main reason why I liked it so much was because while it’s techincally a ‘remake’ of the original film being that it follows cop Alex Murphy as he becomes the robot lawman Robocop after almost dying at the hands of a crime ring, the film manages to be its own thing while making some references to the original film. Ultimately, this film is a reboot and the end result was a film that was actually pretty entertaining, though it was still flawed in some areas. For one thing, it actually had the WEAKEST villains in the history of the franchise with one that was barely used in the film at all and another that really didn’t come off as being that villainous despite the fact that this character was credited as being one of the main villains. Plus, for a film that is called ‘Robocop’, it actually focuses more on the supporting characters than Robocop himself, which is sad because I do feel that Joel Kinnaman actually did a pretty good job in the role given what he had to work with. Hopefully, if they make a sequel (which for the record I do hope they make), they can improve on the first film’s shortcomings. But even as is, I’d say that this is the best Robocop film since the original.

DRAFT DAY


I was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked ‘Draft Day’. Sure, like with most sports films, the overall story is a little predictable but quite frankly the film’s greatest success is that it really holds your interest throughout the entire film. That’s saying a lot considering that this is based around the NFL Draft and all of the stuff that goes on behind the scenes with teams’ general managers as they try to land it big in the draft. The movie makes it work because the film has a generally speedy pace meaning that there wasn’t any time when the film was starting to drag. It’s also not just about the Draft itself; I also liked the other side of the main story in which Browns GM Sonny Weaver (played by Kevin Costner, who does a pretty good job in this) finds himself in a stressful situation because everyone’s putting their faith in him to hopefully turn the Browns’ luck around. Sure at the end of the day it may seem like nothing more than a commercial for the NFL but I still found the film to be pretty entertaining. In other words, this is probably one of the biggest surprises of the year so far for me.

MUPPETS MOST WANTED


Everyone’s favorite puppet performers are back in ‘Muppets Most Wanted’, the sequel to 2011’s surprise hit ‘The Muppets’. As for ‘Most Wanted’, it’s exactly what you’d expect from a Muppet movie. It’s a whole bunch of zany fun filled with enjoyable musical numbers and a bunch of cameos. However, I find myself liking 2011’s ‘Muppets’ much more, which is actually kind of ironic because I’m surprisingly finding that while the last film was critically acclaimed, it seems that generally audiences have had a bit more mixed reaction to it. From what I’ve seen online, the main reason for why some people weren’t too big on it was because it didn’t focus on the Muppets enough, whereas this film is much more focused on them. But ultimately the main reason why the first film was better is because it really benefited from the fact that it was an open ‘love letter’ to the franchise, resulting in a film that had a lot of heart. This, on the other hand, is more or less your basic sequel going through the usual motions. I’m not saying that it’s bad, but overall I prefer the first film more than this one. But even with that in mind, I’m glad that this franchise is back as I feel it’s one of those rare franchises that are able to appeal to both young and old. Sure, this film in particular may be a bit more oriented towards kids but there’s still enough there for adults to enjoy it as well.

NOAH


Certainly one of the more controversial films of the year, this film did manage to be a pretty successful hit at the box office and with most critics which did catch me by surprise because I kind of thought that because of its controversial take on the Bible story of Noah’s Ark and the fact that this was director Darren Aronofsky’s first major big-budget blockbuster, I kind of thought that this film would’ve been a potential flop… but it wasn’t. For the record, yes this film does take quite a few artistic liberties with the story of Noah but at the same time, I also liked how Aronofsky took a more ‘humanistic’ approach to the story. It’s still the same general story of Noah’s Ark but this film focuses more on Noah as we see how he struggles dealing with the massive burden that has been placed upon him, resulting in him nearly committing a terrible act himself but only because he was ‘commanded’ to do so. This film really explores how there is darkness in all of us but it all depends on whether or not we let that darkness overpower us and I feel that that main theme was handled very well. The film has excellent visuals and good performances from all involved, with Russell Crowe giving one of the best performances of his in recent years as Noah. This is not the same story of Noah that you’re used to, but it is still a pretty compelling alternate take on it.

GODZILLA


After the whole disaster with 1998’s ‘Godzilla’, or as some call it ‘Godzilla in Name Only’, director Gareth Edwards brought us a film that is much more deserving of the name ‘Godzilla’. Now this has been a fairly divisive film (despite it getting pretty solid reviews from critics); some really love it, and some really hate it. As for me, I’m kind of in the middle; I like the film, but I don’t love it. First off, it’s definitely a ‘Godzilla’ film. I’m not that big of a ‘Godzilla’ fan but I can safely say this is much more of a ‘Godzilla’ film than the ’98 film was. Also, the final act of this film really delivers on epic monster action. But one of my biggest problems with this movie is that it teases us just a bit too much early on as the camera cuts away from not one but two of Godzilla’s fights with the creatures known as MUTOs. Now at the same time I do appreciate that Edwards didn’t drop the ball on the monster fights right away, but still it’s pretty annoying to have the film cut away from some potentially awesome monster fights. As for the human characters in the film, they may not be given as much quality material to work with, and are focused on a bit more than ‘Godzilla’ if you really think about it, but then again that’s always the case with ‘Godzilla’ films. Bryan Cranston and Juliette Binoche stand out amongst the cast despite the fact that both of them are only in the film for barely 10-15 minutes. Everyone else does a fine job but most of them come off as being either rather dull (e.g. Aaron Taylor-Johnson, though for the record I don’t think he was ‘bad’ in this) or woefully underused (e.g. Elizabeth Olsen). But as is, ‘Godzilla’ is a fun little summer blockbuster that is a welcome return for the ‘King of the Monsters’… however, I kind of like ‘Pacific Rim’ more as I feel that film better delivered on its premise more than this film did. But with that said, I do look forward to the planned sequel… but for that one please filmmakers do two things for us… have Godzilla fight one of his classic foes and don’t tease the action as much.

JERSEY BOYS


Do you want to know the main reason why I was interested in this film? It wasn’t because of the source material (I haven’t seen the actual Broadway musical this was based on) or because I’m a big fan of music. It was because this film was directed by Clint Eastwood. Who would’ve ever thought that the same man who brought us films like ‘Unforgiven’ and ‘Million Dollar Baby’ would direct a musical? Well, he did, and I have to say that I really enjoyed it. I mean given the fact that there are some shady elements within this story of the origin and eventual break-up of the Four Seasons, namely some associations with the mob, it does sort of make sense for Eastwood to direct this film after all. I also liked the fact that this film had a pretty laid-back pace, even if it did mean that the film was just a little bit too long. However, I did really get into the film (after it did sort of take about twenty minutes or so to get going) thanks to a few things. First off, the music is great (I seriously don’t care if I sound like an old man; I just love this kind of music). I also liked the main cast, the majority of whom had already played these roles on stage. I know some have said that their performances feel more suited for Broadway than a film, but I still felt that the four main guys did a really good job, especially because they all had a great camaraderie. If you haven’t seen this one yet, I feel it’s worth checking out.

MALEFICENT


Fans of arguably the greatest Disney villainess of all time might be a little disappointed that this new film, a live-action retelling of ‘Sleeping Beauty’ from Maleficent’s point of view, portrays her as its protagonist rather than the main villain. However, this does actually work for two main reasons. First off, as it has been noted already by everyone, Angelina Jolie is fantastic in this. Simply put, she was perfectly cast in the role and she does make the character very sympathetic in regards to how this film portrays her not as a villain, but as someone who was betrayed who enacts revenge against those who wronged her, which I did find to be an interesting new take on her story. The second major strength of the film is the relationship between Maleficent and Aurora (Elle Fanning, who may not have as much to work with as Jolie but I have to say I found her Aurora to be much more interesting than the Aurora from the original animated film); it’s sort of a motherly relationship, which provides the real heart of the movie. First-time director Robert Stromberg (who has been known more for his work in production design… phenomenal Oscar-winning work on films like ‘Avatar’ and previous big-budget Disney tent-poles ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and ‘Oz the Great and Powerful’, I might add) makes a pretty solid debut with this film, which I found that I liked more than Tim Burton’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and almost as much as Sam Raimi’s ‘Oz the Great and Powerful’. All in all, Disney delivers another solid big-budget live-action fantasy.

CHEF


(Fun Fact: The first time I saw this, the theater I was in had to be evacuated just a few minutes after the movie started due to construction on the nearby entertainment complex located within the same mall my theater is located in. Because of that, I had to go see the film the following day instead. Thankfully no incidents occurred the second time.)

This film clearly shows that after spending the last few years directing nothing but big-budget films like the ‘Iron Man’ films and ‘Cowboys and Aliens’, Jon Favreau must’ve been fairly frustrated with the studio system. In his newest film ‘Chef’, his frustrations with Hollywood translate into the main plot in which the main character, Chef Carl Casper (played by Favreau himself in one of the best performances of his career), also feels like he’s unable to express his creativity, albeit in his case as a chef in a fancy restaurant, not as a director in Hollywood. Because of this, the film has an excellent message that you should always stay true to yourself and it really emphasizes the idea of freedom of expression. This movie is a really heartwarming feel-good film that quite frankly is just really, really pleasant to watch and amidst all of the summer blockbusters we get every year, this film is a definitely good change of pace. I don’t necessarily think that it’s one of the ‘best’ films of the year so far, mostly because I didn’t find the film to be as ‘funny’ as a lot of people were saying, but I was able to overlook that because the film is so charming that it’s really impossible not to like it. Of course if you do see it, make sure that you do eat something beforehand because otherwise if you don’t you might regret it.

NEIGHBORS


Definitely one of the best comedies of the year so far, ‘Neighbors’ works because while it is centered on a ‘turf war’ between a fraternity and a couple with a newborn baby, the film doesn’t have a ‘villain’, per se; the main couple Mac and Kelly are a likable couple (Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne have excellent chemistry; Byrne in particular is the film’s biggest standout because she just has great comedic timing) but because we see that the members of the frat are trying to become a part of their frat’s history (which is actually a pretty admirable goal), they’re not portrayed as being unlikable. Plus, having seen this with a friend of mine who is in a fraternity, I can easily verify that this film does do a very good job at portraying the brotherhood of fraternities, as these brothers will stick by each other no matter what even when they start to fight. I mean, if this film did portray these guys as being nothing than just a bunch of a-holes, I don’t think that the movie would’ve worked as well as it did and it would’ve painted frats in a negative way. Thankfully, that didn’t happen here with this film and as is, it’s a fun little film that has quite a lot of laughs.

TRANSFORMERS: AGE OF EXTINCTION


Once again, the newest Transformers film has been universally bashed by pretty much everyone and once again, I find myself in the minority as one of those who really enjoyed this film. Like with the first two Transformers sequels, I do feel that this one is definitely better than what everyone’s putting it out to be. Now I will agree that the film is overlong at a runtime of nearly 3 hours. The main reason why this is a problem is because this film could’ve easily ended at one point and had the other half of the film saved for a later release date but instead it keeps going and even I’ll admit that I was rather exhausted by the end of the film. But as is typical with Michael Bay’s ‘Transformers’ films, the visual effects and action sequences are phenomenal and while the human characters may not be the most developed characters ever, the new additions to the cast are a very much welcome breath of fresh air for the franchise, highlighted by Mark Wahlberg who proves to be a superior lead than Shia LaBeouf. I’m very eager to see what happens next for the film franchise, though I do think that it’s time for a different director to take over, just because I’m sure that Michael Bay doesn’t want to keep making these films for the rest of his life. They already take up more than a third of his directorial filmography. But as is, Bay delivers yet another entertaining popcorn flick in this lucrative franchise.

VERONICA MARS


First off, I just want to note that I wasn’t one of the contributors to this film’s Kickstarter campaign because at the time it was going on, I hadn’t seen the original show. But after that Kickstarter campaign became one of the most successful ventures ever on the site which resulted in this film being able to get made, I was finally compelled to watch the show and I’m really glad that I did. It’s easily one of the most underrated shows of this past decade and it’s really sad that it only lasted three seasons ending on a rather low note with a finale that actually would’ve been good if it had been a ‘season finale’ but instead was the ‘series finale’, leaving fans with a lot of questions left unanswered. Thankfully now we have this movie and if by any chance it means that there won’t be a follow-up, this is a much more satisfying conclusion to the series. And yeah, the movie’s basically a ‘love letter’ to the fanbase (after all, they were responsible for the movie being able to get made) which means that technically it is geared more towards the fans of the show. But still, I think that this movie can appeal to non-fans because it continued to represent why the show was so good in the first place; intriguing storylines, memorable characters, and one of the best female TV leads ever in Veronica Mars thanks to both the excellent writing and Kristen Bell’s performance in the main role. I love the show, and I loved the movie.

EDGE OF TOMORROW


I’ll be honest… I did not expect this film to be as good as it was. Now for the record I was looking forward to it but I never thought that it would get excellent reviews from critics… but it did. This film offers a much more original story than what we’re used to seeing these days though for the record this is based off of a light novel so the term ‘original’ can only go so far. ‘Edge of Tomorrow’ is a film that revolves around Tom Cruise’s character Bill Cage stuck in a time loop but the film manages not to become tiresome because of this situation. In fact, this movie’s greatest strength is its humor, which comes from Cage’s trial-and-error campaign. Speaking of Cruise, this is probably the best he’s been in quite some time, especially because his character in this does have an arc and doesn’t immediately start off as a badass soldier, like a lot of the characters that Tom Cruise tends to play these days. Also excellent in this is Emily Blunt, who hopefully will get more roles in action movies because she is a legitimate action star and her character in this is a great action heroine. This film unfortunately has been performing rather poorly at the American box office (thank god for the International box office for saving this movie from being a flop) so that means that if you haven’t seen this film yet, you’re really missing out.

TOP 5 OF THE YEAR SO FAR

5. THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2


This is easily the ‘Man of Steel’ of 2014 and by that I mean that this film has been very, very polarizing amongst both critics and audiences. How polarizing is it, you ask? Well, on my podcast group ‘The Feature Presentation’, I’m the only one of us five main guys who actually liked it; in fact, I’m really the only one of us five who actually prefers the Marc Webb directed reboot series to Sam Raimi’s original trilogy, which for the record I still like but at the same time I don’t feel is perfect. And yes, I don’t think that this film is perfect either, but I never found it to be as overcrowded, either in characters or plot-lines, as everyone was saying it is. Maybe it was and maybe that does result in a film that’s rather uneven in a lot of areas but I never really got that impression when watching this. What I really loved about this film was the cast (specifically Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone), the action sequences, and the visuals. Going back to Garfield’s performance, I also feel that this film really captured who Spider-Man was as a superhero; someone who gives the people of New York hope when all seems lost. That’s why he’s my personal favorite comic book superhero. He’s someone who is down-to-earth and just like us who just so happens to have superpowers, making him one of the most likable superheroes of all time. But I will say this about the film and, at the same time, this new Spider-Man franchise; if Sony really wants to develop their own Cinematic Universe a la Marvel, then they really need to start executing it because it’s really only teased at the end of this film. Now I do like the idea that they have in mind (e.g. ‘Sinister Six’) but again if they want it to happen, they actually have to do it. But still I do like what they want to do and I’m really looking forward to the upcoming sequels as well as the announced ‘Sinister Six’ and ‘Venom’ spinoffs… the fact that I’m saying all of this and that I have more faith in Sony than DC right now… says a hell of a lot, folks.

4. 22 JUMP STREET


One of the main reasons why most comedy sequels tend to suck is because a lot of them copy the same plot of the first film. This sequel does copy the same plot as ‘21 Jump Street’ but at the same time everyone involved with it is very self-aware of that. Not only does this film have just as much good material as the previous film had but a lot of this film’s humor comes from how the characters are very much aware of the situation they are in; they’re doing the exact same mission that they did in the first film, with the only major difference being that this time they’re going undercover at a college and not in high school. But it does work thanks to the great bromantic chemistry between Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum and a very smart script that plays off of the fact that this is basically repeating every major plot point from the first film. This is easily one of the best comedy sequels of all time, if not the best, and right now it’s my pick for the best comedy of the year. It’s another great film from the excellent directorial duo that is Phil Lord and Chris Miller. Speaking of those two…

3. THE LEGO MOVIE


Lord and Miller struck gold twice this year, starting off the year with this February release, ‘The LEGO Movie’. Now at first glance, this could have been nothing more than a glorified commercial for the LEGO brand and regardless of how good the film turned out, it sort of still is a ‘marketing gimmick’ (but really that’s unavoidable). But even with all of that in mind, the film really delivered when it came to the writing. The film has a great message that shows that we are all special in our way, whether we play by the rules or boldly go outside the box. This film speaks to both groups and this film really does a great job of representing the legacy and popularity of the brand, primarily through a great twist that was genuinely unexpected in an age where moments like that could be leaked at any time before a film even comes out, potentially ruining the moment. With terrific animation, a great voice cast but most importantly a whole lot of heart, ‘The LEGO Movie’ is easily the best animated film so far this year and at this point, as far as I’m concerned, Phil Lord and Chris Miller can do no wrong. After all, all of their film projects up to this point were deemed unlikely to be that good and once they came out, we were all proven wrong.

2. CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER


My personal favorite film of Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (not counting ‘The Avengers’) had to be ‘Captain America: The First Avenger’ for being very reminiscent of an old-school summer blockbuster but having the modern blockbuster magic at the same time. Its immediate sequel, ‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’ may be set in a different time period (in this case the present day) but the end result… is quite frankly the best solo MCU film to date. Yes folks, I feel that this film is even better than the first ‘Iron Man’. While I never minded that ‘Iron Man 3’ and ‘Thor: The Dark World’ didn’t try to connect with the MCU that much, ‘Cap 2’ really takes advantage of the grand scale of the MCU as it really sets the stage for what’s to come in future MCU movies due to some incredibly game-changing events (e.g. SHIELD taken over by HYDRA). While their previous filmography in comedy doesn’t really suggest that they’d be a good choice to direct an action film, directors Anthony and Joe Russo did an excellent job with the movie with excellent visuals, a very good amount of humor (what else would you expect from two directors that before this were mostly known for comedy), and some very well-shot action sequences that were shot in a shaky cam style but it was effective enough and wasn’t annoying (like some other movies with lots of shaky cam work recently like ‘Alex Cross’ or ‘Battle: Los Angeles’). Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, and Samuel L. Jackson give their best performances in the roles of Captain America, Black Widow, and Nick Fury to date along with a terrific supporting cast, resulting in one of the best superhero films yet… though another superhero film managed to edge it out for the best of the year so far. That other film is…

1. X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST


For many people, this was their most anticipated film of the year being that it was a film based off of an iconic X-Men storyline from the comics, had a large ensemble cast of old and new members of the film franchise, and was directed by the same man who brought the franchise into relevance in the first place, Bryan Singer. It may not have been my most anticipated film of the year (that honor went to ‘Amazing Spider-Man 2’) but overall it’s the one film this year that quite frankly delivered the most without any real disappointments. Sure, the film actually does focus more on the trio of young Professor X (James McAvoy in particular is the biggest standout of this film), young Magneto (Michael Fassbender was just excellent here as he was in ‘First Class’), and young Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence, who already did a really good job in ‘First Class’, was even better in this film). But even then this is the first time in an X-Men film where there is no weak link in the cast whatsoever. Even though a lot of members of the cast are basically just doing cameos in this film, they all do their job well in a film that quite frankly really delivers on its action and characters, really showcasing the ‘group dynamic’ that the X-Men have been known for. Singer returning to the franchise (even if, at first, it was only as a producer/writer for ‘First Class’) saved this franchise from rock bottom after the disappointing ‘X3’ and the horrible ‘Origins’… oh yeah, and now thanks to this new film we can now forget about those two as it’s clear that the filmmakers wanted to erase the mistakes made by those two films… and they did. All of this is why ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ is currently my favorite film of 2014.


But we still have half a year and this Top 5 is definitely subject to change. What new films will make my Top 12 ‘Best of’ list by the end of the year? Well, tune in near the end of the year for that list. Until then, thanks for reading and stay tuned for more movie reviews.