Showing posts with label Steve Jobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Jobs. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

TOP 12 FAVORITE FILMS OF 2015: #12-10 + Honorable Mentions


Like I’ve said before, I don’t like ending a year of film on a bad note. That’s why I do my Top 10 ‘Worst Films of the Year’ list first; so that I can get that out of the way. The internet may like talking about the bad stuff more, but not me. After all, as I’ve also mentioned before, I’m actually getting really sick of the internet’s constant cynicism, especially towards film (e.g. CinemaSins, Honest Trailers). Hence why I officially dub 2015 as ‘The Year that the Internet Overhyped Everything’. Because if you ask me, 2015 was actually a really great year for film. The main reason why was due to a better variety of films compared to last year, specifically what came out that summer. Sure we got films like ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ and ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’ but there was actually quite a severe lack of films that were, at the very least, family-friendly. Seriously aside from ‘How to Train Your Dragon 2’ and ‘Maleficent’, name me one major film geared towards families that came out that summer that wasn’t rated PG-13 or higher? There wasn’t even a Pixar film that year. This year on the other hand had much more to offer if you ask me. However, this year’s lineup of films also had to endure a lot of hype built up by the internet given all of the major films that were coming. And as evident from the responses towards some of these films, clearly film fans haven’t learned their lesson that overhyping anything is always going to end up backfiring on them. So yes, a lot of the films on this list were controversial amongst film fans in their own unique way. So expect to see me make a lot of arguments against the general internet consensus in favor of these films. I won’t lie… this was a really frustrating year for me in regards to dealing with cynical BS towards a lot of the films that I liked this year so this is pretty much my way of venting against all of that.

For those who are new to this blog, I had originally done a Top 12 list instead of the traditional ‘Top 10’ simply as a joke because I had started this blog in May 2012 and decided to do a 12-film list for 2012. However, that ended up becoming my trademark so that I could talk about as many of the films that I loved each year as possible. Before I begin, I need to lay down my three primary ground rules for this list. First of all, I have to warn you that this will be a SPOILER POST. I will be discussing the key elements of all of these films in heavy detail so if you haven’t seen any of these films, read on at your own risk. Second, like every year, I haven’t seen every single film that has come out in 2015. So you won’t be seeing films like ‘Spotlight’, ‘Ex Machina’, or ‘It Follows’ on this list. With that said, and boy do I hate having to now establish this disclaimer every year, yes my list predominantly consists of blockbusters. So if you’re a hardcore cinefile that immediately disregards this list because I don’t have many indie or award-winning films on this list, as well as the fact that some of these films weren’t very well liked by most people, I’m sorry but that’s just how I roll. I promise that I will try and make a better effort to see more indie fare in the future but for now I have to go with the films that I’ve seen which are, yes, primarily blockbusters. And finally, and most importantly (seriously I cannot stress this enough), please be respectful in regards to both my opinion and the opinions of others. These 12 films are just my personal favorites so don’t go giving me crap just because I liked a film that you didn’t like. Believe me, as I’ve been writing these posts I’ve had to deal with some particularly stingy trolls who have mocked me for liking a certain film and quite frankly it’s annoying as hell. Remember folks, film… is… subjective!! As a way to test whether or not some of you are willing to accept different opinions, I am going to make the following statement;

‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is not in my Top 12 nor is it one of my Honorable Mentions.

If you’re still here, then let’s start this 4-part retrospective of my Top 12 Favorite Films of 2015. But first, as always, let’s get the Honorable Mentions out of the Way. This year I have six to name.

KINGSMAN: THE SECRET SERVICE

Kingsman The Secret Service poster.jpg

The first major ‘Grade-A’ release of the year (at least from the films that I saw), Matthew Vaughn gave us another kinetic and highly entertaining action blockbuster with ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’, based off of the comic book series of the same name (minus the ‘Kingsman’ part) by Mark Millar, who Vaughn of course also worked with on ‘Kick-Ass’. Paying homage to the campier days of the spy genre, this film is full of crazy but awesome moments, like when Harry Hart (Colin Firth) kills a whole hate group in a church to the tune of Lynyrd Skynyrd’s ‘Free Bird’ or when the heads of almost all of the henchmen of main bad guy Richmond Valentine (Samuel L. Jackson) explode in firework-like fashion. Colin Firth shines in an against-type action role as does newcomer Taron Egerton as young Kingsman recruit Eggsy, with Egerton very much holding his own against acting heavyweights like Firth, Jackson, and Michael Caine. With one great film out of the way, it’ll be interesting to see where this film’s sequel is going to go. There’s even talk that Colin Firth may return for the sequel even though his character was killed by Valentine after the whole church sequence. Did Hart fake his death? Did he become a ghost? We’ll just have to wait and see…

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: ROGUE NATION


Now under the care of producer AKA ‘franchise savior’ J.J. Abrams, the ‘Mission Impossible’ series has really been able to stand out as one of the premier action franchises in the industry. One of Tom Cruise’s frequent collaborators, Christopher McQuarrie, took on directing duties for the fifth film, ‘Rogue Nation’, which is another highly entertaining action thrill-ride full of awesome/practically-done stunts by action superstar Cruise and featuring a particularly standout performance by Rebecca Ferguson as ‘female Ethan Hunt’ Ilsa Faust. My only gripe with the film, hence why I actually still prefer Brad Bird’s ‘Ghost Protocol’, is that this film sort of ignores one of the best elements of ‘Ghost Protocol’; the team dynamic that had been generally missing from earlier installments. While Benji (Simon Pegg) is involved just as much as Ethan Hunt is in regards to the main plot, both Brandt (Jeremy Renner) and Luther (Ving Rhames) are mostly ignored up until the third act. While it may have the advantage of a better villain in Sean Harris’ Solomon Lane, I still prefer ‘Ghost Protocol’ for its stronger balance of the roles of Ethan Hunt’s teammates. However, ‘Rogue Nation’ is easily the series’ second best installment to date and McQuarrie more than proved himself worthy enough to be chosen to helm the sixth film, a first for the series in that no other director has ever directed 2 ‘Mission Impossible’ films.

BLACK MASS


I’ve never really been in the camp who feel that Johnny Depp has been in a slump acting-wise these past few years. To me, it’s just been a case of him picking a few weak projects, some of which unfortunately ended up being major commercial bombs at the box-office like ‘The Lone Ranger’ and this year’s ‘Mortdecai’. However, with ‘Black Mass’, Depp gives one hell of a career-high performance as the legendary Boston gangster Whitey Bulger. Equally terrific, however, is Joel Edgerton as Whitey’s primary ally in the FBI, John Connolly, who orchestrated the FBI’s alliance with Whitey’s gang, the Winter Hill Gang. Admittedly the story may be a bit standard as far as the gangster genre is concerned but Depp more than commands the screen as Bulger to the point where he can be quite terrifying at times. He may or may not get an Oscar nom for his work here, but he’s definitely the highlight of this fascinating true story about one of the most notorious gangsters in U.S. history.

THE MARTIAN


Easily the best film that Ridley Scott has done in years, ‘The Martian’ is a light-hearted but epic space survival story highlighted by Matt Damon’s outstanding performance as stranded astronaut Mark Watney. His journey to get off Mars is a highly compelling one that is very smart from a scientific perspective but smartly executed to the point where it can appeal to those who aren’t familiar with the science that’s explored in this film. In other words, Watney makes science fun. I mentioned earlier that the film is ‘light-hearted’, which to some may sound a bit weird given that it’s supposed to be a survival story. Well that’s because throughout the film, Watney maintains an optimistic and occasionally witty attitude that provides us with quite a lot of funny moments, like when he accidentally causes an explosion while trying to produce water or when he expresses his displeasure with fellow crewmate Melissa Lewis’ (Jessica Chastain) collection of disco music, the only music that he can listen to while trapped on Mars. Though in the case of the latter, it means that the film has a really nice soundtrack as well as one hilariously awesome and very much fitting piece of end-credits music in the form of ‘I Will Survive’. In short, ‘The Martian’ was a really fun entry in the sci-fi genre that, if it ends up getting an Oscar nomination for Best Picture, will definitely be the fan favorite of general audiences against all of the other nominees.

STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON


Director F. Gary Gray took on the grand story of ‘the world’s most dangerous group’, N.W.A., in the biopic ‘Straight Outta Compton’. While the film is produced by band members Ice Cube and Dr. Dre and stars Cube’s son O’Shea Jackson Jr. in the role of his father, the film actually never feels very egocentric. Obviously some will view the casting of Jackson Jr. as his father as a case of nepotism but he does do a genuinely outstanding job in the role as do Corey Hawkins and Jason Mitchell in the roles of Dr. Dre and Eazy-E, respectively. It admittedly should be noted that these three are the main focus of the film, meaning that fellow N.W.A. members MC Ren and DJ Yella are basically reduced to being side characters here. And as for the film itself, it showcases both the highs and lows of N.W.A. in a solid matter without ever feeling like it’s trying way too hard to over-glorify them. The story of N.W.A. may have been a bit too large for a two-and-a-half-hour film but aside from some slow points here and there, it’s a powerful and emotionally charged biopic highlighting how a bunch of guys from one of the most dangerous cities in America rose up against the oppression they faced in their hometown to become music superstars.

STEVE JOBS


After the Ashton Kutcher-starring ‘Jobs’ turned out to be a critical disappointment, Danny Boyle and Aaron Sorkin found much more success with their take on Apple’s founder Steve Jobs. Their film is a three-act series of events that all take place before Jobs unveils major products like the Macintosh and iMac. The pairing of Boyle’s direction, even if his artistic style is downplayed in this case (which many felt was actually a good thing), and Sorkin’s electric screenplay come together to produce a fascinating look at the legendary Apple founder/personal computer pioneer. Like Mark Zuckerberg in ‘The Social Network’, Jobs is shown to be a person who is impossible to fully love or fully hate due to his tendency to piss off his associates but is clearly a technological pioneer ahead of his time. It’s also very much an actors showcase, with Michael Fassbender shining as Steve Jobs, even if he doesn’t 100% look like him, while being backed up by a terrific supporting cast that also includes Kate Winslet, Seth Rogen, and Jeff Daniels. You can definitely expect to see ‘Steve Jobs’ get some attention come awards season.

And now it’s time to begin listing off my Top 12 favorite films of 2015. Kicking off the list at #12 is the unexpected continuation of one of cinema’s most beloved franchises. But under new direction and taking a unique new path that still respects what came before it, this film ends up being another knockout effort from the ‘Rocky’ franchise.

12. CREED


When ‘Rocky Balboa’ was released back in 2006, everyone thought that this would be the end of the ‘Rocky’ franchise, including Sylvester Stallone. One of the reasons why he had done the film in the first place was to give the series a more proper sense of closure after the fifth film turned out to be a disappointment for many. And quite frankly it very much was a fitting conclusion to Rocky Balboa’s time in the ring. But then to the surprise of many, the series made a comeback this year in an arguably unexpected way. Director Ryan Coogler, fresh off of 2013’s indie darling ‘Fruitvale Station’ reteamed with his lead Michael B. Jordan for a new spin on the ‘Rocky’ franchise with ‘Creed’. This time around, the focus shifted to a new character; Adonis Johnson Creed, the illegitimate son of Apollo Creed, who takes up a boxing career just like his father. But while Rocky may no longer be the main character, he still plays a vital role in this film as Donnie ends up seeking him out so that he can be his trainer. Like the previous films in the series, ‘Creed’ really delivers on the franchise’s definitive underdog spirit, though Donnie is an underdog in a much different way compared to Rocky in the first film. In the first ‘Rocky’ film, Rocky was a nobody from Philadelphia who got the chance of a lifetime to fight Apollo Creed, the heavyweight champion of the world. In this film, Donnie also starts out as a no-name boxer but soon enough the world comes to know that he’s the son of Apollo Creed, forcing Donnie to have to live up to his father’s legacy, something that he most certainly didn’t want to have to do at first.

Ultimately Donnie’s rise to fame shares many similarities to what Rocky went through in the first film, right down to how the final fight plays out. Even though Donnie is very much the underdog against the current light heavyweight champion of the world, ‘Pretty’ Ricky Conlan, and he ultimately does end up losing the fight by a split decision, he manages to go the distance and become ‘the people’s champion’ just like Rocky did when he first fought Apollo. So while the film may not add too much to the genre, Coogler’s excellent direction, especially during the fight scenes (particularly the fight between Donnie and Leo ‘The Lion’ Sporino which was legitimately all done in one take), and the terrific performances from its leads are what truly make the film so great. Michael B. Jordan carries quite a bit of the personality that Carl Weathers brought to the role of Apollo and he has terrific camaraderie with Stallone. And as for Sly… well this might arguably be his best performance in what has been the most iconic role of his career. First of all, he once again conveys all of the great personality traits that made Rocky such a lovable character in the first place, like his great comedic timing. This is best exemplified in a scene where Rocky gives Donnie a list of training exercises that he just takes a picture of with his phone and then gives it back to Rocky, telling him that he saved it to the Cloud, to which Rocky, who clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about, confusedly looks up at the sky and asks “What cloud?”

But then Rocky has to deal with a fight of his own in this film, outside of the ring, when he’s diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which forces him to confront his own mortality more than he’s even done before. It gets to the point where he decides not to do chemotherapy and is completely willing to let life take its toll on him, figuring that there’s not much left for him in the world, especially now that both his wife Adrian and brother-in-law Paulie have passed away (in her case before the events of ‘Rocky Balboa’ and in his case before the events of this film). It’s only through encouragement from Donnie that he ‘keeps fighting’ and does go through chemo and by the end of the film when Donnie and Rocky climb the iconic ‘Rocky steps’, Rocky is shown to be slowly but surely getting better. Sly is so great in this film that hopefully he’ll get nominated for Best Supporting Actor at this year’s Oscars. After all he’s already gotten quite a few wins from other award circuits so it would be a genuine surprise if he doesn’t get any recognition from the Academy. And who knows? Maybe ‘Creed’ will get even further attention during awards season. Well, no matter what happens, ‘Creed’ is another excellent addition to the legendary franchise that is the ‘Rocky’ series. It’s a film that both respects what came before and does its own thing, effectively giving the series new life. So with that said, could we end up seeing more of Donnie’s boxing career in future films? Only time will tell…

I only have one thing to say to lead into my #11 pick… ‘Just for Kids’ my ass!

11. THE GOOD DINOSAUR


I really don’t get the argument that ‘The Good Dinosaur’ is the first Pixar film that’s solely intended ‘For Kids’. First off, I thought that ‘Cars 2’ was the first based on the general consensus towards that film though I guess those people have already forgotten about that film. And second, this is a film about dinosaurs (that includes the carnivores) that features a scene where one of the main characters bites the head off of a beetle and another scene where both main characters, for lack of a better term, go on the equivalent of an acid trip after eating some rotten berries. Yeah… totally ‘just for kids’. Clearly in regards to the two Pixar films that were released this year (a first for the studio), this was the lesser positively-received of the two. It may have something to do with the fact that A.) this was the second Pixar film released this year and was following in the footsteps of a particularly critically acclaimed film or B.) the film went through quite a few production issues before it saw release, namely a switch in director that resulted in the film being completely reworked. But despite that supposed setback, which might I add was also a case with previous Pixar films like ‘Toy Story 2’ and yet weren’t as scrutinized by the media, ‘The Good Dinosaur’ is another excellent effort from Pixar that is both beautifully animated and strong in the themes that it conveys. I’ll admit, the story is a fairly simple one; it’s a straight-forward tale of the main character Arlo trying to get home after he ends up falling into the river and gets washed far away from home. But even if the plot is simpler than some of Pixar’s other films, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t strong in terms of its overall messages.

Like ‘Wall-E’, the film doesn’t rely too much on dialogue and instead places greater emphasis on visual storytelling. There’s a scene in here where Arlo tells Spot about how he misses his family and that his dad recently died, to which Spot responds by revealing to him, without saying anything at all, that his family is gone too. While there have been some people who felt that the more cartoony looking characters didn’t mix too well with the film’s more realistic-looking backgrounds, I wasn’t too bothered by this contrast at all. As far as the story and characters are concerned, Arlo undergoes an admittedly simple but terrifically executed arc of overcoming his fears as he tries to get back home, enduring everything from vicious pterodactyls (“The Storm Provides!”) to a flash flood similar to the one that killed his father. But at the same time, the film also shows that fear can also be a good thing. As the ‘rancher’ T-Rex Butch says, “If you ain’t scared… you ain’t alive”. The film is also highlighted by a great friendship that develops between its main characters, the Apatosaurus Arlo and the cave-boy Spot (a reverse ‘boy and his dog’ story where the dinosaur is the ‘boy’ and the boy is the ‘dog’). At first, Arlo hates Spot for inadvertently being responsible for getting him into his current situation. But as time goes on, the two do begin to grow closer to each other… And I dare you not to cry at the end when they go their separate ways, specifically when Arlo nudges Spot towards his new family and when the two share one last hug goodbye. It’s a scene that I’d argue is just as emotionally powerful as anything that came out of Pixar’s other 2015 release.

I made the following argument, which my friend Kyle over at ‘Kyle’s Animated World’ made as well, in my review of the film and I’ll reiterate it here. What’s so wrong with Pixar making a film that’s not a 15/10 masterpiece? Nothing is ever perfect and yet Pixar’s track record prior to 2011 was so successful that a lot of people act like their ‘failures’ (or as I like to put it, films that don’t have at least a 90% score on RT (that includes both ‘Cars’ films, ‘Brave’, and ‘Monsters University’)) are worse than they really are. I’ve gone on record defending ‘Monsters University’ as the studio’s most underrated film to date and will also admit that I warmed up a bit more to ‘Brave’ upon re-watch. ‘Cars 2’ I’ll admit I have not seen since I saw it in theaters but I am willing to give it a second viewing. And as for ‘The Good Dinosaur’, it's definitely another underrated Pixar effort that I fear may have gotten overshadowed by its more critically acclaimed fellow 2015 brother. And unfortunately, at the moment it’s been a bit of a dud at the box-office, having only just recently gotten past its $200 million budget. Hopefully it’ll do better when it gets released in other markets like China but until then it’s currently the lowest-grossing Pixar film to date. And hey, all of you people out there who complain about Pixar doing too many sequels nowadays? Well where the hell were you when this original Pixar film needed it? Sigh… well, like my friend Kyle, I will always defend this film as being yet another terrific outing from one of the best animation companies in the industry, one that sadly hasn’t gotten the attention that it truly deserves. In my book, Pixar went ‘2 for 2’ this year.

WARNING: Hardcore Cinefiles are guaranteed to hate the film I put at #10. Seriously if you didn’t like this film, you’re not going to like what I have to say about it. Because contrary to popular opinion, I really enjoyed this film and am eager to see where the series goes from here.

10. TERMINATOR GENISYS


Yeah… crucify me… I don’t care! I loved this film. I saw it twice in theaters. I got it on Blu-Ray. In fact, it’s the first ‘Terminator’ film that I own on Blu-Ray. I liked it that much. And I recognize that a lot of people didn’t. That’s been the case with the ‘Terminator’ franchise ever since James Cameron’s first two films, after which Cameron was not involved with any of the subsequent sequels. And for the record, yes I will admit that the decision to continue the franchise after ‘Terminator 2: Judgment Day’ was an unnecessary one because that film ended on a pretty damn conclusive note, with the Connors destroying Cyberdyne and getting rid of all traces of Skynet and the Terminators. But Hollywood forged on anyway and then produced two more sequels that pulled one of the biggest retcons ever by saying that the Connors’ efforts to stop Judgment Day in the second film only postponed the inevitable doomsday. But you know what? I actually really like ‘Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines’. Was it unnecessary? Hell yea it was. But even with that in mind, the return of Arnold Schwarzenegger and some really solid action sequences at least made it a fairly entertaining sci-fi action blockbuster. ‘Terminator Salvation’, the first of the films that was actually set in the post-Judgment Day world, admittedly was quite a disappointment, primarily due to the lackluster writing, but I didn’t ‘hate it’ that much either. And now we come to ‘Terminator: Genisys’. This was one of those films that just couldn’t catch a break in the months leading up to its release.

First off, there was all the mockery directed towards the title. Yes, that’s not how you spell the word ‘genesis’. Apparently the title is a combination of that word and the computer term ‘sys’ (system). Yeah it still confuses me a bit but you know what, why complain about a film title when it has no impact on the quality of the film whatsoever? But probably the biggest controversy surrounding the film came as a result of the second trailer. Even director Alan Taylor himself was displeased with the trailer as it revealed one of the big twists of the film; that John Connor had been compromised by Skynet and turned into a Terminator. But as someone who doesn’t really get too worked up over trailers ‘giving away’ too much, it didn’t bother me too much. In fact, I was actually quite happy with the reveal because it meant that one of my favorite underrated actors working today, Jason Clarke, was going to have a much more substantial role in the film than what the first trailer for the film had suggested. But obviously, I was clearly in the minority when it came to actually liking that trailer and even though James Cameron himself stated that he did like the film (which, unlike some people, I didn’t view as a marketing ploy at all because he wasn’t involved with the film’s production whatsoever), the film did pretty badly with critics. It even has a worse RT score than ‘Salvation’. In that case, allow me to retort…

‘Genisys’ took the same route as the recent ‘Star Trek’ films, which is fitting seeing how both series are currently owned by Paramount/Skydance, by setting up a new alternate dimension. As Kyle Reese is sent back in time to the year 1984, a mysterious figure (later revealed to be the physical embodiment of Skynet) attacks John Connor, setting off a chain of events that lands Kyle in an alternate timeline. And in this timeline, the scared and vulnerable Sarah Connor that he thought he was coming for has instead changed into a badass warrior with the help of her guardian T-800. But all of that change to the series’ canon has been one of the primary sore spots for many people in regards to this film, with their argument being that the creation of an alternate timeline does away with all of the awesome stuff that happened in the previous films. I’ve even seen a few people refer to this film’s plot as being nothing more than ‘Terminator fan-fiction’. Well here’s where I debunk that myth saying that ‘alternate universe’ storylines are a bad idea. Because I can still go to Best Buy and buy both of James Cameron’s Terminator films on Blu-Ray without any trouble. For you see, folks, no matter what happens next for this series, those original films are still there for you to enjoy. It’s only in the series’ current ‘timeline’ that the events of those previous films have been ‘erased’. And hey, at the very least this film made the smart move of ignoring the retcon of the third and fourth films, re-establishing the original Judgment Day date of 1997 and not 2004. Though seriously, ‘Star Trek’ did the same thing and you don’t see anyone complain about that… oh wait, bad example, a lot of hardcore Trek fans complained about it.

Well regardless of what others say, I personally really like this idea of taking a pre-existing storyline and spinning it into a new timeline. That is because in doing so, it allows the filmmakers to explore the series’ lore and characters from a different perspective. And yes, sometimes that will result in some familiar story/character motifs reoccurring from time to time but these instances can be still be done in a different context and done really well, like in ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ with the whole Khan scenario (again, contrary to what some people might claim). I am legitimately interested in seeing where the ‘Terminator’ series continues from this point on as Sarah, Kyle, and ‘Pops’ traverse through this new timeline together, especially now that the latter has basically become a T-1000 after getting thrown into a vat of mimetic polyalloy. Because while they believe that they’ve taken down Skynet, represented in this film as the A.I. behind a new operating system in the alternate timeline version of 2017, Genisys (hence the title of the film), the mid-credits sequence shows that Skynet’s system core is still running even after the Cyberdyne facility was destroyed so it’ll be interesting to see how Skynet will reemerge as the threat that it is as the series continues. And I think it’s safe to say that Matt Smith’s character, the aforementioned physical embodiment of Skynet that is basically responsible for setting up this new timeline, will be involved in some way.

If you ask me, Alan Taylor deserves a lot of credit for being able to almost completely recreate the opening scenes of the first ‘Terminator’ film in both look and feel, save for a few re-castings (sorry folks, there ain’t no Bill Paxton in here to tell the Terminator ‘F*** you asshole!’) and the whole alternate timeline thing. And yeah, the fight between old Arnold and young Arnold was easily one of the best moments of the entire film. But to me one of the absolute best elements of the film that actually did make it work so well was the strong camaraderie amongst the main trio of Sarah, Kyle, and ‘Pops’. Emilia Clarke does a fantastic job stepping into the shoes of one of cinema’s most iconic action heroines, Sarah Connor, and Jai Courtney isn’t too far behind taking on the role of Kyle Reese. Yes, you just read that right. I actually thought that Courtney, who’s quickly become one of the most despised actors working today amongst film fans (up there with people like Shia LaBeouf) primarily for being a part of a few famous franchises’ most critically-bashed entries (e.g. ‘A Good Day to Die Hard’, this), actually did a really nice job as Reese. I’m not saying that he was better than Michael Biehn in the first film but he did his job serving as the audience avatar trying to navigate through this strange new alternate dimension. And while he isn’t in the film that much, J.K. Simmons is a major scene-stealer as O’Brien, a detective who first comes across the group in LA in 1984, nearly gets killed by the T-1000, and then comes across the trio again many years later in 2017 San Francisco and helps them out there completely accepting of what they tell him about them trying to save the world.

As for Jason Clarke as John Connor, I noted before how I did like that he had a much more substantial role in the film than I had initially thought. At first I thought that he was only going to be in the scenes set in the Judgment Day timeline before Kyle goes back in time but nope, he’s in the film more than that and yes, he plays the main villain. It’s revealed that after he was attacked by Matt Smith’s character, he was transformed into the T-3000 to ensure Skynet’s survival and sent into the future to the year 2014 to help develop its ‘cover’, Genisys. Here’s the thing… Ignoring the whole controversy regarding this reveal being shown in the second trailer, I was totally fine with this twist. Not only that, but Clarke’s become my new favorite John Connor after it had been Nick Stahl in ‘Terminator 3’ for a few years now. Clarke does a really great job in making the Terminator John Connor a pretty darn charismatic and badass villain, who’s like a more advanced version of the T-1000. I have the feeling that some viewed this as a ‘betrayal’ of the character given the fact that he’s always been portrayed as one of the series’ main protagonists. But really that’s far from the case here. See, if the scenario was that Connor was revealed to have been a villain the whole time, without having been turned into a Terminator, then I’d be more likely to say that it ‘betrayed’ everything that the character was in the other films. But instead it’s just a case where John was only turned into a villain by Skynet, which obviously works much better.

But of course I can’t talk about this film without mentioning the best part about it; ARNOLD! Whether you like the film or not, you cannot deny that the return of Arnold Schwarzenegger to the most iconic role of his career was very much welcome. This was the first time that he’s been in the role since ‘Terminator 3’ 12 years ago. He wasn’t in ‘Terminator Salvation’ (not counting his CGI double in that film) and after watching this film, I have come to the conclusion that this was arguably the biggest flaw of ‘Salvation’, even more than the writing. Simply put, you can’t have a ‘Terminator’ film without Arnold. Though with that said, I’ve heard rumors that the next film is going to be the last ‘Terminator’ film that he’s going to do which means that if that ends up being true, then the planned third film of this new trilogy is going to have one hell of a chip on its shoulder in regards to having to move on without the series’ biggest star. But anyway, back to his role in ‘Genisys’. Even though he’s now 68 years old, he still manages to kick major ass and is once again excellent in the role of the T-800, especially when it comes to his great comedic timing. Just try and tell me that you didn’t laugh at least once when he tries to smile, a nice little nod to a deleted scene from ‘Terminator 2’. And despite the occasional bickering that goes on between him and Sarah, specifically in regards to the fact that she is destined to ‘mate’ with Kyle in order to give birth to John Connor, you can actually sense that he’s developed a pretty solid father-daughter esque relationship with her. I’ll admit that on repeat viewings of the film, the scene at the end where he tells Kyle to ‘protect my Sarah’ right before he nobly sacrifices himself to destroy the T-3000 was actually a really effective emotional moment.

So yeah, that’s my whole spiel on ‘Terminator: Genisys’. Clearly I’m in the minority when it comes to liking this film and the general discontent towards it definitely showed from a commercial standpoint when this film was released this past July. Domestically it only grossed about $89.7 million, a total that was way below the film’s budget, which put Skydance’s plan of producing two more sequels to the film in jeopardy. But then in came the foreign box-office to save the day, specifically in China where it grossed over $112 million. Overseas the film managed to gross over $350 million which helped the film breakeven (I think… I’ll admit I don’t know much about this whole ‘budget’ and ‘breaking even’ process) on its $155 million budget. The planned trilogy is still up in the air but at the very least, this film was saved from being a box-office bomb by the overseas market (Thank you China!). And while obviously not too many people are keen on seeing the series continue on at this point, I am very much eager to see where it decides to go next now that it has established a new alternate reality a la ‘Star Trek’. In conclusion, I had a lot of fun with ‘Terminator: Genisys’. Is it as good as the two Cameron films? No, but obviously those two films are one hell of a tough act to follow, though that doesn’t mean that I’m holding that against the sequels that came after it. At the very least, this film does feel like a proper sequel to those films without pulling a major retcon that goes against everything that happened at the end of ‘Terminator 2’, effectively making it the best of the sequels after that film. Many of you will argue that this isn’t saying much but it is to me.


And that’s the end of Part 1 of my ‘Top 12 Favorite Films of 2015’ list. Check back tomorrow for Part 2 where I’ll be listing films #9-7.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Steve Jobs (2015) review


What more can be said about Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, that hasn’t been said before? The man was one of the main pioneers of the personal computer revolution when he and fellow co-founder Steve Wozniak founded Apple Inc. in 1976 and produced the Apple II one year later. After that, Jobs would go on to develop numerous groundbreaking electronic products from the iMac to the iPod to the iPhone. He also helped invest in a computer graphics company when it spun-out from Lucasfilm in 1986; today we know that company as Pixar. Sadly Jobs passed away on October 5, 2011, leaving behind a legacy unmatched by many. A major part of that legacy is explored in director Danny Boyle’s new biopic, ‘Steve Jobs’. This is actually the second Steve Jobs biopic to come out in the last three years, the other being the 2013 film ‘Jobs’ starring Ashton Kutcher in the lead role. However that film was neither a critical or commercial success. ‘Steve Jobs’ on the other hand, which stars Michael Fassbender as Jobs, is a different story. Not only is it directed by an Oscar-winning director but the screenplay, based off of the official ‘Steve Jobs’ biography by Walter Isaacson, was written by renowned screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, writer of the hit TV series ‘The West Wing’ as well as another notable ‘biopic’ based around a technological breakthrough, ‘The Social Network’. The combined efforts of Boyle and Sorkin produce a highly compelling biopic that is as well-made as many of the products that its main subject produced.

‘Steve Jobs’ is set up as a three-act story, with each act of the film focusing on the moments leading up to the launches of three major products that Steve Jobs (Michael Fassbender) was associated with. The first act focuses on the launch of the Apple Macintosh in 1984 following the iconic ‘1984’ commercial that aired during Super Bowl XVIII. The second act of the film takes place in 1988, after Steve Jobs was removed from the company following the disappointing commercial performance of the Macintosh. He went on to found the company ‘NeXT’, which developed the ‘NeXT Computer’ in 1988. Finally, the film cuts to 1998, after Jobs was reinstated as Apple CEO, as he prepares to debut the iMac. In each of these three sequences, we see Jobs and his marketing executive Joanna Hoffman (Kate Winslet) prepare for each event while Jobs deals with situations involving some of his associates, including fellow Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogen), who continuously requests that Jobs highlight the Apple II team in his speeches, and then-Apple CEO John Sculley (Jeff Daniels), whose father-son esque relationship with Jobs starts to falter when Jobs gets ousted from Apple. But perhaps the most pressing of dilemmas for Jobs revolves around him eventually trying to take responsibility as the father of his high school sweetheart Chrisann Brennan’s (Katherine Waterston) daughter, Lisa (played at different ages by Perla Haney-Jardine, Ripley Sobo, and Makenzie Moss).

For a film that is basically just three separate sequences showcasing what happened behind the scenes at product launches, without even showing any of the actual event itself, ‘Steve Jobs’ is a biopic that never misses a beat and never once feels repetitive. This is the result of two major forces; Sorkin’s writing and Boyle’s direction. These two elements help keep the film flowing smoothly and while Boyle’s artistic directorial style isn’t really on full display here compared to his other films, there are still quite a few instances of that style being present throughout. One of the primary examples of this is the fact that each of the film’s three acts were shot in a different film format (16mm for 1984, 35mm for 1988, and digital for 1998), which obviously connects perfectly with the technological advances that Apple achieved over that period of time. Ultimately though the real highlight of the film is Sorkin’s screenplay. While it’s been made clear that the film isn’t exactly historically accurate, that and I’m pretty certain that the dialogue Sorkin wrote wasn’t actually spoken, Sorkin’s writing helps us delve into the psyche of Jobs, primarily through his relationships with his co-workers, friends, and family. Not only that, but each act of the film, though set in different times, all feel strongly connected thanks to familiar beats that occur in each sequence (e.g. conversations that Jobs has with specific people).

‘Steve Jobs’ is a prime example of an actor’s showcase, with each member of the cast shining thanks to the strong writing of Sorkin. There’s been a lot of talk about how Michael Fassbender doesn’t really look like Steve Jobs but like with Tom Hanks in ‘Saving Mr. Banks’, it’s more about the actual performance than whether or not the lead actor/actress looks exactly like the person they’re portraying. And with that in mind, Fassbender delivers one of the best performances of the year. As Jobs, Fassbender perfectly captures the Apple co-founder’s vision and attitude, striving for perfection even if it means pissing everyone off to get to it. Like Sorkin’s version of Mark Zuckerberg in ‘The Social Network’, Jobs is someone who can’t be entirely painted as either a hero or villain. Because like Zuckerberg, he really did know what he was doing. As many people have pointed out, he was a master showman and his presentations were the technological equivalent of a rock concert. It’s just that it results in him being unable to work well with others. As noted earlier, a lot of the film revolves around the relationship with Jobs has with various people. We can sense a real brotherhood between Jobs and Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogen, in a rare dramatic turn, provides a more down-to-earth voice compared to Jobs’ more biting/calculating personality), the father-son like relationship that Jobs has with John Sculley (Jeff Daniels of course is a veteran when it comes to Sorkin’s writing having starred in his series ‘The Newsroom’), and the more personal relationships that Jobs has with both Joanna Hoffman (Winslet is the film’s other big standout as the only person who, for the most part, is able to put up with Jobs) and his daughter Lisa.

Just a quick disclaimer; at the time I am writing this review I have not seen the 2013 Steve Jobs biopic ‘Jobs’ starring Ashton Kutcher and given that film’s generally negative reception it’s probably unlikely that I’ll watch it anytime soon, especially after watching the much more acclaimed Danny Boyle directed, Aaron Sorkin written version. Suffice it to say, these two really went above and beyond in this well-made biopic that is a direct combination of the former’s direction and the latter’s writing talents. The end result is a highly engrossing biopic that explores the fascinating life of one of the world’s most famous technological pioneers, just like what Sorkin did with David Fincher (who at one point was even slated to direct this film) in ‘The Social Network’, while also showcasing that while he may have been hard to work with, he was clearly ahead of the curve when it came to knowing where technology would end up taking us in the future. And while Michael Fassbender may not look exactly like Steve Jobs, performance-wise he gives it his all alongside the equally terrific supporting cast. Needless to say, in a few months you can expect to see this film become a major player during awards season. Maybe even a few Oscar nominations?


Rating: 4.5/5

Thursday, October 1, 2015

2015 Preview: October

The Fall/Awards Movie Season continues as we look into the month of Halloween, October. Quite a lot to talk about this month, especially when compared to September. That’s usually the case around this time of the year; the season really gets started in October. But anyway, welcome back to Rhode Island Movie Corner’s year-long preview of the films that are set to come out in 2015. This is Part 10 of 12 and today we’ll be looking at the films that will be hitting theaters this October. Let’s get started…

OCTOBER 2- One main wide release and an IMAX exclusive debut to kick off the month. Aside from that, the Denis Villeneuve/Emily Blunt pic ‘Sicario’ will make its nationwide debut.


*Matt Damon stars in Ridley Scott’s latest film, ‘The Martian’, based off of the novel of the same name by Andy Weir. In it, he plays an astronaut who ends up getting stranded on Mars, resulting in him having to survive on the Red Planet while his crew tries to rescue him. The film’s big ensemble cast also includes Jessica Chastain, Jeff Daniels, Michael Pena, and Kate Mara.


*Debuting early on September 30th exclusively in IMAX theaters, ‘The Walk’, directed by Robert Zemeckis, is the true story of high-wire artist Phillipe Petit’s famous tightrope walk between the Twin Towers on August 7, 1974. Joseph Gordon-Levitt stars as Petit and the film also stars Ben Kingsley, Charlotte Le Bon, and James Badge Dale.

OCTOBER 9- One main wide release this week while ‘The Walk’ expands into all theaters nationwide.


*Director Joe Wright brings to life the world of Neverland in this prequel to J.M. Barrie’s classic novel ‘Peter Pan’, ‘Pan’. It’s the story of how the young Peter Pan (Levi Miller) is first brought to Neverland and how he first met James Hook (Garrett Hedlund). The film also stars Hugh Jackman as the main villain Blackbeard and Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily.

OCTOBER 16- A trio of new wide releases include the latest from directors Steven Spielberg and Guillermo Del Toro.


*Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg reunite for the first time in over a decade with ‘Bridge of Spies’. Co-written by the Coen Brothers, the film, based on a true story, stars Hanks as lawyer James B. Donovan, who in 1962 negotiated the release of captured U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers (Austin Stowell) from the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The film also stars Mark Rylance, Amy Ryan, and Alan Alda.


*Guillermo Del Toro returns to his horror roots with ‘Crimson Peak’. Mia Wasikowska stars as a young author who moves into the haunted estate of her new husband (Tom Hiddleston) and his sister (Jessica Chastain), where she comes across all sorts of ghostly beings.


*The classic children’s horror series by R.L. Stine, ‘Goosebumps’, gets brought to the big screen. Jack Black stars as R.L. Stine himself as the film centers on him, his daughter Hannah (Odeya Rush), and their new neighbor Zack (Dylan Minnette) as they try and stop the monsters of his stories when they are accidentally unleashed from their books.

OCTOBER 23­- Boy oh boy is this a busy week. Six (!) new releases, one of which is a nationwide expansion.


*Bradley Cooper stars in director John Wells’ ‘Burnt’ alongside a big ensemble cast that also includes Cooper’s ‘American Sniper’ co-star Sienna Miller as well as Daniel Bruhl, Alicia Vikander, Lily James, Uma Thurman, and Emma Thompson. Cooper plays a chef named Adam Jones (and I’m only saying that because that was one of the working titles for the film) who looks to establish a prestigious London restaurant but must overcome his personal problems that had previously derailed his career.


*In a rare non-horror turn for Blumhouse Productions, we have ‘Jem and the Holograms’, based off of the toy line and 80’s animated series of the same name. Directed by Jon M. Chu (‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’ and, yes, two Justin Bieber concert films), the film, like the original series, centers on a group of friends who form a hit rock band. The film stars Audrey Peeples, Molly Ringwald, and Juliette Lewis.


*But then there’s the other Blumhouse Productions release this week, which serves as the return of the ‘Paranormal Activity’ franchise. Reportedly the ‘final’ installment of the series, ‘Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension’ will revolve around the protagonists actually being able to see the ‘paranormal activity' this time around.


*Vin Diesel stars in and produces ‘The Last Witch Hunter’, in which he stars as the ‘titular’ witch-hunter who teams up with, of all people, a witch to take down the covens of New York City. The film also stars Elijah Wood and Michael Caine.


*In director Barry Levinson’s ‘Rock the Kasbah’, Bill Murray stars as a down-on-his-luck manager who finds a young girl from Afghanistan with an incredible voice and manages her as she competes in the Afghanistan equivalent of ‘American Idol’. The film also stars Bruce Willis, Zooey Deschanel, Kate Hudson, and Danny McBride.


*And finally from this week there’s the nationwide expansion of the Danny Boyle directed and Aaron Sorkin written biopic ‘Steve Jobs’. Michael Fassbender stars as the titular co-founder of Apple as the film will be based around three major product launches. The film also stars Seth Rogen as fellow Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Kate Winslet as Mac and NeXT team member Joanna Hoffman, and Jeff Daniels as former Apple CEO John Sculley.

OCTOBER 30- After all of those wide releases on the 23rd, the month ends on an easier note with only two main wide releases.


*Sandra Bullock stars in ‘Our Brand is Crisis’, which is a ‘remake’ of a 2005 documentary of the same name that was about the 2002 presidential elections in Bolivia and how one of the candidates enlisted the help of an American political consulting firm to help him win the election. Bullock stars as the politician’s manager alongside Billy Bob Thornton as her rival political consultant.  



*Finally, there’s ‘Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse’, in which a trio of scouts have to help their town deal with a zombie outbreak.

And those are the films that are set to come out this October. Check back next week for Part 11 of this year-long preview as we’ll be looking at the films that will be hitting theaters in November.