Wednesday, February 24, 2016

88th Academy Awards: Predictions


While I won’t get into the reason why just yet, obviously it is shaping up to be quite a controversial and tense Oscar ceremony this year. The 88th Academy Awards, hosted by Chris Rock, who previously hosted the show in 2005, will be presented on February 28th, honoring the many great films that came out this past year. But like with every Oscar ceremony, there’s been quite a lot of controversy surrounding it and not just for the one thing that everyone’s talking about at the moment (which, again, we’ll get to later on). Every year’s ceremony is subjected to much criticism and scrutiny by film fans over the nominations; who got nominated and who didn’t, etc. But as for me, I’ve moved on from complaining about snubs and all that noise because I feel that it’s just pointless to get worked up over stuff like this. Award shows are just as subjective as film itself. No matter how ‘accurate’ these shows are in honoring the best in film from the past year, they never fully please anyone. Everyone has their own opinion on who and what should win; for example, if I had a hand in picking the awards, I would give a lot of them to blockbusters like ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Tomorrowland’ because those were some of my favorite films from 2015. So in other words, do not expect me to point out a lot of ‘snubs’ in this post. Because if you ask me, people shouldn’t be taking the Oscars THAT seriously because they’re not meant to represent the be-all and end-all of film opinions. I don’t take them that seriously and yet still enjoy watching the show every year for the pageantry and excitement of it all.  

So with that said, today I’ll be listing my predictions for this year’s Academy Awards from the technical categories like ‘Best Visual Effects’ and ‘Best Score’ to the big ones like ‘Best Actor/Actress’, ‘Best Supporting Actor/Actress’, and of course, ‘Best Picture’. For the record, though, I will not be covering every single one of the 24 Oscar categories in this post, and the primary reason for that is in the case that I haven’t seen enough of the films featured in that category, which is usually the films nominated for ‘Best Foreign Film’ and ‘Best Documentary’. I will say though that, for the second year in a row, I have been able to watch all eight of the nominees for Best Picture. So when we get to that category, I’m just going to rank all of those films from least favorite to my #1 pick. And of course, as I just pointed out earlier, this is all subjective so be sure to sound off in the comments below to give your own picks for this year’s Oscars. So, without further ado, here are my picks for the 88th annual Academy Awards.

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS

*EX MACHINA

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE MARTIAN

*THE REVENANT

*STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS

MY PICK: STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS


I have the feeling that a lot of cinefiles are rooting for ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ to win this award for its predominantly practical effects work, particularly in regards to the action sequences. Another possible favorite for them is ‘Ex Machina’, with its impressive effects on a small budget. But as great as the effects in both of those films were, my vote goes to another film that, like ‘Mad Max’, also made the effort to do as many practical effects as possible; ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’. And I’m just going to get this out of the way right now… I’m legitimately a little disappointed that it didn’t get a Best Picture nomination. I mean, sure, I have the feeling that it wouldn’t have won anyway given the other films in that category but the film was a legit critical hit with both fans and audiences. This wasn’t like the highly polarizing prequels; this was a genuine critically acclaimed hit so I think it should’ve at least gotten some more recognition from the Academy than just getting nominations in the technical categories. Well, at the very least, it’ll probably go home with at least one or two technical awards and I feel that Visual Effects is its best chance at an Oscar. After the much-maligned heavily-CGI developed nature of the prequels, J.J. Abrams brought back the series’ original tradition of having as many practical effects and real sets as possible, something that he also did with his ‘Star Trek’ films. The end result is most certainly one of the best-looking films of the year, hence why it earns my vote for best visual effects.

P.S. Don’t get too mad, ‘Fury Road’ fans, that film will get my runner-up spot in this category.

BEST FILM EDITING

*THE BIG SHORT

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE REVENANT

*SPOTLIGHT

*STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS

MY PICK: STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS


Once again I’m going with ‘Star Wars’ because editing is pretty darn crucial to the energetic nature of these films that make them so entertaining. In fact, some would argue that the editing was what saved the original ‘Star Wars’ from being a disaster all those years ago. For my runner-up pick, I’ll go with ‘The Big Short’. There were definitely a lot of quick edits in that film but I thought it all worked pretty well in conveying the chaos of the troubled economy of the time. 

BEST COSTUME DESIGN

*CAROL

*CINDERELLA

*THE DANISH GIRL

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE REVENANT

MY PICK: CINDERELLA


Admittedly I can’t say much about this category so I’ll just make it quick. My vote goes to the excellent costume design from my #3 favorite film of last year, Cinderella, as done by legendary costume designer Sandy Powell. Simply put, Powell’s period-piece costumes were just as beautiful as the film itself, particularly Cinderella’s iconic blue ball-gown. My runner-up pick goes to ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’. After all, costume design is a vital part to any ‘Mad Max’ film. In fact, I have the feeling ‘Fury Road’ is actually going to win this award this Sunday instead. Still, even with that in mind, ‘Cinderella’ does take my pick for this category partially because I kind of want to see a win for one of my favorite films from this past year.

BEST MAKEUP/HAIRSTYLING

*THE 100-YEAR OLD MAN WHO CLIMBED OUT THE WINDOW AND DISAPPEARED (Try saying that title five times fast)

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE REVENANT

MY PICK: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD


Admittedly I don’t know how much I can truly say about ‘Fury Road’ when it comes to hairstyling seeing how two of the main characters, Furiosa and Nux, and all of the War Boys were bald. The makeup for the film was much more noteworthy, though, especially in regards to the pretty darn iconic look of the War Boys.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

*CAROL

*THE HATEFUL EIGHT

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE REVENANT

*SICARIO

MY PICK: THE REVENANT- EMMANUEL LUBEZKI


I’ve already talked about this film a couple of days ago so I won’t try to repeat myself too much here. Simply put, ‘The Revenant’ was one of the absolute best-looking films of the year thanks to Emmanuel Lubezki’s amazing cinematography, from the beautiful and occasionally wintry forest landscapes to the fact that he and Inarritu basically shot the entirety of the film with only natural lighting. For my runner-up pick, I’m going to go with the other wintry film in this category; Quentin Tarantino’s ‘The Hateful Eight’. That film prided itself on its cinematography as it was shot in glorious 70mm. And while I never got the chance to see the film in that style, the film was still one great-looking film with its wintery mountain backdrops and wide shots.   

BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN

*BRIDGE OF SPIES

*THE DANISH GIRL

*MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*THE MARTIAN

*THE REVENANT

MY PICK: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD


While I may not have been as big on ‘Fury Road’ as, well, most of the internet was, that doesn’t mean that I won’t be giving it any attention with these predictions. I’m sure it’s going to win a few awards this Sunday. So with that in mind, ‘Fury Road’ does earn my pick for Best Production Design because let’s face it, that’s the best aspect of the film. Hell, that’s arguably the best part of any ‘Mad Max’ film, and ‘Fury Road’ arguably outshines them all. George Miller and comic artist Brendan McCarthy spent years coming up with the designs for the vehicles and the final result is truly one for the ages, from Immortan Joe’s ‘Gigahorse’, made from the frames of not one but two Cadillac Coupe de Villes, to the insanity that is the ‘Doof Wagon’, an 8-wheeler complete with a line of drummers, big speakers, and of course everyone’s favorite flame-throwing guitar wielder, the Doof Warrior. And that’s just in regards to the vehicles. The whole film is one gorgeous-looking effort from the filmmakers and the eye-popping color palette produces one great looking cinematic experience. I don’t even have a Runner-Up for this category because I don’t see how any of the other four films are going to beat ‘Fury Road’. It’s won nearly every major award for Production Design this awards season and I think it’s safe to say the film will earn that same award from the Academy this Sunday.

BEST SOUND MIXING/EDITING

MY PICKS: STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS


I’ll admit that I don’t know too much about sound mixing and sound editing so I can’t say much about it here. In short, my vote for both of these categories goes to ‘Star Wars’ because in some ways I feels that the sound design of the film is just as important as everything else that goes into making it all work. For runner-up, I’m again going to go with the same film for both categories; ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’. The reason? Well remember that scene in the film where Max is on a long pole and moves across the screen as a big-ass explosion happens behind him? That moment was one of the best uses of a theater’s sound system that I’ve ever witnessed. You really could feel the thundering nature of that explosion even when considering the fact that you were just sitting in a theater watching it happen onscreen. In fact, I kind of have the feeling that my runner-up pick might end up being the actual frontrunner for both of these categories. Who knows?   

BEST ORIGINAL SONG

*EARNED IT (FIFTY SHADES OF GREY)

*MANTA RAY (RACING EXTINCTION)

*SIMPLE SONG #3 (YOUTH)

*TIL IT HAPPENS TO YOU (THE HUNTING GROUND)

*WRITING’S ON THE WALL (SPECTRE)

MY PICK: ‘TIL IT HAPPENS TO YOU’


I actually have to admit that when I was originally writing this section of the post, my original pick for Best Song was the criminally underrated theme from the criminally underrated Bond film ‘Spectre’; Sam Smith’s ‘Writing’s on the Wall’. Admittedly, the primary reason why I wanted it to win was just so that in doing so, it would go against all of the criticism that the song got when it first debuted online because I do think that it’s a really good Bond theme, especially in regards to its orchestration and romanticized feel reminiscent of past Bond themes like ‘Nobody Does It Better’ and ‘For Your Eyes Only’. However, after listening to the other nominees, my pick changed to Lady Gaga’s emotionally powerful piece from the documentary ‘The Hunting Ground’, ‘Til it Happens to You’. ‘The Hunting Ground’ covers a really serious topic in regards to sexual assaults on college campuses and without having seen the actual film, this song is easily one of the best that Lady Gaga has ever done. She herself has been a victim of sexual assault in the past along with another member of her family so this song clearly must have meant a lot to her and it shows in her performance. This whole year has been a big one for Lady Gaga, as she also recently, and in some online circles rather controversially, won a Golden Globe for her role in ‘American Horror Story: Hotel’. And I think it’s safe to say she’ll probably be adding a well-earned Oscar win to her long line of accolades this Sunday.

But what about the other songs in this category? While it may not be my #1 pick anymore, ‘Writing’s on the Wall’ is still my runner-up pick of the other 4 nominees for the reasons that I listed earlier. ‘Manta Ray’ from the documentary ‘Racing Extinction’ has a nice melody to it but I’m not as positive on the vocals. I can’t really explain why but I feel that the song would’ve just worked better as an instrumental piece. As for ‘Simple Song #3’ from the film ‘Youth’, it too has a very nice and calming melody, in this case courtesy of a violin accompaniment. It also features a really nice performance by South Korean singer Sumi Jo, resulting in a very relaxing song that played a major part in the film, represented as a piece that had been written by Michael Caine’s character. And finally, want to know a fun way to stun a lot of cinefiles? Tell them that ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ got an Oscar nomination. That’s right, ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’, one of the most mocked films of last year, can now bear the distinction of being an Oscar nominated film. But you know what? For as much flak as I know that I’m going to get for this, I’m not bothered by this, simply because the film actually did have a pretty decent soundtrack. Though with that said… why ‘Earned It’? I thought the big one from that soundtrack was ‘Love Me Like You Do’ by Ellie Goulding. That was the one that got nominated for a Golden Globe. But then again, ‘Earned It’ won a Grammy so I guess it was technically the ‘bigger’ song on that album. I’m not defending the film or anything, in fact it was on my Top 10 worst of the year list, but even lousy films can have a solid soundtrack every now and then and, at the very least, I can say that about ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’… which is pretty much one of the only positive things that I can say about it.

P.S. Hey Academy, why no nom for ‘See You Again’ from ‘Furious 7’?

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE

*THOMAS NEWMAN- BRIDGE OF SPIES

*CARTER BURWELL- CAROL

*ENNIO MORRICONE- THE HATEFUL EIGHT

*JOHANN JOHANNSSON- SICARIO

*JOHN WILLIAMS- STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS

MY PICK: THE HATEFUL EIGHT


As much as I would love to give my pick to John Williams for his always excellent work for the ‘Star Wars’ franchise, my vote this year actually goes to another legendary film composer, Ennio Morricone, who provided the score for Quentin Tarantino’s latest balls-to-the-wall film epic, ‘The Hateful Eight’. As many others will no doubt point out, there’s a very haunting quality to Morricone’s score which matches pretty damn perfectly with the tension that comes from the story and the snowy landscape. Some have even said that the score feels like something out of a horror film, which is actually a pretty decent analogy seeing how Morricone did the score for John Carpenter’s ‘The Thing’, which just so happened to star ‘The Hateful Eight’s Kurt Russell. I should probably also point out that Morricone actually hasn’t won an Oscar yet for his work despite his long and historic run in the film industry. He did win an ‘Honorary Academy Award’ in 2007 but has never won an official Oscar for Best Score despite having been nominated five times before for films like ‘Days of Heaven’ and ‘The Untouchables’. So yeah, I think it’s high time to give Morricone an Oscar. But for my runner-up pick, I’m still going to go with John Williams for his work on the latest ‘Star Wars’ film. Simply put, Williams and ‘Star Wars’ go together as well as PB&J.

BEST ANIMATED SHORT FILM

MY PICK: SANJAY’S SUPER TEAM


I’ll admit that I haven’t seen four of the five nominees for Animated Short Film so I’m just going to cut to the chase… my vote goes to Pixar’s ‘Sanjay’s Super Team’, which was released in theaters along with ‘The Good Dinosaur’. Sadly, no nomination was given to the short that ran with ‘Inside Out’, ‘Lava’. Based on what I’ve seen online it seems like that one didn’t do as well with critics which is a shame because I personally thought it was great. I thought it was really charming, had some gorgeous animation, and I love the title song for it. But anyway, I’m getting off track… back to ‘Sanjay’s Super Team’. Watching this short, you can most certainly sense how personal of a project this was to its creator, Sanjay Patel. This was directly inspired by Sanjay’s childhood growing up in San Bernardino, where he struggled at times with his identity due to him both following his family’s Indian traditions and acting like your typical American kid through watching cartoons and playing with action figures. This translates well into a short that has a lot of heart to it, especially in regards to its ‘father-son’ story as the father and son come to accept both of these identities instead of each of them favoring one over the other. And of course, the animation is excellent, even bringing in a cool superhero vibe. The Hinduist designs produce a superb, colorful, and exotic style that gives the short a nice original look unseen anywhere else. And speaking of Pixar…

BEST ANIMATED FILM

Well I’ve only seen one of these films so, again, I’ll just cut to the chase. My pick goes to…

MY PICK: INSIDE OUT


What more needs to be said about ‘Inside Out’? While I’m not one of the people who always expects Pixar to deliver a 15/10 masterpiece with every film, ‘Inside Out’ does its purpose of satisfying ‘that crowd’, being the first Pixar film since ‘Toy Story 3’ to receive universally positive reviews from critics and audiences. And rightfully so as it was definitely one of the studio’s finest and arguably most mature efforts to date. Not only did it develop a pretty unique concept around the idea of personified emotions that guide us through our daily lives (and yes, I’m aware of the ‘Herman’s Head’ comparisons. Moving on.), but it also handled them in a very mature way through putting the main character of Riley through situations that a lot of us can relate to, whether it’s moving to a new town/city like San Francisco or starting class at a new school. And yes, as ironic as it is to say given the fact that this is a film based around emotions, there are some very, very emotional scenes throughout this film that are guaranteed to make you tear up. Pair that with some of Pixar’s most colorful animation to date and a terrific voice cast highlighted by Amy Poehler and Phyllis Smith in the roles of Joy and Sadness, respectively, and you have an animated masterpiece that definitely deserved all of the praise that it got when it was released. Though shockingly, it didn’t get a nomination for Best Picture, which definitely surprised a lot of people given how critically acclaimed it was and the fact that previous critically acclaimed Pixar films like ‘Up’ and ‘Toy Story 3’ did end up getting nominated for Best Picture as well as for Best Animated Feature. Well, at the very least, I think it’s safe to say that this is the front-runner for this particular category.

While I haven’t seen the other films in this category, I’m sure they were great as well. This includes what may be Studio Ghibli’s final film ‘When Marnie Was There’, Aardman Animation’s ‘Wallace and Gromit’ spin-off ‘Shaun the Sheep Movie’, and Charlie Kaufman’s highly acclaimed stop-motion animated flick ‘Anomalisa’. However, this also resulted in two fairly disappointing snubs in my opinion in regards to some of the other really great animated films from this past year. One was Pixar’s other 2015 release ‘The Good Dinosaur’, which unfortunately pretty much confirmed the film’s status as a severe under-performer for the company. It only grossed about $300 million at the box-office and while ‘Inside Out’ was critically acclaimed by both critics and audiences alike, ‘The Good Dinosaur’ was received on the same level as ‘Brave’ and ‘Monsters University’, which is sad because I think that it’s really underrated, even if it is much simpler in execution compared to ‘Inside Out’. The other big snub was Blue Sky Studios’ ‘The Peanuts Movie’. And while I know it wasn’t the most critically acclaimed animated film of the year, I really, really loved this film as I felt it was one of the most heartwarming films of 2015 by resurrecting one of the most classic franchises in pop culture history but doing it with class and affection for the source material, which is a very big deal considering that the filmmakers made the risky venture of bringing the world of Peanuts to computer animation.  

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

*THE BIG SHORT

*BROOKLYN

*CAROL

*THE MARTIAN

*ROOM

MY PICK: THE MARTIAN


This category is a bit trickier to decide because I haven’t read any of the books that these five films were based off. So instead, I have to base this pick around which screenplay was the most well-written in my opinion. So for my pick, I’m going with Drew Goddard’s screenplay for ‘The Martian’ for making the complicated science that it covers easy to understand without talking down to the audience. For my runner-up pick, I’m going to go with a more serious screenplay in the form of ‘Room’. ‘Room’ primarily focused on a young boy experiencing the outside world for the first time in his life after he and his mom escape their captor who had kidnapped the mother years earlier and trapped them within a tiny shed they call ‘Room’, hence the title of the film. Obviously it is a very emotionally devastating story but it is one that is executed perfectly thanks to the direction, the cast, and a solid screenplay that does a fantastic job in conveying both the boy’s new life experiences and his mother’s struggles with re-adjusting to normal life. 

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

*BRIDGE OF SPIES

*EX MACHINA

*INSIDE OUT

*SPOTLIGHT

*STRAIGHT OUTTA COMPTON

MY PICK: INSIDE OUT


Why not? If you ask me, I’d say this award should go to Pixar’s latest masterpiece, which would actually be a first for an animated feature as usually those films only get recognized for the ‘Best Animated Feature’ award with a rare few occasionally getting a ‘Best Picture’ nom as well. And because ‘Inside Out’ didn’t get a Best Picture nom this year, I think that giving it the award for Best Original Screenplay would be a nice way to compensate for that ‘snub’ by honoring one of the most maturely written screenplays that Pixar has ever done. For my runner-up pick, I’m going to go with ‘Spotlight’. Like ‘Room’, it covers a heavy subject, in this case a sexual abuse scandal involving Roman Catholic priests, but handles it with maturity by sympathizing with the victims of this scandal, not over-glorifying its protagonists, and also conveying the effect that this scandal had on the people of Boston.

Before I get into the acting categories, it’s now time for me to finally address the elephant in the room; the Oscar diversity issue… again. Yes, for the second year in a row, all of the nominees in the acting categories are white with no minority actors or actresses getting a nomination. This controversy, which spawned the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag, was an issue last year as well but it has torpedoed into a full-blown outrage this year now that it’s happened again. It’s gotten to the point where some folk in the industry, like Spike Lee and Will and Jada Pinkett Smith, have announced that they’re boycotting the ceremony… and I’m just going to be frank… I feel that the whole boycotting situation is rather ridiculous. Now for the record, I’m not saying that this diversity thing isn’t an issue. It is, and thankfully the Academy has made it clear that they recognize the issue at hand as well and are now taking considerable efforts to prevent something like this from happening again. But remember in the intro to this post how I said no one should take the Oscars ‘that’ seriously? Well, the same principle applies here because it’s not entirely the Academy’s fault that this has happened. I concur with people like Whoopi Goldberg who say that it’s more of an issue with the film industry in general for not giving enough roles to minorities. And to quote Goldberg again, boycotting the show would be a huge disservice to Chris Rock, who has to weather all of this as this year’s host.  

Now, sure, the Academy could’ve done a much better job at highlighting minority performances from this past year, like the cast of ‘Straight Outta Compton’ or Samuel L. Jackson in ‘The Hateful Eight’. But at the end of the day, they’re just voting for a winner. They’re not the ones who are responsible for making the films that come out every year. All that they’re doing is just listing some of the best performances of the year and picking four names out of the 20 that are nominated. Of course these award shows are just as subjective as film itself and as some have argued, considering the fact that the acting categories are limited to five names per category, it’s really hard to limit down the best performances of the year to just five. Similar to how the Best Picture category has grown in size from five nominees to ten nominees and then a random number of nominees every year for some reason, some suggest that the acting categories should be expanded from just five performances from the past year. But at the end of the day, that’s as much as I’m going to say about this whole Oscar diversity thing because I don’t like to normally talk about this stuff when it comes to film. That doesn’t mean I don’t recognize the issues at hand, I just don’t like talking about them. And again, I do recognize the issue at hand with the Academy’s troubles when it comes to diversity. However, this whole diversity issue is more of an issue with the film industry in general than it is in regards to a simple awards ceremony. Now that I’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get into this year’s nominees for Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, and Best Supporting Actress.  

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

*JENNIFER JASON LEIGH- THE HATEFUL EIGHT

*ROONEY MARA- CAROL

*RACHEL MCADAMS- SPOTLIGHT

*ALICIA VIKANDER- THE DANISH GIRL

*KATE WINSLET- STEVE JOBS

MY PICK: JENNIFER JASON LEIGH


Of these next categories, Best Supporting Actress was the hardest to pick because this category is full of terrific performances across the board. While ‘The Danish Girl’ ended up being a rather polarizing film in regards to how it handled the true story of Einar Wegener/Lili Elbe, Alicia Vikander was easily the film’s biggest highlight, even outshining her co-star Eddie Redmayne in the role of Einar/Lili’s wife Gerda Wegener. Again, while the film itself didn’t really cover the complete story of Lili and Gerda, Vikander’s performance helped give the film a really good amount of heart and emotion, resulting in one of many great performances from her in what has most certainly been her breakout year. Another terrific performance that stood toe to toe with the film’s main lead was Kate Winslet in the role of Steve Jobs’ confidant Joanna Hoffman in the Apple founder’s titular biopic. Winslet, who has already proven herself time and time again to be one of the best actresses in the businesses, more than held her own against Michael Fassbender as the one who was responsible for keeping Jobs’ moral compass in check. Rachel McAdams also shined in the role of reporter Sacha Pfeiffer in ‘Spotlight’, the Spotlight team’s lone female reporter whose family, particularly her grandmother, ended up being hit hard by the Catholic Priest Scandal, and as for Rooney Mara in ‘Carol’… well I haven’t seen the film so I can’t comment on it.

Ultimately though my pick goes to Jennifer Jason Leigh for her standout turn as the feral Daisy Domergue in Quentin Tarantino’s ‘The Hateful Eight’. Believe it or not, this is Leigh’s first nomination for an Academy Award despite the fact that she’s long been regarded as one of the best actresses in the business. And while I’ll admit that I haven’t seen a lot of the films that she’s been in, her turn in ‘The Hateful Eight’ is more than enough proof of how talented of an actress she is. To put this next statement as nicely as I can, given the fact that pretty much all of the main characters in this film are despicable people, Daisy Domergue is a very animated character and Leigh, who’s particularly been known for her method acting, really sinks into the role of a character who spends the whole film chained to Kurt Russell’s John ‘The Hangman’ Ruth, resulting in yet another classic Tarantino character. The tough part now is trying to list my runner-up pick for this category. I guess if I had to choose from the other three whose films I have seen my main runner-up pick would be Kate Winslet in ‘Steve Jobs’. It seems like Winslet’s currently a favorite to win having also won a Golden Globe and BAFTA award for her work in the film. I think it’d also be pretty cool to see Alicia Vikander win for ‘The Danish Girl’, even though a lot of film fans feel she should’ve been nominated for her role as Ava in Alex Garland’s ‘Ex Machina’.  

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

*CHRISTIAN BALE- THE BIG SHORT

*TOM HARDY- THE REVENANT

*MARK RUFFALO- SPOTLIGHT

*MARK RYLANCE- BRIDGE OF SPIES

*SYLVESTER STALLONE- CREED

MY PICK: SYLVESTER STALLONE


At the 49th Academy Awards, one of the biggest upsets in Oscar history occurred when ‘Rocky’, in an underdog manner that paralleled the journey of its titular character, won the Oscar for Best Picture beating out films like Martin Scorcese’s ‘Taxi Driver’, ‘Network’, and ‘All the President’s Men’. Its star/writer Sylvester Stallone was nominated for Best Actor as well but did not win. Nearly four decades later, it’s looking like Stallone will finally land Oscar gold for his seventh turn as the most famous character of his career, Rocky Balboa, in Ryan Coogler’s ‘Creed’. And given the rapturous ovation that he got when he won the Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor last month, clearly a lot of people want to see him win it… and quite frankly he should. Stallone has always been great in the ‘Rocky’ films and in ‘Creed’, he’s arguably at his best. Rocky may not be the main character this time around but he still is a vital part of the story as he takes on the role of mentor for his old rival Apollo’s son, Adonis Johnson Creed. But at the same time, Rocky finds himself struggling with his own fight outside of the ring when he learns that he’s been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. It’s probably the lowest that we’ve ever seen Rocky be at and it gets to the point where he feels his that time is done, especially considering many of those who were close to him (e.g. Adrian, Paulie, Apollo, etc.) are now gone. It’s arguably the most emotional performance of Stallone’s career and that’s why he earns my vote for Best Supporting Actor.

But that shouldn’t take away from the other great performances in this category. Mark Rylance was the big standout of ‘Bridge of Spies’ with his reserved and in some ways unassuming composure in the role of Soviet spy Rudolf Abel. Mark Ruffalo was also one of the biggest standouts of his film as reporter Michael Rezendes in ‘Spotlight’, who’s shown to be the most on edge of the Spotlight team when it comes to uncovering the Boston church scandal. As John Fitzgerald in ‘The Revenant’, Tom Hardy portrayed a ‘villain’ that was actually a pretty layered character despite his status as an antagonist towards Hugh Glass. And despite the instances where the film strayed from the true story it was based on, Hardy’s performance was just as superb as his main co-star’s was. And finally, there’s Christian Bale in ‘The Big Short’ as Michael Burry, the hedge fund manager who was the first to notice the rocky stability of the housing market back in 2005. Burry is quite frankly the most fascinating of the film’s main characters; he’s undoubtedly a genius but also fairly anti-social, primarily due to him being diagnosed with Asperger syndrome. Of these four, my runner-up pick is actually going to be a tie between Hardy and Ruffalo, though obviously I think it’s safe to say that Stallone will be taking this one come Sunday.     

BEST ACTRESS

*CATE BLANCHETT- CAROL

*BRIE LARSON- ROOM

*JENNIFER LAWRENCE- JOY

*CHARLOTTE RAMPLING- 45 YEARS

*SAOIRSE RONAN- BROOKLYN

MY PICK: BRIE LARSON


This year’s group of Best Actress nominees featured two particularly noteworthy performances from Brie Larson and Saoirse Ronan. Both of these actresses have already had fairly lengthy careers but this year saw them both experiencing their true breakout performances through ‘Room’ and ‘Brooklyn’, respectively. Ultimately, though, it was Larson who shined the most in her turn as Joy ‘Ma’ Newsome in ‘Room’. Simply put, it was a very tough role for Larson, who had to take on the responsibilities of a character who was both a young mother and a kidnap victim, whose son is the only real bright spot of her life at that point. While the bulk of the film centered around her son Jack experiencing the outside world for the first time, we also see how Joy struggles to readjust to her normal life after her very traumatic experience. Obviously, this is one very emotionally devastating story and Larson handles her character’s shattered composure perfectly. Speaking of characters named Joy, my runner-up pick for this category (even though Larson is clearly the front-runner) is Jennifer Lawrence for her turn as entrepreneur Joy Mangano in David O. Russell’s ‘Joy’. Though with that said, it seems like Lawrence’s third straight Oscar nomination since 2012 has attracted a much more polarizing reaction from film fans as a result of the film’s generally polarizing reception. But I heavily disagree with those who say that she shouldn’t have been nominated, mostly because I think they’re just saying that because they weren’t big fans of the film. But even if ‘Joy’ wasn’t the absolute best film of the year, there’s no denying that Lawrence was still superb in the role of Mangano. Once she starts getting into the entrepreneurial business, Lawrence takes command of the screen and as a result, is easily the best part of the film.

BEST ACTOR

*BRYAN CRANSTON- TRUMBO

*MATT DAMON- THE MARTIAN

*LEONARDO DICAPRIO- THE REVENANT

*MICHAEL FASSBENDER- STEVE JOBS

*EDDIE REDMAYNE- THE DANISH GIRL

MY PICK: LEONARDO DICAPRIO


Yeah I know… I’m obvious. But hey, can you blame me? Leo was put through one hell of a shoot for ‘The Revenant’ but he came out on top to deliver yet another terrific performance that will hopefully get him that long awaited Oscar that has eluded him for so long. Another reason why I’m rooting for him? Well that would be the fact that I’d hate to see how angry the internet would get if Leo doesn’t win. Obviously, Leo’s cold streak at the Oscars has become quite a running joke online but something tells me that the internet would be particularly pissed off if he doesn’t win this year. So if any of the other 4 nominees in this category ends up winning instead, they’re definitely going to catch a lot of heat from angry film fans for stealing Leo’s thunder. Of those four, something tells me that last year’s winner Eddie Redmayne would get blasted the most on the internet if he beats Leo because ‘The Danish Girl’ wasn’t as well-received as Redmayne’s last Oscar flick ‘The Theory of Everything’. But you know what? If he ends up winning, I will defend the guy from angry internet fanboys because he actually did do a really good job in ‘The Danish Girl’.

Now like I said earlier, ‘The Danish Girl’ isn’t a perfect film, primarily due to the fact that it’s more of a fictional interpretation of the story of Lili Elbe. It should also be noted that Redmayne’s casting in the role of Lili attracted a considerable amount of backlash due to the fact that a cisgender man (in other words, one who identifies with his/her assigned gender) was taking on the role of the famous transgender figure. But even with that in mind, Redmayne did handle the role with maturity and grace and because of it, he and Alicia Vikander were the biggest bright spots of the film. It wasn’t their fault that the film didn’t completely deliver on the emotional depth of its true story. So in conclusion, if Redmayne wins this award for the second year in a row, I will legitimately be happy for him because he is one of my favorite up-and-coming actors in the industry. However, considering the typically savage nature of the internet when it comes to the Oscars, it’d probably be better that he doesn’t win so that the internet won’t crucify him for beating DiCaprio. In fact, he isn’t even my primary runner-up pick. That distinction actually goes to Michael Fassbender as Steve Jobs in, well, ‘Steve Jobs’. He may not have necessarily looked like Jobs but he most certainly acted like him. Matt Damon was also terrific in ‘The Martian’ but I don’t think he’s got much of a chance at winning this year.

BEST DIRECTOR

*ADAM MCKAY- THE BIG SHORT

*GEORGE MILLER- MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

*ALEJANDRO G. INARRITU- THE REVENANT

*LENNY ABRAHAMSON- ROOM

*TOM MCCARTHY- SPOTLIGHT

MY PICK: ADAM MCKAY


I’ll admit that this was another tough category to determine. I’ve seen some argue that maybe it should go to either George Miller for ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ or Alejandro G. Inarritu, which would be his second straight win in this category, for ‘The Revenant’ due to the generally rough shoots that they had to endure in order to get these films made. But as well-shot and well-directed as both films are, they both suffered in terms of writing so instead I’m focusing more on the other three nominees in this category due to the fact that their films were a bit more balanced when it came to the material. Ultimately, my pick for Best Director will be Adam McKay for ‘The Big Short’. Obviously McKay is mainly known for his work in comedy, particularly his collaborations with Will Ferrell including ‘Anchorman’ and ‘Talladega Nights’. He even helped write the screenplay for ‘Ant-Man’. With ‘The Big Short’, though, McKay ended up going ‘against type’ to helm a true-story drama. But that doesn’t mean that his comedic abilities weren’t utilized, as the film’s witty screenplay helped lighten up the mood, which is a good thing considering that this film was about the financial crisis of 2008. For my runner-up pick, I’ll be going with Tom McCarthy for ‘Spotlight’, where he perfectly balanced the elements of this true story in order to highlight the importance of investigative journalism without over-glorifying its protagonists.

BEST PICTURE

And finally we come to Best Picture. For this part, I’m just going to do a ranked list of the eight nominees, starting from my least favorite to the film that earns my vote for Best Picture.

8. MAD MAX: FURY ROAD


So yeah, if you’ve been following me for at least a year now, you probably know that I wasn’t too big on ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’. I didn’t ‘dislike’ it but I do feel that the internet had considerably overhyped it in regards to many people calling this ‘one of the best films of the year’. I’ll admit I went into it without having previously seen the last three ‘Mad Max’ films but even though some say that you don’t have to see them before seeing this film, I do feel that doing so would’ve helped me get a better idea of what to expect. Now despite what I have to say about this film, I will give it credit for its greatest asset; its action. Primarily shot with practical effects and stunt-work unlike a lot of today’s action films, ‘Fury Road’ does feature some amazing action backed up by a terrific production design and an eye-popping color scheme. The film also features terrific performances from the likes of Charlize Theron as the film’s true main character Furiosa and Nicholas Hoult as arguably the film’s stand-out character Nux. But while those two performances are great as is the action, the film is severely lacking in regards to its story. Now for the record, I know that this wasn’t really the primary goal of the filmmakers and that the film is meant to be focused more on the visceral nature of the action. Still, at the end of the day this is just a simple ‘road chase’ film and Furiosa and Nux are really the only major characters in this film to get any sort of character development. And while the film may be called ‘Mad Max’, Tom Hardy is severely underused in the role of Max, who’s basically just a spectator to this whole plot and nothing more. Again, let me be clear, I don’t ‘hate’ this film but I just don’t see why some treated this film like it was the second coming of Christ. As great as the action is, the story is lacking so I feel that adding just a bit more to it, namely in regards to character development, would’ve truly made it one for the ages in my book.  

7. BROOKLYN


‘Brooklyn’ is a very charming romantic drama featuring a standout performance from lead actress Saoirse Ronan. She stars as a young Irish girl named Eilis who immigrates from her hometown in Ireland to Brooklyn, New York when her sister gets her a job in the city. While there, she meets and falls in love with a local boy named Tony (Emory Cohen) but when she learns that her sister has died, she returns home for the funeral and is courted by a local bachelor named Jim (Domhnall Gleeson), which puts her in a conflict regarding her status in both her hometown and her new home of Brooklyn. The film is very nicely shot and does a great job of capturing the struggle that Eilis goes through in having to adapt to a new world and the heartbreak that comes from having to leave her family behind, which does result in some genuinely heartbreaking moments like when Eilis first talks with her mom over the phone after her sister’s death. While she has already had a pretty lengthy career with films like ‘Atonement’ and ‘The Grand Budapest Hotel’, I view ‘Brooklyn’ as Saoirse Ronan’s true breakout performance. It’s the most mature role that she has taken to date and she handles it beautifully, all while being backed by a solid supporting cast that includes Cohen and Gleeson as her potential suitors and Julie Walters in a standout turn as Eilis’ stern but kind landlady in Brooklyn. The only reason why it’s this low on this list is because as good as it is, I don’t think it’ll take Best Picture.

6. THE REVENANT


Again, I already talked about this film earlier this week in my official review for the film. For a more extensive description of my thoughts on it, click Here for that review. In short, ‘The Revenant’ heavily benefits from terrific cinematography from Emmanuel Lubezki and solid direction from Alejandro G. Inarritu. It also features Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy in some of the best performances of their careers. But despite the great cinematography, the film itself lacks quite a bit in terms of emotional depth, primarily because it occasionally goes against the real-life events that it is inspired by. This film gives the character of Hugh Glass a son that he never had in real life so we don’t care too much about the son when he gets killed by John Fitzgerald. Plus, the film’s ending is drastically different from what really happened to Glass and Fitzgerald and as cool as this finale is, I think the real ending would’ve been much more interesting and even rather thought-provoking because of the fact that Glass ultimately never got the chance to take revenge on Fitzgerald for leaving him to die. By the time he returned to civilization, Fitzgerald had joined the army and Glass realized that he would’ve gotten in even bigger trouble if he killed a U.S soldier. But in the end, that’s not the path the film takes and as a result it feels rather hollow. Still a great-looking film though featuring what could be the performance that could finally earn Leo his long-awaited Oscar.

5. BRIDGE OF SPIES


While not my favorite of this year’s Best Picture nominees or even one of Spielberg’s absolute best, there’s still no denying that ‘Bridge of Spies’ is very much a Spielberg film. With him in control, you can always expect a well-shot, well-edited, and overall just well-made film and that’s definitely the case here with this true story about how one man, James B. Donovan, orchestrated a prisoner exchange between the U.S. and the Soviet Union in the midst of the Cold War. Tom Hanks, as usual, is terrific in the role of Donovan as is Mark Rylance in the role of the unassuming Rudolf Abel, who was put in the center of the U.S.’s Cold War paranoia when he was arrested on the charge of being a Soviet spy. Really the only thing that keeps this from being one of Spielberg’s all-time best films is the fact that because the film is covering two major ‘storylines’ in the form of Donovan taking on the already lost case of Abel and the prisoner exchange for Francis Gary Powers, it can be a bit dry at times and lacks a bit in terms of tension. But again, this film is pure Spielberg and fans of his work are most certainly going to love his latest offering. 

4. ROOM


‘Room’ is one hell of an emotionally-draining film, in which Brie Larson and Jacob Tremblay star as a mother and son who, unbeknownst to the son, have been held captive for years in a tiny shed by a man who had kidnapped the mother, Joy, when she was a teenager. Once they finally get free, the film primarily focuses around Joy’s struggles with PTSD and her son Jack experiencing the world for the first time. Again, heavy stuff here but the film also brings us a terrific mother-son relationship between Joy and Jack, both of whom are played excellently by Larson and Tremblay, which makes the happy moments between them all the more satisfying. Like Saoirse Ronan in ‘Brooklyn’, ‘Room’ is easily Brie Larson’s breakout role and she handles the deep emotional turmoil of Joy perfectly. I’ll admit it took me a little bit to get used to Tremblay as Jack but once the two of them get free, Tremblay is also superb and Jack’s adjustment to the real world is fascinating to behold. All of this comes together for a film that is, again, very hard to watch at times but also gives us a great story about how a mother’s love for her son helped them escape their precarious situation.  

3. THE BIG SHORT


I’ll admit it… I know very little about economics and anything relating to Wall Street and the housing market. But the great thing about Adam McKay’s drama ‘The Big Short’, which focuses on three separate parties who in 2005 realize that the housing market is about to collapse and shows how they decided to bet against it, that it recognizes that not everyone is going to understand the details of the topics that it’s covering. So in order to combat that, the film maintains a generally light-hearted tone via the occasional quips, mostly from Ryan Gosling’s character Jared, who basically serves as the film’s narrator, and a series of cameos from the likes of Margot Robbie and Selena Gomez who help explain some of the things they’re talking about in this film. The fact that this film does take a bit of a humorous slant to the story definitely is impressive and in some cases I guess you can say necessary for a story like this. That’s because, as the film clearly shows, while the main characters all come off wealthy as a result of them betting against the housing market, that’s actually coming at the expense of pretty much almost everyone else in the country. It serves as a biting indictment of the big banks for letting this happen in the first place and for basically getting away with it. In short, McKay’s rare foray into drama turns out to be an incredibly well-acted and fast-paced take on one of the most fascinating events in recent U.S. history by focusing on those who saw it coming before anyone else.

2. THE MARTIAN


While it may not have made my Top 12 for the year, ‘The Martian’ was most certainly one of the most entertaining blockbusters of 2015. And that’s saying a lot considering that this film, based on the novel of the same name by Andy Weir, is primarily based around a lot of science and could’ve ran the risk of being overly complicated for some viewers. Thankfully, that doesn’t happen as Drew Goddard’s screenplay, Weir’s writing, and Ridley Scott’s direction give the film a solid structure in which the science is explained in a way that’s pretty easy to understand without talking down to the audience. Plus, the film is anchored by Matt Damon’s outstanding performance in the lead role of stranded astronaut Mark Watney. Damon brings a lot of charisma to the role while also providing us with a good amount of humor via the occasional wit that comes from the screenplay. Though with that said, I guess I do need to address the ‘elephant in the room’ which is the fact that, at this year’s Golden Globes, the film was nominated for Best Comedy… and won. That became a running joke on the internet but honestly I think the backlash towards this nomination was a bit overblown. Yes, technically speaking, ‘The Martian’ is not primarily a comedy. It’s a story of survival in the harsh environment that is the Red Planet. But it was because of Matt Damon’s performance that the film gained a nice amount of humor via Watney’s wit and occasionally cocky (in a good way) attitude. So in other words, this film being nominated for Best Comedy isn’t a ‘completely out of left field’ move. To quote the RT consensus, this film is ‘surprisingly funny’, which I felt was a good move because it helped lighten the mood at just the right moments without being a straight-up comedy, hence why ‘The Martian’ was most definitely one of the most enjoyable films from this past year.
But at the end of the day, my favorite film of this year’s Best Picture nominees, and subsequently my vote for Best Picture, goes to…

MY PICK: SPOTLIGHT


‘Spotlight’ is the true story of what happened in 2001 when the ‘Spotlight’ team of the Boston Globe investigated into the very substantial child sex abuse scandal involving up to 87 Catholic priests in the Boston area and the cover-up of it as orchestrated by Cardinal Law. Obviously this is a very serious subject matter and director Tom McCarthy handles the situation with maturity. It’s not like the film tries to over-glorify its heroes, the members of the Spotlight team. Instead, it balances the focus between the Spotlight team and the victims of this scandal. And ultimately the reason why this works is because the film really does highlight how impactful the scandal was for the people of Boston given how big the Church has been in the lives of many in the area and the fact that all of the members of the Spotlight team were raised as Roman Catholics. At the same time, the film also highlights the importance of investigative journalism as well as even taking a little bit of time to address the growing divide between print and online journalism, which basically makes this an absolute must-see for anyone interested in the journalism industry. And of course, the film features a terrific ensemble cast. While everyone in the cast is great, from Stanley Tucci to Rachel McAdams to Liev Schreiber, the two biggest standouts are Michael Keaton as Spotlight’s no-nonsense editor Walter Robinson and Mark Ruffalo as reporter Mike Rezendes, who quite arguably takes the reveals of their investigation the hardest as evident in a scene where he and Robinson get into an argument over publishing the story before the Boston Herald is able to write it before them. Admittedly I don’t know what this film’s chances are at taking Best Picture but of these 8 nominees, my favorite of the bunch is ‘Spotlight’.

So those are my picks for this year’s Academy Awards. What films/performances have your vote for this year’s event? Sound off in the comments below with your picks and stay tuned for my Post-Oscars reaction post sometime after Sunday.


Sunday, February 21, 2016

The Revenant (2015) review


Over the past few years, Leonardo DiCaprio has established himself as one of the best actors in the business, with plenty of great performances in films like ‘Inception’, ‘Django Unchained’, and his numerous collaborations with director Martin Scorsese in films like ‘The Departed’ and ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’. However, all of that success has yet to earn him a win at the biggest award circuit in the industry; the Academy Awards. He’s been nominated four times in the past, once for Best Supporting Actor for 1993’s ‘What’s Eating Gilbert Grape’ and three times for Best Actor for 2004’s ‘The Aviator’, 2006’s ‘Blood Diamond’, and ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ in 2013, but has come up empty-handed every time. Leo’s unlucky streak at the Oscars has practically become a running gag amongst film fans on the internet to the point where some have joked that it’s more likely that someone else is going to get an Oscar for playing Leo in a film than Leo actually winning one himself. But this year could finally end Leo’s Oscar drought with his latest performance in ‘The Revenant’, inspired by the real-life experiences of frontiersman Hugh Glass in 1823 in the Great Plains. It certainly has the team behind it, as the film is directed by Alejandro G. Inarritu, who’s fresh off of winning the Oscar for Best Director for his work on last year’s Best Picture winner ‘Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)’. And while I can’t really say that this is the best of this year’s Best Picture nominees, primarily due to the film occasionally straying far from the actual story of Hugh Glass, DiCaprio truly does shine in this intense but beautifully shot tale of survival.

In 1823, frontiersman Hugh Glass (DiCaprio) is part of a team of trappers led by Captain Andrew Henry (Domhnall Gleeson) hunting for pelts in the unorganized U.S. territory that would eventually go on to become the Dakotas. When the party is suddenly attacked and forced to flee downriver from a group of Arikara Natives, Glass recommends that the party return to their outpost, Fort Kiowa, on foot, which they do at the expense of having to ditch the pelts that they’ve acquired. But while scouting ahead, Glass is suddenly attacked and viciously mauled by a grizzly bear. Near-death and after being transported on stretcher by the party for a little while, he is left behind along with fellow trappers John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy) and Jim Bridger (Will Poulter) and Glass’ half-native son Hawk (Forrest Goodluck) when Fitzgerald suggests that Glass won’t survive his injuries. But that only results in Fitzgerald trying to kill Glass himself, which then leads to him killing Hawk and lying to Bridger in order to help him bury Glass alive by telling him that the natives are nearby and that they must leave him there. Left for dead, the severely wounded Glass now finds himself on his own in the harsh forest landscape as he must now embark on a perilous journey in order to get back to his party and, more importantly, enact his revenge on Fitzgerald for both leaving him to die and for killing his son.

‘The Revenant’ is easily one of the most beautifully-shot films of the year. From the gorgeous landscape shots to the long takes that were a key part of Inarritu and cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki’s last film ‘Birdman’ to the fact that the two decided to almost entirely shoot the film with natural lighting, this is one great-looking film. And while it meant that the film ended up being quite an arduous shoot that also went quite a bit over-budget, at the end of the day it was most definitely worth it if solely for this outstanding cinematography. This also results in a film that can obviously be very brutal at times in terms of its action, from the infamous scene where Glass is attacked by the bear to the climactic fight at the end which I won’t spoil the details of for anyone who hasn’t seen the film yet. These sequences are well-shot and put you right in the center of the action. Admittedly, though, for as well-shot as the film is, it does lack a bit in terms of emotional depth. Now don’t get me wrong, the film’s themes of survival are very prevalent throughout, which is most definitely admirable. But at the same time, the whole thing about Glass seeking revenge on Fitzgerald isn’t as strong, namely in regards to him avenging the death of his son at Fitzgerald’s hands. Spoiler Alert, the whole thing with the son is purely fictional. From what we know, Hugh Glass didn’t have a son or a wife, he was just pissed at Fitzgerald and Bridger for leaving him to die. So as a result, that part of the story feels pretty darn hollow because of the fact that it was 100% fabricated.

Leonardo DiCaprio has gone on record saying that this was ‘the hardest performance of his career’ and considering what happens in this film, I don’t blame him. After all, in this film his character goes through all sorts of hell and considering how rough the shoot must have been at times, the same could be said for what DiCaprio had to do while in the role. At one point he even had to eat raw bison meat while being a vegetarian in real life. This performance is no easy task and to put it simply, DiCaprio does endure to deliver an excellent performance as you’d expect from him nowadays. Equally excellent here is Tom Hardy in the role of Fitzgerald, who in a lot of ways is actually a much more layered character than one may think. While he may serve the role as this film’s antagonist given the fact that he’s the one who orchestrated Glass’ abandonment and was responsible for killing his fictional son, you actually do get where he’s coming from, as strange as that may sound. He clearly realized that the party wasn’t going to get very far carrying the critically wounded Glass through this harsh environment with a bunch of natives on their tail. So he did what he felt was the right thing to do; leave him on the grounds that he would probably soon succumb to his injuries in order to prevent the possibility of him and Bridger being killed by the pursuing natives. Because of this, Fitzgerald is more than just a straight-forward baddie and Tom Hardy handles this complex character perfectly. 

I’ll admit I didn’t actually read into the ‘true story’ behind this film until after seeing it and quite frankly, it’s a little disappointing that the film didn’t go all the way with it. Instead, the film adds in a fabricated story involving Glass and his fictional son which doesn’t really elicit as much emotional drama as it wants to. I for one feel that it would’ve be far more interesting for the film to be more focused on the true aspects of the story, especially in regards to how this conflict between Glass and Fitzgerald ultimately turned out. It’s different in the film and as cool as the conclusion of that conflict is between the two, I think the actual conclusion would’ve been much more thought-provoking, as it would’ve strengthened the moral predicament of Fitzgerald having to do what he did primarily due to the hostile environment that they were in while also showing that Glass never really did enact his revenge on Fitzgerald for leaving him to die. But on the bright side, ‘The Revenant’ does benefit from some amazing cinematography, solid direction from Inarritu, and terrific performances from its two leads, DiCaprio and Hardy. So in short, ‘The Revenant’ isn’t really my favorite of this year’s Best Picture nominees, mainly due to its issues in terms of its story. But at the very least, the film is still one of the best-looking films of the year so it does definitely deserve some Oscar attention from a technical standpoint. And who knows… this could finally be the film that breaks Leo’s cold streak at the Oscars. Seems like this year is the best opportunity for him to finally win that coveted golden man.

Rating: 4/5

  

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Deadpool (2016) review


When it comes to the vast array of characters within the equally vast expanse of the Marvel universe, one major fan favorite has been the character of Deadpool. Created by Rob Liefeld in 1991, mercenary Wade Wilson, better known as the ‘Merc with a Mouth’, has been one of the most popular Marvel characters amongst comic book fans, primarily due to his comedic nature and frequent instances of breaking the fourth wall. However, when it comes to Deadpool’s appearances in live-action films, he didn’t start off on the best of notes. He first appeared in 2009’s ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ played by Ryan Reynolds, who was actually referenced by Deadpool himself once in the comics, prior to the film’s release, when describing his appearance. But while Reynolds was certainly a good choice in the role, the character was ultimately screwed over big time in that film as the writers did away with pretty much everything that made the character who he is in the comics. After appearing briefly in the opening action sequence, Wilson is then revealed to have been experimented on by Colonel William Stryker and turned into ‘Weapon XI’, a mutant possessing the abilities of other mutants that the character obviously didn’t have in the comics. And to make matters worse, the ‘Merc with a Mouth’… had his mouth sewn shut. So in short, the writers completely butchered one of Marvel’s most popular characters in his big-screen debut, becoming one of the many problems of that ill-fated X-Men spinoff. And for a while after that, despite rumors of a Deadpool spin-off film, it didn’t seem like the ‘Merc with a Mouth’ would get a chance to redeem himself on the big-screen.

But then in July of 2014, everything changed when a clip of VFX test footage for the film was leaked online. Developed in 2012 by VFX artist Tim Miller, who Fox had hired a year earlier to direct the film, this turned out to be one of the rare cases in the film industry of a leaked product actually having a positive outcome, as the footage proved to be a big hit with fans. That enthusiastic response was what finally convinced Fox to go ahead with a ‘Deadpool’ film, with Reynolds once again returning to the role that he was pretty much born to play. Now obviously, ‘Deadpool’ is a much different kind of superhero film compared to A.) its fellow Fox-produced Marvel films and B.) the films of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. While those films are always rated PG-13 and are intended for a wider audience, ‘Deadpool’ is decidedly a much more violent and crude entry in the superhero genre. So obviously, it’s an R-rated superhero film that revels in its violence, sex, and crude humor. And while some may have originally viewed this as a ‘risky venture’ for that exact reason, clearly that risky venture has paid off given the extremely positive reviews that this film has gotten from both critics and audiences and its record-setting $135 million opening weekend here in the U.S.. So with all of that said, does Deadpool, and for the matter Ryan Reynolds given his previous misfires in the genre, finally get the proper superhero film that they deserve? Well, to put it simply, yes they do. ‘Deadpool’ is an extremely fun superhero film that isn’t afraid to go places that other superhero films wouldn’t dare to go. And for the most part that does make up for a few of the film’s shortcomings.

As already noted, Ryan Reynolds stars as Wade Wilson, a mercenary from Canada who spends a lot of his time protecting teenagers from potential stalkers. One night, he meets an escort named Vanessa (Morena Baccarin) and the two end up in a relationship. However, one year later, the two learn that Wade has been affected with terminal cancer in multiple parts of his body. Looking to find any possible way to overcome his new affliction, Wade is approached by an Agent Smith-like recruiter (Jed Rees (And I’m not making a joke here. This character literally is referred to by that moniker multiple times in the film.)) who offers him a way to cure his cancer. Wade eventually accepts the offer and is then subjected to torturous procedures as part of the Weapon X program led by Francis Freeman AKA Ajax (Ed Skrein) and his partner Angel Dust (Gina Carano). While his cancer does end up being cured as a result of his newly gained abilities of healing, the process also ends up severely disfiguring his face and skin. Left for dead by Ajax, who tells him that he has the cure for his disfigurement, Wade survives and soon takes on the vigilante persona of ‘Deadpool’ as he tracks down ‘Francis’ for revenge. Things get a little more complicated when fellow mutants Colossus (voiced by Stefan Kapičić and performed via motion capture by Andre Tricoteux) and Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Brianna Hildebrand) try to convince Wade to join the X-Men and Ajax ends up kidnapping Vanessa.

Fans have been clamoring for years for a proper Deadpool film and, more specifically, that it would be rated R so that it would properly represent the fan-favorite mutant on the big-screen. And in that regard, this film definitely succeeds in doing its title character justice. After the severe misfire that was Deadpool’s characterization in ‘Origins’, the character in this new film is very much the Deadpool that fans know and love. He’s constantly cracking jokes, particularly fourth wall jokes, and massacring his opponents in gory detail. The end result is one very hilarious film from beginning to end, with loads of great jokes as well as some pretty darn awesome action sequences that of course are much more violent than what we’ve seen in other superhero films. But while the film is very much a no-holds-barred R-rated superhero affair, admittedly it is a bit lacking in terms of being an actual ‘superhero’ film. The humor and action may be superb, but at the end of the day this is basically just a simple story of a man enacting revenge against the man who ruined his life. Sure the film may subvert and poke fun at the usual tropes of the superhero genre but other times it ends up doing those exact same tropes so it doesn’t completely succeed in lampooning the genre. Also I should probably note that while I did find the humor in this film to be hilarious, its generally crude nature (in other words, a whole lot of sex jokes) might turn off those who aren’t fans of this kind of humor. 
   
Ryan Reynolds’ comedic abilities made him a perfect choice for the role of Deadpool when he first took on the role all the way back in 2009 for ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’. It’s too bad then that he got screwed over in that film just as much as the character did. Now that Deadpool has finally been given a proper superhero film, Reynolds finally gets the chance to shine in the superhero film genre and proves that he was the perfect choice for the role of the wise-cracking mercenary. On the other side, though, Morena Baccarin is severely underused as Deadpool’s girlfriend Vanessa. While the two do have really nice chemistry, Baccarin spends most of the film as a damsel in distress for Deadpool to save at the end. It’s even more disappointing because her character is a superhero in the comics named Copycat. Maybe they’ll go that route for the sequel but here she’s just the pretty face that has to be saved. However, Deadpool does have a pair of memorable allies in the form of Colossus and Negasonic Teenage Warhead or, as Deadpool puts it, ‘the only X-Men the film could afford’. Colossus had previously appeared in ‘X2’, ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’, and ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ but, with no disrespect towards Daniel Cudmore (who played the character in those films), the Colossus in this film is much more in line with the Russian metal man that fans know and love from the comics while Brianna Hildebrand makes quite a great first impression in what will no doubt be her breakout role as the character with one of the coolest names ever. T.J. Miller also gets some memorable one-liners as Deadpool’s best friend Weasel, who points out many examples of what Deadpool looks like with his face all disfigured (e.g. an avocado had sex with an older avocado).

But memorable protagonists come at the expense of some very, very forgettable villains. You know how a lot of people tend to criticize all of the MCU villains that are not named Loki for not being as memorable by comparison? Well, that doesn’t mean that ‘Deadpool’ is off the hook either because its villains are arguably the biggest weak link of the film. Ajax is basically just your typical evil British guy whose only real quirk is the fact that his real name is Francis and Deadpool constantly mocks him for it. Ed Skrein is fine in the role but the character really doesn’t do much to stand out amongst the other villains of the superhero film genre, even the ones that the internet tends to mock. The same can also be said for his assistant Angel Dust. Pretty much all that Gina Carano has to do in this film is just stand around, glare at people, and occasionally punch someone. Sure it may do well enough to highlight Carano’s MMA experience but that’s really about it. So like how the film occasionally slips into the same exact territory of the superhero films that it’s poking fun at, it too suffers from one of the most common criticisms that befall a lot of the films of the genre; dull villains. And as a result, the film ends up feeling a lot smaller-scaled than it already is. There’s not a lot of connections made towards the other ‘X-Men’ films which, while understandable given the film’s more hardcore style and tone, still would’ve been appreciated. I have the feeling, though, that we will be seeing Deadpool play a bigger role in the X-Men universe in future films.

Now despite the criticisms that I’ve gone over in this review, I want to make it clear that I did like ‘Deadpool’. It really is a very fun superhero film and the filmmakers do deserve credit for not flinching when it comes to giving the film a harder R-rated feel compared to other films of the genre. But at the end of the day, I don’t think it’s that big of a ‘game-changer’ as much as others are saying it is. Really, all it does different is just that; being an R-rated superhero film. Obviously, though, it’s the first big R-rated superhero film of this current era of the genre and because this film is definitely going to be a hit, that’ll most likely lead to more R-rated superhero films down the road. And I can tell that this is something that quite a few people will be happy with because let me tell you, I’ve seen quite a few reviews that have compared this film to the MCU films and have negatively referred to the latter as ‘toothless, watered-down mediocrity’. Well you may think that but at least those so-called ‘toothless watered-down mediocrities’ have more to offer in terms of plot, action set-pieces, and even villains. Some say that this film set the bar for this year’s slate of superhero films but at the end of the day I’m probably going to be talking about films like ‘Captain America: Civil War’ and ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ more than this one when the year’s done. To make it clear, I have nothing against there being more R-rated superhero films. But just like how I don’t want to see darker superhero films for characters that aren’t meant for darker storylines, I don’t want to see certain superhero franchises get needlessly more R-rated just because that’s what certain fanboys want more of. Again, I really did like this film. I guarantee you that you’ll have a lot of fun watching it. But ‘best superhero film of all-time’ as some are saying? Uh-uh…


Rating: 4/5

Monday, February 8, 2016

Top 10 WORST Superhero Films (Aside from Batman and Robin)

This weekend sees the release of the first big superhero film of the year, ‘Deadpool’. Starring Ryan Reynolds as ‘the Merc with a Mouth’, a major fan-favorite character amongst comic book fans, many are hopeful that this film will do justice to the character on the big-screen, especially after he was severely misused in 2009’s ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’. For those who haven’t seen it, the writers of that film made several changes to Deadpool’s character, resulting in him acting nothing like his comic-book counterpart. It was one of the many issues of that highly disappointing ‘X-Men’ spinoff. With that in mind, today I’ll be doing a list that I’ve been wanting to do for a while now; my Top 10 WORST superhero films of all-time. Because for every great superhero film that has come out over the years, from the MCU films to Nolan’s ‘Dark Knight’ trilogy, there have also been some real stinkers that failed considerably in regards to doing their main character(s) justice on the big-screen. Now for the record, I haven’t seen all of the infamous ‘bad’ superhero films, like ‘Blade: Trinity’ or ‘Ghost Rider’. And while quite a lot of people are more than likely to put films like ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’, ‘Spider-Man 3’, ‘Daredevil’, and the 2000’s era ‘Fantastic Four’ films on this list given the harsher reception that they’ve gotten from fans, you will not see those films anywhere on here because, yes, I do like those films. Finally, as a way to keep things interesting, ‘Batman and Robin’ will not be included in this list. I’m not saying that it doesn’t deserve to be here but I think that it’s time to point out some of the other lousy superhero flicks that have come out over the years. So without further ado, these are my personal Top 10 worst superhero films of all-time. I don’t have any dishonorable mentions this time so we’re going to get right on to the list. 

The lower half of this list is mostly going to consist of films that I don’t fully ‘dislike’ but are still really disappointing efforts from the genre. And I know for a fact that my Number 10 pick was a severe disappointment for fans of this character.

10. GREEN LANTERN


Before Ryan Reynolds took on what could very well be his first major successful superhero film role with ‘Deadpool’, he had quite a bad run when it came to the superhero films that he starred in. First, there was ‘Blade: Trinity’ and without having seen it, I’m aware that this is an instance where he definitely didn’t help make things better based on the footage that I have seen of him as the overly cocky and rather douche-y Hannibal King. Then he made his first on-screen appearance as Deadpool in ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’, where at the very least he proved to be a solid choice for the role. But of course, that film screwed the character over big-time, hence why Reynolds now has a chance to do it right this year with the ‘Deadpool’ film. But his most infamous turn to date in a superhero film was not a Marvel project, but a DC project; 2011’s ‘Green Lantern’. Upon release the film was subjected to extremely negative reviews from critics and just barely made back its massive $200 million budget, which shut down any plans that Warner Bros. had for a sequel. But like how Reynolds was a good choice for the role of Deadpool, he actually did a pretty fine job in the role of Hal Jordan, who takes on the mantle of Green Lantern when the dying Lantern Abin Sur gives him his Power Ring. While there is literally a point in the film where Jordan, rather cowardly, runs away from his duties as a member of the Green Lantern Corps, Reynolds, at the very least, does his best with the lackluster material that he has to work with in this film.

The film even features a particularly standout performance by Mark Strong in the role of legendary Green Lantern baddie Sinestro. However, Sinestro is not the main villain of this film. Instead he spends most of the film just like how he started out in the comics; as a member of the Green Lantern Corps. The ‘villainous’ nature of his character is pushed aside until the post-credits scene, where he takes on the power of fear (via a special Yellow Power Ring) in a sequence that clearly tried to set up a sequel that clearly wasn’t going to happen. The actual main villains of the film are scientist Dr. Hector Hammond (Peter Sarsgaard) and the fear-bringing entity known as Parallax… and boy are both of these villains woefully underdeveloped. There’s a bit of potential with Hammond given his connection with childhood friends Hal Jordan and his main love interest Carol Ferris but at the end of the day Hammond does little and just ends up getting killed off, rather harshly I might add, by Parallax who consumes his life force. And as for Parallax, he’s basically just a big CGI cloud that literally gets defeated in like ten minutes. While I haven’t read much of the ‘Green Lantern’ comics, it seems to me like this film really didn’t do much to capitalize on the lore of the franchise, as it spent more time on Earth than it did on the planet Oa where the Green Lantern Corps reside. Pair that with a lackluster script and the questionable choice of Martin Campbell, AKA the guy who brought us two of the best James Bond films of all-time in ‘GoldenEye’ and ‘Casino Royale’, directing the film (though ultimately it isn’t really his fault in regards to how the final product turned out) and you have one hell of a disappointing superhero film. Here’s hoping the upcoming reboot ‘Green Lantern Corps’, set for a 2020 release, turns out better.  

My Number 9 pick goes to the film that sent its franchise on a pretty severe downward spiral that wouldn’t be stopped until 2011 when the franchise’s original director made a triumphant return (albeit not as a director initially but that’s beside the point) that would eventually lead to the franchise’s redemption.

9. X-MEN: THE LAST STAND


As just a regular summer blockbuster, I don’t really ‘hate’ ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’ that much, hence why it’s so low on the list. I do think that it’s actually a decently entertaining popcorn flick if you don’t take its place in the franchise that much into consideration. But ultimately it is because of how it serves as an ‘X-Men’ film that makes it such a colossal disappointment. After directing the first two X-Men films, Bryan Singer dropped out of directing this film in favor of ‘Superman Returns’. Ironically that didn’t turn out well for Singer either so he returned to the franchise in 2011 as a writer/producer for ‘X-Men: First Class’. The success of that film led Singer to finally return to the role of director for 2014’s franchise-best effort ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’. Now Singer is back in control of the franchise and I’m sure I’m not the only one who is highly anticipating the upcoming ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ that is set to come out this May. But as for ‘The Last Stand’, Brett Ratner was chosen as Singer’s replacement in the director’s chair. Simply put, that proved to be the wrong choice as Ratner, to put it bluntly, definitely wasn’t as good of a director compared to Singer and it definitely showed with ‘The Last Stand’. Ultimately though, the real issue of the film lies within its script. Primarily based on one of the most famous ‘X-Men’ storylines of all-time in ‘The Dark Phoenix Saga’, in which X-Men telepath Jean Grey is corrupted by the power of ‘the Phoenix’, X-Men fans were severely disappointed by how the film handled that iconic storyline.

Instead of just focusing on the ‘Dark Phoenix’ story, the film is a mix of two separate storylines from the comics, the other being ‘Gifted’, which was notably written by ‘Avengers’ director Joss Whedon, where a mutant cure is developed that proves to be very divisive amongst the mutant community. By combining these two storylines into one, the film ends up being a fairly jumbled mess that tries to cover the plots of both storylines in just one film but doesn’t succeed in doing either of them full justice on the big-screen. Not only that, but then there’s also the film’s questionable handling of some of the main characters. Sometimes it severely diminishes the roles of characters like Rogue and Mystique. The former decides to take the mutant cure and is absent for the final battle while the latter is only in the film for a few minutes before she gets affected by the cure and completely abandoned by Magneto, her closest ally. Not only that, but the film even kills off a few characters as well. Cyclops, who’s only in the film for about 10-15 minutes or so, dies as a result of Jean’s powers, as does Professor X when he confronts her in her childhood home. And while these deaths actually could’ve worked in regards to the story, instead they come off more as shock value than anything else. With all of this in mind, it was a good thing that the ending of ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ erased the events of both this film and ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ from the series’ canon. Say what you will about the franchise’s rather messed-up continuity prior to the events of ‘Days of Future Past’ but considering the quality of the third and fourth films, I think we can all agree that this was ultimately the best move for the ‘X-Men’ series.

Another superhero film that ended up derailing its franchise takes the Number 8 spot. While not as bad as its immediate successor, it still ended up marking a noticeable drop in quality for the franchise.

8. SUPERMAN III


Decades before the modern era of superhero films and cinematic universes, Richard Donner gave us the first ‘big’ superhero film in 1978 with ‘Superman’, starring Christopher Reeve in the title role of the ‘Man of Steel’. Originally, Donner was also tapped to direct the follow-up as well and because the two films were shot simultaneously, Donner had gotten about 75% of ‘Superman II’ completed before filming went on a temporary hiatus in 1977 so that Donner could have time to get the first film finished in time for its release. However, due to a considerable amount of tension between him and producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind and Pierre Spengler over scheduling and budgetary issues, Donner ended up getting kicked off the sequel in 1979 and was replaced by Richard Lester. Lester had recently directed the producers’ 1973 production ‘The Three Musketeers’ and its 1974 sequel ‘The Four Musketeers’, which ironically was another case of a two-part film project, and had been brought in as an uncredited producer to serve as a mediator for the two parties. Obviously things didn’t work out between them and it wasn’t until 2006 when Donner finally got the chance to present his version of the film, ‘Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut’. However, upon initial release, Richard Lester’s ‘Superman II’ still ended up doing pretty well both critically and commercially. As a result, Lester was brought back to direct the next film, ‘Superman III’… and this is where the series officially began to take a severe nosedive in terms of quality. 

When watching ‘Superman II’, you can most definitely notice the difference between the scenes that were shot by Donner and those that were shot by Lester. While Donner handled the material in a more serious manner, Lester’s footage was more comedic in nature. So because Lester was the sole director for ‘Superman III’, the entire film takes on a much campier tone than its predecessors. That’s most evident from the fact that the film stars comedian Richard Pryor in a major role as bumbling computer genius Gus Gorman, so much so that he arguably has more screen-time than Superman. And as for the villain? He’s just a tobacco multimillionaire, whose sister ends up getting turned in a supercomputer… no I am not making this stuff up. That is literally what happens in this film. In short, this is a really, really goofy (and not in a good way) superhero film and there are only two things in it that keep it from being any higher on this list. The first is that Christopher Reeve is still great in the role of Superman despite having lousy material to work with that hinders the potential that comes from the plot-line of Superman being corrupted by false kryptonite and taking on a more sinister persona as a result. The other highlight of the film is the fight in the junkyard between Superman’s evil side and his good side, represented as his alter-ego Clark Kent. But at the end of the day, ‘Superman III’ is still the film that was responsible for commencing the decline for the original ‘Superman’ film franchise… and things would only get worse with the next film.  

There are quite a few superhero characters who have yet to get a well-received film adaptation. The Punisher is one of them and this is one of those failed attempts.

7. THE PUNISHER (2004)


Frank Castle AKA The Punisher first made his film debut in 1989’s ‘The Punisher’, starring Dolph Lundgren in the title role. However, the film, as is pretty much the case with every Marvel film at the time (on a side note, two of ‘those’ films will be appearing later on in this list), never saw a theatrical release, due to its distributor New World Pictures dealing with financial issues at the time. Instead, it was released direct-to-video two years later and ended up faring poorly with both critics and audiences. In 2008, Marvel attempted a more over-the-top take on the character with ‘Punisher: War Zone’, starring Ray Stevenson as Castle. However, while this film did end up getting released in theaters, it too ended up being a critical, as well as financial in this case, disappointment, although it has gained a bit of a cult following in recent years. Thankfully it seems like the Punisher’s losing streak when it comes to his live-action appearances might end soon by means of Jon Bernthal’s upcoming turn as the character on Season 2 of ‘Daredevil’. But as far as ‘Punisher’ films are concerned, Thomas Jane’s performance in the role in 2004’s ‘The Punisher’ is usually regarded as the best take on the character to date performance-wise. Jane’s take on the character was so well-received by both critics and comic book fans that Jane ended up reprising his role in an independent short film that he produced called ‘Dirty Laundry’ that first premiered at Comic-Con in 2012. But as for the official ‘Punisher’ feature-length film that he starred in, it’s quite the mixed bag.

At times, the film is overly depressing. I mean sure that sort of makes sense given Castle’s darker and more tragic backstory but the filmmakers sort of went a bit too far when it came to this idea, especially in the sequences where Castle’s family is murdered as ordered by vengeful crime boss Howard Saint. It also doesn’t help that the film maintains a generally drab color sequence throughout the entirety of the run-time. But then the film tries to liven things up with ‘silly moments’, like a scene where Castle’s flat-mates start dancing to classical music all while Castle is fighting a big Russian hitman in the other room. In short, the film sort of has an identity crisis. It tries to more serious than other comic book films but also attempts to have a few moments of levity on occasion so that the film wouldn’t be entirely somber. Believe it or not, I do appreciate that the film at least tried to lighten up from time to time but ultimately it wasn’t able to succeed in that regard. By comparison, films like ‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’ and Christopher Nolan’s ‘Dark Knight’ trilogy were much more successful in regards to maintaining a generally serious tone throughout while still managing to throw in a few moments of comedic levity from time to time to liven things up when necessary. As stated earlier, Thomas Jane truly was excellent in the lead role but ultimately he was let down by a mediocre script and the end result is a fairly misguided take on Marvel’s legendary vigilante.

Just missing the Bottom 5 is the first in a line of attempts to bring one of Marvel’s most iconic superhero teams to the big-screen. Obviously none of them have really worked so far.

6. THE FANTASTIC FOUR (1994)


(For my original review of this film, click Here)

I already talked about this film in my ‘Fantastic Four’ retrospective last summer so I won’t try to repeat myself too much here. Simply put, this is the most infamous example of Marvel’s low-budget attempts to bring their characters to the big-screen in the early 90’s. Produced on just a $1 million budget, the film never saw an official release, either because Marvel never intended to release it or because they didn’t want it to ruin the franchise (You Decide!). And yes, the film’s low-budget nature is obvious throughout. There’s literally a ‘fight scene’ where the sole ‘action’ in the scene is the camera rapidly spinning around to ‘simulate’ the ‘action’. Also, Doctor Doom clearly didn’t have any ADR work done because there are numerous times in this film where he’s completely unintelligible. This Doom is also arguably the weakest superhero film supervillain of all-time as he spends most of the runtime getting his ass kicked or having his plans fail almost immediately after he sets them into motion. At the very least, this film does actually have a decent amount of heart to it. In fact, dare I say it has more heart than any of the subsequent ‘Fantastic Four’ films… and that’s saying a lot. I’m not saying that it’s a ‘good’ film and there are quite a few cheesy moments from time to time, including a scene where Sue and Johnny Storm’s mother literally calls the group ‘The Fantastic Four’. But even with that said, I can at least tell that the cast and crew were putting their all into it despite the limitations that they had to deal with, primarily in terms of budget. And I do legitimately feel bad for them in regards to the fact that this film that they spent a lot of time working on never got to see the light of day until it got leaked onto the internet in crappy quality. Still, there’s no denying that the first ‘Fantastic Four’ was a lackluster outing for Marvel’s First Family. And as we all know, things weren’t going to get better for this franchise in the years to come.

The film that compelled me to finally do this list starts off the Bottom 5.

5. X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE


Believe it or not, there actually was potential in regards to this ‘X-Men’ spinoff centered on the film series’ most popular character. Wolverine of course had been played perfectly by Hugh Jackman in the previous ‘X-Men’ films, even after some were initially skeptical about a Broadway-trained actor like Jackman taking on the role of the iconic adamantium-clawed mutant. And he’s still great in this film… it’s too bad then that he has lousy material to work with here. This film tries to do a lot in the span of 107 minutes and as a result it pretty much glosses over the entirety of Wolverine’s rather expansive backstory. The end result is a fairly dull superhero film with generic action sequences and woefully underdone CGI, particularly in regards to Wolverine’s adamantium claws. And of course, I’ve already gone over how the film screwed over the character of Deadpool so that’s just an extra issue that the film has. Thankfully, Jackman got the chance to work on a better Wolverine spin-off in 2013 with ‘The Wolverine’, inspired by the famous comic storyline of the same name from 1982 by Chris Claremont and Frank Miller. And of course thanks to ‘Days of Future Past’, the events of ‘Origins’ have now been retconned from the series’ canon and I think we can all agree that the series is better off now because of it. But now all eyes are on what is set to be Jackman’s final outing in the most famous role of his career in the upcoming third ‘Wolverine’ solo film. Here’s hoping it ends his phenomenal run as Wolverine in the best way possible.

How ironic. The fourth, and worst, installment of this franchise takes the Number 4 spot.

4. SUPERMAN IV: THE QUEST FOR PEACE


The original ‘Superman’ film series actually has a fairly identical history to the pre-Nolan ‘Batman’ film series in regards to the overall quality of their first four respective films. The first film in each series was a major critical and commercial hit and both were pretty much responsible for setting a new standard for the genre at the time of their release. Their first sequels, while not as well-received as their predecessors, still did solidly with both critics and audiences. Things started to get a bit more complicated, though, with the third film of each series (note: though in reality I’d argue that ‘Batman Forever’ is actually superior to ‘Batman Returns’) as each saw a drop in critical reception compared to their predecessors. And as for their fourth films… well, ‘Batman and Robin’ and ‘Superman IV: The Quest for Peace’ ended up bringing both of their franchises to a screeching halt and it would be years before either series would make its own big-screen comeback. ‘Superman IV’ was not produced by the Salkinds this time around and was instead produced by Cannon Films. In the 80’s, the company was run by the duo of Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus, who were known for producing a lot of B-movies out of ‘bottom-barrel’ scripts. And as for ‘Superman IV’, Christopher Reeve has gone on record saying that the film was severely affected by budget cuts, with the original budget being cut by more than 50% as a result of Cannon being involved with around 30 other film projects at the time of production. And boy does it show... visible wirework, clearly fake backgrounds, and some laughably bad green-screen effects. And for the record, this is all coming from the franchise that actually made all of that stuff look really good back in its early days.

If you thought the plot of ‘Superman III’ was ridiculous, just wait until you see what happens in ‘Superman IV’. In this film, Superman announces to the world that he’s going to get rid of all of the planet’s nuclear weapons and is then able to do so without anyone stopping him. While all of this is going on, Lex Luthor takes a strand of Superman’s hair, attaches it to one of the nuclear missiles that Superman destroys by throwing them into the sun, and the resulting reaction spawns ‘Nuclear Man’. Do I really to say anything more about this lunacy that is the plot to this film? At the end of the day, I actually think that this film is ‘worse’ than ‘Batman and Robin’. Because at the very least, ‘Batman and Robin’ at least has that ‘so bad it’s good’ vibe going for it as a result of its ridiculously campy nature. ‘Superman IV’ doesn’t really have that same advantage. Sure it’s overly campy as well but it’s much more sluggish in comparison to ‘Batman and Robin’ with its lousy ‘fight scenes’ (a term used fairly loosely in this case), bland storyline that tries to tie in with the Cold War, and the aforementioned piss-poor visual effects. Not even Christopher Reeve could save this from being the absolute worst ‘Superman’ film of all-time and the film that effectively derailed the franchise for nearly two decades until 2006’s ‘Superman Returns’. And while ‘Returns’ did fare better than ‘Superman IV’ from both a critical and commercial standpoint, it too ended up halting the series for a while until yet another ‘reboot’ came out seven years later in the form of ‘Man of Steel’, whose follow-up ‘Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice’ will be hitting theaters next month.

 ‘Captain America: The First Avenger’ is easily one of my all-time favorite superhero films. The same cannot be said for Cap’s previous foray in film. That film in question takes the spot of my Number 3 worst superhero film of all-time.

3. CAPTAIN AMERICA (1990)


Before Chris Evans took on the role of Captain America in Marvel’s Cinematic Universe, there was another ‘Captain America’ film that was made in the 90’s. And as you might have already guessed given the other aforementioned Marvel films that came out at that time, like 1989’s ‘The Punisher’ and the 1994 ‘Fantastic Four’ film, it ultimately never saw an official theatrical release. And also like those other films, you can definitely see why when watching it. But ultimately the biggest flaw of the film is how it portrays Cap and his main adversary, the Red Skull. Matt Salinger does a decent job in the role of Cap but the character in this film barely resembles the iconic hero as he has been portrayed in the comics. This Cap spends most of the film running away from danger, getting his red, white, and blue ass handed to him by his enemies, and at one point even steals a car by pretending to be sick, getting out, and then rushing back to the car and taking it once his companion walks over to him… twice! As for the Red Skull, he’s only in that get-up for about… five minutes. After Cap gets frozen in ice for five decades and the film jumps ahead to 1993, he is revealed to have gotten plastic surgery in order to look more ‘normal’. So with that said… why is he still intended to be referred to as the ‘Red Skull’ if he doesn’t have a frigging red skull? Bottom line, when it comes to ‘Captain America’ films, you’re much better off with ‘The First Avenger’ and ‘The Winter Soldier’, as both of those films did a much better job at conveying the true character of the iconic Marvel Avenger.

While the thought of a spin-off film featuring this character had potential, the final result was… well…

2. CATWOMAN

Image result for catwoman 2004 poster

What more can be said about this film that hasn’t already been said before? This easily has to be one of the most disastrous films of all time, and not just in regards to the superhero genre. And like I said before, there really was some potential for this spin-off centering on the iconic Batman anti-heroine Catwoman, especially when considering that this was originally conceived as a spin-off of the Burton era Batman films and was going to have Michelle Pfeiffer reprising her role from ‘Batman Returns’. Obviously that didn’t work out and instead Halle Berry took on the role of an entirely different character named Patience Phillips who, despite having the exact same ‘origin story’ as Pfeiffer’s Catwoman (aka the incredibly ridiculous ‘dying and then resurrected by cats’ plotline), was pretty much nothing like the Catwoman of the comics. And that’s really this film in a nutshell… it has nothing to do with the comics whatsoever and is instead just an overly-sexualized superhero film, right down to Catwoman’s ‘bikini’ costume, with poor CGI (a good chunk of Catwoman’s actions in the film were done with a digital double), lousy writing, and so on and so forth. Halle Berry, at the very least, tries her best to work with this terrible material but that’s really the only positive thing I can say about this film. My advice? Just ignore this ‘strange’ attempt at a film based around the legendary DC anti-heroine and stick with Michelle Pfeiffer and Anne Hathaway’s far superior turns in the role in ‘Batman Returns’ and ‘The Dark Knight Rises’, respectively.    

And finally, here is my Number 1 worst superhero film of all-time. It does pain me in a way to have to do this, but I have to give the honor to one of the most disappointing films that I have ever seen.

1. FANTASTIC FOUR (2015)


(For my original review of this film, click Here)

(For the second half of my ‘Top 10 Worst of 2015’ list, in which I put this film at the #2 spot, click Here)

I’ve thought about it these past few months and ultimately I did come to the conclusion that the 2015 reboot of ‘Fantastic Four’ is the absolute worst superhero film that I’ve ever seen. And it legitimately disappoints me to have to say that because, as many of you know, I was one of the few people who were actually really looking forward to this film. I was hopeful that this could finally be the first ‘great’ ‘Fantastic Four’ film. After all, it was to be directed by Josh Trank, fresh off of 2012’s superb found-footage film ‘Chronicle’, and contrary to internet opinion, I thought the filmmakers had picked an excellent group of leads in Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan, and Jamie Bell to take on the roles of the Fantastic Four as well as casting Toby Kebbell, fresh off of his great villainous turn as Koba in ‘Dawn of the Planet of the Apes’, in the role of Dr. Doom. But as we all know, the film turned out to be a disaster in every sense of the word. Now for the record, it’s very much clear that Josh Trank was screwed over by Fox in regards to them taking control of the film away from him. The cut released to theaters was clearly a case of a studio trying to salvage the material that it had and failing to do so, from obvious re-shoots (e.g. Kate Mara’s changing hair) to the fact that the film literally skips over an entire year of what could’ve been quality character development for the characters. But that doesn’t mean that Josh Trank is entirely off the hook when it comes to some of this film’s biggest issues.

Apparently he was the one who was responsible for the film’s dour tone and telling the cast to be as dull as possible in regards to their performances. As a result, the film is a complete downer of an affair, which is definitely not something that you want to see in a superhero film. It’s also an incredibly dull superhero film as well, with the only major ‘action sequence’, and a lame one at that, occurring at the very end of the film. As for the Four themselves, they may be played by a talented group of actors/actresses but they never once display the characteristics of the heroes that they’re playing. It doesn’t help that they spend most of the film apart from each other and only appear together on-screen at, you guessed it, the very end. And then there’s Doctor Doom, arguably Marvel’s greatest villain… who’s yet to be done right on film, from the wuss Doom of the ’94 film to Julian McMahon being severely miscast as Doom in the ’05 film and now Toby Kebbell’s underused and underdeveloped Doom in this film. In short, this is easily the worst ‘Fantastic Four’ to date. You know this film is bad when the un-released 1994 ‘Fantastic Four’ film isn’t as bad by comparison. And at the end of the day, it really does disappoint me that this film ended up the way it did. Unlike a good chunk of the internet, I legitimately was hoping for the best when it came to this film. I was hoping that this would end up being one of those films that would prove the internet fanboys wrong and turn out to be great. Obviously that wasn’t the case and now we can only wait and see what happens next for the ‘Fantastic Four’ franchise. Back to Marvel Studios? Fourth time’s the charm?

So there you have it… my Top 10 worst superhero films of all-time. As with any Top 10 list, you’re certainly going to get different results when you ask different people to name their least favorites of the superhero genre. So with that said, be sure to sound off in the comments section below to list your own picks for the worst superhero films of all-time. And to keep things interesting, try to name some other than ‘Batman and Robin’. 


Monday, February 1, 2016

The Finest Hours (2016) review


In February of 1952, members of the United States Coast Guard performed what has since been regarded as one of the most famous rescue missions in the organization’s history. In the midst of a particularly harsh ‘Nor’easter’ storm that had hit the East Coast, a four-man crew from the Coast Guard station in Chatham, Massachusetts braved the storm and the harsh waters of the Atlantic in order to help the crew of the SS Pendleton, a T2 tanker that had broken in half about 20 miles or so off of the Chatham coast. In fact, it was the second of two T2 tankers that suffered the same exact fate on the very same day, the other being the SS Fort Mercer. Ultimately, though, it was the Pendleton rescue that became known as the most famous small boat rescue in U.S. Coast Guard history and the story of this daring rescue mission is brought to life on the big-screen in Disney’s ‘The Finest Hours’, which is primarily based off of the book of the same name by Michael J. Tougias and Casey Sherman that chronicled the events of that day. ‘The Finest Hours’ is driven by some particularly stand-out performances from its two main leads, Chris Pine and Casey Affleck, and while the film is admittedly a bit straight-forward when it comes to its proceedings, it’s still a fittingly honorable and suitably thrilling take on this fascinating true story of the heroism of four men in some of the harshest conditions imaginable.    

The leader of the four-man crew was Boatswain’s Mate First Class Bernard ‘Bernie’ Webber (Chris Pine), who at that time was courting a local girl from the neighborhood named Miriam (Holliday Grainger) who worked as a telephone operator. But on February 18, 1952, T2 tanker SS Fort Mercer ends up getting split in half by the impending winter storm that is set to hit the Cape Cod area. And as fate would have it, another T2 tanker nearby, the SS Pendleton, breaks in half as well. But unlike the SS Fort Mercer, the SS Pendleton was unable to make a distress call for help due to a loss of radio capabilities as a result of the breakage. While another team heads out to help the crew of the SS Fort Mercer, Chatham station commander Daniel Cluff (Eric Bana) dispatches Bernie to help the Pendleton. Despite the severe risks that come from the storm and the fact that they would have to go over the extremely dangerous Chatham Bar to reach them, Bernie and his crew; Seaman Richard Livesey (Ben Foster), Engineman Third Class Andrew Fitzgerald (Kyle Gallner), and Seaman Ervin Maske (John Magaro), head out on Lifeboat CG-36500 to help the crew of the SS Pendleton. Meanwhile, on the Pendleton, Chief Engineer Ray Sybert (Casey Affleck) takes control of the crew, due to the fact that the Captain of the Pendleton was lost because he was on the other half of the ship, in order to keep the ship afloat as long as they possibly can in the hopes that they are rescued before the ship sinks.

‘The Finest Hours’ can be a bit straight-forward at times in terms of its plot. Then again, that’s sort of expected given that it’s a true story and you may or may not be generally aware of what happened and how it all ended going into it. But even with that in mind, the film is full of some genuinely thrilling moments as both Bernie and his crew and the crew of the SS Pendleton, as led by Ray Sybert, try to stay alive in some of the harshest conditions imaginable while out on the open sea. Those sequences set at sea, including the sequence where Bernie’s crew traverses over the aforementioned Chatham Bar, a sand bar that was capable of running ships aground even in lesser conditions compared to the storm that they had to go through that day, are definitely the major highlights of the film. They convey the right amount of tension and suspense and are benefitted by some solid visual effects work. However, there are some who have argued that the film doesn’t really do enough to convey the real emotional core of the story and, as a result, feels a bit too ‘workmanlike’ at times. But overall I think that the film did do a fine enough job in regards to showcasing the valor of its heroes simply by way of the remarkable nature of the situation that they’re put through.

In regards to the film’s cast, the biggest standouts are its two main leads, Chris Pine as Bernie Webber and Casey Affleck as Ray Sybert. As Webber, Pine once again shows off his strong charisma that was also present in many of his other performances like James T. Kirk in the ‘Star Trek’ films or as Cinderella’s Prince in ‘Into The Woods’, while also doing a great job of getting across Webber’s audacity and courage in the face of danger. As Sybert, Affleck is also terrific in the role of the one man who, despite the fact that a lot of the crew didn’t like him very much, took charge of them so that they could survive. The two are backed up by a solid supporting cast that includes, among others, Ben Foster, Kyle Gallner, and John Magaro as the other members of Bernie’s crew and Eric Bana as Webber’s commanding officer Cluff. Pine also has really solid chemistry with the film’s main female lead Holliday Grainger, resulting in some very charming and sweet romantic moments between them. However, Grainger ends up being rather underused in the role of Bernie’s girlfriend Miriam. While the trailer may have implied that she would have a fairly substantial role in the film, as primarily evident in the sequence in the trailer where she confronts Cluff over sending Bernie and his team out into the storm on what very much seems to be a ‘suicide mission’, that’s really all that she gets to do in this film. In other words, she’s basically stuck in a ‘50’s era housewife’ role. Though from what I hear, at the very least this is more than what her character actually did in real-life. In reality, Miriam was stuck at home with the flu while all of this was going on.

The consensus on Rotten Tomatoes notes that this film is ‘old-fashioned to a fault’ and I will say that this is a pretty accurate description of the film. For some, this may be just a bit too ‘old-fashioned’ for their taste. But as traditional as it may get from time to time, it’s still a very solid and exciting adventure that highlights one of the most fascinating rescue missions in U.S. Coast Guard history. To truly put this moment into perspective for you folks, Webber and his crew had to rescue a 33-man crew commandeering a 35-foot boat that could only hold 12 in the midst of an extremely harsh winter storm. And while some may argue the film is a bit too subdued in regards to how it handles its true story, overall I’d say that the film does do a fine job in conveying the heroism of its real-life subjects. And to top it all off, the film has a solid cast buoyed (no pun intended) by leads Chris Pine and Casey Affleck and some genuinely tense action sequences backed by solid visual effects. In short, it’s a neat little look into a fascinating true story that took place in the New England area. Being a local New Englander myself, I’ll admit that I’m always fascinated by true stories like this that took place in this area, with other notable examples being ‘Black Mass’ and, to some extent, ‘The Social Network’. ‘The Finest Hours’ is the latest of these films and overall I say that it’s very much worth checking out for those looking for a good-old fashioned rescue drama.


Rating: 4/5