Showing posts with label Sleeping Beauty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sleeping Beauty. Show all posts

Saturday, November 2, 2019

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (2019) review


Michelle Pfeiffer, Angelina Jolie, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Elle Fanning, Ed Skrein, and Harris Dickinson in Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (2019)

In 2014, Disney released their then-latest live-action remake of one of their animated classics, Maleficent. The film served as a reimagining of the studio’s 1959 film Sleeping Beauty, but as the title suggests, the focus was shifted from the titular ‘Sleeping Beauty’ AKA Princess Aurora to its iconic villainess, Maleficent. However, instead of just simply maintaining the character’s villainous nature from the original film, Maleficent ended up going a radically different route and turned the character into a tragic anti-hero whose actions served as an act of revenge against those who wronged her while also forming a genuine mother-daughter relationship with Aurora. As you might have guessed, this new characterization didn’t exactly go over well with everyone, thus contributing to the film’s overall mixed reception. And yet, that didn’t stop it from being a massive hit at the box-office where it grossed over $758 million worldwide, effectively continuing the financial hot streak of Disney’s live-action remakes. Thus, half a decade after the original’s release, the ‘Mistress of All Evil’ (and yes, I will use that title in this instance even though this version of the character isn’t a villain) is now back in a new film, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, albeit with a notable change in director. Whereas the first film served as the directorial debut of production designer Robert Stromberg, this film is directed by Joachim Rønning, who’s fresh off directing the fifth Pirates of the Caribbean film with long-time directing partner Espen Sandberg (though, to be clear, this one is Rønning only). And while Mistress of Evil does continue to go with its polarizing heroic rendition of its main character, those who were fans of the first film will find this to be yet another solidly entertaining dark fantasy all bolstered once again by Angelina Jolie’s truly excellent turn in the title role.

It has been five years since the powerful Dark Fey Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) saved Princess Aurora (Elle Fanning) from the death-like sleeping curse that she had inflicted upon her as a baby due in large part to the motherly affection that she had developed for the young Princess. Since then, Aurora has dutifully served as the ruler of Maleficent’s kingdom, the Moors, and on one faithful day, her dashing suitor Prince Phillip (Harris Dickinson, taking over for Brenton Thwaites from the previous film) asks for her hand in marriage. Despite Maleficent’s objections over this due to her own past experiences with love, Aurora convinces her to travel to Phillip’s home, the Kingdom of Ulstead, and meet with his parents, King John (Robert Lindsay) and Queen Ingrith (Michelle Pfeiffer). However, this doesn’t end up going very well as Maleficent soon begins to feel threatened by Ingrith, especially after she claims that this union will result in her becoming the mother that Aurora ‘never had’. Thus, when Maleficent lashes out at this remark in a manner that seemingly curses King John into a perpetual sleep like she did with Aurora, she becomes vilified by Ingrith, who promptly begins to mount an all-out war against the Moors. During this time, Maleficent also ends up coming across other Dark Feys, led by the duo of Conall (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and Borra (Ed Skrein), who find themselves in disagreement over this impending conflict. Whereas Borra is hellbent on wiping out humanity to save their kind, Conall believes that Maleficent’s the only one who can use her powers to unite the two sides.

One of the things that these Maleficent films have always excelled at is their phenomenal production design. Sure, just like practically every other recent live-action Disney remake of the past few years, they mainly utilize CG to craft their environment and the non-human creatures that inhabit it, but they still succeed immensely when it comes to bringing the truly unique fantasy world that they’ve created to life. Plus, when compared to the ‘arguably a bit too dark’ aesthetic of Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland (not counting its follow-up Alice Through the Looking Glass since it did, at least, brighten things up considerably), these two films manage to achieve a good mix between dark and atmospheric and bright and colorful. But just like the first film, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil stumbles a little when it comes to its story. While it does notably have the benefit of not having to adhere to any specific bit of source material since it obviously did the whole Sleeping Beauty arc in the previous film, everything here is still rather basic in terms of plot. But perhaps the most disappointing aspect of this film is that there aren’t as many scenes with Maleficent and Aurora together, which I only bring up because the whole mother-daughter relationship between them was very much the heart of the first film. Thankfully, they aren’t separated for the whole film and the biggest scenes that directly involve the two of them are easily amongst its best moments. Plus, despite boasting a longer runtime than its predecessor (Mistress of Evil runs a little under two hours whereas the first was only an hour and a half long), the film still retains the solidly breezy pacing that served the first film nicely.

But, of course, the biggest highlight of these films is the continuously excellent work by Angelina Jolie in the title role. Even if you aren’t a fan of how these films eschew Maleficent’s villainous characterization from the original Sleeping Beauty, there’s no denying that Jolie perfectly nails the role in every possible way. She obviously has the look down, excellently maintains the character’s classic mannerisms, and in the context of these films, has a solid on-screen camaraderie with Elle Fanning that impeccably illustrates the strong relationship between Maleficent and Aurora. It is this relationship that has arguably made Fanning’s take on Aurora superior to her animated counterpart, and this is well-reflected in the sequel thanks to a noticeably matured turn from Fanning performance-wise. Another key returning player from the previous film is Sam Riley as Maleficent’s raven confidante Diaval, and while the character does get somewhat sidelined in the same way that the film doesn’t have a lot of scenes between Maleficent and Aurora, Riley still excels at making Diaval a fully endearing sidekick. Speaking of sidekicks, the film also makes the wise decision to downplay Aurora’s three pixie caretakers; Knotgrass (Imelda Staunton), Thistlewit (Juno Temple), and Flittle (Lesley Manville). In retrospect, I admit that I may have been a bit harsh on these three in my review of the original Maleficent back in 2014, but I still stand by what I said about how they ended up being one of the weaker aspects of that film due to them being portrayed as far ditsier than their animated counterparts. Sure, the trio of Flora, Fauna, and Merryweather had their silly moments (e.g. their squabble over the color of Aurora’s dress), but the first Maleficent arguably went a bit too far with their humor in its attempt to show that Maleficent was a far better caretaker for Aurora than they were. Thankfully, that’s not as big of an issue this time around because while these three do still maintain their bumbling personas, they don’t play as big of a role in the story this time.  

There is one notable change regarding the returning cast of characters, however, as Harris Dickinson takes over the role of Prince Phillip from Brenton Thwaites due to scheduling conflicts for the latter. Thankfully, this change doesn’t affect the film in any notable way as Dickinson has solid chemistry with Fanning and it also helps that Phillip has a larger role in the story this time (even if it’s still a generally minor supporting role) whereas Thwaites’ Phillip only appeared in two major scenes near the tail-end of the previous film. As for new characters, the biggest addition, of course, is Michelle Pfeiffer as Phillip’s mother and, subsequently, the film’s main antagonist, Queen Ingrith. And while it would’ve been nice to have some more scenes where Pfeiffer and Jolie interact with each other directly (if only for the opportunity to see more of these two iconic actresses together onscreen), Pfeiffer brings a great commanding presence to the role that fits nicely with the backstory and motivations that she’s given. Finally, closing out the new cast of characters is the duo of Chiwetel Ejiofor and Ed Skrein as Maleficent’s fellow Dark Feys Conall and Borra. Both are natural fits in their respective roles, with Ejiofor being the noble leader and Skrein being the fierce warrior. However, you may be surprised to learn that Ejiofor doesn’t factor into the film as much as its marketing may have implied to the point where Skrein arguably ends up having more screen-time than him.

As I’ve been alluding to throughout this review, the overall reception of these Maleficent films is primarily dependent on one’s views of their radically different portrayal of the title character. Thanks to her role in the original Sleeping Beauty, Maleficent has consistently been regarded as one of the greatest villains in a Disney animated film. In contrast to that, the Maleficent films make her the main character of the story and portray her in a generally more heroic manner. Thus, if you’re not a fan of this characterization, you’re better off sticking with the original Sleeping Beauty and various other bits of Disney media that maintain her villainous status; in fact, you’ll probably wonder why this sequel decided to go with the Mistress of Evil subtitle even though it isn’t an accurate descriptor for this iteration of the character. But for those who were fans of 2014’s Maleficent, you’ll be pleased to know that this film does continue to maintain many of the aspects that made its predecessor such a big hit with audiences. Its visual effects and production design are still second to none, Angelina Jolie continues to prove why she was born to play the title role, and it’s easy to appreciate these films’ commitment to their female-led narratives. The only major downside to this film is that it doesn’t provide as many heartwarming moments between Maleficent and Aurora as there were in the first film, which is why I admittedly wouldn’t call Mistress of Evil a ‘superior sequel’. Ultimately, though, this does not prevent the film from being yet another solid live-action outing from Disney.

Rating: 4/5

Friday, November 4, 2016

DISNEY MONTH: Ranking the Disney Princesses


Today marks the beginning of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s ‘Disney Month’, in which I’ll be honoring the best of Walt Disney Animation Studios in preparation for the release of their 56th animated feature, Moana. And to kick it all off, I’m doing a very big list. Today I’ll be ranking the characters that make up one of Disney’s biggest franchises; the Disney princesses. I’ll be ranking them based solely on their characterizations in regards to the films that they appear in. And for the record, when I say ‘films’, I mean the ‘original’ films that they were in; no direct-to-video sequels or any stuff like that. Disney’s ‘Princess Line’ has certainly been one of the company’s most profitable franchises since it was first established sometime in the early 2000’s by then Disney Consumer Products chairman Andy Mooney. However, at the same time, the franchise has seen quite a lot of backlash from some audiences, namely feminists who argue that it instigates stereotyping and bad life lessons for the young girls that it markets to. In fact, I think it’s safe to say that pretty much all the Disney princesses before 1991 have attracted a considerably polarizing reception. But with that said, I’d argue that there’s more to some of these earlier Princesses than most give them credit for. Sure, by comparison, some of the newer Princesses have technically gotten more development because of the times but that doesn’t mean the earlier ones don’t have their strengths too. So, with that said, I’ll be counting down the franchise’s current 11 members, plus two characters that aren’t part of the lineup but, in a way, technically are, from ‘least favorite’ to ‘best’. I recognize that there might be some controversy surrounding the order in which I rank these characters so please be civil in the comments if you disagree with me in any way. Here we go…

12. AURORA (SLEEPING BEAUTY)

Image result for aurora disney

Starting this list off is ‘Sleeping Beauty’ herself, Princess Aurora. As I noted in my 50’s Disney Retrospective, Aurora and her prince, Phillip, are unfortunately the weakest part of the original Sleeping Beauty. In her case, it’s mostly just due to one main reason. As her ‘nickname’ suggests, she spends most of the film asleep after pricking her finger on the spindle of a spinning wheel after being cursed to do so by the evil witch Maleficent when she was a baby. Obviously that’s the main plot of the story but it does limit her as a character. As is, she’s basically just the usual ‘nice’ Disney princess dreaming of her true love. Because of this, I actually have to give a lot of credit to the live-action remake, 2014’s Maleficent, because I think the Aurora in that film is the superior interpretation of the character. Now with that said, even in that film she’s still basically a side character in the story. After all, the film is called Maleficent so that means that the focus is more on her and Angelina Jolie is very much the star of the show in the title role. Still, I do have to give Elle Fanning a lot of credit because she actually did kind of make the most out of her somewhat limited role. I liked the relationship that formed between Aurora and Maleficent in this film. I didn’t mind that the film portrayed Maleficent in a more sympathetic light, which mainly stems from the maternal instincts that she begins to have towards Aurora. It gets to the point where she’s the one who awakens Aurora from her eternal sleep, not Prince Phillip. Yes, I know that there are quite a few people out there who REALLY hate the live-action remake but I’m sorry, it kind of has an advantage over the original when it comes to Sleeping Beauty herself.

11. POCAHONTAS (POCAHONTAS)

Image result for pocahontas disney

I’ve gone on record saying that Pocahontas is one of my least favorite Disney animated films. Aside from being a rather dull affair, it also doesn’t help that most of the characters in it are weak, including the titular heroine herself, Pocahontas. While Pocahontas certainly has more to do character-wise than Aurora, she’s still a rather bland lead. Now when it comes to the problems that I have with her portrayal in the film, I’m not referring to the fact that the film has been generally criticized for its representation of Native American history. And at the very least, Irene Bedard, who the character was also physically modeled after, does a solid job voicing her. But like I said before, there’s not much to her. Like many of the other Disney princesses of the time, she’s adventurous, headstrong, and isn’t exactly willing to adhere to the cultural norms of her time. In her case, it’s the fact that she’s being set to marry one of her tribe’s most famous warriors, Kocoum, who Pocahontas dismisses as being ‘so serious’. But once the European settlers arrive, she then meets and subsequently falls in love with settler John Smith, eventually saving his life when he is sentenced to death by her tribe after he took the blame for one of his settler friends killing Kocoum. But really, this romance doesn’t matter in the long run considering that, historically speaking, they weren’t ‘lovers’ and she instead ended up marrying another settler named John Rolfe. But, then again, I did mention the fact that this film isn’t that historically accurate so… yeah. Really, there’s not much else that I can say about her and that’s why she’s near the bottom of this list.

10. SNOW WHITE (SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS)

Image result for snow white disney

Snow White, the young girl with ‘hair as black as ebony, lips as red as the rose, and skin as white as snow’, is the original Disney princess in what was the original Disney animated film; Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And just like the film itself, Disney has come quite a long way in terms of its Princess characters following Snow White. But that doesn’t mean that Snow White is a ‘bad’ character, per se. It’s just that nowadays her characterizations are very simple when compared to other Disney princesses. She’s kind, innocent, and wishes for her prince to come for her one day, hence the name of her song ‘Someday My Prince Will Come’… and that’s basically it. Does she do much in the film? Not really. Like Aurora, at one point she’s put into an eternal slumber, in this instance by means of the Wicked Witch’s poisoned apple, and this lasts until she is woken up by her prince. Speaking of her prince… yeah he’s only in it for a few scenes. But despite the limited nature of the role, I still think that Snow White is a decent enough main character for the time. As Roger Ebert noted in his review of the film, the filmmakers arguably made a smart move by not outright focusing on Snow White, instead spending more time on the Evil Queen/Wicked Witch and the Seven Dwarfs. So, in short, Snow White may not be one of the best Disney Princesses but of course, there wouldn’t be any other Disney Princesses if it wasn’t for her.  

9. MERIDA (BRAVE)

Image result for merida brave

Merida, the star of 2012’s Brave, was the first Pixar character to be inducted into the Disney Princess lineup. The film itself did ok with critics but not exactly on the same level as Pixar’s most famous efforts. It also didn’t help that this was the first Pixar film that was released after their first critically-maligned effort, Cars 2, which came out the year before. So, in other words, the generally ‘meh’ reception towards this film effectively continued the growing doubt that the internet began to have over Pixar in terms of the quality of their work that would only be cooled, for now at least, by Inside Out and Finding Dory. But anyway, the first time that I saw this film, I liked it okay though I’ll admit that I was a bit disappointed by it. But when I saw it again recently, I found that I did warm up to it quite a bit. Sure, it ultimately ends up being a rather straight-forward family film, despite starting off on a much different kind of note, but it’s still an enjoyable Pixar flick that mainly benefits from what makes up the heart of the story. And that is the mother-daughter relationship between Merida and her mother, Queen Elinor. Right from the get-go, the film establishes the main conflict that emerges between the two of them. Elinor is constantly trying to get Merida to act more like a princess while the latter clearly does not want to live that kind of life, especially once she learns that she is being forced into betrothal to one of her father’s allies’ sons. So, when Merida goes to see a witch to try and change her fate, she accidentally ends up turning her mother into a bear and now they must work together to reverse this curse before it becomes permanent.

And sure, despite the shift into kid-friendly territory that occurs from this point on, the relationship between the two is the best part of the film as both end up learning from each other while on their journey. Elinor learns to lighten up and not follow tradition all the time but Merida, who proves to be a likable heroine and talented marksman with a bow and arrow, learns that there are times where one must take responsibility for their actions, especially if they’re of royal status like herself. After all, when she was arranged to be wed to the son of one of her father’s allies, she ends up breaking tradition by shaming the other clans of her kingdom in an archery competition as an act of defiance, effectively causing a stir amongst the clans that threatens to tear the kingdom of Dunbroch apart. But in one of the best scenes in the film, she manages to calm the feuding clans by admitting her mistake but at the same time also convincing them that she and her ‘suitors’ should be free to live their lives and fall in love with whoever they want, instead of being forced into it. Really, her only major downfall as a character is that when her mother is first turned into a bear, she tries to shirk responsibility by constantly saying that it wasn’t her fault, even though the facts clearly say otherwise. But despite that, Merida is a solid protagonist and while Brave may not have been one of Pixar’s most beloved efforts, it seems as if, at the very least, she is commonly regarded as being one of the best things about it.

8. RAPUNZEL (TANGLED)

Image result for rapunzel tangled

And now we go from one computer animated Disney princess to another; in this case, the first computer animated member of the Disney Princess line. Tangled, of course, is the story of Rapunzel, the girl with the long golden hair who was trapped for years in a tall tower. The film expands upon this story by having her be the daughter of the king and queen of the kingdom of Corona. Her long hair was the result of a magical golden flower that possessed healing abilities. The King of Corona used it to save his wife when she was sick while pregnant and thus, Rapunzel inherited some of the flower’s magic in her hair. This ends up getting Rapunzel kidnapped from the kingdom and locked away in a tower by an old woman named Gothel who had been using the flower to maintain a youthful appearance. It isn’t until her 18th birthday when she finally leaves the tower, with the help of a thief named Flynn Rider, so that she can see the kingdom’s annual releasing of lanterns, which was the King and Queen’s way of hopefully finding their daughter. Now there was some controversy over the film’s change in title from Rapunzel to the arguably more generic Tangled. However, it does prove to be a fitting title considering that the film does equally balance the roles of Rapunzel and Flynn Rider in the story. Rapunzel proves to be a lovable free-spirited heroine and the many creative ways in which she uses her hair are awesome. And a lot of Rapunzel’s likability comes courtesy of her voice actress, Mandy Moore. Not only does Moore give Rapunzel an infectious enthusiasm for experiencing the world outside her tower but she also succeeds in establishing her as a no-nonsense young woman who is very much capable of taking care of herself. Say what you will about the film’s title but Rapunzel is very much one of the best parts about Tangled.

7. MULAN (MULAN)

Image result for mulan disney

Technically speaking, Mulan isn’t actually a Princess. Sure, she’s the main character of her film and she does save the day and become a hero of China but she’s not a member of the Royal Family. But she was made a member of the Princess line so, yeah, now she’s counted as one, I guess. Regardless of the legitimacy behind this decision, she is an excellent protagonist in what is one of the most underrated films of the Disney Renaissance. The daughter of an aging war hero, Mulan ends up taking her father Fa Zhou’s place in the Chinese army when he is summoned to help fight the Hun army, as she knows that he’s too old to fight anymore. In doing so, Mulan proves to be an excellent role model for young girls by showing that they can do just as much as the boys can. At the same time, there’s also some fun humor that comes from having Mulan pose as a man, from hiding from her army buddies while swimming in a lake to speaking in a ‘manly’ voice as ‘Ping’ to following the [questionable] advice of her ‘protector’ Mushu. Mulan is voiced by Ming-Na Wen (AKA Melinda May from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) and she does a fantastic job in the role, both in terms of handling the humor and giving Mulan her inner strength and likability. Mulan also proves to be quite a badass warrior. In fact, she’s the only Disney princess to, no joke, have a kill count due to the scene in which she defeats the Hun army by causing an avalanche. The only real aspect of her character that has been commonly criticized is the romance that develops between her and her commander, Captain Li Shang. However, this doesn’t bother me that much because it’s never the focus of the film. In fact, it’s only brought up right at the end, for the most part. Sure, that still arguably makes it very tacked-on but the film is still primarily about Mulan going against all sorts of societal and gender norms at the risk of bringing dishonor to her family.

6. ARIEL (THE LITTLE MERMAID)

Image result for ariel disney

Ok, I can tell that this one is going to be rather controversial; especially because I ranked Ariel above some of the more recent Disney princesses. While Little Mermaid is widely regarded as a Disney classic and the film that effectively redeemed the company by kick-starting the Disney Renaissance, its title character has been much more polarizing amongst critics and audiences. I went over the reasons why in my 80’s Disney Retrospective but I’ll go over them again here. The main issue that some have with Ariel is that they feel that she doesn’t learn anything from the whole ordeal that she goes through to live in the human world. And, technically speaking, they do kind of have a point there. Because Ariel goes to see Ursula to change her into a human, she basically ends up letting Ursula take her father Triton’s powers without much opposition. And even though Ursula is defeated without Ariel still not ‘learning’ from this whole ordeal, her father allows her to become human anyway. But here’s where Ariel is a better character than most give her credit for. Some claim that she gave up her undersea life just to be with a man that she hardly knew and that’s not entirely the case. Sure, once she laid eyes on him, she basically fell in love with him right then and there but her desire to explore the human world had already been established at that point. So, you could say that Prince Eric was just an added incentive for her. And through it all, she is a likable character voiced excellently by Jodi Benson. So, when it comes to Ariel’s best strengths as a character, it comes down to her curiosity and for having a desire that was different than previous Disney princesses. Sure, she has her flaws and it’s understandable why some aren’t that big on her because of it, but these aren’t as big of a problem as some say they are.

5. TIANA (THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG)

Image result for tiana disney

Tiana was Disney’s first African-American princess… and yet she’s a frog for most of the film. Yeah, some people weren’t too pleased about that given how, again, this was Disney’s first African-American princess. Still, Tiana’s a pretty great main character even though she does spend most of the film as a frog. And the main reason why is because she is something that most Disney princesses usually aren’t; a hard worker. As The Princess and the Frog begins, it references the classic Disney song ‘When You Wish Upon a Star’. But then it pulls the rug out from under it by having Tiana’s father tell her that to achieve your dreams, you must work for it. And so, after her father dies (because this is a Disney film, after all), Tiana starts to work towards the collective dream that they had of owning a restaurant. So, at the expense of a social life, she spends much of her time working as a waitress at two different restaurants so that she could earn enough money to open her own restaurant. However, despite managing to earn enough money to rent a potential site, she soon learns that someone else has made a higher bid for it. And if that wasn’t enough, she then gets turned into a frog when she kisses one; a reversal of the typical ‘Princess-Frog’ story. This frog is revealed to be Prince Naveen of Maldonia, who was turned into a frog by the evil Shadow Man as part of a plot to inherit the fortune of the richest man in New Orleans and now the two of them must find a way to become human again. As for the romance that develops between these two, it’s sort of like Beauty and the Beast in that they don’t immediately like each other. In fact, Tiana pretty much hates Naveen at first for getting her turned into a frog; but of course, they do warm up to each other by the end of the film. Thanks to those great character traits as well as a spunky and charismatic performance by her voice actress, Anika Noni Rose, Tiana proves to be one of the best role models in the entire Princess line.

4. JASMINE (ALADDIN)

Image result for jasmine aladdin

If I were to list the best ‘romantic pairings’ in Disney films, Aladdin and Princess Jasmine are definitely near the top of the list. The romantic chemistry between them is easily one of the best parts of the film and this is a case where both are generally treated as equals in the plot. The film begins with both trying to get out of their current societal predicaments. Aladdin wishes to be more than just a worthless street rat and Jasmine is annoyed with the fact that she’s being forced into marriage before her next birthday. When she decides to sneak out of the palace, the two of them meet and a connection immediately emerges between them. However, Aladdin is soon dealt with the reality of the situation; that he’s not a prince and therefore has no chance with her. But when he finds the mystical being known as the Genie, it allows him to pose as a prince so that he can be with her. Now with all of this said, there does come a point where Jasmine becomes a damsel in distress for Aladdin to save. But that’s only during the finale. In the rest of the film, she’s a spunky heroine who can even stand up to the likes of Jafar because she’s a no-nonsense gal. And even after Aladdin does manage to ‘become’ a Prince, it takes him a bit before he’s able to properly woo her. So, in short, while she may not necessarily be the most pro-active Disney princess of the bunch, Jasmine is still a very likable female lead and has always been one of my favorites in what is one of my favorite Disney films.

3. BELLE (BEAUTY AND THE BEAST)

Image result for belle disney

As I said before, prior to 1991, pretty much all of Disney’s princess characters received extremely polarizing responses from critics. They had their fans but they also had their naysayers. Belle from Beauty and the Beast was pretty much the first major member of the Disney Princess line to attract universal acclaim. And while all throughout this list I’ve been going over why some of the earlier princesses are better than most give them credit for, I do agree that Belle is a terrific lead who would set the standard for all future Disney princesses to come. As the film begins, it’s established that she is a smart and independent young woman who is a mystery to the rest of the people in her town because of her non-conforming ways. Eventually she comes across the Beast and while initially terrified of him, the two come to better understand each other and they eventually fall in love. And unlike other Disney couples that come together quite sporadically, the film does take time to develop a relationship between the two. But of course, it all comes together beautifully in the end. Now, for the record, that doesn’t mean that Belle hasn’t faced some criticism from certain audiences. Some have argued that Belle displays a case of Stockholm syndrome, a condition in which prisoners (because part of the plot has her voluntarily taking her father Maurice’s place as the Beast’s prisoner) begin to sympathize with their captors. Personally, I never look too deep into that kind of stuff and at the end of the day, all her other traits stand out much more. And that is why Belle is easily one of the best Disney princesses to date.

2. ANNA AND ELSA (FROZEN)

Image result for anna and elsa frozen

Ok I’m kind of cheating here because, technically, Anna and Elsa aren’t members of the Disney Princess line. Why? Well I remember reading a report saying that they were intended to be inducted into the line sometime in 2014 but then nothing happened. It wasn’t until recently when I found out why this is the case and it’s actually a pretty legit reason. Seeing how Frozen has become one of Disney’s most popular franchises, there’s really no need for the two to be included in another franchise at this point. Still, I wanted to include them in this list because not only are they ‘Disney royalty’ (heck, technically Elsa outranks all the Disney princesses because she is a queen) but they truly are a great pair of characters. This was the first time that a Disney animated film truly focused in on a pair of sisters as their main protagonists… though with that said, as I’m sure many will point out, it’s technically not the first time that a Disney film has done this. 2002’s Lilo and Stitch also focused around a pair of sisters, Lilo and Nani, namely through them struggling to keep their family together after their parents died in a car crash. However, the thing is… that wasn’t the main plot of the film. Instead, it was about Stitch trying to adapt to life on Earth. Thus, I consider Frozen to be Disney’s first true ‘sister story’ and it ends up giving the film so much heart. It’s about how Anna and Elsa try to reconnect after spending so many years apart. That’s because their parents kept Elsa locked away from the world due to her icy powers, with Anna being completely unaware of them because when she was younger and did know about Elsa’s powers, her memory of them was wiped after Elsa accidentally injured her.

While Elsa is certainly the more popular of the two sisters, if I had to choose a favorite it’d have to be Anna. Because technically Anna is the main character of this story. She’s the one who goes off to find her sister after Elsa flees the Kingdom of Arendelle and ends up causing an eternal winter. She’s a determined, free-spirited, and optimistic young woman who won’t give up on her sister no matter what and that’s what makes her such a terrific lead. And at the same time, she has her own personal flaws that make her a relatable protagonist. These primarily stem from all the time that she’s spent locked up in the castle along with her sister. She’s often quite naĂ¯ve at times, mainly represented by how quickly she falls in love with Prince Hans of the Southern Isles and then immediately deciding to marry him despite having just met him that day. Which, for the record, I find hilariously ironic because Anna’s voice actress, Kristen Bell, starred in a film, 2010’s When in Rome, in which this exact same situation occurred. And yet in that film, Bell was the ‘Elsa’ in that scenario, warning her sister about going too fast with her current relationship. And obviously, this backfires on her by the end of the film when Hans reveals his true colors. But in the end, her optimism, endearing social awkwardness, and the unabashed love that she has for her sister truly make her a lovable protagonist and Kristen Bell does a phenomenal job in giving Anna that warmth and likability.

But while I consider Anna to be my favorite of the two leads, that doesn’t mean that I don’t like Elsa as well. She’s just as important to the film as Anna is, but in a different way. In the early stages of the film’s production, she originally started out the same way that her character is portrayed in the original fairy tale that the film is loosely based on, ‘The Snow Queen’ by Hans Christian Andersen. At first, she was the main villain. But ultimately I think many of us can agree that it was for the best that they decided to change that and instead have her be a sympathetic, misunderstood protagonist struggling to control her icy powers. And part of that change, of course, came from the decision to have Anna and Elsa be sisters. Right from the get-go, the film establishes the struggle that Elsa faces due to her icy powers. Sure, it’s never explained how she got her powers but it’s made clear that they could become a problem and result in her becoming feared by the people of Arendelle. And so, Elsa is locked away from society until her Coronation Day and even then, they do end up getting unleashed, forcing her to flee. However, at that point, she finally embraces who she is, which of course is represented perfectly by the film’s iconic number ‘Let it Go’. It’s quite easy to see why Anna and Elsa have become such prolific role models for many people. They’re arguably some of Disney’s most relatable protagonists to date. Anna may be a Princess but she’s not exactly a prim and proper one like some of the other Disney princesses. And while, obviously, no one has icy powers like Elsa (that we know of…), her characterization as a young woman who’s scared at first to embrace who she is before it all culminates in her liberation, is very much capable of inspiring others who share a similar struggle. Is it any wonder why ‘Let it Go’ became the anthem that it is?

1. CINDERELLA (CINDERELLA)

Image result for cinderella disney

Oh, boy I can hear the feminists now… did I seriously just pick Cinderella as my favorite Disney princess? Yes, yes I did and in this case, I’m counting her both in regards to the original animated film, in which she was voiced by Ilene Woods, as well as the 2015 live-action remake where she was played by Lily James. As I’ve noted many times before, the main issue that some have with Cinderella is that they argue that she’s just a passive character who does nothing until her Prince comes to save her. But as I’ve also been saying time and time again, there’s more to her than that. After all, we’re talking about a young woman who for years has been the subject of abuse from her Evil Stepmother and Stepsisters. And yet through it all, no matter what they put her through, she always maintains an optimistic outlook on life. To me that is what makes her such a great character and like I said, this is well reflected in both versions of Disney’s Cinderella. On that note, let’s go over the character as was portrayed by Lily James in the remake. I do not consider this Cinderella to be a ‘passive’ protagonist. This film does a much better job at establishing the relationship between her and the Prince, as they first meet ‘as equals’ because she doesn’t yet know that he’s actually the Prince. By comparison, the romance between the two in the original was basically a ‘shotgun wedding’. And through it all, she’s still the same Cinderella that we know and love from the original, strengthened even more by the fact that the film opens with her mother giving her the crucial life advice to “have courage and be kind” And ultimately I feel that this is one of the best life lessons that kids can learn from. Sure, Cinderella may not exactly be as pro-active as characters like Anna and Elsa, Tiana, or Mulan but her inner strength is what makes her one of the most iconic members of the Disney princess line.

Image result for cinderella 2015


And those are my rankings of the current members of the Disney Princess line. Obviously, I know that the way I which I specifically ranked these characters could pose some controversy so if you do sound off in the comments in regards to how you’d rank them, please be civil about it. Disney Month will continue next Tuesday with a ‘Double Feature’ of Top 5 lists as I rank my Top 5 favorite Disney ‘Protagonists’ and ‘Sidekicks’.

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Disney Retrospective: The 50's


Welcome back to Rhode Island Movie Corner’s ongoing series of Disney Retrospectives, in which I look back upon the many, many animated films that have been produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios. And today, we’ve actually come to the final part of this series as we’ll be covering the final collection of Disney animated films that I’ve yet to address; the Disney films that came out during the 50’s. Last time around I covered Disney’s first 11 features, which of course started with 1937’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and was then followed by the likes of Pinocchio, Fantasia, and Bambi. But then came World War II, which resulted in not only some of the studio’s staff members being drafted but also certain overseas markets being cut off. As a result, most of the Disney animated features during the 40’s were low-budget ‘package films’, a series of animated shorts that were not usually connected narratively. This included projects like Saludos Amigos, Fun and Fancy Free, and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad just to name a few. It wouldn’t be until the 50’s when the studio returned to doing full-length feature films. And I must say, out of all of the decades that make up Disney Animation’s long history, the 50’s might arguably be the studio’s most iconic period. Obviously nowadays the decade that most Disney fans are probably familiar with is the 90’s AKA ‘the Disney Renaissance’. But as far as the 50’s is concerned, while there were only five films that were released during this time, pretty much all of them are considered to be some of the studio’s most classic films. So with that said, it’s time to look back upon the decade where the young woman put on the glass slipper, the girl fell down the rabbit hole, and the boy who never grew up explored the world of Never Land. These are the Disney Animated films of the 50’s.

CINDERELLA (1950)

Image result for Cinderella 1950 poster

You might recall that I was a really, really big fan of Kenneth Branagh’s live-action reimagining of this film that was released last year. One of the reasons why I was really looking forward to it was because Disney’s original take on the story of Cinderella was actually one of my favorite Disney films growing up. And even though nowadays I sort of lean towards the live-action version for its improvements over the original film, namely a more developed relationship between Cinderella and Prince Charming, that doesn’t mean that I don’t still appreciate the great things that came from this Disney classic. It’s got some really nice animation, especially in regards to the creation of grand and gigantic rooms. It’s got a great collection of songs from Cinderella’s sweet melody ‘A Dream is a Wish Your Heart Makes’ to the Fairy Godmother’s bubbly tune ‘Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo’. As noted before, Cinderella is generally viewed as one of the more passive Disney princesses, with some claiming that she does nothing the whole film and then gets rescued by Prince Charming at the end of it. But as I’ve also noted before, I believe that there’s more to her character than that. She deserves a lot of credit for managing to endure all of the crap that her stepmother and stepsisters put her through while still maintaining an optimistic outlook on life. That is why she’s one of the best Disney princesses in my opinion. And of course this film has plenty of great side characters as well from the aforementioned Fairy Godmother to Cinderella’s wicked stepmother Lady Tremaine to Cinderella’s friendly mouse friends, especially Jaq and Gus. So in short, I guess you can say that this is one of my all-time favorite Disney films; one that now has an excellent live-action version to serve as a companion piece, not as a replacement!

Rating: 5/5!

ALICE IN WONDERLAND (1951)

Image result for alice in wonderland 1951 poster

Also commonly known as the film that many love to joke about in regards to them claiming that Walt and his team were totally on drugs when they made it, Alice in Wonderland is exactly what you’d expect from a film adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s classic story of a young girl’s adventures in the wacky world of Wonderland. It’s a world that is full of crazy characters in nonsensical situations and as a result, this film boasts some of the studio’s absolute best animation. Simply put, the animators perfectly captured the surreal imagery of the story as the animation is the perfect combination of vibrant colors and zany visuals. As for the plot, while I’ve never read Carroll’s original book, it seems as if the film follows the same general non-linear plot of the book in that it’s mostly just Alice getting into various situations and meeting a wide variety of goofy characters. Speaking of characters, Alice herself is a likable lead, voiced excellently by Kathryn Beaumont who would go on to voice another main character in the next Disney film. And of course the film also has plenty of memorable side characters, from the mischievous, always-grinning Cheshire Cat to the foul-tempered Queen of Hearts, who always orders “Off with their Heads!” whenever someone gets on her bad side. Alice in Wonderland is generally considered to be one of Disney’s finest animated classics and I can totally see why. All in all, it’s a very charming and light-hearted adventure through the strange world of Wonderland complete with a fun cast of characters and the studio’s usual excellent animation.

Rating: 4/5

PETER PAN (1953)

Image result for peter pan 1953 poster

In 1953, Walt Disney Animation brought J.M. Barrie’s iconic play/novel Peter Pan to life in what is generally considered to be the most famous adaptation to date of ‘the boy who would never grow up’. This was the final Disney animated film that was primarily supervised by Disney’s original core team of animators AKA ‘The Nine Old Men’. It was also notably the last film that Disney released as part of their distribution deal with RKO Pictures. Since then, the studio has released all of their films under their own distributor, Buena Vista. In that regard, this is certainly a great one to end on when it comes to the Disney/RKO partnership. That’s because Peter Pan is easily one of Disney’s best films. It really does have it all. All of the main characters are great, from Peter Pan to Wendy (voiced by Kathryn Beaumont in her second major Disney Animation film role) to Tinker Bell and so on and so forth. The villains are absolutely terrific. The notorious Captain Hook and his main lackey Mr. Smee are two of Disney’s most hilarious villains. They work off each other so well as the two bumbling buffoons that they are. Just look at the scenes in which Hook tries to avoid being eaten by a hungry crocodile. The soundtrack is excellent as well. The main theme ‘You Can Fly’ is simply iconic but ‘Following the Leader’ is a pretty darn fun song as well. Sure, in hindsight the film gets a lot of flak nowadays for its arguably fairly racist/stereotypical portrayal of Never Land’s Indians and it’s completely understandable if some people are offended by this. But aside from that, it’s pretty easy to see why Peter Pan is commonly regarded as one of the most famous films in the Disney canon. It’s just a really fun adventure that is guaranteed to capture the imaginations of young and old.

Rating: 5/5!

LADY AND THE TRAMP (1955)

Image result for lady and the tramp 1955 poster

Sandwiched in between two of the most famous Disney animated films of all-time is 1955’s Lady and the Tramp, which is actually based off of a story titled Happy Dan, The Whistling Dog that was written by Ward Greene and published in Cosmopolitan magazine. The film focuses on the romance that develops between Lady, the beloved cocker spaniel of an upper-class family, and Tramp, a stray mutt. The romance that forms between the two of them is pretty nice, highlighted by the iconic ‘Bella Notte’ sequence in which they share a romantic candlelit spaghetti dinner while being serenaded by the owner of the Italian restaurant that provided them the food. Simply put, this is one of the most iconic ‘love story’ moments in the history of film. But the rest of the film is quite solid as well. One of the most interesting elements of the story is the fact that the majority of the film is seen from the perspective of the dogs. Lady refers to her owners as ‘Jim Dear’ and ‘Darling’ because that’s what they frequently call each other from her point of view. And when they have a baby, Lady doesn’t initially realize it at first when she finds that they start to become rather distant and we also see how the baby’s arrival ultimately affects her relationship with her owners. Granted, I wouldn’t really call this one of Disney’s absolute ‘best’ films. The story is rather simple and it is sort of like Alice in Wonderland in that it’s mostly just a random collection of moments involving the main characters. Still, with a likable lead duo, a solidly developed romance, and the usual nice Disney animation, Lady and the Tramp is still a pretty darn classic entry in the Disney canon.

Rating: 4/5

SLEEPING BEAUTY (1959)

Image result for sleeping beauty 1959 poster

From an artistic perspective, Sleeping Beauty is definitely one of the most beautifully animated films that Disney has ever made. It was the second film that they’d ever shot in widescreen, after Lady and the Tramp, and the results really are fantastic. The grand landscapes that come from the format are excellent and have an excellent painting-like quality to them. The film also has some excellent music, which was adopted from Tchaikovsky’s 1890 ballet of the same name. ‘Once Upon a Dream’ is definitely a classic Disney love song. But when it comes to the writing, admittedly it’s rather flawed in some parts, namely the main characters. Princess Aurora is unfortunately one of the weaker Disney princesses, though that’s mostly just due to the fact that she spends a good chunk of the film asleep. Her prince, Phillip, is also a bit underwritten at times; in fact, once he goes off to rescue Aurora he never says anything for the remainder of the film. But despite a rather underdeveloped pair of leads, the film does have a great cast of side characters. The three fairies, Flora, Fauna, and Merryweather are an excellent trio who work off each other well when it comes to the three of them trying to raise Aurora in secret without the help of their magic. And of course, there’s the main villain, Maleficent. Sure her motivations are rather weak, as she does what she does only because she wasn’t invited to the party celebrating the birth of Aurora, but her elegance and magical abilities easily make her one of Disney’s greatest villains. In short, Sleeping Beauty may not be perfect but it’s still a very enjoyable entry in the Disney canon. While it doesn’t really do much for its two main protagonists, the main villain, side characters, music, and animation do make up for that for the most part. Ultimately, though, Sleeping Beauty was actually an underperformer at the box office upon initial release, effectively resulting in Disney moving away from adapting fairy tales until The Little Mermaid three whole decades later.

Rating: 4/5


And with that, Rhode Island Movie Corner’s ‘Disney Retrospective’ series officially comes to a close. As always, be sure to sound off in the comments below in regards to your own thoughts on the films discussed here today and be sure to also check out the previous Disney Retrospectives that I’ve done in the links below. However, this is not the end of my discussion of Disney Animation for now. You may have noticed in a few of the previous ‘Disney Retrospectives’ that I mentioned that I have something BIG planned for next month. Well, since we’ve reached the end of these Retrospectives, I figured that it’s time to finally reveal my big plan… so be sure to check back tomorrow for the big announcement of what is coming to Rhode Island Movie Corner this November.






Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Maleficent (2014) review


In 1959, Disney released their 16th feature-length animated film, ‘Sleeping Beauty’, based on the 1697 fairytale ‘La Belle au bois dormant’ by Charles Perrault, which was later adapted by the Brothers Grimm in 1812 as ‘Little Briar Rose’. While the film received generally mixed reviews at the time of its release and it also performed rather disappointingly at the box office, it has since become a Disney classic and one of the greatest elements of the entire film was its main villain, Maleficent. Easily one of Disney’s finest villains, Maleficent was graceful and elegant, but also incredibly sinister at the same time, even if her motivations in the film were rather questionable, being that she was ‘offended’ at not getting an invitation to Princess Aurora’s christening. Still, she was a great villain and now with this new film ‘Maleficent’ we get to see her side of the story because this basically is the live-action version of the story but told from Maleficent’s point of view. Because of this, this film offers quite a different take on the story than one might expect, but overall it does offer an intriguing new look on the story ‘we thought we knew’ and of course is headlined by the terrific performance by the perfectly cast Angelina Jolie as the ‘Mistress of All Evil’.

Before she became known as the ‘Mistress of All Evil’, Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) was once a young fairy who lived in a magical realm known as the Moors, which bordered a human kingdom. One day, she meets and befriends a peasant boy named Stefan and eventually they fall in love. However years later, when Stefan (Sharlto Copley) returns to her after having not seen her for a long time, he ends up betraying her by cutting off her wings so that he can become king. Heartbroken and outraged, Maleficent enacts revenge on Stefan on the day of his daughter Aurora’s christening. Maleficent curses the infant child proclaiming that on her 16th birthday, she will prick her finger on the spindle of a spinning wheel and fall into a sleep-like death, and can only be awakened by true love’s kiss. In the hopes that this curse can be avoided, Stefan has Aurora sent away from the kingdom to live in hiding with three pixies (Imelda Staunton, Lesley Manville, and Juno Temple) until the day after her 16th birthday. But as Aurora (Elle Fanning) starts to grow up, Maleficent, who ends up taking care of her more than the pixies do, begins to grow more attached to her, resulting in her trying to find a way to remove the curse from Aurora before it’s too late.

Now if you’re coming into this expecting Maleficent to be the bad guy, you’re probably going to be rather disappointed because it’s more like ‘Wicked’ in that she’s the protagonist in this. Sure she does curse Aurora with the sleeping curse and for a little while early on she doesn’t like her that much, but for most of the movie she’s just a misunderstood character who was betrayed by King Stefan, the real main antagonist of the film, which ends up leading her on a path of revenge. But she soon starts to care more for Aurora, whose cheerful persona starts to change Maleficent’s outlook on humans. Overall, the relationship between the two, which is sort of like a ‘mother-daughter’ relationship, is the best part, and ultimately the heart, of the movie. The movie also benefits from some pretty excellent visuals, which is not that surprising seeing how this was directed by someone who’s been a production designer, which help immerse us in this film’s universe. Plus, at just 97 minutes, making it the shortest of Disney’s recent live-action fairytales, the film doesn’t overstay its welcome and never drags at any point.   

As it’s been well documented by pretty much everyone who’s seen this movie, Angelina Jolie does a fantastic job as Maleficent. She looks the part, acts the part, and was just a perfect choice to portray the character. She’s so good here that… well, she admittedly overshadows everyone else in the film. Now I’m not saying that the rest of the cast is bad; it’s just that this movie really belongs to Jolie and the fact is that Maleficent is focused on the most here more than anyone else. While Aurora is just your average ‘nice’ princess (Prince Phillip (Brenton Thwaites) is really just serving as a cameo here), if I remember correctly she wasn’t the most compelling lead in the original animated film either. Still, Elle Fanning does do a very good job with the rather limited material she has to work with but as I stated earlier, the relationship between her and Jolie in this movie is really top-notch. Sharlto Copley also doesn’t really have as much to work with as Stefan but he also does a pretty good job here as well. However, the three pixies here do get rather annoying at times, not in their performances but how they are portrayed in this. I haven’t seen the original ‘Sleeping Beauty’ film in quite some time, but I don’t recall the three fairies in that film being as incompetent as these three are. It’s clearly shown that Maleficent is a far better caretaker of Aurora than them. I really don’t know what went wrong in the translation from animation to live-action, but here they’re more like the Three Stooges.

When it comes to Disney’s recent big-budget live-action fairytales, I find that I like ‘Maleficent’ more than ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and almost as I much as I liked ‘Oz the Great and Powerful’. At the end of the day, ‘Maleficent’ turns out to be a pretty good film. Director Robert Stromberg, who has been mostly known for his work as a fantastic production designer on films like ‘Avatar’ as well as the previously mentioned ‘Alice’ and ‘Oz’, makes a pretty good first debut with this film and a lot of that is because of the brilliant performance by Angelina Jolie as Maleficent. Sure, she’s not the bad guy in this, which I’m guessing will be rather disappointing for some people, but her relationship with Aurora in this film certainly makes up for it. And while Jolie does overshadow everyone else in the film, they all do a pretty fine job even if they don’t have as much to work with. Plus, the film has really nice visuals and doesn’t really drag at any point seeing how it is much shorter than both ‘Oz’ and ‘Alice’. So overall, if you’re okay with the fact that this film’s Maleficent isn’t the main villain, then I do recommend this movie because I don’t think that having Maleficent be the protagonist in this betrays who the character was in the original film. It’s just a very interesting new take on the story of ‘Sleeping Beauty’ from her perspective.


Rating: 4/5