Showing posts with label Bruce Willis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bruce Willis. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Glass (2019) review

Samuel L. Jackson, Bruce Willis, and James McAvoy in Glass (2019)

One year after making it big with The Sixth Sense, writer/director M. Night Shyamalan released his next directorial effort, Unbreakable. Serving as a deconstruction of the superhero genre, the film followed a seemingly average man who ponders if he’s a superhero himself after miraculously surviving a devastating tragedy. Upon its release, the film didn’t quite do as good with critics and audiences as The Sixth Sense, but it has gone on to arguably surpass it as Shyamalan’s most popular film. And yet, because it wasn’t that big of a hit, plans for a sequel were put on hold for the next decade and a half. It wasn’t until 2017 when the idea of continuing the series was put into play thanks to Shyamalan’s then-latest effort, Split, which had continued his recent career resurgence after a string of critical flops in the 2000s. But while the film may have seemed like a simple small-scale thriller about a group of girls who found themselves kidnapped by a man with multiple identities, audiences were surprised to discover that the film was the long-awaited Unbreakable sequel thanks to a cameo by the previous film’s protagonist. And thus, the plans were set for a third film that would bring together the main characters of both films and provide a conclusive finale to what is now being referred to by fans as the Eastrail 177 trilogy, named after the train that started this whole ordeal. Taking its name from the first film’s main antagonist, Glass once again brings audiences into a world of real-life super-heroes and real-life super-villains. And while some may be put off by the ways in which it continues the story of Unbreakable, it’s still a highly engaging thriller with captivating performances.  

19 years ago, security guard David Dunn (Bruce Willis) was the sole survivor of a devastating train crash in the city of Philadelphia. After learning that he somehow managed to survive the crash without any injuries, David proceeds to undergo a journey where he starts to test himself to see if he’s a real-life superhero, a notion that’s encouraged by comic enthusiast Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson), a man who suffers from brittle bone disease. However, David eventually learns that Price was the one responsible for the train crash, having decided that his purpose in life was to be David’s arch-enemy, Mr. Glass, resulting in David alerting the authorities and Price being placed in a mental institution. Since then, David has continued to operate as the vigilante known as ‘The Overseer’, which leads him to a confrontation with Kevin Wendell Crumb (James McAvoy), an infamous kidnapper/murderer who has dissociative identity disorder and 24 distinct identities fighting for control of his mind, thus earning him the nickname ‘The Horde’. Their ensuing clash ends up with them both being arrested and sent to the Raven Hill Psychiatric Hospital where, as fate would have it, Price is being held as well. Whilst there, the three become the subjects of Dr. Ellie Staple (Sarah Paulson), who specializes in dealing with patients who have delusions of grandeur, specifically the idea that they possess super-powers. But as the three men find themselves subjected to intense psychological evaluations that put their abilities into question, the ever-devious Elijah begins planning his next criminal scheme that he promises will prove to the world once and for all that super-powered beings truly exist.

When it comes to this unexpected trilogy of films, Glass is a combination of the best elements of its two predecessors. Since Split wasn’t technically revealed as a sequel to Unbreakable until its ending, Glass is ultimately more in line with the first film when it comes to its structure and purpose as a commentary on the concept of comic-book superheroes. At the same time, though, Glass also carries over the psychological ideologies of Split’s plot to further strengthen its commentary. With that in mind, it should be noted that this isn’t meant to be a big-budget superhero flick with large-scale action sequences a la something out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Instead, Glass’ big action sequences are reserved for its first act and finale, with the rest of the film focusing on its main characters’ time spent in the mental institution. And overall, the film manages to maintain an engaging narrative throughout because of its layered characters and effective moments of emotional poignancy that come from taking the idea of super-powered beings and grounding it in realism. But just like any Shyamalan film, this story ends up leading to some major twists that, in this instance, seem to be a major source of contention amongst this film’s critics, and to be perfectly frank, in some ways it’s easy to see why this is. Without spoiling any of these twists, the biggest of the bunch could’ve benefitted from being built up a bit more because as is, it sort of feels like it came out of nowhere. And yet, despite this, the film then immediately course corrects itself with another twist that works a lot better because it manages to provide a thorough conclusion to the arcs of its main characters.

On that note, one of the biggest draws to this film is getting to see the three main leads of the franchise together in one big ‘crossover’. Starting with the cast from Unbreakable, Bruce Willis is excellent once again as main protagonist David Dunn. Instead of being one of Willis’ more recent outings where many have felt that he’s just ‘phoning it in’, he provides the film with several of its best emotional moments in his second go-around as the reluctant hero who’s been put through the emotional wringer more often than most. But, of course, you can’t have a hero without a villain, and that’s where Samuel L. Jackson comes in as Elijah Price AKA Mr. Glass. Now fully embracing his role as ‘the mastermind’, Jackson commands the screen as this series’ fascinating antagonist with the tragic backstory of a life that’s been considerably hindered by his condition. And yet, arguably the biggest standout of them all is James McAvoy reprising his role from Split as Kevin Wendell Crumb and his 24 unique identities. Just like in the previous film, the ways in which McAvoy slips in and out of each identity, whether it’s the innocent 9-year old Hedwig or a Southerner named Luke who has the tendency to spoil films, is a sight to behold in terms of all the physical and mental transformations that he undergoes. The three are then joined by a variety of returning players from the other films, including Spencer Treat Clark as David’s son Joseph and Anya Taylor-Joy as Casey, the sole survivor of Kevin’s rampage in Split, and they’re all good as well despite not having as much to do as Willis, Jackson, and McAvoy. Sarah Paulson then closes out the ensemble as this film’s primary new addition, Dr. Staple, and she shines as well as the film’s most mysterious character with an unclear agenda.  

With Glass, M. Night Shyamalan has been granted something that he hasn’t had in years, hype. While it may not have been as big of a hit as The Sixth Sense was upon its initial release, Unbreakable has since gone on to be regarded by many as his best film. As such, when it was revealed that his 2017 outing Split was the unexpected follow-up to Unbreakable, the anticipation began to mount for the concluding installment of the Eastrail 177 trilogy. Despite this, however, Glass is proving to be quite the polarizing affair amongst critics and audiences, with several feeling that it just didn’t live up to the hype and was a lackluster conclusion to this promising trilogy. And to be perfectly fair, there are certain aspects of this film that won’t exactly go over well with everyone when it comes to the ways in which it concludes the trilogy and, more importantly, the overall arcs of its main characters. Ultimately, though, I did find Glass to be a genuinely satisfying finale to this trilogy, as it combines the best elements of Unbreakable and Split to produce yet another highly engaging thriller. It may not boast the usual structure of a ‘superhero flick’ but the story is solidly written and the film benefits from an excellent collection of layered characters headlined by the phenomenal lead trio of James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, and Samuel L. Jackson. In short, it’s nice to see that after all these years, M. Night Shyamalan was finally able to return to the world of heroes and villains that he had initially created with Unbreakable to spawn a truly unique trilogy of superhero films.     


Rating: 4.5/5

Saturday, February 16, 2013

A Good Day to Die Hard (2013) review


John McClane has fought terrorists in a high-rise office building in Los Angeles. He's fought terrorists in a Washington airport. He's fought a terrorist's vengeful brother in the city of New York, and he's even fought cyber-terrorists who shut down every computer in America. So what's next for the no-nonsense cop from New York who was once called a 'cowboy' by terrorist Hans Gruber? Well, in 'A Good Day to Die Hard', the fifth entry in this long-running series, McClane heads out of the United States and joins up with his son Jack in Russia for another fight with a group of terrorists. But, I hate to break it to you people, but this movie... really sucks. Why? Because it's not a Die Hard movie. Sure, it may bear the name 'Die Hard' but in reality, this is nothing more than just a generic action movie starring Bruce Willis.



In 'A Good Day to Die Hard', NYPD Detective John McClane (Bruce Willis) heads to Russia when he learns that his son John Jr. AKA Jack (Jai Courtney) has gotten into some trouble and has been arrested. When he gets there, however, he learns that Jack is actually working for the CIA. For the last three years, he has been on a mission to acquire 'political prisoner' Yuri Komarov (Sebastian Koch), who is believed to have incriminating evidence against a high-ranking Russian official, who has now sent henchmen in order to find Komarov and to kill anyone who tries to oppose him, namely Jack. Now caught up in the whole ordeal as well, John joins forces with his son in order to take down these terrorists before they get their hands on Komarov and this alleged file.



So what's wrong with this movie? Well, there's a lot to talk about in regards to that question, but easily the biggest problem with the film is that there is absolutely no tension. One of the greatest strengths of the last four films was that there was great tension and you got the sense that McClane was in mortal danger. Well, okay, in 'Live Free or Die Hard' he started to live through some outrageous stunts but in this movie, there's no denying it; John McClane has pretty much become superhuman. There are multiple instances where he survives through death-defying stunts with barely any scratches, like in one scene where's he driving a truck and it flips over at least 10 times but he manages to get out without much difficulty. The only real part of the film that has any tension is at the end. Why? Because the final action sequence takes place at Chernobyl and neither John, Jack, or the villains wear any protective gear and there's no indication that any of them get affected by radiation whatsoever (so you can add 'defying logic' to this film's list of many problems).



But that's not the only thing wrong with this film. The plot is so convoluted that the plot outline I just wrote for the film was my best effort of doing so. The plots of the other four films were simple; terrorists attack and John McClane has to stop them. There are somewhere around four villains in this film, and they are all terrible. Jack and John have absolutely no camaraderie at all and Jack spends most of the film yelling at John. At one point, he even threatens to shoot his own father. It's not really Jai Courtney's fault, it's the writing. You can't really blame Bruce Willis, either, but at this point he's not playing John McClane. He's just Bruce Willis in a generic action film that feels more like a video game (which is ironic considering that this director's last film was a video game adaptation (2008's 'Max Payne')) than an actual Die Hard film.



This is a sad day. The legacy of a great franchise is tarnished by what is undoubtedly its worst film ever. It's a film so bad that after I saw it, I bought the first Die Hard film simply out of pity. It's a film that in no way resembles its four predecessors and the end result is just a generic action film starring Bruce Willis, who certainly isn't playing John McClane anymore. I know a lot of people weren't huge fans of the PG-13 rated 'Live Free or Die Hard' but believe me when I say that that film actually felt like a Die Hard film while this film is far from it. Before this film came out, Willis said that he wanted to do at least one more movie after this one before retiring the character. But now, after this film, I recommend that they end the series here because unless this 'Die Hard 6' can be as good as the first four films in the series, this series is pretty much dead.
 
Rating: 0.5/5