The first ‘Hunger Games’ film was a huge success both
critically and commercially when it came out back in March 2012. However, while
the film was very good thanks in part to the writing and Jennifer Lawrence’s
outstanding performance in the lead role, there was room for improvement,
namely in regards to the shaky camera work and fast editing during the actual
Hunger Games. That’s not to say the film wasn’t bad. It’s always been the case
with most book-to-film franchises in that most of them get better as their
series go on (e.g. Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings). It’s the responsibility of
the first film to set up the universe and characters, and the first did a great
job as far as that was concerned. So now all eyes are on the first sequel ‘Catching
Fire’ to continue the story. In the director’s chair this time around instead
of Gary Ross is Francis Lawrence (no relation to the leading lady), director of
‘Constantine’ and ‘I Am Legend’, who impressed Lionsgate enough to be chosen as
the director for the final two Hunger Games films, parts 1 and 2 of ‘Mockingjay’.
He’s certainly the right man for the job, because while I do really love the
first ‘Hunger Games’, ‘Catching Fire’ is far superior to it in almost every
way.
After their victory in the 74th Annual Hunger
Games, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson)
return home to District 12 before heading off on their ‘Victory Tour’ through
the other districts of Panem. However, while both of them are looking to get on
with their lives, they soon learn that their defiant actions in the Arena,
where they became the first dual winners in the history of the Games, have
inspired rebellions all over Panem. This now makes Katniss not only the symbol
of hope for the rebellion, but also a target of the Capitol and she is warned
by President Snow (Donald Sutherland) to make it look like her actions were
done out of her supposed love for Peeta and not as an act of defiance; otherwise
her loved ones will be killed. But soon, Katniss and Peeta are forced back into
the arena for the 75th Annual Hunger Games due to the 3rd
Quarter Quell, an event that takes places every 25 years where the Games are
affected by a unique rule. In this case, all of the Tributes are past Hunger Games
winners, making things even more challenging for Katniss and Peeta this time
around.
The biggest advantage that this film has over its
predecessor is perhaps the fact that, with a bigger budget, F. Lawrence is able
to expand on the world of Panem in ways Gary Ross couldn’t necessarily do with
the first one. We get a greater sense of this world and, more importantly, the
rebellion that is now happening in it. We don’t necessarily see a full-out
rebellion as it’s more focused around Katniss and her reluctance to be the
symbol of hope for the districts, but we clearly see that it’s beginning to
take shape. Obviously, this rebellion will become much more important in the
next two films. Once the film gets into the arena for the 75th
Hunger Games, you folks will be pleased to know that the shaky cam and fast
editing of the first film is no longer a problem. It’s all terrifically shot
and, while I’ll be spoiler-free about what happens during these Games, the
whole arena is very unique, which makes it a little more interesting this time
around.
Once again, Jennifer Lawrence shines in the role of Katniss
Everdeen, the reluctant symbol of the rebellion who is also sort of traumatized
by her experiences in the previous Hunger Games, which we see early on when
Katniss suddenly has a vision of one of the tributes from the last film while
hunting with Gale (Liam Hemsworth). The relationship between Katniss and Peeta
is far more developed in this film, mainly because the writers actually did
remember to use the plot-point of how Katniss was playing up their relationship
in the arena to win over the audience; the previous film omitted a key scene at
the end where Peeta learns about this. Because they have far more substantial
roles to work with in this film, Hutcherson and Hemsworth are able to get into
their roles more. The idea of a ‘love triangle’ is there, but it’s not
overplayed. Like the last film, this one has a great supporting cast with great
performances all around from both returning characters (Woody Harrelson as
Haymitch, Donald Sutherland as President Snow, etc.) and new ones (Sam Claflin
as Finnick Odair, Jena Malone as Johanna Mason, etc.).
While I do love the original ‘Hunger Games’ film, despite
its flaws, ‘Catching Fire’ is superior to the original in almost every way. Now
with the whole idea of ‘establishing’ the universe out of the way, thanks to
the first film, this sequel allows us to explore this world even more and with
that, we’re able to see the growing rebellion that is beginning amongst the
Districts of Panem, making things quite suspenseful at times for the main
characters. The cast once again brings their all to it and once the film moves into
the Arena this time, the shaky camera work and fast-editing from the first film
is non-existent which leads to a much more exciting Hunger Games. Francis
Lawrence certainly proves that he’s the right man for taking over this
franchise, more specifically the two-part finale, ‘Mockingjay’. I’m a little
hesitant on the idea of splitting the final book into two films. It’s not because
of who’s involved behind the camera, or the quality of the material; it’s just
if there's enough material to work with like ‘Harry Potter’. We’ll just have to
wait and see when ‘Part 1’ comes out next November.
Rating: 5/5!
No comments:
Post a Comment