(Note: The following is a newly written review, updated from
an earlier review that I did on this film back in March 2012 on Rotten
Tomatoes. I would’ve just reposted that original review here, but looking back
I realized that it wasn’t really that good and, also, a little biased. It mostly
just consisted of me making numerous comparisons to another certain young adult
film franchise which was also adapted from a popular book series. Because of
this, I decided to write a new review just in time for ‘Catching Fire’. Enjoy!)
(Also, as a bit of a warning, there are some Spoilers
regarding the ending.)
We all know how J.K. Rowling’s ‘Harry Potter’ series, which
was already a major success in book form, became even more successful once the
books were adapted to film beginning in 2001. In the wake of Potter, many
studios tried to cash in on the success of the franchise by adapting other
popular book franchises. However, for the longest time, no one really had any
luck at creating ‘the next Harry Potter’, despite the fact that some of these
movies had really good source material to work with, like ‘Eragon’ and
‘Stormbreaker’. The first book-to-film adaptation that managed to become as big
as ‘Potter’ was ‘The Twilight Saga’ but, in the opinion of this reviewer, this
was mainly because of the popularity of the source material and not because of its
quality; in other words, the movies were terrible. Now, both ‘Harry Potter’ and
‘Twilight’ have come to an end, meaning that it’s time for a new franchise to
step up and become the next ‘Harry Potter’ and that franchise is ‘The Hunger
Games’, based off of the best-selling book series by author Suzanne Collins.
Sure, in retrospect, the first adaptation of this franchise isn’t perfect,
namely due to some decisions that were made in the transition to film, but overall
this first film does a good job at setting up its universe and, more importantly,
its lead heroine.
In the future, the nation of Panem exists in a
post-apocalyptic North America consisting of the main city of The Capitol and
its 12 neighboring districts. After the 12 Districts (previously 13) started a
rebellion, The Capitol, after defeating the rebels and apparently destroying
the 13th District, initiated a new annual event called ‘The Hunger
Games’, a televised event where 24 ‘Tributes’ (one male and female from each
district) fight to the death until only one remains as the winner. During the
year of the 74th Hunger Games, District 12 resident Katniss Everdeen
(Jennifer Lawrence) volunteers to be the female Tribute for the District after
her sister Prim (Willow Shields) is initially chosen. Along with fellow
District tribute Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), Katniss is brought to the
Capitol where she and Peeta are put to the test as they must compete with
Tributes who have had more experience than them and have better ‘odds’ at
winning.
Like most book franchises, ‘The Hunger Games’ serves as the
film in its series whose job is to set up the universe and its characters, and
as far as that is concerned, director Gary Ross does a very good job at
establishing the unique world of Panem and bringing it to the big screen. The
key themes of the novel, like the idea of oppression and critiques of both
government and the media, are executed well on film. In terms of staying
faithful to the source material, the film may not maintain the first-person
narrative from the book, as told by Katniss, but I do like that it gives more
attention to those behind the scenes, namely President Snow (Donald Sutherland)
and Head Gamemaker Seneca Crane (Wes Bentley). But as for the action once the actual Hunger
Games get started, it leads to probably the biggest problems that some have
with the film; a lot of shaky camerawork and fast editing. There’s no denying
it; it is pretty noticeable, but considering that this film probably wouldn’t
have been able to maintain a PG-13 rating considering how violent things get during
the Games, it’s sort of understandable as to why they went this route.
But really the best part about this whole film is its main
character, Katniss Everdeen. Compared to a certain female lead in another young
adult franchise, Katniss can certainly hold her own and is not dependent on a
man. This film belongs to Jennifer Lawrence, who does an outstanding job at
conveying Katniss’s emotions. She’s backed up by a terrific supporting cast
that includes Woody Harrelson as Katniss and Peeta’s mentor Haymitch, Stanley
Tucci as Hunger Games commentator Caesar Flickerman, and Lenny Kravitz as
Katniss’s stylist and ally Cinna. Sure, this movie does have one of those ‘love
triangles’ that you see a lot of in these kinds of movies and the two male
leads may not be as ‘developed’ as Katniss, but both Hutcherson and Liam
Hemsworth, who plays Katniss’ friend Gale (who, for the record, is only on
screen for like 10 minutes), do good enough jobs with what they have to work
with. It may seem like Lawrence and Hutcherson don’t really have good chemistry
but that’s sort of how it played out in the book; Katniss played up the romance
in order to gain sympathy from the audience, ultimately resulting in her
actually beginning to have feelings for Peeta. However, I do have to add that,
as faithful as they were to the book, the filmmakers left out a key scene in
the end where Peeta learns about this, which would have helped developed their
relationship in future movies. Hopefully ‘Catching Fire’ doesn’t forget this
crucial plot-point.
In the end, ‘The Hunger Games’ may not exactly be perfect,
mainly due to some shaky camerawork and fast editing during the actual Hunger
Games. But as a whole, this film does benefit from some very good writing and,
for the most part, very well-developed characters. The one in particular who
stands out here is Jennifer Lawrence. Not only is the character of Katniss a
well-developed female heroine, but Lawrence carries the movie on her back with
the help of a talented supporting cast. Overall, Gary Ross did a very good job
at establishing the universe and the characters, but I am curious to see what
Francis Lawrence brings to the series with ‘Catching Fire’. Considering that he
will be returning for both parts of ‘Mockingjay’, it seems like Lionsgate was impressed
by his work on the first sequel. ‘Catching Fire’ is currently getting highly
positive reviews, but we’ll just have to wait and see if it manages to be
superior to its predecessor.
Rating: 4.5/5
No comments:
Post a Comment