Showing posts with label David Ayer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Ayer. Show all posts

Monday, August 8, 2016

Suicide Squad (2016) review


Warner Bros hasn’t really been very lucky with their attempts in establishing a cinematic universe centering around the characters of DC Comics a la Marvel Studios and their Cinematic Universe, at least in terms of critical reception. Whereas the Marvel Cinematic Universe films have consistently done well with critics, the ‘DC Extended Universe’ films haven’t fared as well. The first installment of the franchise, 2013’s Man of Steel, attracted generally mixed reviews from both critics and audiences, easily making it the most polarizing film of that year. And then things got even more complicated with the next installment, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Released this past March, the film was absolutely savaged by critics. And while it certainly had its fair share of fans, this time around those who didn’t like it were much more vocal. It certainly didn’t help matters when, before the film was released, it was made clear that the version shown in theaters wasn’t director Zack Snyder’s intended cut. Instead, he was forced to cut more than 30 minutes out of the film, including some very important plot-points, in order to reach a more manageable run-time. As a result, the ‘director’s cut’ AKA the ‘Ultimate Edition’ debuted with the film’s home media release and most people agreed that, at the very least, this was the superior version of the film. Regardless, though, the theatrical release of BvS didn’t turn out as well as the studio hoped, meaning that more pressure was to be put on DC’s subsequent films to fare better critically. And out of the current slate of DC films set to follow in the next few years, arguably the most anticipated of the bunch was the other big DC film of 2016, Suicide Squad.

This truly is one of the most unique installments to come from a film genre that’s unfortunately been getting more and more scrutinized these past few years. And that is because while most superhero films have focused on just that, the superheroes, this film handles things differently and instead focuses on a group of supervillains. Specifically, the film centers on the villains that make up ‘Task Force X’, a disposable black ops unit controlled by the government to do their dirty work for them. Under the direction of David Ayer, writer of Training Day and director of films like End of Watch and Fury, and featuring an all-star cast that included the likes of Will Smith, Jared Leto, and Margot Robbie, the film was no doubt poised to be a smash hit for Warner Bros. For one thing, the marketing for the film was one of the most exciting marketing campaigns in recent memory, implying that the film would be a much different kind of beast compared to BvS, especially in terms of its overall look and feel. However, now the film has come out and, well, unfortunately it ends up sharing one major similarity with BvS and that is that the reviews for it have been absolutely savage. And yet, also like BvS, this is a case where those reviews are making it out to be worse than it really is. Because even though Suicide Squad is undeniably flawed in a few ways, it still manages to stand on its own merits due to its unique style, an equally unique premise that explores some fascinating aspects of a world filled with superheroes and supervillains, and an excellent ensemble cast.

The film opens up sometime after the death of Superman as was witnessed in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. As the existence of ‘meta-humans’ (AKA the term used to describe DC’s superhuman characters) is becoming more publicly known, the government begins to fear the possibility of having to deal with a being like Superman that ‘isn’t’ on their side. It is during this time that agent Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) comes up with a bold idea. Having assembled a wide array of dangerous criminals at the Belle Reve Penitentiary in Louisiana, she proposes that the criminals be put to work for the government as part of a black ops unit known as ‘Task Force X’. To make things easier for the government, this ‘suicide squad’ would be easily disposable if they were to fail their mission. And so the squad is formed under the command of Colonel Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman), with some of the other members of the squad including but not limited to assassin Floyd Lawton (Will Smith) AKA Deadshot and former psychiatrist turned crazed villainess Dr. Harleen Quinzel AKA ‘Harley Quinn’ (Margot Robbie). Their mission finds themselves heading into Midway City under the guise of them rescuing a high-profile mark during an alleged terrorist attack. However, this excursion soon turns into them having to save the world from the real threat, an ancient evil force known as Enchantress, who has taken over the body of Flag’s girlfriend, archaeologist June Moone (Cara Delevingne), and is hell-bent on destroying mankind for ‘imprisoning’ her for so many years. Then there’s also the uncertainty of the ‘wild card’ that is Harley’s lover, the ‘Clown Prince of Crime’ himself, the Joker (Jared Leto).

Like the theatrical cut of BvS, this film’s primary issues mainly stem from the writing and the editing. Now this isn’t exactly like BvS in which certain scenes were forcibly cut from the theatrical cut to the point where it effectively shuttered the story. Though with that said, it has been reported that, once again, there’s been quite a lot left on the cutting room floor, namely scenes that would’ve given more development to certain characters. Ultimately though, in this case the biggest problem with the editing is that it can be a little too erratic at times. By that I mean it sometimes cuts really fast to the point where there are quite a few ‘blink and you’ll miss it’ shots. But even with this in mind, the film still manages to be a really fun comic book flick full of cool visuals and entertaining action sequences. While Batman v Superman was criticized for being too ‘dour’, Suicide Squad is certainly much more light-hearted in tone. Granted that doesn’t mean that this film has the same kind of tone as, say, something out of the MCU but at the very least it does make a greater attempt to inject some humor into its proceedings, which mainly comes in the form of the banter between the various members of the squad. Pair that with an enjoyably flashy color palette, the always solid visual effects that you’d expect from a superhero film of this magnitude, and a really badass soundtrack that’s seriously up there with ‘Awesome Mix Vol. 1’ as one of the best superhero film soundtracks ever and you just have a fun, albeit maybe a bit simply plotted, supervillain-centered adventure that has a style unlike any other film in the genre.

In the months leading up to the film’s release, it was made clear that its ensemble cast had established quite a strong camaraderie during filming, which is certainly a good thing for a film of this nature. And it certainly shows as far as the final product is concerned. The cast is excellent and work off of each other extremely well. And even with some of its story-based shortcomings in mind, it’s still really fascinating to watch the film attempt to find the humanity within a bunch of characters who are normally villainous in nature and for the most part, it actually does manage to succeed in doing just that. Will Smith is pretty much the film’s biggest ‘headliner’ in the role of Deadshot and in a film in which it’s shown that not all of these bad guys are ‘truly bad’, Deadshot is certainly the most ‘layered’ of the bunch in regards to the film exploring his humanity, primarily shown through his relationship with his daughter Zoe. The role’s also a pretty darn perfect fit for Smith as far as him utilizing his ability to make a whole bunch of wisecrack remarks. Viola Davis also shines in the role of Amanda Waller, the Squad’s ‘boss’ who, despite being a part of the US government, can be just as ruthless as those she’s leading. The big scene-stealer, however, is Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn. Whereas most superhero film castings have been subjected to some form of pre-release scrutiny from fans, I find that Robbie’s casting had been well-received by most people when it was first announced. And although there has been some controversy over how the character is portrayed in the film, Robbie absolutely kills it in the role, from the mannerisms to the New York accent to her unabashed love for ‘Puddin’.

Speaking of ‘Puddin’, this film re-introduces the character of the Joker to the big screen nearly a decade after Heath Ledger’s iconic, and Oscar-winning, turn in the role in The Dark Knight. So with that said, how does Jared Leto fare in the role? Well remember what I said before about there being quite a lot of deleted scenes? Because according to Leto, many of them involved ‘Mr. J.’ so unfortunately Joker doesn’t factor that much into this film. However, in the scenes that he does appear, I will say that Leto certainly proves to be an entertaining Joker. He certainly gives off the impression of being perhaps the most unhinged out of all of the on-screen Jokers we’ve seen to date. After all, we are talking about a character who’s supposed to be a complete psychopath and it’ll be interesting to see how future DC films will utilize his Joker. As for the rest of the cast, while the film primarily focuses on characters like Deadshot and Harley Quinn, there are a few notable standouts amongst the other members of the squad. This includes Jay Hernandez as El Diablo, a former gang member with the ability to summon fire but is hesitant to use his powers after they caused him much personal tragedy and, believe it or not, Jai Courtney as Captain Boomerang, who gets quite a lot of funny moments primarily based around the fact that the character is basically a straight-up jackass. Don’t expect much of a villain, though, because the ones in here are ‘fairly standard’ at best. By that I mean they’re not absolutely ‘terrible’ but they’re not that ‘great’ either.

As was the case with Batman v Superman, this film’s poor reviews have resulted in quite a considerable divide between fans and critics. And sure enough, this has once again led to the ‘critics are being paid by Marvel’ conspiracy that got tossed around when the previous film came out. But believe me when I say that this clearly isn’t true and keep in mind that this is coming from someone who admittedly can be quite the MCU fanboy most of the time. However, I am starting to sense some unfair bias when it comes to how the DCEU films have been received by critics. Because come on critics, this film isn’t THAT bad. Sure, like BvS, it does have some flaws. In the case of this film, they mainly stem from the occasionally erratic editing and for some elements of the story being a bit underdeveloped. However, at the end of the day, this film still manages to stand out amongst its fellow superhero films on its premise alone. We legitimately have not seen anything like this before when it comes to live-action superhero films and I think it’s really cool to have a film like this that dares to try and make characters who in any other film would be the bad guys the ‘heroes’ of a story. And overall the film does succeed for the most part in finding the humanity in a bunch of bad guys. So in short, I’m all for another adventure with the so called ‘worst heroes ever’. I’d say they earned the chance for a sequel, which hopefully will happen because given the fact that this is the second straight DCEU to get generally negative reviews, once again the future of the franchise is uncertain.


Rating: 4/5

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Fury (2014) review


War films… can be brutal; there’s no denying it. I really can’t think of any war film (that I’ve seen at least) that wasn’t brutal in some way, shape, or form. I mean, would you ever make a lighthearted film based on some of the darkest moments of human history? Odds are you probably wouldn’t because ‘war is hell’ and we have certainly seen that through other famous war films like ‘Schindler’s List’, ‘Flags of our Fathers’, and arguably the most famous war film of the modern era, ‘Saving Private Ryan’. This idea of the horrors of war is also showcased in the latest war flick, ‘Fury’, the second major film of the year directed by David Ayer (most famous for writing the film ‘Training Day’) following the release of ‘Sabotage’ back in March. ‘Fury’ admittedly can be very brutal at times as is common with war films, and it is also very grim. In fact, this film is arguably grimmer than it is brutal. But even with that in mind, ‘Fury’ is still an extremely riveting war drama featuring a top notch cast of leads and some truly exceptional action sequences. Yes, it’s very hard to watch at times but many other war films have been as well. This one is no exception.

The film takes place in April 1945 near the end of the European Theater section of World War II as the Allied forces begin to make their final push into Nazi Germany. We primarily follow the five-man crew of a Sherman tank nicknamed “Fury” led by Staff Sergeant Don “Wardaddy” Collier (Brad Pitt), with the main crew consisting of himself, Boyd “Bible” Swan (Shia LaBeouf), Trini “Gordo” Garcia (Michael Pena), and Grady “Coon-Ass” Travis (Jon Bernthal). Their fifth crew member ends up getting killed in battle and is immediately replaced by Norman Ellison (Logan Lerman), a typist who had just enlisted a few weeks ago. Due to his inexperience in tank combat and his unwillingness/hesitation to kill any enemy soldiers, Ellison is initially mocked by the rest of the crew of ‘Fury’, who have all been together since the North African campaign. This results in “Wardaddy” having to get him into the ‘warfighting’ spirit as they head off on a mission behind enemy lines where they soon find themselves outnumbered and outgunned against the German army.

Some have said that this film is like having someone come up to you and yell “war is hell” at you for two hours and while I can definitely see where these people are coming from, ‘Fury’ hasn’t been the only war movie to do this. Yes this film is brutal and yes it’s very grim but despite that it does do a really great job at portraying the horrors of war, specifically through the eyes of Ellison, who’s clearly in way over his head due to the fact that he’s a ‘rookie’ of war compared to the rest of the crew of ‘Fury’. Ultimately, he too has to go to some very dark places because that’s what happens in war; Compassion won’t get you anywhere far. This film features some incredible cinematography and the action sequences are phenomenal, some of the best that I’ve seen from a war movie. This helps make it extremely compelling although there is one scene in the film around the midway point that really slows things down, and not entirely in a good way. The scene in question is when the main characters go into a German town and meet a young woman and her cousin in their house. Now for the record, this isn’t exactly a ‘bad’ scene as it does allow for some nice bits of character development, particularly for Wardaddy and Ellison. The problem, however, is that it just goes on for way too long. In what is a two hour movie, this sequence arguably takes up about a quarter of the runtime. Again, it’s not a ‘bad’ scene, but the film would’ve really benefitted from having it trimmed a bit.

One of the key factors to this film’s success relied on whether or not the five leads have great camaraderie with one another given the fact that they’re all cooped up in a tank and are basically the only people on screen for most of the film. Now unfortunately, most of the main characters come off as being rather unlikable at times, primarily due to how they initially treat Ellison, resulting in him being the main one you root for over the course of the film. Jon Bernthal’s character in particular comes off as being particularly dickish, especially during the aforementioned sequence in the German village. Heck, even Wardaddy acts a little extreme at times when he’s working to break Ellison’s innocence, like when he forces him to shoot a prisoner against his will. But as the movie goes on, we do see that there are still ounces of humanity in all of them. Again, that’s war in a nutshell… it turns you into something you don’t want to become but in the end there’s nothing you can do about it. The five leads do have superb camaraderie, resulting in a very effective and genuine sense of brotherhood amongst them. Pitt and Lerman in particular work off each other extremely well in the figurative roles of ‘teacher’ and ‘student’ respectively though LaBeouf (Who dare I say might just be the standout amongst the five?), Pena, and Bernthal all do fantastic jobs as well.

‘Fury’ is a film that isn’t really for the faint of heart. It’s brutal and also very grim in regards to its overall tone and atmosphere. But at the same time, the movie does manage to be an incredibly captivating war drama with some excellent action sequences and phenomenal cinematography. But at its core, the film’s greatest strengths come from how it does a great job at not only portraying the horrors of war through the eyes of an inexperienced soldier but also the brotherhood between soldiers as shown through the five members of the ‘Fury’ crew. Their camaraderie is superb and all five leads do a phenomenal jobs, with Logan Lerman and Shia LaBeouf in particular giving some of the best performances of their careers. It can be argued that this film is more brutal than it ultimately needed to be but really, when has a war film ever not been brutal/grim? That’s the whole point as these films convey to us how dark things can get in the time of war. ‘Fury’ is indeed a hard-hitting movie but at the same time it will also have you on the edge of your seat from beginning to end.


Rating: 4.5/5