Showing posts with label Captain Underpants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Captain Underpants. Show all posts

Saturday, February 8, 2025

Dog Man (2025) Review

In 1997, author Dav Pilkey would publish what would quickly become the breakout hit of his career, The Adventures of Captain Underpants. A kid-friendly send-up of the superhero genre, the book followed the daily adventures of best friends George Beard and Harold Hutchins, a pair of mischievous fourth graders who loved to pull pranks at their elementary school, especially if it came at the expense of their lousy teachers. When their notoriously cruel principal Mr. Krupp threatens to enact the most severe punishment imaginable on them, the two manage to get out of it by using a hypno-ring to coerce Mr. Krupp into believing that he is the hero of their self-produced comic book series, Captain Underpants, an underwear-themed superhero who’s “faster than a speeding waistband, more powerful than boxer shorts, and who can leap tall buildings without getting a wedgie”. Unfortunately, this ends up working a bit too well and Mr. Krupp starts going around trying to fight for “truth, justice, and all that is pre-shrunk and cottony” despite not having any actual superpowers, thus resulting in George and Harold having to go after him to keep him safe, especially once they start coming across actual supervillains like a bunch of sentient toilets and a mad genius with the unfortunate name of Pippy P. Poopypants.

Upon its release, the book quickly became a huge hit with readers, ultimately going on to spawn a franchise consisting of 12 mainline installments and multiple spin-offs that have collectively sold over 80 million copies worldwide. Granted, all this success has also come with a bunch of controversies, namely because of the books being some of the most consistently banned books in public libraries due to their juvenile sense of humor and anti-authoritarian nature, but that hasn’t stopped them from becoming beloved staples of the literary journeys of those who grew up with them. In 2017, the series was adapted into film by DreamWorks Animation, who had been looking to purchase the film rights to them ever since their debut in 1997. Eventually securing said rights in 2011, Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie, which was notably the last DreamWorks film produced under the 20th Century Fox banner after the studio was purchased by Universal the year prior, opted to be an amalgamation of the books (utilizing the origin story of the first installment and the main antagonist of the fourth, for example) rather than a straightforward adaptation of the first book. Upon its release, the film became both a critical and commercial hit, earning over $125 million worldwide. And in the eyes of Captain Underpants fans, the film was one of the most surprisingly faithful ‘book-to-film’ adaptations ever made, flawlessly replicating the artistic and narrative spirit of the books and even managing to adapt seemingly uncinematic aspects of the books to screen such as the ‘Flip-O-Rama’ segments where readers were encouraged to rapidly flip two pages back and forth to simulate action sequences.

One year prior to the film’s release, Dav Pilkey launched his next book series, Dog Man. Another spin-off of the Captain Underpants series, Dog Man is presented as the in-universe first comic series that George and Harold created together after they had first met in kindergarten (which, fun fact, was referenced as early as the original novel in 1997 as this was a character that Pilkey had conceived when he was in second grade). Following the conclusion of the mainline Captain Underpants series, the two rediscover their old Dog Man comics and decide to relaunch the series. Like the Captain Underpants books, the Dog Man books have been hugely successful critically and commercially, currently standing at 13 installments (with a 14th set to release later this year) with every installment being amongst the best-selling children’s books of their respective release years. And in 2020, DreamWorks began the process of bringing Pilkey’s latest hit series to the big screen, which brings us to this year’s Dog Man. Directorial duties for this one go to Peter Hastings, who has only directed one film prior (that being the… ‘infamous’ adaptation of Disney’s Country Bear Jamboree theme park attraction) but has had plenty of experience in both the world of animation, producing the likes of hit shows like Animaniacs, and the works of Dav Pilkey as he was one of the show-runners of the Captain Underpants film’s Netflix series spin-off The Epic Tales of Captain Underpants. With all this in mind, it should come as no surprise that, like its cinematic predecessor, Dog Man is another entertainingly goofy yet wholly sincere and genuinely faithful adaptation of Dav Pilkey’s beloved literary works.

In the bustling metropolis that is OK City, the local Police Chief (voiced by Lil Rel Howery) and his officers are constantly threatened by the inventions of the notorious evildoer Petey the Cat (voiced by Pete Davidson). The only two that have consistently been able to successfully thwart his plans are Officer Knight (voiced by director Peter Hastings), a highly decorated yet admittedly quite dimwitted police officer, and his loyal canine companion Greg (also voiced by director Peter Hastings), who’s clearly shown to be the smarter one of the two despite being a dog. Unfortunately, the duo end up getting critically injured when they’re unable to defuse one of Petey’s bombs, with Officer Knight suffering significant head injuries and Greg sustaining serious bodily injuries. As a way of saving them both, a pair of surgeons swiftly decide to transplant Greg’s head onto Officer Knight’s body, with the ensuing experiment resulting in the creation of a half-dog/half-human hybrid, Dog Man. Almost immediately, Dog Man becomes a beloved hero in the eyes of the people of OK City as he continues his ongoing crusade against Petey the Cat, who continues to enact all sorts of devious plans to take down his arch-nemesis, which includes everything from resurrecting one of Dog Man’s old foes, Flippy the Fish (voiced by Ricky Gervais) to creating his own clone, Li’l Petey (voiced by Lucas Hopkins Calderon) who, to Petey’s disappointment, turns out to be not quite as villainous as he is.

Now the first thing I should note about this film is that, despite everything that I’ve mentioned about its source material’s roots and connections to the Captain Underpants series, the film itself is not presented as the in-universe spin-off that it technically is. There’s no framing device that establishes it as the creation of George and Harold and the only major connection that it does share with Captain Underpants is a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it cameo from the creators themselves. There’s not even a Flip-O-Rama sequence in this film despite the Dog Man books having them just like in the Captain Underpants books as that concept has been a staple of Dav Pilkey’s work since its debut in the original Captain Underpants novel. And yet, as neat as it would’ve been to see this film attempt to properly connect itself to the Captain Underpants series, I also recognize that it’s ultimately not that necessary for it to do so. Regardless of how much it does or doesn’t try to be a spin-off of its cinematic predecessor, Dog Man the film dutifully follows in the footsteps of the 2017 Captain Underpants film by being a highly respectful adaptation of its source material that faithfully adapts it not by being a direct 1:1 adaptation of its first installment but by seamlessly combining key story elements of multiple books into a singular narrative (Flippy the Fish? He’s the villain of the second book, Dog Man: Unleashed. Li’l Petey? He was introduced in Book 3, Dog Man: A Tale of Two Kittens.). All the while, the film also does a great job in capturing Pilkey’s well-established narrative sensibilities, resulting in a pleasantly light-hearted family-friendly comedy that’s unabashedly goofy. And while many of Pilkey’s biggest critics have often derided his work as being nothing more than a series of immature toilet jokes, I believe that, in doing so, they overlook the more subtly brilliant aspects of his writing, like his penchant for cleverly self-aware humor and simple yet delightfully wacky running gags.

Case in point, while Dog Man is a largely comedic endeavor, it’ll also take you by surprise by how it manages to throw in some genuinely heartfelt story beats. Much of this comes from the introduction of Li’l Petey who, as established earlier, doesn’t possess the same villainous tendencies that Petey has. Li’l Petey ends up forming a friendship with Dog Man over the course of the film, which then leads to Petey gradually starting to act less like a villain which, yes, is another way in which the film honors the books, where Petey turns into a hero by the end of the fifth book, Dog Man: Lord of the Fleas. The Captain Underpants film also had its fair share of heartfelt moments, which helps to exemplify why both these films, for as silly as they are, also have such a wholesome vibe to them while never having any moments that feel cynical or mean-spirited. Like Captain Underpants, Dog Man’s animation wasn’t an in-studio job (here, it was handled by Jellyfish Pictures whereas its predecessor was made by Mikros Image and Technicolor Animation Productions) but it still does a great job in replicating Pilkey’s trademark comic art style to make it all look like a comic book coming to life on-screen. Meanwhile, the film boasts a fun voice cast to play the franchise’s eclectic cast of characters, including Lil Rel Howery as Dog Man’s perpetually exasperated police chief, Isla Fisher as OK City’s most dedicated news reporter Sarah Hatoff, and Pete Davidson gleefully hamming it up as Petey.

I didn’t exactly imply it all that much throughout this review but I’m very much a part of the generation that grew up with the Captain Underpants books. Back in a time when I wasn’t fully aware of how controversial they were amongst certain groups (for, to be perfectly blunt, hilariously overblown reasons), I was thoroughly enthralled by their goofy yet subtly clever sense of humor and hugely entertaining stories that I’m confident were essential in me developing my love for the superhero genre back before I truly got into the likes of Marvel and DC. I eventually stopped reading the series regularly after its eighth installment, Captain Underpants and the Preposterous Plight of the Purple Potty People, partially due to it leading to a six-year gap between book releases (albeit for the completely valid reason of Pilkey stepping away from writing to take care of his father David before he passed away in 2008) but mainly for the more standardized reason that applies to anything you enjoyed as a kid as I simply grew out of the series’ target demographic. However, that didn’t stop me from going to see the Captain Underpants film in 2017 which, ironically, was also the first DreamWorks Animation film that I’d seen in theaters in nearly a decade for… well, the exact same reason why I stopped reading the books. And for me, the result was not only one of DreamWorks’ best films but also one of my favorite films of that year. Despite not having read the books in quite a few years, I was pleasantly delighted by how surprisingly faithful the film was in adapting them to the screen even if that was largely done by way of it combining different story beats from multiple books in the series. No joke, I damn near cheered in the theater when the film managed to pull off an incredibly successful cinematic rendition of the series’ trademark ‘Flip-o-Rama’ segments.

Conversely, I do not have any sort of history with the Dog Man book series as it didn’t start coming out until 2016. This would’ve been a much different story had this new film been an adaptation of the Captain Underpants series’ original spin-off, The Adventures of Super Diaper Baby, another in-universe comic by George and Harold about a newborn named Billy Hoskins who gains Captain Underpants’ super-powers, or a different Dav Pilkey series named Ricky Ricotta’s Mighty Robot, in which the titular mouse Ricky Ricotta befriends a giant robot as they team up to fight all sorts of intergalactic antagonists. Nevertheless, my nostalgia for the Captain Underpants series was ultimately enough to compel me to check out Dog Man’s film adaptation, and while I can’t say that it’s ‘as good’ as the 2017 Captain Underpants film (nor is it one of DreamWorks’ best, for that matter), it’s also one of those films that I’d argue is almost impossible to dislike. Not only does it do a fantastic job of being devotedly faithful to its source material but its wholly uncynical nature makes it a refreshingly positive animated flick that candidly wears its heart on its sleeve. As such, it’s clear that this film will be a smash hit with fans of the Dog Man series, undoubtedly destined to become a regular rewatch for the generation that will grow up with it, while still managing to appeal to older audiences who most likely aren’t familiar with the source material with its wacky sense of humor and vibrant animation. But perhaps best of all, this film’s success will assuredly make it another exemplary testament as to why Dav Pilkey continues to be an indisputable icon in the world of children’s literature.

Rating: 4/5

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

TOP 12 FAVORITE FILMS OF 2017: #12-10 + Honorable Mentions


Overall, I’d describe 2017 as a great year for film… and a terrible year for the film industry. And in terms of the latter, you all know exactly what I’m talking about. Early this past October, several sexual harassment and assault allegations were levied against longtime producer Harvey Weinstein. Like clockwork, this then led to other allegations against some of the biggest names in the industry, including Kevin Spacey, Louis C.K., and even Disney/Pixar mainstay John Lasseter just to name a few (emphasis on ‘just to name a few’). Now, as many of you know, I usually try to avoid delving into political discussions on this site… but, in this instance, the ‘Weinstein effect’ is such an unavoidable topic at this point that I feel that I at least have to say something about it. With that said, I’ll say this. At the very least, it’s clear that the film industry has begun to take major steps in fighting back against the sexual predators that have been a part of their community for years (e.g. when Ridley Scott removed Kevin Spacey from All the Money in the World, replacing him with Christopher Plummer). And while there are undeniably still a lot of ‘Harvey Weinstein’ types out there, there are also quite a lot of good people in the industry who are doing all that they can to get rid of the industry’s scum. In short, to quote a line from this year’s historical drama Detroit, ‘change is coming’; and to quote a widespread online hashtag, #TimesUp. With all that out of the way, it’s time to delve into my annual list in which I count down my picks for my Top 12 Favorite Films from this past year in film. For those who are new to this site, the main reason why I do a Top 12 instead of the more traditional Top 10 is so that I can honor even more of the many great films that I’ve seen over the last 12 months.

Before I begin, though, I must lay down my usual ground-rules for the following 4 posts. First off, I will warn you all ahead of time that these posts will be heavy on the spoilers. If you have not seen any of the films that will be appearing on this list, please refer to the non-spoiler reviews that I have made for them as I will be addressing some of their most critical moments in these posts. Said reviews will be provided via a series of web links that can be found at the start of each pick. The second thing to note about this list is that, like every year, I haven’t had the time to see every major film that had come out in 2017. Believe me, if I did have the time, then I would most surely try to see as many films as I possibly can before working on this list. However, that’s just not feasible at this point; thus, if you end up wondering why films like Get Out, Lady Bird, and The Big Sick aren’t on this list, this is the reason why. And this brings me to another point that I’ve unfortunately had to implement as one of my ground-rules in recent years. I want to make things perfectly clear; this list will be almost entirely dominated by films that fall into the category of big-budget, VFX-heavy blockbusters. I recognize that this will probably not sit very well with those who prefer films that come out of the independent market; however, that’s just how I roll right now. In fact, I’d argue that a lot of the films that will be appearing on this list (several of whom are remakes, sequels, reboots, etc.) are more than capable of standing toe to toe with whatever gets nominated for this year’s Best Picture category at the Oscars. And really, just because a film is ‘original’ or ‘independently made’ does not automatically make it ‘good’ (don’t make me have to bring up Mother again).

Finally, as always, there’s the most important ground-rule of all; please, please, PLEASE be respectful of other people’s opinions when it comes to discussing your favorite films of the year. I say this especially considering some of the unpleasant incidents that the film fan community has been involved in this past year (heck, I might even address some of them in this list). At the end of the day, we all need to remember that film is a subjective medium. In other words, not everyone is going to like the same thing; that’s why I don’t get too worked up about whatever film wins at all the big awards shows or the always controversial award season ‘snubs’. You can’t please everybody. With that in mind, I’m well-aware that not everyone reading these posts will be a fan of some of the films that will be appearing on this list. That is why I always refer to it as my ‘Favorite Films of the Year list’ instead of the more definitive-sounding ‘Best Films of the Year list’, so if there’s a film on this list that you weren’t a fan of, that’s totally fine. All the power to you, my friend. Just don’t be a jackass about it and harshly berate those who have a different opinion than yours. Trust me, I’ve been subjected to comments along the lines of ‘your opinion doesn’t matter’ quite a few times in the past and, simply put, it’s not fun. And now, with that long intro out of the way, I present you with my Top 12 Favorite Films of 2017. This is Part 1 of 4 and today we’ll be looking at picks #12-10.

But first, as always, let’s start with my Honorable Mentions. This year, I have 6 to name…

DUNKIRK

Fionn Whitehead in Dunkirk (2017)

Some of you may be surprised to find that Christopher Nolan’s latest directorial effort did not crack the Top 12. After all, I have gone on record stating that Nolan is one of my favorite directors working today; as such, his films usually end up ranking high on these end-of-the-year lists for me. Case in point, his last film Interstellar was originally one of the two films that were tied for my favorite film of 2014… before I accepted the fact that I had pulled a major cop-out that year and then proceeded to put it back to the #2 spot. But as for Dunkirk, while I did like it, I’ll admit that it just wasn’t one of my absolute favorites from this past year. Still, Nolan’s take on the real-life evacuations that had occurred from upon the beaches of the titular Dunkirk, France during World War II is a well-crafted wartime thriller. While there was some initial skepticism over the fact that Nolan decided to limit the war action to a non-graphic PG-13 rating, he more than makes up for this with some of the most tension-filled action sequences of the year. And like any Nolan film, these sequences were done with practical effects and shot on film instead of digital, resulting in some amazing cinematography that makes this film quintessential viewing on the big screen. After all, if there’s one thing that Nolan has very much become known for these past few years, it’s his concentrated efforts to keep the art of theater-going alive with films that are best seen on the biggest screens around. Sure enough, like Interstellar, Dunkirk was an undisputed must-see in IMAX screened on 70 mm film.

THE DISASTER ARTIST

James Franco, Seth Rogen, Zac Efron, and Dave Franco in The Disaster Artist (2017)

Many on the internet are familiar with the infamous 2003 flick The Room. Since its initial release, writer/director Tommy Wiseau’s bizarrely incoherent drama has gone on to become one of the most popular ‘so bad, it’s good’ films of all-time. And now, thanks to The Disaster Artist, based on the autobiography of the same name of Wiseau’s co-star Greg Sestero, we get to witness some of the madness that went into its production. James Franco not only directs the film but stars in it as well as the one and only Tommy Wiseau. And all in all, he does an excellent job in both roles, giving the film solid pacing and a consistent tone throughout while also perfectly capturing all aspects of Wiseau’s eccentric personality. This is paired nicely with Franco’s brother Dave and Seth Rogen’s equally excellent performances as Sestero and The Room’s script supervisor (and ‘alleged real director’) Sandy Schklair, respectively, both of whom serve as the straight men to Tommy’s antics. Ultimately, though, this film is a lot like Tim Burton’s 1994 biopic on another infamous filmmaker, Ed Wood. In other words, while the film fully acknowledges the fact that Tommy Wiseau is a bizarre individual who often acted in a tyrannical manner while directing The Room, it also sympathizes with him through his and Sestero’s journey of just trying to make it big in the film industry. Because of this, while The Room is still considered by many as one of the worst films of all-time (though in its case, that’s not entirely a bad thing), The Disaster Artist is a far different story.

BATTLE OF THE SEXES

Elisabeth Shue, Bill Pullman, Alan Cumming, Steve Carell, Sarah Silverman, Emma Stone, and Andrea Riseborough in Battle of the Sexes (2017)

This film’s title says it all as it focuses on the iconic exhibition tennis match that it’s named after between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. King’s victory in the 1973 match proved to be a landmark moment in the sport as it paved the way for female tennis players gaining greater respect in what was, at the time, a heavily male-dominated sport. Sure enough, co-directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris’ film explores the build-up to the event and how King worked tirelessly to fight for equal pay amongst her and her fellow players. This includes everything from the women-only tennis tournament established by her and reporter Gladys Heldman to the moment where she eventually has to accept Riggs’ offer to play him when one of her big rivals loses to him in an embarrassing blowout. Through it all, King proves to be an endearing protagonist who goes through quite a lot on an emotional level, namely when she begins to have an affair with her hairdresser Marilyn that ends up affecting her marriage to Larry King (For the record, not ‘that’ Larry King). Because of all of this, you find yourself fully rooting for her when she finally ends up competing against Riggs in the big ‘Battle of the Sexes’ exhibition match. And, of course, a lot of this is thanks to Emma Stone’s phenomenal performance as Billie Jean, though she’s also backed by an excellent supporting cast that includes Steve Carell as Riggs, Andrea Riseborough as Marilyn, and Alan Cumming as King’s fashion designer/friend Ted Tinling just to name a few. In short, Battle of the Sexes is quite a unique entry in the sports film genre as the main sport that it focuses on, tennis, is ultimately not its biggest focus; instead, it’s more about Billie Jean King and the impact that she left on the sport. And what an impact it was.

CAPTAIN UNDERPANTS: THE FIRST EPIC MOVIE

Ed Helms in Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie (2017)

To answer your first question, yes, a film titled Captain Underpants is one of my favorite films of 2017. Like many others of my generation, I grew up reading author Dav Pilkey’s popular series of books about an elementary school principal who’s hypnotized into thinking that he is an underwear-themed superhero. Despite their admittedly juvenile sense of humor, the books featured fun characters mixed with clever writing that almost always broke the fourth wall. And even though the book series technically ended back in 2015, you may be surprised to find that its first film adaptation, courtesy of DreamWorks, is one of the most faithful film adaptations of any source material in recent years. While technically a combination of the plots of books 1 and 4 with the origin stories of the former and the main antagonist of the latter, writer Nicholas Stoller perfectly captures the spirit of the books right down to the implementation of the series’ most popular running gags. This includes everything from the read-throughs of main protagonists George Beard and Harold Hutchins’ homemade comics to, of course, Flip-O-Rama, the moments from the books where readers were encouraged to flip a pair of pages back and forth to simulate ‘extremely violent’ action sequences. Don’t even get me started on how excited I was when that scene popped up. But amidst all the toilet humor (figuratively and literally seeing how there are sentient toilets in this), the film also manages to capture the charm and heart of the books through the perfect representation of one of the franchise’s key elements, the friendship of George and Harold. Both Kevin Hart and Thomas Middleditch are fantastic in their respective roles as are Ed Helms in the dual role of Mr. Krupp/Captain Underpants and Nick Kroll as the film’s main antagonist Professor Poopypants (and yes, that’s his name…). Thus, to make a long story short (yes, that’s a reference to the books…), watching Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie truly made me feel like a kid again. TRA LA LAAAAAA!!!

P.S. I was also glad to hear that there’ll be a Netflix series coming out sometime later this year that will continue the wacky adventures of our lovable main protagonists.

BABY DRIVER

Ansel Elgort in Baby Driver (2017)

After enduring the whole debacle that arose from his involvement and ultimate departure from Marvel Studios’ Ant-Man, Edgar Wright was finally able to return to doing what he does best this year with his latest big-screen masterpiece, Baby Driver. Partially inspired by a music video that he directed for the band Mint Royale in 2003, the film is a high-octane crime thriller that boasts some fantastic car chases. Said car chases and all other subsequent action sequences are set perfectly to an equally outstanding soundtrack that rivals the Awesome Mixes from the Guardians of the Galaxy franchise as one of the best film soundtracks in recent years. Now, admittedly, the film’s plot, in which a good-natured young man who’s forced into being a getaway driver for a crime boss tries to get out of ‘the business’, is arguably one of the more straight-forward plots to come out of one of Wright’s films. Despite this, however, it all works out in the end thanks to Wright’s excellent direction, as he manages to craft some effectively suspenseful moments in the film’s second half despite what I just said about the plot being a tad bit predictable. Plus, the film boasts an excellent ensemble cast highlighted by Ansel Elgort as the charismatic protagonist Baby, Jon Hamm and newcomer Eiza Gonzalez as the wild couple of Buddy and Darling, and Jamie Foxx as the volatile Bats. All in all, Baby Driver was another welcome addition to Edgar Wright’s prestigious filmography and it ended up becoming his most commercially successful directorial outing to date, which I’d argue is a nice reward for him after everything that happened with Ant-Man.

KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE

Colin Firth, Julianne Moore, Mark Strong, Channing Tatum, and Taron Egerton in Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017)

This film serves as a prime example of why I don’t take Rotten Tomatoes’ ratings that seriously. I mean, really, this film opens with an epic car chase set to Prince’s ‘Let’s Go Crazy’, concludes with an epic final shootout set to Elton John’s ‘Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting’, and features the Rocket Man himself in an admittedly absurd but still all-around awesome cameo… and yet it only maintains a 51% rating on RT whereas something like Mother has a 69% rating? In all seriousness, I will admit that this year’s follow-up to director Matthew Vaughn’s 2015 outing Kingsman: The Secret Service is far from perfect. Sure, maybe the film is a bit overlong with a near two-and-a-half-hour runtime. And sure, maybe some of the new characters that are introduced in this film don’t get as much material to work with as they should (e.g. despite his prominent appearance in the marketing, Channing Tatum’s Agent Tequila is basically just a ‘cameo appearance’). Still, this film proves to be just as entertaining as its predecessor thanks to A.) its awesomely over-the-top action sequences and B.) the franchise’s phenomenal lead trio of Taron Egerton as Eggsy, Colin Firth as Harry Hart, and Mark Strong as Merlin. After his breakout turn in the previous film, Egerton has transitioned perfectly to the role of ‘leading man’ while Firth gets some excellent material to work with thanks to Harry’s ‘resurrection’ arc. And finally, Mark Strong is still just as big of a standout as always as Kingsman tech guru Merlin, who goes out on the most epic of notes with an emotionally stirring sacrifice set to John Denver’s ‘Country Roads, Take Me Home’. In conclusion, I’ll admit that my high praise for this film may have been partially influenced by the fact that it was the first new film that I saw after the torturous experience that I had while watching Mother; still, as a fan of the first Kingsman, I was more than satisfied with its equally entertaining follow-up despite its shortcomings.

And now we move onto this year’s Top 12, which starts off with a first for this annual list of mine… a horror film. As I’ve made it clear in the past, I’m not that big a fan of the horror genre. This explains why a lot of recent horror films usually end up on my ‘Worst of the Year’ lists (e.g. my #3 worst from this past year, Rings), which also means that it would take quite a lot for a film like this to crack my Top 12. And with this next film, that is exactly what happened…

12. IT

Bill Skarsgård and Jackson Robert Scott in It (2017)

This year’s big film adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 novel It was the second major adaptation of its source material following a two-part miniseries that aired on ABC in 1990. In preparation for the new film, I watched and reviewed the miniseries for this site. In that review, I noted that while I didn’t think that the miniseries was ‘terrible’, it also hasn’t aged that well. Really, the only notable thing about it nowadays is Tim Curry’s standout performance as the main antagonist, Pennywise the Dancing Clown. Suffice it to say, the film version of It is a far superior take on its source material. Because it only focuses on the first half of the story, it’s allowed to take its time when it comes to properly developing its main characters. And whereas the miniseries had to tone down some of the darkest elements of the novel to be suitable to air on national television, the film fully embraces its R rating to showcase some of the most disturbing moments from King’s novel. Granted, not every major sequence from the novel occurs in the film, most notably the infamous scene in which the seven kids partake in a massive orgy (and no, I’m not kidding about that one; quite frankly, I think many of us can agree that it was a good thing that this part was taken out), but the dark and foreboding atmosphere is still strong throughout. This, of course, is thanks in large part to Bill Skarsgard’s excellent turn in the role of Pennywise. Now, to be fair, I understand why some may still find Tim Curry’s take on Pennywise to be better given how Skarsgard isn’t given a lot of opportunities for comedy, which some feel is a vital part of being a clown. Still, in the context of this film, the darker take on the character works quite well as Skarsgard very much succeeds in giving off an unsettling vibe whenever he’s on-screen. In a lot of ways, it’s very similar to Heath Ledger’s iconic take on the Joker from The Dark Knight, which focused more on the character’s psychotic personality than his affinity for dark humor.

The real highlight of the film, however, is its group of main leads AKA the seven kids from the town of Derry, Maine who band together to form ‘the Losers’ Club’. For a cast that was made up of mostly newcomers, these seven young leads are all fantastic in their respective roles. Sure, the film does tend to focus on some of them more than others, namely Bill given what happens to his brother Georgie and Beverly, the lone girl of the group who deals with A.) being deemed a ‘slut’ at school and B.) her abusive father. Still, each of the kids does get their moment to shine in the film; more importantly, though, is the fact that you become fully endeared to them as the film goes on. Without this, you wouldn’t go ‘aww…’ at the moment when Ben saves Beverly by kissing her and she reveals to him that she knows that he was the one who wrote her a romantic poem. And you wouldn’t tear up at the part where, after the gang defeats Pennywise, Bill finds Georgie’s yellow raincoat, resulting in him finally coming to terms with his brother’s death at the hands of the demonic clown. And this, to me, is why this film works so well in contrast to other recent horror films. Oh sure, it does have some great horror moments, like the scene where Pennywise emerges from a projector to attack the kids (I won’t lie, I audibly yelled ‘Holy S***!’ in the theater when that happened; it’s THAT effective of a scene). But when it comes to some of the biggest flaws of a lot of modern horror films, easily one of the biggest comes in the form of stock, cliched characters who are just there to be killed by the bad guy. That’s not the case here, though, as you do care about these kids and root for them to succeed against Pennywise. Because of this, It is much more than just a ‘horror’ film; it’s a tale of friendship, young love, and overcoming one’s fears…that just so happens to involve a kid-eating clown. Thus, you don’t have to be a fan of the horror genre to appreciate how truly well-made of a film that this is.

Image result for it 2017 gif

One of the most famous films of all-time ended up getting a sequel this year. And despite having to follow in the footsteps of a landmark entry in the science-fiction genre, this next film more than managed to live up to the hefty expectations that were laid upon it.


Harrison Ford, Jared Leto, Ryan Gosling, and Ana de Armas in Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

I’ll openly admit that this past year was the first time that I watched Ridley Scott’s seminal 1982 classic, Blade Runner. Obviously, I made sure to check it out first before seeing its long-awaited sequel, Blade Runner 2049. And after watching the ‘Final Cut’ of the film, mainly because this was the one cut out of all of Blade Runner’s infamous various edits that Scott himself was the most involved in developing, I must say that I do agree with the consensus that it’s one of the best sci-fi films of all-time. This, of course, means that there was quite a lot of pressure put on the sequel to be just as successful, especially considering that it had been in the works for years. Thankfully, Arrival director Denis Villeneuve manages to live up to these lofty expectations, for the most part, with a highly engaging follow-up that respects its predecessor while also doing its own thing at the same time. In terms of the former, that primarily comes via the efforts to replicate the original’s classic visual style. While there have been quite a lot of advancements in the art of visual effects since the original Blade Runner came out, Villeneuve very much succeeds in recapturing the mesmerizing aura of the franchise’s iconic dystopian future setting. Because of this, Blade Runner 2049 is easily one of the best-looking films of the year thanks in large part to the amazing cinematography from the legendary Roger Deakins. From the impressive wide shots to the film’s rich and vibrant color palette, 2049 boasts plenty of great frame-worthy imagery. And it’s all backed, in turn, by a terrific score from the equally legendary Hans Zimmer and Zimmer protégé Benjamin Wallfisch (who also did the music for It).

As for the plot, it’s an effectively natural follow-up to the original as it sees new main protagonist K (Ryan Gosling) investigating a seemingly impossible development; a female Replicant who gave birth. This then leads to him crossing paths with the child’s father, who is none other than the original film’s main protagonist, ex-Blade Runner Rick Deckard, meaning that the pregnant Replicant was Deckard’s love interest from the first film, Rachael, who is revealed to have died in childbirth. Now, on that note, it should be noted that while Harrison Ford does return to reprise his role as Deckard, he ultimately doesn’t show up in the film until after the halfway point. Also, for those who were wondering, the film doesn’t really address the long-standing debate of whether Deckard is a Replicant himself, which was initially brought upon by the various interpretations of the first film’s ending depending on the cut of it that was viewed. Still, despite his limited screen-time, Harrison Ford is once again excellent in the role and is given a lot of great emotional material to work with. One of his best scenes comes when he finds himself taken captive by Replicant manufacturer Niander Wallace, who offers him a reward in exchange for information about his child. Said reward comes in the form of a clone of Rachael, which Deckard ultimately rejects when he points out that ‘her eyes were green’… which then leads to Wallace’s assistant Luv executing the clone point-blank. All in all, it’s an excellent sequence thanks to Ford’s excellent performance and the impressive visual effects work that was done to recreate Sean Young’s Rachael as she had looked in the first film. And for the record, yes, that wasn’t Sean Young reprising her role; it was just a digital double.

Gosling also gets some great material to work with as well, namely when K (who is immediately established as being a Replicant) starts to wonder if he’s the child of Deckard and Rachael because of one of his earliest memories involving a toy horse. This is ultimately proven false, though, as we learn that the child is Replicant memory scientist Dr. Ana Stelline (“All the best memories are hers…”). But when it comes to the film’s biggest standout, that honor goes to Ana de Armas as Joi, one of many from a line of holographic A.I. programs that has been retrofitted into being K’s girlfriend. Like the arc that Rachael went through in the first film when she began to realize that she’s a Replicant, Joi is easily one of the most complex characters in the entire film because of her desire to be ‘real’, to the point where she even hires a prostitute to project her form onto so that she can experience sex with K. Armas also has excellent chemistry with Gosling, so much so that the scene where her mobile unit (and, subsequently, her entire system) is destroyed by Luv is hands down one of the most heartbreaking scenes in the entire film. Speaking of Luv, Sylvia Hoeks is also a major standout as Wallace’s ruthless assistant who effectively blurs the line between loyal servant and a stone-cold killer. But as for Wallace, he’s ultimately the film’s weakest link. For the record, I don’t attribute this to Jared Leto’s performance in the role, which is something that I only bring up following all the backlash towards his controversial turn as the Joker in Suicide Squad. Really, the problem with this character is that he is vastly underdeveloped to the point where there is no resolution to his role in the plot, as he is never seen again after the ‘Rachael clone’ scene. Ironically, this is a lot like his turn in Suicide Squad… mainly because he only appears briefly in either film. Despite this, however, Blade Runner 2049 is an excellent film in every sense of the word. And while it sadly shared the same fate as its predecessor at the box-office, there’s a good chance that it’ll end up being regarded just as much as the original Blade Runner in the years to come. 

Image result for blade runner 2049 gif

Aside from the colossal disappointment that was Justice League, 2017 was one of the greatest years yet for the superhero genre; sure enough, all 5 of the other major superhero films from this past year will be appearing on this list. And to start things off at #10, we have the highly satisfying return to form of everyone’s favorite web-slinger.


Tom Holland in Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)

Spider-Man: Homecoming served as the second major reboot of the Spider-Man film franchise in half a decade… understandably, for some that’d be a cause for concern given how quickly this occurred following the previous franchise reboot back in 2012. However, if there’s one reason why I stayed optimistic about this new film in the months leading up to its release, it was all because of two words… Marvel Studios. Yes, thanks to a deal between Sony and Marvel, while Homecoming was released under the former’s banner, it also counts as a Marvel Cinematic Universe film. Ergo, it has all the great things that we’ve come to expect from the MCU; excellent characters, awesome action sequences, and solid humor. But this film also gives us something else, and that is one of the best character arcs of the entire franchise thanks to the terrific development of the MCU’s rendition of Peter Parker AKA Spider-Man. Of course, we were first introduced to Tom Holland’s take on Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War, and it was clear right out of the gate that Marvel Studios was intent on keeping Peter in high school, something that was only briefly done in previous Spider-Man films. In the Raimi trilogy, Peter was only in high-school for the first half hour or so of the first film. And while the first Amazing Spider-Man film had Peter in high school throughout, he and Gwen Stacy then proceeded to graduate at the start of Amazing Spider-Man 2. In contrast, the MCU Peter is immediately established as still being a high school student when he ends up getting ‘recruited’ by Tony Stark AKA Iron Man to assist him in dealing with his conflict with Captain America.

This then paves the way for Peter’s main arc in Homecoming. After getting to fight alongside the Avengers, Peter immediately thinks that this means that he’s been brought in to join the team. Ultimately, though, he finds himself having to return to the role of being a ‘friendly neighborhood’ Spider-Man in his hometown of Queens under the ‘guidance’ of Tony and his bodyguard Happy Hogan. And thus, the bulk of the film revolves around Peter trying to prove himself while also coming to terms with the fact that, despite his enthusiasm for being a crime-fighting superhero, he is still just a kid in the larger Marvel Cinematic Universe. When he tries to stop some bad guys on the Staten Island Ferry, he nearly gets everyone on it killed before being saved by Tony, who quickly reprimands him for his reckless behavior and demands that he give back the suit that had been made for him for the airport battle in Civil War. And when Peter desperately pleads with him to let him keep the suit, stating that ‘he’s nothing without it’, Tony then sternly notes the following; “If you’re nothing without this suit, then you shouldn’t have it”. This whole bit serves as an excellent callback to Tony’s arc in Iron Man 3 in which he came to realize that his suit wasn’t the one thing that defined him; not to mention the fact that it also ties in nicely to the part where Peter remarks that he just wanted to be like Tony, who replies by stating that he wanted him ‘to be better’, clearly recognizing all his mistakes from past films. Later in the film, when Peter finds himself trapped under rubble in the lair of the film’s main antagonist Vulture, how does he react to it? By screaming out for help, fearful for his life. It isn’t until he sees his reflection in a pool of water intermixed with his homemade Spider-Man mask, along with remembering Tony’s stern words from earlier questioning his ‘need’ for the suit, that he’s able to regain his confidence and get himself out of this perilous situation. Simply put, this is hands down one of the best moments in the entire film (“Come on Peter! Come on Spider-Man! COME ON SPIDER-MAN!”)

While I’m still a fan of Andrew Garfield’s take on the character in the Amazing Spider-Man films, I cannot deny how fantastic of a job that Tom Holland has done as the MCU’s Spidey, as he perfectly nails the character’s charisma and comedic timing. As for Tony, some were concerned that Robert Downey Jr.’s presence in the film would end up placing a huge burden on Holland. Ultimately, though, this is not the case, as Tony does not have that big a role in the film and is utilized perfectly as Peter’s stern but sympathetic mentor figure. The same also applies to Jon Favreau in his first appearance in an MCU film since Iron Man 3 as Happy, who begrudgingly serves as the intermediary between the two. Another controversial casting choice occurred with Marisa Tomei as Aunt May, namely because she is the youngest actress who’s taken on the role in the live-action films. Ultimately, though, Tomei does a fine job in the role thanks in large part to her strong camaraderie with Holland. Plus, she also gets one of the best lines in the film at the very end when she finally learns that Peter is Spider-Man (“What the F…?! (*immediately cut to credits*)”). Holland is also backed by a solid supporting cast in the form of Peter’s high-school classmates. This includes Zendaya as the sarcastic Michelle, who’s ‘not obsessed with him… just very observant’, and Tony Revolori as Peter’s classic rival/bully Flash Thompson. It’s a shame, though, that he was subjected to a lot of hate from fans for being an ethnically different rendition of the character. Heck, even Zendaya got some of that backlash when it was reported that she may potentially be the MCU’s version of Mary Jane Watson, which was later proven false despite one line in the film where Michelle remarks that some people call her ‘MJ.’. And, of course, we can’t forget about Jacob Batalon as Peter’s best friend Ned, who is easily one of the MCU’s best ‘sidekick’ characters (“Guy in the Chair!!”) 

But what about the main villain, Adrian Toomes AKA the Vulture, played by former Batman star Michael Keaton. Well, I’d say that Marvel Studios has done a far better job with their villains, who have often been the most maligned parts of any MCU film, since the start of Phase 3, and this was very much the case with Vulture. This is mainly thanks to the big twist near the tail-end of the film when Peter learns that Toomes is the father of his classmate/love interest Liz which, of course, also ties into the common plot thread of him having a personal connection to his foes. At the same time, it also continues the trend of Peter’s villains not necessarily being ‘evil’. In Toomes’ case, he was a former salvager who got screwed over by Stark Industries when he and his team tried to salvage remnants from the Battle of New York in the first Avengers, which then results in them moving into the business of making weapons out of Chitauri technology and selling them on the black market. Simply put, Keaton does an excellent job in the role, especially in terms of handling his character’s motivations (e.g. him trying to provide for his family). On that note, I also liked how the film handled the relationship between Peter and Liz. While never fully going down the same romantic path as Peter and Mary Jane from the Raimi trilogy or Peter and Gwen from the Amazing films, the film does a nice job of showcasing the solid connection that they have while also showing Peter’s inability to admit his feelings for her. It all ends on a bittersweet note when Peter is forced to ditch Liz at Homecoming to stop her father and she and her mother end up moving to Oregon following Toomes’ arrest. Finally, closing out the film’s excellent ensemble cast is Jennifer Connelly in a voice cameo as Karen, the A.I. in Peter’s suit that he unlocks once he and Ned disable the suit’s ‘Training Wheels Protocol’ security feature. Not only is it a fitting cameo seeing how Connelly is married to Paul Bettany AKA Tony Stark’s original A.I. Jarvis (now the Vision), but she also works well off Holland as a friendly figure for Peter to talk to while he’s out fighting crime.

I only have one major issue with this film, and that is that it’s arguably a bit too overlong. Now, for the record, the first time that I saw this film was at the end of a very long travel day as I had just arrived in Los Angeles for vacation; so, understandably, I was rather tired while watching it. However, upon re-watch, I found that this issue of mine still stood. The best way that I can describe it is like this; when the film gets to the titular Homecoming dance, there’s still about half an hour to go in a film that has already been going for quite a while with several big ‘finale-esque’ action set pieces (e.g. Peter rescuing his classmates at the Washington Monument). Still, the film is engaging throughout thanks to everything that I’ve mentioned so far; plus, keeping in line with the MCU’s habit of tackling different genres, director Jon Watts does a great job of making the film feel reminiscent of the many classic high school comedies written and directed by John Hughes. And that’s ultimately Spider-Man: Homecoming in a nutshell. While I wouldn’t necessarily call it the ‘best’ MCU film to date, I would argue that it’s one of the franchise’s best character-driven entries because of its phenomenal work in developing the franchise’s rendition of Spider-Man. All in all, it was a well-deserved success story for all involved. It gave Sony one of their most successful franchise outings to date following the polarizing Amazing Spider-Man duology while also continuing Marvel Studios’ hot streak on the big-screen that I will always argue is still going strong today. Not only that, but at the time that I’m writing this, Spider-Man: Homecoming stands as the highest-grossing superhero film of the year worldwide. Not bad for a film that served as its title character’s third major live-action iteration in the past decade.

Image result for spider-man homecoming gif

And that’s the end of Part 1 of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s annual ‘Favorite Films of the Year’ list. Thanks for following along and be sure to check back in tomorrow for Part 2, in which I’ll be listing films #9-7.

Monday, July 3, 2017

2017 Midyear Recap

Well, we’re now halfway through 2017, and for those who have been following this blog for a few years now, you know exactly what that means. Yes, today I’m looking back at these past six months of the year, recounting every film that I’ve seen during that time, and ultimately ranking them from worst to best. And unlike previous years where I didn’t keep much track of everything that I saw, the film fan website Letterboxd has allowed me to keep a ‘diary’ of the films that I’ve seen, thereby making these posts easier to assemble. And, overall, I’d say that this year has been quite excellent in terms of its new releases. Sure, there will always be those out there who will say otherwise (hopefully, in a few months, we won’t have another situation like last year where the entire internet expresses disappointment over this year’s summer slate) but, as usual, there has been a great variety of films from multiple genres to appeal to all age groups. Though, of course, there have also been a few notable ‘stinkers’ that I’ve seen this year, as there always is. However, for now, at least, I’ve found that the ‘worst’ films that I’ve seen this year so far have been more ‘disappointing’ than ‘anger-inducing’. After all, as I’ve made it clear in the past, I rarely get angry at films anymore because I find it to be rather pointless in a time where I feel that film fan culture is starting to get more nitpicky and negative due to overly heightened expectations. I mean, the internet does have this tendency to focus more on the ‘bad stuff’ than it does with the ‘good stuff’… and, simply put, that’s just not what I’m about as a film fan. Thus, with that in mind, here is my annual Midyear Recap of every film that I’ve seen so far in 2017, starting with my worst of the year and culminating with my current Top 5.

Also, just as a quick warning, there may be a few spoilers ahead for some of these films.

WORST FILM OF THE YEAR (SO FAR)

BAYWATCH

Image result for baywatch 2017 zac efron fall

While I had never watched an episode of Baywatch before seeing it, it seemed like this year’s R-rated film adaptation of the cult TV series was shaping up to be the big comedy hit of the summer, especially given all the marketing that went into it. Sadly, it ended up being the complete opposite; in other words, Baywatch was a colossal dud. Its talented cast, which included the likes of Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson, Zac Efron, and Priyanka Chopra, was ultimately stranded with a mediocre script that failed to produce any major laughs. From what I’ve read, the show took a more serious approach by comparison. At the same time, though, nowadays the show is regarded as being overly cheesy; thus, there legitimately was some potential for some good humor that poked fun at the show’s goofier elements (e.g. its iconic motif of lifeguards running in slow motion). However, this film ends up having one of the worst hit-miss ratios that I’ve ever seen out of a comedy, producing only a few chuckle-worthy moments and not a single laugh-out-loud moment. And it’s sad because many of the people involved in this have done better in other films, especially comedies. Zac Efron, of course, has been a stand-out in the Neighbors films while Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson is one of the most charismatic actors in the business. But even with their solid on-screen camaraderie, their best efforts do nothing to save this film. As such, this new adaptation of Baywatch does quite a piss-poor job of representing its source material. I mean, I probably will watch a few episodes of the original show someday, but if you’re like me and you went into this film having never watched Baywatch before, this does not portray it in a positive light.

OTHER NOTABLE ‘STOINKERS’

(For those unaware, the term ‘Stoinker’ is a homage to Schmoes Know host Kristian Harloff, who often uses the phrase ‘It Stoinks!’ to describe bad films.)

THE CIRCLE

Image result for the circle 2017 film

Despite the best efforts of a talented and impressively stacked ensemble cast, director James Ponsoldt’s adaptation of Dave Eggers’ best-selling novel from 2013 felt like a severely watered-down version of its source material. Granted, I haven’t read it at the time that I’m writing this but from what I’ve read about it online, the film clearly cuts out some of the darker elements of the story. This ranges from a plotline in which main character Mae’s (Emma Watson) best friend Annie (Karen Gillan) suffers some serious emotional trauma due to some unearthed family history to the ultimate characterization of Mae herself, who goes down a more sinister path by the story’s end to tie everything back to its themes regarding the dangers of technology. And while I don’t mind the idea of toning these plot elements down to make the film more appealing to audiences, it ultimately feels like there’s not much at stake here. The whole plotline in which Mae and Circle co-founder Ty (a severely underused John Boyega) try to prevent their superiors from misusing employee information doesn’t amount to much. Plus, the film doesn’t do much to make its supposed ‘main villains’, Circle CEOs Eamon Bailey and Tom Stenton, seem like sinister antagonists. I mean, for one thing, it doesn’t help that likable actors like Tom Hanks and Patton Oswalt were cast in these roles, to begin with. Ultimately, though, the overall truncation of the source material is what hurts The Circle the most, as any chances of it being an engaging and even timely technological thriller are wasted in what ultimately becomes a rather dull affair. On that note…

THE MUMMY

Image result for the mummy 2017 film

It’s quite sad when a Mummy film that stars the one and only Tom Cruise ends up being quite the dull affair. But, unfortunately, that was exactly the case with Universal’s new adaptation of their 1932 horror classic, The Mummy. It tried to be a combination of the horror elements of the original and the action-adventure vibe of the 1999 remake starring Brendan Fraser. Unfortunately, it didn’t really deliver on either of those aspects; it wasn’t that scary and while the action sequences are, at least, well-directed, they feel few and far between. And despite the best efforts of a talented ensemble cast that includes the likes of Cruise, Russell Crowe, and Sofia Boutella in the title role, they’re all stranded by a mediocre screenplay with subpar character development. And then there’s the whole thing about this film being the first installment of a new cinematic universe based around the Universal Monsters. It’s odd, though, because this film does so little to set-up this universe and yet still focuses on teasing future films so much that it ends up being a ‘set-up’ film first and a Mummy film second. Despite this mediocre start, though, I do think that this ‘Dark Universe’ could work because it’s technically been done before in some of the original Universal Monster films. I mean, Bill Condon is set to direct the next installment, Bride of Frankenstein, which he does have experience with because he directed a 1998 film, Gods and Monsters, that partially focused on the making of the 1935 horror classic. But as for The Mummy, while I don’t blame all its shortcomings on director Alex Kurtzman, this new franchise is admittedly off to a slow start.

WORTHWHILE RECOMMENDATIONS

THE ZOOKEEPER’S WIFE

Image result for the zookeeper's wife

In director Niki Caro’s newest film The Zookeeper’s Wife, based off the book of the same name by author Diane Ackerman, Jessica Chastain stars as Antonina Å»abiÅ„ska, who ran the Warsaw Zoo in Poland during the 1930’s with her husband, Jan (Johan Heldenbergh). However, most of the zoo ends up getting destroyed when the Nazis invade the country during World War II. Amidst the chaos of their war-torn city, the two decide to use their zoo as a place of refuge for several of the Jewish families who are being aggressively tortured by the Nazi regime. Caro’s direction is solid in this adaptation of a true story and Jessica Chastain does do a fantastic job in the lead role, as does Daniel Bruhl in the role of Nazi zoologist Lutz Heck, who Antonina has a tumultuous relationship with that’s often on the verge of being romantic. The only downside, though, is that I don’t think the film manages to fully capture the emotional depth that it wants to convey. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a powerful story about two people who risked it all to save several during one of the darkest times in history. However, it does feel like the film focuses more on its protagonists’ actions than the protagonists themselves. In fact, it could be argued that Antonina is sometimes overshadowed by her husband despite being the titular character of the story. Still, it’s hard to fault this film when its heart is clearly in the right place. Thus, while it may not end up being the award contender that it’s aiming to be, it still is a fascinating story of hope, one of several that came out of the horrors of World War II.

SPLIT

Image result for split m night shyamalan

During the 2000’s, M. Night Shyamalan experienced one of the most brutal periods of ‘rock bottom’ that any filmmaker can go through. Many of his films (e.g. The Last Airbender, The Happening, etc.) were subjected to scathing reviews from critics and audiences, a far cry from his early successes with films like The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable. However, it seems like things are turning around for him recently thanks to hits like The Visit and this year’s Split, in which James McAvoy stars as a man named Kevin with 23 distinct mental identities. The story revolves around him kidnapping a trio of teenaged girls as he prepares to sacrifice them to his mysterious 24th identity known as ‘The Beast’. McAvoy truly is the star of the show in a well-layered and multi-faceted role, as he effectively switches in and out of his numerous identities with ease. Some of his most notable ‘identities’ include the 9-year old child Hedwig and the stern matriarch Patricia. Meanwhile, Anna Taylor-Joy is solid in the role of main protagonist Casey while Betty Buckley shines as well as Kevin’s psychologist Dr. Fletcher. And then, of course, there’s Shyamalan’s trademark twist ending. But while many of his more recent twists have gone down horribly with audiences (e.g. nature is responsible for the events in The Happening), this one I think will go over better. Why? Because through a closing cameo by Bruce Willis, it’s revealed that this film takes place in the same universe as Unbreakable. And while I haven’t seen that film yet, I probably will soon as Shyamalan is now preparing to do a third Unbreakable film, Glass, in 2019. Taylor-Joy and McAvoy will be returning from this film while Willis reprises his role of David Dunn once again. And, of course, Samuel L. Jackson will be returning from the original Unbreakable as that film’s main villain, Mr. Glass. Given Shyamalan’s recent track record, I bet that it’ll turn out to be another solid hit.

KONG: SKULL ISLAND

Image result for kong skull island

The most legendary ape in cinema, King Kong, returned this year in a brand-new film, Kong: Skull Island. This film is the second installment of Legendary Pictures’ planned Cinematic Universe (AKA the ‘MonsterVerse’) that also involves the version of Godzilla seen in the character’s 2014 reboot. Like that reboot, though, this new take on King Kong has proven to be rather polarizing as well. And to be fair, it’s understandable as to why this is, as Kong: Skull Island is a much different kind of beast compared to other blockbusters both visually and narratively. Plus, like Godzilla, there isn’t much in terms of character development for the human characters, despite some solid performances from the likes of Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson, John Goodman, Samuel L. Jackson, and John C. Reilly. Though even with that said, Reilly does, in fact, get the most interesting subplot of the group given his character’s status as a WWII pilot who got stranded on Skull Island several decades prior to the time that this post-Vietnam set story begins. But unlike Godzilla, where the monster-based action sequences were mainly limited to the finale, this film doesn’t shy away from its monster action. Featuring the largest Kong yet in film, Kong: Skull Island benefits from an eye-popping visual style and great production design. Thus, overall, I did enjoy it despite its shortcomings. Plus, this is all leading up nicely to future films, including a sequel to Godzilla directed by Michael Dougherty in 2019 and the biggest one of the bunch, a Godzilla vs. Kong crossover in 2020 directed by Adam Wingard.

ALIEN: COVENANT

Image result for alien covenant

Speaking of polarizing releases, we have a similar situation with Alien: Covenant, the follow-up to 2012’s most polarizing release, Prometheus. This film claimed that it would answer some of the unexplained mysteries left by its predecessor, which was one of the biggest problems that critics had with Prometheus. Whether it does so is ultimately up to the viewer, but I will say that I did find Covenant to be another solid entry in this long-running franchise. Sure, it probably has one of the weaker overall stories of the franchise and it doesn’t really live up to its promise of returning to the series’ horror roots. That and the ending is rather lackluster because a lot of it is based around a blatantly obvious twist. Still, to its credit, the film’s ending is also a rather ballsy one given the ways in which it sets things up for the next installment. And, of course, just like the other Alien films directed by Ridley Scott, it benefits greatly from fantastic visuals and a terrific production design. As for the cast, the sheer amount of ‘main protagonists’ in this story does sometimes make it hard to keep track of them all, but the plotline of having them all tied together as couples does give some emotional depth to their death scenes. Michael Fassbender is terrific as always in the dual role of Prometheus´ android David, who’s still just as enigmatic as ever, and the new crew’s android, Walter. Meanwhile, Katherine Waterston immediately establishes herself as the most sympathetic member of the new crew, Daniels, after an opening in which she suffers a tragic loss. With all this in mind, Alien: Covenant may not be the best entry in the Alien series but it’s also far from being one of the worst.

PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES

Image result for pirates 5

And speaking of polarizing franchises, this year gave us another installment of Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, a series that’s done far better commercially than it has done critically. And that overall streak continues yet again with the new installment, Dead Men Tell No Tales. However, as someone who has been a fan of this series and has liked all four of the previous films (yes, even the sequels), I found that I still liked this film about as much as I did the other films. Sure, there are times where the film slips into the same old flaws of its predecessors, like a messy narrative and scenes/characters that don’t really go anywhere (e.g. a truly random scene where Jack Sparrow and his crew are captured by an old associate of his who forces Jack into marrying his sister). But at the same time, directors Joachim Rønning and Espen Sandberg did do a solid enough job of keeping things generally fresh, especially with the addition of new main protagonists as well as some solid development for returning characters. Barbossa, especially, gets a major plot thread in this installment that surprisingly elicited some effective emotional results, though it’s mainly because of how big a part he’s played in this franchise. Johnny Depp, even amidst all his recent controversies, is still just as memorable as ever as Captain Jack Sparrow while Javier Bardem is a solid (albeit a bit underwhelming) adversary as the ghostly Captain Salazar. And, once again, I’ll admit that I wouldn’t mind seeing future installments of this franchise. After all, this film’s post-credit scene teases an interesting plot development revolving around the apparent revival of one of the series’ best characters. At the very least, I would like to see how this new development pans out.

CARS 3

Image result for cars 3

Contrary to popular opinion, I really love the first Cars film from 2006. Was it one of Pixar’s absolute best? No, but it was still a charming little story with a heartfelt message about slowing down and appreciating the simpler things in life. Heck, I’ll even admit that I still like Cars 2, Pixar’s first critical dud. Again, it’s nowhere near the studio’s best work, namely due to a messy narrative, but it’s ultimately a harmless affair. Thankfully, with Cars 3, the filmmakers leaned more towards the spirit of the first film; it’s back to racing again and this time, the story of Lightning McQueen comes full circle. In Cars, he was the hot-shot rookie that eventually learned about his mentor Doc Hudson’s devastating crash that put him out of commission before he was ready to retire. This time around, Lightning finds himself in the same situation as he tries to outlast a new and advanced line of rookies who threaten to put an end to his career. Yes, like its predecessors, the story in this film is simple but at the same time, that doesn’t mean that there’s no emotional depth to it. Just look at this film’s terrific implementation of Doc Hudson, despite the character’s passing after the events of the first film due to his voice actor Paul Newman passing away in 2008. Then there’s also the great characterization for new protagonist Cruz Ramirez who, despite starting out as just Lightning’s new trainer, is shown to be very much capable of lasting alongside other racers on the racetrack. If this series ever does continue in the future, I wouldn’t mind seeing her return to become its new main protagonist. After all, to reiterate, this third Cars film did basically conclude the overall story arc for Lightning McQueen. No matter what happens, though, I’ll always argue that while Cars 3 may not be the best Pixar film ever made, it’s certainly more than just a ‘middle-of-the-road’ affair as some critics have been saying.

TRANSFORMERS: THE LAST KNIGHT

Image result for transformers 5

Yeah, I know… this is a questionable choice to put in the ‘Worthwhile Mentions’ category given that it’s one of the worst-reviewed films of the year and is yet another critical dud in the live-action Transformers series. But, for those who have been following this blog for a while, you’ll know that I’m one of the few people out there who does indeed like every entry in the series; yes, even the most critically despised ones like Revenge of the Fallen and Age of Extinction. The same can be said for The Last Knight. Now don’t get me wrong, this film isn’t even remotely flawless. For one thing, this was the first time where I genuinely got lost at times with the plot. They literally throw everything but the kitchen sink at you when it comes to conveying new ‘information’ about the Transformers. Plus, this time around it’s legitimately a Transformers film where the titular characters themselves are downplayed in favor of the human characters. So… why the heck did I still end up liking this film, you ask? Well, like always, its shortcomings in terms of the writing are [somewhat] saved by the consistently terrific visual effects. Plus, Michael Bay at least deserves some credit when it comes to crafting impressively staged action sequences. Though on that note, hopefully, this will be Bay’s last entry in the series, as he’s claimed, for two reasons. A.) Because it’s time for him to move on to other projects before he gets stuck doing these for the rest of his career and B.) so that new blood can be brought into this franchise to turn things around. I mean, who knows, maybe the upcoming spin-off starring the franchise’s best character, Bumblebee, could turn out fine. After all, it is set to be directed by Travis Knight, director of last year’s critically-acclaimed Kubo and the Two Strings. Only time will tell, though…

POWER RANGERS

Related image

This was one of the year’s most pleasant surprises for me. As I’ve noted in the past, I didn’t really grow up with the Power Rangers franchise despite being part of the generation that grew up with it. Still, I was genuinely interested in seeing this new big-budget film reboot of the franchise BECAUSE of its connections to my generation. And even as a casual fan of the franchise, I felt that this film was a solid new take on this iconic facet of 90’s pop culture. Granted, it isn’t perfect; like its source material, there are quite a few goofy moments in this. For one thing, this film has one of the most ludicrous bits of product placement in recent memory involving Krispy Kreme. Despite this, I was impressed by the film’s surprisingly effective handling of its plot. This is a true ‘origin story’, as we see the main characters grow and develop to become the Power Rangers. And when they do, it results in an awesome finale that respects the original Mighty Morphin series while still being its own thing. Sure, this means that the film doesn’t really get into any Power Rangers action until the very end, but unlike, say, Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie, where the Rangers did nothing until the finale despite having their powers, this film takes its time to develop the main characters. And this is what makes the finale incredibly satisfying because, at this point, we’ve become fully attached to this group of ‘misfits’, portrayed by an excellent group of young leads who work off each other incredibly well. In fact, they work so well together that I genuinely hope that they get to do a sequel. I mean, I know that the franchise’s future is in flux right now because this film didn’t do so well at the box-office, but come on! After that post-credits tag that teased the franchise’s most iconic character, Tommy Oliver AKA the Green Ranger, they deserve at least ONE sequel.

JOHN WICK: CHAPTER 2

Related image

In 2014, Keanu Reeves’ career experienced a great bit of resurgence with the action thriller John Wick. Directed by former stuntmen Chad Stahelski and David Leitch, who had both worked with Reeves before on the Matrix films, the film featured some of the most stylish and all-around best action sequences in recent years. These were then packaged nicely with a simple but effective story of a legendary hitman who’s out to avenge the death of his dog against those who attacked him. And while it’s only Stahelski behind the camera this time around due to Leitch moving on to other projects (i.e. Atomic Blonde and Deadpool 2), John Wick: Chapter 2 is yet another fantastic and action-packed thrill ride. Keanu Reeves is great once again as the calm and collected badass John Wick, while also being backed by a highly memorable supporting cast that includes the likes of Common, Ian McShane, and Laurence Fishburne. But, of course, the true stars of the show are the action sequences and, once again, they’re excellently choreographed and filmed. Plus, the film ends on an awesome note that sets the stage for what will surely be an epic third installment, in which good ol’ ‘Baba Yaga’ will find himself facing down incredible odds without the help of the hitman community. And that’s because he broke the one rule that a hitman knows never to break; never commit one’s business in the Continental Hotel. With all this in mind, I will, in fact, argue that John Wick: Chapter 2 is one of the rare ‘superior sequels’ to an equally fantastic predecessor. It has a larger scale compared to the first film, as is the case with most sequels, but it still manages to maintain the simplistic but badass nature of the world that it creates.

THE FATE OF THE FURIOUS

Image result for the fate of the furious

We’re now at the eighth installment of this absolute monster of a film franchise. And at this point, you’re either fully invested in it… or you despise it with a burning passion for being so popular despite it getting more ridiculous and goofy with each new film. And yet, that’s precisely what makes these films so damn fun; at this point in the game, they know exactly what kind of series they’re trying to be. And I won’t lie… this new one may have become my new favorite entry in the series. While many of us may have joked at how the film would handle its main plotline of main protagonist Dominic Toretto going rogue against his team, the reveal is surprisingly well-handled. If anything, it ties in perfectly with the franchise’s recurring theme of ‘family’… despite all the behind-the-scenes controversy that happened during this entry of the series. Of course, there was the ‘clearly not staged’ feud between Vin Diesel and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson, but now it’s being reported that Michelle Rodriguez may leave the franchise if they don’t start giving its female characters larger roles (which, to be fair, she’s right…). Well, no matter what happens after this, one thing is for certain; the cast still works great together on-screen. Jason Statham is thankfully given a larger role this time around and while Charlize Theron spends most of the film away from the action, she manages to be one of the series’ best villains through her effective manipulation of Dom. In conclusion, though, to reiterate a point that I made in my original review, if you scoff at the sight of The Rock pushing away a torpedo with his bare hands, then this film isn’t for you. But if you’re one of this series’ long-time fans, then I’m sure that you’ll love this new entry just fine.

THE LEGO BATMAN MOVIE

Image result for the lego batman movie

After Warner Bros. scored a big hit in animation with 2014’s The LEGO Movie, they continued their new line of animated LEGO films with yet another smash-hit, The LEGO Batman Movie. Of course, as the title suggests, it focuses on the character that many felt was the standout of the original LEGO Movie; LEGO Batman. And Will Arnett once again does a phenomenal job as this hilarious interpretation of the classic superhero. But this time around, he’s also given a great story arc in which he learns to finally accept people into his life again after years of isolation. This comes to fruition through his ‘unintentional’ adoption of a young ward, Dick Grayson, his sometimes-tumultuous partnership with Gotham’s new police commissioner, Barbara Gordon, and even his ‘hero-villain’ relationship with his greatest nemesis, the Joker. And because of this, the film very much delivers on having a strong emotional depth, just like its predecessor. Meanwhile, the animation in this is just as excellent as it was in the original LEGO Movie. It really is impressive how the animators managed to inject a stop-motion feel (the animation style commonly seen in fan-made LEGO films) into a computer animated film. And, of course, being a Batman film, The LEGO Batman Movie is full to the brim with references to DC Comics and the character’s long, long, long history (“I have aged phenomenally!”). Thus, The LEGO Batman Movie is a fantastic follow-up to its equally fantastic predecessor. Simply put, to quote the predecessor’s iconic song, ‘everything is awesome’ right now with Warner Bros.’ LEGO franchise.

BABY DRIVER

Image result for baby driver

It’s good to see that Edgar Wright has managed to come back after his tumultuous exit from Marvel Studios’ Ant-Man. Clearly, both sides have moved on from that problematic ordeal; Marvel Studios continues to dominate the superhero genre (as we’ll see in a bit) and Wright has another stylishly entertaining film for us with Baby Driver. Influenced by a music video that he directed for the band Mint Royale in 2003, Baby Driver focuses on a young and generally innocent getaway driver for a local kingpin who constantly listens to music. This allows him to both drown out the hum in his ears following a traumatic incident from his past and to be the best getaway driver in the business. And that is very much apparent thanks to the film’s exceptional car chase sequences, all of which were done practically and are excellently shot and edited. But the real star of the show is the film’s soundtrack. Not only does the film feature a rocking soundtrack full of classics but Wright also manages to seamlessly tie them into every action that happens on-screen, from a shoot-out set to ‘Tequila’ to a scene where Baby takes the time and effort to restart a song so that he’s in the proper mindset. And it’s all backed by an excellent ensemble cast, which includes the likes of Ansel Elgort as the film’s charismatic lead, Kevin Spacey being the Kevin Spacey we all know and love, and a great collection of supporting characters played by, including but not limited to, Jon Hamm and Jamie Foxx. Thus, if you’re a big fan of Wright’s previous work, including the legendary Cornetto trilogy, then I bet that you’ll love his latest directorial effort just as much. It truly is fantastic.

AND NOW, MY TOP 5 OF THE YEAR (SO FAR)

Spoilers… almost all these are superhero films! So much for that superhero fatigue, eh?

5. CAPTAIN UNDERPANTS: THE FIRST EPIC MOVIE

Image result for captain underpants movie

Yes, a film adaptation of a popular children’s book series that has been around for two decades has turned out to be one of my favorite films so far in 2017. The main reason why is because it managed to be one of the most faithful adaptations of any given source material that I’ve seen in recent memory. Director David Soren and screenwriter Nicholas Stoller (AKA the director of comedy hits like Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Neighbors, along with co-writing the screenplay for the two most recent Muppets films) perfectly capture the crude but charming style of Dav Pilkey’s best-selling series, right down to the on-screen implementation of its iconic running gags. Seriously, I damn-near cheered when they brought in the classic ‘Flip-O-Rama’ segment from the books. But amidst all the toilet humor (figuratively and literally as there are, in fact, sentient toilets in this), this film genuinely has some heart to it. This is mainly represented by the terrific friendship between main protagonists George Beard and Harold Hutchins, who are excellently voiced by Kevin Hart and Thomas Middleditch, respectively. Meanwhile, Ed Helms is a great pick for the dual role of Mr. Krupp AKA Captain Underpants as is Nick Kroll as the film’s main villain, Professor Poopypants. Really, I can’t say much more about this film except for that I really felt like a kid again while watching it because I used to read these books all the time when I was growing up. And even though it’s been years since I’ve read any of them, the kid in me was very much satisfied with this adaptation. TRA LA LA!!!!

4. LOGAN

Image result for logan 2017

After 17 years in the role of Wolverine, Hugh Jackman ended his run as one of the best casting choices in the history of the superhero genre on the best note possible. With Logan, Jackman and director James Mangold managed to give the iconic hero the film adaptation that his fans have long wanted to see; a brutal, no-holds-barred, and all-around gory R-rated superhero film. They almost got that with 2013’s The Wolverine, but Jackman and Mangold were forced to cut that film down so that it would be PG-13. Thankfully, an uncensored cut was released on Blu-Ray and it was, obviously, the superior version of that film. But as for Logan, nothing is toned down here; these fights are so brutal that they’re very much capable of eliciting visceral reactions from the audience. But even amidst all the awesome action sequences, the film also does a great job in concluding Logan’s story. Part of this is through the introduction of a young girl named Laura, AKA Wolverine clone X-23. Newcomer Dafne Keen straight up steals the show while Jackman and Patrick Stewart give arguably their greatest performances in the roles of Logan and Xavier AKA Professor X, respectively. Save for a few underdeveloped villains, this film is an incredibly well-layered story that also serves as the final curtain call for the X-Men of the original film series. Of course, the cast of the franchise’s First Class era lead the show now and will do so again next year in X-Men: Dark Phoenix. But as for Logan, not only is it the best Wolverine solo film to date (though some may say that this isn’t saying much), but it’s also one of the best entries in the entire X-Men franchise. And it achieves this with a story that, as we expected, really hit us on an emotional level.

3. WONDER WOMAN

Image result for wonder woman

After suffering tons of critical backlash in 2016 with Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad, Warner Bros. and DC finally managed to catch a lucky break this year with the fourth installment of the DC Extended Universe, Wonder Woman. Director Patty Jenkins did a phenomenal job in bringing the beloved member of DC’s Trinity to the big-screen in her long-awaited solo film after initially debuting in BvS. And, of course, Gal Gadot did an equally phenomenal job in the role of the iconic heroine, very much proving her critics wrong thanks in part to a terrific character arc in which the initially naïve Amazonian princess soon learns about the harsh reality that is the darker side of humanity. But even though the film is primarily set during World War I, that doesn’t mean that it forgets to be a fun and light-hearted superhero film that ties in perfectly with Wonder Woman’s characterization, complete with epic action sequences and an equally terrific supporting cast to back Gadot up. Chris Pine is a great foil to Gadot as Diana’s love interest Steve Trevor, never once overshadowing her while still being more than just a typical love interest. Meanwhile, the two are joined by a highly memorable group of supporting characters in the form of their fellow team members (Sameer, Charlie, and Chief), while both Connie Nielsen and Robin Wright give great, dignified performances as Diana’s mother Hippolyta and aunt Antiope, respectively. And while I do think that the villains are ultimately some of the weaker elements of the film, that doesn’t take away from everything else that’s great about it. In short, Wonder Woman is one of the most satisfying entries in the superhero genre and a much-deserved win for all who were involved.

2. BEAUTY AND THE BEAST

Related image

Sure, maybe this entry in Disney’s continuing line of live-action remakes was a questionable one given that the original Beauty and the Beast is one of the studio’s most beloved animated efforts. And sure, at the end of the day, it’s mostly just the same plot as its predecessor, making its overall status even more questionable in the minds of those who aren’t fans of remakes. But even with all this in mind, and ignoring the completely overblown and 100% stupid controversy revolving around the announcement that the film would feature Disney’s first ‘exclusively gay’ moment (a moment which, may I add, is so subtle that some may not have even noticed it if it hadn’t been pointed out by the media beforehand), at the end of the day this is just a highly satisfying ‘feel-good’ film. It respects the original film while also doing just enough to be its own thing, even if it is admittedly the same general narrative. Still, the changes to the narrative are subtly executed without ever betraying the heart of this classic story of embracing people for who they are on the inside. And if that wasn’t enough, the film is visually spectacular with terrific visual effects and a great production/costume design. It also boasts a terrific ensemble cast highlighted by Emma Watson as Belle (P.S. Contrary to popular opinion, I thought that she was perfectly fine in terms of her singing), Dan Stevens as the Beast, Luke Evans as Gaston, Josh Gad as LeFou, and an awesome supporting ensemble to fill the beloved roles of the Beast’s servants, from Ewan McGregor to Ian McKellen to Gugu Mbatha-Raw to Emma Thompson. And of course, who can forget the classic songs from Disney icons Alan Menken and the late Howard Ashman, plus a few new songs as well that are great additions to this ‘tale as old as time’ (I especially love the Beast’s new solo, ‘Evermore’). In conclusion, no, I don’t think that this was better than the original; that was a tough act to follow, after all. But even though the original Beauty and the Beast is one of my Top 5 favorite Disney animated films of all-time, that doesn’t mean that I was going to be judgmental towards this new take on the story because of it.

1. GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2

Related image

Now when I first reviewed this film, I noted that I felt that there were some instances where, to quote the common argument seen in almost EVERY SINGLE DAMN REVIEW for the film, ‘it wasn’t as good as the original Guardians of the Galaxy’. However, as I thought about it more, I realized that, contrary to popular opinion, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 IS better than the first film. Don’t get me wrong, I still adore the original Guardians for its successful efforts in making us care for a group of characters who were once viewed as a ‘C-list’ superhero team in the comics. However, writer/director James Gunn manages to take the strong emotional depth of the original one step further with the sequel thanks to a poignant story based on the theme of fatherhood. And while some may question the decision to have the Guardians be split up into pairs of two for most of the film, it ultimately works because each pairing (e.g. Drax and Mantis, Yondu and Rocket/Groot, etc.) is a perfect match. This all leads to what is arguably the most emotional moment in any Marvel Cinematic Universe film to date, which is backed by the scene’s excellent score by Tyler Bates (i.e. the track ‘Dad’) and is then followed by the perfect use of Cat Stevens’ song ‘Father and Son’ in the subsequent scene. And just like the original, the main characters are all lovable and portrayed by an excellent ensemble cast, the film boasts gorgeous visuals, and it’s all backed by the kick-ass tunes of Awesome Mix Vol. 2. Simply put, I adored Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, and because I do think it’s better than the original, that effectively makes it my new favorite entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. And bear in mind that at the time that I’m writing this, I’ve only seen it once. That, my friends, is saying a lot!

And those are all the films that I’ve seen so far in 2017. Thanks for following along and be sure to sound off in the comments below with your own personal Top 5 of the year so far.