Showing posts with label Family Guy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family Guy. Show all posts

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Ted 2 (2015) review

Ted 2 poster.jpg

After creating one of the most successful shows of the 2000’s in ‘Family Guy’, a show that survived not one but two cancellations by Fox, Seth MacFarlane moved into film in 2012 with his directorial debut, ‘Ted’, the story of a Boston native by the name of John Bennett and his relationship with his talking teddy bear Ted, who came to life after John had made a wish on a shooting star back when he was a kid. The film ended up being a huge success, attracting solid critical reviews and grossing over half a billion dollars worldwide. Three years later, everyone’s favorite ‘Thunder Buddies’ are back with ‘Ted 2’. But of course, as we all know, comedy sequels are pretty darn tough to get right. Most of the time they end up being inferior to their predecessor, usually because they just end up rehashing the same jokes instead of doing something new. But at the end of the day, ‘Ted 2’ actually does manage to be one of the better comedy sequels out there, even if that may not necessarily be saying much given most of the other comedy sequels that have come out over the years. It’s by no means the absolute funniest comedy of the year, even when compared to the first film, and it does share some of the issues that plagued MacFarlane’s previous film, the general misfire that was ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’. But unlike that film, those issues aren’t really as prevalent in ‘Ted 2’, which is thankfully much more consistent in terms of its humor. And that’s primarily thanks to the film’s great leading duo of John and Ted, who ultimately are the main reason why these two ‘Ted’ films have been so much fun to watch.

The film picks up about six months after the events of the first film, with John Bennett (Mark Wahlberg) coping with his recent divorce with Lori (in other words, Mila Kunis did not return for the sequel) while Ted (voiced by Seth MacFarlane) marries his girlfriend Tami-Lynn (Jessica Barth). One year later, the couple find themselves at great odds with each other so Ted suggests that they have a baby. But due to obvious reasons (i.e. Ted being a teddy bear), the two, with the help of John, instead have to resort to other methods to have a child. However, when they try to adopt, Ted learns that he is viewed only as ‘property’ by the government, which results in him losing his job and his marriage to Tami-Lynn being annulled. With nowhere else to go, Ted and John decide to take their issue to court to prove that Ted is as much of a person as everyone else. With the help of Samantha Jackson (Amanda Seyfried), a young up-and-coming lawyer who John and Ted immediately connect with due to their shared interests (e.g. marijuana), the ‘Thunder Buddies’ embark on a quest to get Ted’s life back by proving to the world that not only is he human but that he can also make positive contributions to society. All the while, the pals embark on another series of misadventures, including having to deal with the return of their nemesis Donny (Giovanni Ribisi), who once again hatches a plot to kidnap Ted, this time teaming up with Hasbro so that they can try and figure out what caused Ted to come alive so that they can produce more living teddy bears.

Like its predecessor, your overall enjoyment of ‘Ted 2’ will more than likely depend on whether or not you find MacFarlane’s general style of humor funny. ‘Ted 2’, just like the first film and ‘Family Guy’, is full of adult, immature, and sometimes even potentially offensive humor. It’s pretty much the live-action version of ‘Family Guy’, with John and Ted basically being the live-action equivalents of Peter and Brian Griffin. Me personally, I loved the first few seasons of ‘Family Guy’ but I haven’t watched the show in recent years mainly due to the simple fact that the show’s quality has dropped with each subsequent season that it is still on. But as for ‘Ted’, it was one of my favorite comedies of 2012 and ‘Ted 2’ is not too far off. Sure, like with MacFarlane’s last effort, ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’, there are some ‘dead air’ moments in ‘Ted 2’ with no humor, which is usually whenever the film tries to be serious, more so than it needs to be. That and perhaps the film does go on just a bit too long, which was also a problem with ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’. But unlike that film, the humor is a lot more consistent and like the first film, there are also some legitimately heartfelt moments even amidst all of the dirty humor. At the end of the day, all I can say is that it’s just really funny to see something like a teddy bear act so raunchy and that’s really one of the biggest strengths of both ‘Ted’ films; it’s just a fun and unique premise that only someone can Seth MacFarlane could pull off.

But once again, the best element of ‘Ted 2’, just like with the first, is the duo of John and Ted, who are just one of the best comedy duos of the past few years thanks to Mark Wahlberg and Seth MacFarlane’s excellent camaraderie. Sure, John and Ted can be immature and crude most of the time but there’s also something about them that actually still makes them such a likable pair, which is probably due to the strong bond of friendship between them. Mila Kunis doesn’t reprise her role of Lori in this film, which is disappointing not only because the plotline of her and John getting divorced basically goes against one of the most endearing elements of the first film (their relationship) but because she played just as big a role in the film as much as John and Ted and wasn’t just ‘the girlfriend who dislikes her boyfriend’s best friend’. But to her credit, Amanda Seyfried works just as well with Wahlberg and MacFarlane. At the end of the day though, John and Ted are the true heart of the film and whenever they aren’t onscreen, that’s where the film’s humor doesn’t hit. Usually this with any scene involving the character of Donny, whose plotline in the first film of him trying to kidnap Ted for his son was admittedly one of the weaker parts of that film. But, like with pretty much any MacFarlane production, you can also expect a whole bunch of memorable cameos, including Tom Brady, Morgan Freeman, and Liam Neeson, the latter of whom is thankfully used to greater effect here than in ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’.

‘Ted 2’ is by no means the funniest comedy of all-time, especially when compared to the first film. That and it did share some of the issues that plagued ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’ (e.g. ‘dead air’ moments and being just a bit overlong), even though those issues weren’t as big of a problem this time around. But still, at the end of the day, I had a good time watching ‘Ted 2’ which I would actually argue is almost just as funny as the first film. Like the first film, the main reason for this is the duo of John and Ted. They’re just a great comedy film duo and it’s fun to watch these two go on all sorts of misadventures and get into a bunch of hi-jinx. Yes, like its predecessor and MacFarlane’s iconic show ‘Family Guy’ (especially in recent seasons), the humor can be a bit harsh and mean-spirited at times. That’s just the kind of humor MacFarlane does and obviously it’s not for everyone. But what surprises me about both of these ‘Ted’ films is that despite all of that, there are still some moments that are actually legitimately touching, which again is usually due to the great friendship of John and Ted. All in all, ‘Ted 2’ does manage to be one of the better comedy sequels of all time. If you loved the first film, then I’m pretty sure that you’ll like this one too. But if you’re not a fan of MacFarlane’s brand of humor, then you’re better off with something else.


Rating: 4/5

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

'Family Guy' Rant Part 2 AKA The Return of Brian


(Spoilers!)

Well, a few weeks ago, I expressed quite a bit of angry thoughts over the episode of ‘Family Guy’ called ‘Life of Brian’. It was the episode that was touted as the one that would be killing off one of the main characters of the show ‘permanently’ and, as that episode title suggests, it ended up being Brian, who got hit by a car. Obviously I wasn’t too keen on that decision, not only because Brian was one of the best characters, alongside Stewie, left on the show since it started to suck, but the episode itself was just tasteless. The writers tried to make us forget about him immediately by having the Griffins buy a new dog instead and apparently eliminating any possibility of Brian’s return. As for the new dog Vinny, it may have been only the first episode he was in but I didn’t care; you can’t replace Brian no way no how. On a show filled with insane/over-the-top and, let’s be honest, rather unlikable characters (mainly in recent seasons), he was the sanest character on the show and the most likable alongside Stewie.

Thankfully, I wasn’t the only one who was against this as pretty much every fan of the show was as well. There were numerous petitions filed (I will openly admit that I myself signed one of them) and several fans said that they would be boycotting the show unless Brian was brought back (I too was also one of them; I haven’t been watching the show for about two years but after this episode, I decided to have it stay that way). Two episodes later, during this past weekend’s Christmas-themed episode, ‘Christmas Guy’, fans received the Christmas miracle they were hoping for. After coming across a past version of himself while at the mall, Stewie was able to get a new time machine and traveled back to the precise moment where Brian was hit by the car and pushed him out of the way, effectively saving him from his death. For the record, I just watched the episode and I am glad that Brian is back. Sure, perhaps my initial reactions towards the character Vinny were rather hasty. ‘Sopranos’ alum Tony Sirico did do a good job in the role and while I found the character to be rather annoying at times, his final scene with Stewie (where he accepts the fact that by saving Brian he won’t be the Griffins’ pet anymore) was a pretty touching character moment.

However, that doesn’t change the following fact of how pissed off I still am at the writers for doing this. According to show writer Steve Callaghan, the writers ultimately decided to kill off Brian as, and I quote, “a fun way to shake things up…” I don’t know why they thought this was a good idea because killing a character is not ‘a fun thing’, especially when that character is beloved like Brian is. Again, my problem with this storyline wasn’t that they killed him off. As proven by Joss Whedon shows/movies, it can happen. My problem with it was that the death itself was not handled properly. Also, now I’m left wondering this; was the decision to bring him back from death just part of the writers’ plan in the first place or because we as a fan base were very much against it? I seriously hope that this is the case of the latter scenario, because if it wasn’t, then this would easily have to be one of the worst marketing ploys that I have ever seen. To quote A.V. Club writer Eric Thurm in his review of this episode, “If anything, ‘Christmas Guy’ proves that Family Guy probably doesn’t have a heart except for Stewie and Brian.”, which is something I completely agree with.

Here’s the link to Eric’s review:

Monday, November 25, 2013

Thoughts on last night's episode of 'Family Guy'


(Warning: MAJOR SPOILERS!!)


For a very long time, one of my favorite cartoons was ‘Family Guy’. I consider the first six-seven seasons of the show as ‘classic’; the writing may not have always hit well, but it had plenty of memorable characters and moments, the latter thanks in part to the random cutaway gags that occurred in each episode. However, in recent seasons, the show has declined in terms of its overall quality. The cutaway gags were getting stale and only a few characters were working while some were getting really annoying. I stopped watching the show precisely after a line in the episode ‘Friends Without Benefits’ where Lois mentions that she’s put Stewie ‘in the oven’ before and I haven’t watched a single new episode since… until last night. This newest episode caught my attention when it was announced that one of the main characters would be permanently killed off. I wasn’t really supportive of the idea of killing off one of the characters who we’ve come to know over the many years of the show’s existence, but I was intrigued nevertheless. However, this ended up being one of the worst half-hours of television I have ever seen.

The episode starts off harmless enough, with Brian and Stewie immediately getting into trouble, like they normally do. Right away, they’re being chased by a bunch of Native Americans because Stewie used his time machine to go back in time to Jamestown, where he gave weapons to the Natives. After the two get things back to normal, Stewie then destroys his time machine, knowing that it’s caused way too much trouble before. All seems to go well until Brian and Stewie start to play street hockey outside of the Griffin house after they find a street hockey net in the junkyard where they have the time machine destroyed. Stewie heads back inside for a quick moment before Brian is… run over by a car. Yes folks, it turns out that Brian is the family member that ends up dead.

…Where do I begin? I wasn’t really supportive of the idea to kill off one of the Griffin family in the first place, but of all of those characters, why the hell does it have to be Brian? When Family Guy was beginning to go into decline, Brian and Stewie were the only good characters left on the show. They had such a good camaraderie, making any episode where they were not the main focus duller by comparison. Why not kill off Meg or Chris? In the case of the former, considering the character’s status on the show, it would have been a little obvious but she wasn’t really contributing much to the show anyway. Even then, that just proves my point in that the death of a Griffin was just the wrong idea. But you know, it could have worked had they handled the event properly.

And that’s my biggest problem with this episode… they don’t. The death happens just five minutes into the episode, leaving a lot more things to happen. The writers tastelessly try to add in a few gags during Brian’s funeral, a scene that should have never had them to begin with. There is a glimmer of hope that this isn’t permanent when Stewie tries to rebuild his time machine. However, he learns that his supplier can no longer provide him the materials he needs… so he just gives up on it. After that, there is not a single mention of the time machine and even worse, the writers try to make us forget that Brian ever existed by having the family adopt a new dog. I’m sorry, writers, but you won’t make us forget one of the best characters on the show. The new dog, Vinny, sucks by the way. I know this is only the first episode he’s in, but I don’t care. No matter what happens in future episodes (which I won’t be watching, for the record, not even the crossover with ‘The Simpsons’ which sounds interesting), you cannot replace Brian.

This has to be one of the biggest ‘f*** you’ moments in the history of television. Of all of the things that Family Guy has done, why did they have to kill off one of their best characters and what’s even more insulting is how the writers try to make us forget about him when there’s no chance of hell of that ever happening. I am officially done with ‘Family Guy’. I was going to give this episode a chance, despite the fact that they were going to kill off a main character (I’m especially against it now considering which one they got rid of), but this was just a tasteless episode. The reason why I stopped watching the show in the first place was because of a tasteless line, but this is way worse. (Sigh) Well, at least we have re-runs of the older episodes.

R.I.P. Brian Griffin for you will be forever missed.



(UPDATE: Since posting this, I read about how a future episode apparently still revolves around Brian. Will this mean that he's not going to stay dead? I kind of hope he'll be back, but even if that happens, that just makes this episode even more insulting.)

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Ted (2012) review


Seth MacFarlane made a name for himself in 1999 when he created the hit animated sitcom 'Family Guy'. Even though the show was canceled not once, but two times by Fox early on in its run, its cult following helped it get back on the air in 2005 and since then, it has become one of Fox's biggest hits. I've been a fan of Family Guy ever since about 2008 but like everyone else, I agree that the show has certainly declined in overall quality in recent years. Now there can be many reasons for this, but it seems that one of the main reasons for it would be that MacFarlane was busy with his directorial debut, 'Ted', and the reason why I say this is because Ted is easily one of the funniest movies I have seen in a long time. MacFarlane brings his trademark humor to the big screen with great success, with a film that is not just funny as hell but also very heartwarming at the same time, which is something that doesn't really happen that much with most R-rated comedies.



John Bennett (Mark Wahlberg) is a normal guy from Boston whose life changed on the day he got a teddy bear for Christmas when he was 8. Longing for a friend, he wishes that the bear would come to life and by the miracle of a shooting star, he does. The two become inseparable and 27 years later, John and Ted (voiced by MacFarlane) are still best friends. However, Ted's vulgar and immature lifestyle has affected John's life greatly, even when he is in the midst of a relationship with Lori (Mila Kunis), who asks John to have Ted move out so that they could move on with their lives. This forces John to start acting his age, even when his relationship with Ted keeps preventing that from happening and John must find a way to keep both his girlfriend and his best friend in his life.



'Ted' is very similar in style and tone to Family Guy. It takes place in New England, one of the main characters is something that shouldn't even exist, and the characters of John and Ted do very much resemble Peter and Brian on Family Guy. In fact, Ted sounds exactly like Peter Griffin and they even make a joke about it in the film. On Family Guy, MacFarlane constantly pushes the envelope for what can be shown on television, and 'Ted' pretty much gives him free reign to do even more than what he could get away with on Family Guy. There are racial jokes, ethnic jokes, 80's references, and so on. Basically, it's the usual crazy stuff you see on Family Guy, and trust me when I say that this film truly deserves the 'R' rating it has been given.



But 'Ted' has something that makes it all work and that is heart. True, both John and Ted act immature and vulgar, but both are actually pretty likeable and are true friends to the end. The main message of the film of growing up and taking responsibility for yourself is very genuine and despite all of the racist and ethnic humor that this movie spews out constantly, it's not hateful in any way. The ending in particular is enough to warm the heart of any New Englander. The screenplay is very well-written and the film never gets dull at any point. Patrick Stewart as the narrator goes beyond the boundaries of your typical narrator, and even when the film becomes more of a thriller during the final act, MacFarlane still pulls in enough jokes to make it all worthwhile.



Mark Wahlberg does a great job here, and really should be given a lot of credit for interacting with something that was only added into the film in post-production. MacFarlane, of course, gets the biggest laughs as this vulgar and obnoxious teddy bear, and him and Wahlberg have great chemistry together. Wahlberg also has great chemistry with Mila Kunis as well, and the filmmakers don't go the cheap route with how her character is written. Instead of just making her a heartless objector of Ted's actions, she's someone who does love her boyfriend but is annoyed that he still acts like a child, obviously because of the bear who has been his best friend since he was 8 years old, which is affecting any chance they have at taking their relationship to the next level. The other members of the cast bring some great humor as well, including Joel McHale as Lori's boss who keeps trying to hit on her and Giovanni Ribisi as a creepy father who tries to acquire Ted for his son.



Seth MacFarlane's directorial debut is one for the ages and is easily the funniest film of the year so far. Wahlberg, MacFarlane, Kunis are great together and as crude, vulgar, and crazy as much of this film is, it does have a lot of heart to it. This easily makes up for the lackluster run that Family Guy has been on for the last few seasons, and while I'm not exactly saying that MacFarlane should stop doing Family Guy just yet, it's clear that MacFarlane should focus on his film career now because he has a lot to offer. Obviously, if you're a fan of Family Guy, then you'll love this movie. But even if you aren't, then I would still recommend this movie because I guarantee that you will be very much entertained by it.

Rating: 5/5!