Saturday, December 28, 2013

Top 10 Worst Films of 2013: #5-1

Welcome back to Rhode Island Movie Corner’s list of the Top 10 worst films of 2013. This is Part 2; if you haven’t read ‘Part 1’ yet, I suggest you do so before reading this. Now, it’s time to look at my picks for the Top 5 worst films of the year and boy are these films bad. We have another comedy at Number 5, one of the many ‘parodies’ (I use that term loosely) that came out this year. It isn’t the worse of this bunch, but that still doesn’t mean that it’s any good.

5. A Haunted House

Now the reason why I say this wasn’t the worst comedy, or parody, of the year is because while it is a film that is part of a genre that has continued to die a most slow and painful death over the years thanks to the hacks known as Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer (I pity those who actually watched their latest film, ‘The Starving Games’), at least this parody stays consistent in terms of what it’s parodying; the found footage horror films, specifically ‘Paranormal Activity’. Most of the parodies today are incredibly inconsistent because they just parody whatever’s popular but this film at least manages not to do that. Still, the movie’s not that funny at all. The big problem with this one for me is that it kind of feels too mean-spirited. It uses the ‘N’ word repeatedly to the point where it starts to get annoying; the characters themselves are equally annoying. But, in the end, this film was a success at the box office due to its low budget and now a sequel is set to come out next March… S***! You asked for it, folks.

At number 4 is the latest film in a long-running action film franchise. However, when watching it, you probably wouldn’t get the idea that it is a film in that franchise because all this film really shares to it in comparison is its title and nothing else. Ooh does this one piss me off.

4. A Good Day to Die Hard

For the longest time, I was certain that this film would be my pick for the Worst film of the year. 3 other films managed to be worse than this one, but that doesn’t mean I’m not going to rip it a new one. This is easily the worst action film I’ve seen in a long time and a complete insult to the once-great ‘Die Hard’ franchise. I know that a lot of people weren’t really fans of the PG-13 rated ‘Live Free or Die Hard’ but I actually do like that one because while it did tone down the violence and John McClane was pretty much invincible for most of the film, it still felt like a ‘Die Hard’ movie, unlike this one. This movie may be rated ‘R’ like the first three films, but you wouldn’t notice. The PG-13 rated ‘Die Hard’ was more violent than this one. There are numerous sins to this film that completely go against what made these movies great in the first place.

First off, the villains are terrible, something that shouldn’t be the case with a ‘Die Hard’ villain. There are a total of four ‘villains’ in this movie; one of them is a guy who seemed to be the main bad guy as suggested by the trailer but in the end he isn’t. All he ever does in this film is eat a carrot and tap dance around. Then you have the daughter of this guy who John McClane and his son are supposed to protect who’s just… there, and then that guy they were protecting turns out to be the main villain in the end… too bad he’s completely boring and unmemorable. There’s this other guy whose like this corrupt Russian official, but he really doesn’t play any real part in this. So in total, there are as many villains as there were main villains in the last four films, and they all frigging suck. Actually, strike that, this film actually has some of the biggest villains in the history of the franchise… director John Moore and writer Skip Woods. The direction is terrible and the story is so convoluted; I mean let’s be honest, ‘Die Hard’ films have rather simple plots (a terrorist is trying to take over the world, and McClane has to stop him) but if you asked me to describe the plot of this film, I would have a real hard time doing so because there’s so much going on in this film and yet so little at the same time that I wouldn’t be able to give you a clear synopsis.

Another big problem with the film is that John McClane and his son are pretty much invincible in this film. ‘Live Free or Die Hard’ also started to lean towards this, but in this one, it’s far worse. For example, the finale takes place in Chernobyl, which is apparently safe to be in now that John and Jack go in without any protective gear despite, you know, that ‘meltdown’ that took place in 1986? Apparently, Woods didn’t know about that. Because of this, there’s absolutely no tension whatsoever. What made these films great in the first place was that John McClane was the ‘everyman’ who got caught in tough situations but persisted through them in order to save the day. That’s no longer the case now. No matter what is thrown at John and his son (who have absolutely no chemistry by the way… this is not the fault of Bruce Willis and Joel Courtney, for the record. It’s just the terrible writing), they come out with barely any scratches on them. If you haven’t figured it out yet, this is the worst film in the Die Hard series. Hell, it shouldn’t even be considered as a ‘Die Hard’ film; it’s just your typical average action film starring Bruce Willis… which earned over 300 million at the box office. UGH!!!! Somehow, three other films are worse than this.

Number 3 is another film that is the latest in its franchise. It’s a franchise that I’m not too familiar with, but after this one I don’t know if I want to be.

3. Scary Movie 5

I’ve never seen any of the ‘Scary Movie’ films; I guess that’s because I really hate the new ‘standard’ for parody films these days as brought on by Seltzerberg, who ironically were co-writers with the Wayans brothers on the first ‘Scary Movie’. In a sense, you can kind of argue that the first ‘Scary Movie’ was the film that was responsible for this current trend but I’ve heard generally okay things about it. Anyway, now we come to ‘Scary Movie 5’. You know, it just blows my mind that there are five of these films. In fact, it’s been about 7 years since the last ‘Scary Movie’ came out and this one does not feature some of the same people from the last one, so why bother? To milk the franchise, I’m guessing. That’s what studios tend to do with big franchises these days. Again, I haven’t seen any of them, but after this one, I kind of don’t want to. First off, even as far as recent parodies go, this one feels really dated. Some of its ‘parodies’ include ‘Inception’ and ‘Black Swan’, films that came out 3 years ago. There are some ‘parodies’ of more recent flicks, like ‘Cabin in the Woods’ and the ‘Evil Dead’ remake (in the case of the latter, a film that came out just a week before this film) but on a whole, as you might guess, it’s not funny. Perhaps the biggest reason why this one in particular is so high up on the list is that some things that happen in this movie are just… weird. That’s not a good sign when my response towards most of the movie is ‘what the hell am I watching?’ Like ‘A Good Day to Die Hard’, this one looked like it would be my pick for the worst film of the year, but then we have the next two.

For many critics, this is easily one of their worst films of the year. Obviously, I share the same sentiment but this one had more attention than the next film on this list. Still, this one is just horrible and it’s really sad considering that a lot of talented people were attached to this one.

2. Movie 43

You know, looking back, this one really doesn’t piss me off as much as it just saddens me. Here is a movie with a gigantic cast of very talented people, with stars like Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslet, Richard Gere, Terrence Howard, Halle Berry, Dennis Quaid, Greg Kinnear, and many more. But the whole film itself is just painfully unfunny. It’s trying to be the next big ‘sketch comedy’ film but it just fails in every regard. What’s even worse is that it has all of these talented actors/actresses doing extremely degrading material; Hugh Jackman plays a man who has a pair of testicles on his neck (why do I have the sinking feeling this cost him the Oscar?), there’s a sketch involving this product called the ‘iBabe’ which is an MP3 player shaped like a naked woman, and… good god, I don’t want to go any farther than that. From what I hear, a lot of these actors/actresses did not even want to be a part of the film… but unfortunately this film is a stain on their careers now. For a while, I thought this would be the worst film of the year, but…

(Sigh), finally we’ve come to Number 1 and… the following film… is the worst piece of s*** I’ve ever seen in my life. I’ve seen some bad movies (the Seltzerberg films, Sucker Punch, half of the films on this list) but this is just an utter abomination and embarrassment to not just the film industry itself, but to anyone who loves movies. If you thought ‘Movie 43’ was bad, wait until you get a load of this.

1 Inappropriate Comedy

There are two kinds of ‘bad movies’. Films like ‘Batman and Robin’, ‘The Room’, and the previously mentioned ‘Sharknado’ are films that, while bad, do have some entertainment value to them because of how bad they are. But a film like this is just plain horrendous; there’s absolutely nothing in this that is the least bit entertaining. Like ‘Movie 43’, this is trying to be a ‘sketch comedy’ but here we have nothing but down-right rip-offs of other successful movies/TV shows. There’s ‘Flirty Harry’, which is a rip-off of Dirty Harry trying to be a parody where former Oscar-winner Adrien Brody (oh, how some have fallen from grace) tries to do a Clint Eastwood impersonation and all of his dialogue consists of double entendres. There’s ‘The Porno Review’ which is like ‘At the Movies’, only here the movies are pornos. Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel must be rolling in their graves because of this. There’s ‘Blackass’, which is ‘Jackass’ just with a black cast.

But the worst is easily ‘The Amazing Racist’, where this guy, Ari Shaffer, goes around in the style of Borat acting very racist towards Asians, African Americans, and Jews. One scene has him acting like a driving school instructor and making fun of Asian stereotypes and the ‘victims’ of them give him the proper angry response that he deserves. WHO THE HELL WOULD PUT UP WITH THIS A-HOLE? It’s not like ‘Borat’ because while he too was acting weird and a little racist (albeit in Borat’s case, more in his portrayal than his actions towards other people) at times, at least Sacha Baron Cohen has more decency than this guy. There’s another scene which is part of the ‘Blackass’ sketch where a woman goes to a new baby store and is told that the store has some babysitters for hire. It turns out that these ‘sitters’ are the ‘Blackass’ crew. It’s not a good sign if, during this scene, I have a sinking feeling that the woman is going to be either raped or murdered and these men are going to take her baby. That’s all I have to say because I really don’t want to remember anything more about this. Stay away from this horrendous piece of crap by any means necessary. I think this movie needs a new title; would ‘Cinematic Torture’ work?

F***… THIS… MOVIE!!!!


And those are the worst films of the year. Thankfully, now we can move on to the good stuff. Check back soon for the first part of my ‘Best films of the year’ list.

No comments:

Post a Comment