This week marks the release of what may be the most
anticipated film of 2013, ‘Man of Steel’. It may also be one of the riskiest
films this year for a few reasons. This is Warner Bros’ second attempt at
reviving the Superman franchise following 2006’s ‘Superman Returns’, which did
not perform as well as the studio hoped. Also, in the wake of ‘The Avengers’,
it is unclear whether or not ‘Man of Steel’ will be the kick-starter film that
will create a ‘Cinematic Universe’ that would ultimately lead to a live-action
Justice League film. That film has already had a rather troubled production,
with the initial script reportedly being tossed out, which is not a good sign
for a film that is supposed to come out only two years from now in 2015. But
for Man of Steel, another thing that could hold it back, despite the fact that
it is produced by Christopher Nolan, is that it’s directed by Zack Snyder, a
director who has made really good films (‘300’ and ‘Watchmen’) except for his
most recent film, 2011’s ‘Sucker Punch’. However, the footage shown so far has
been really amazing so I’m really excited for this new Superman film and I’m
hopeful that it will be great.
Now let’s take a look back at the Superman
live-action film franchise so far (I won’t be looking at any animated Superman
films, like ‘All-Star Superman’ or ‘Superman: Unbound’). This post will only
focus on the original four Superman films starring Christopher Reeve and Warner
Bros.’ first attempted revival and yes, a full review of ‘Man of Steel’ will
follow in the next few days.
SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE
(1978)
Superman The Movie is regarded as the first major
superhero movie and even if it isn’t, it certainly set the standard for future
superhero films. Even after 35 years, it still holds up as not only the best
Superman movie to date, but one of the best superhero films of all time.
Christopher Reeve is perfect in the lead role of Superman, but also succeeds by
being very unsuspecting as Superman’s alter ego Clark Kent. Marlon Brando, Margot
Kidder, and Gene Hackman are also great too as Jor-El, Lois Lane, and Lex
Luthor respectively. Granted, the ending is a little questionable. I would say
spoilers, but this movie’s been out for 3.5 decades so it’s no big deal. If
Superman can fly so fast that he can turn back time (which he does in order to
save Lois from dying), then why couldn’t he grab both of Lex Luthor’s missiles
at that speed? Oh well, the movie is still great anyway and it’s a must-see for
any comic-book fan.
Rating:
5/5!
SUPERMAN II (1980)
Superman II has had quite a controversial production
history. Richard Donner (director of the first Superman film) was originally
set to direct this film as well, but due to conflicts with the producers,
Donner was booted off the project and replaced with Richard Lester, who ended
up shooting new footage. However, some of Donner’s footage was used in the
original theatrical cut, though most of the footage was shot by Lester. In
2006, a new version that mainly consisted of Donner’s footage was released;
Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut. At the time I am writing this, I have not
yet seen the Donner cut, though I’m aware that many consider it to be the
superior version. But for now, I’ll only be looking at the original theatrical
cut of the film.
When watching this version, it’s clear that even
though the majority of the footage was shot by Lester, Donner’s influence is
still present, evident from the scenes in this cut that he had shot. Lester
went a more comedic route but the Donner scenes are more serious in tone. While
the humor does get a little more slapstick at times, the film still works as a
whole. It also has probably the best Superman villain (in the film franchise)
in General Zod, played with a commanding presence by Terrence Stamp (KNEEL!!!).
Christopher Reeve and Margot Kidder once again do excellent jobs as Superman
and Lois Lane, and the plot of Superman deciding to give up his powers in order
to be with Lois is well-done. All in all, the original theatrical cut of
Superman II may not be on the same level as the previous film, but it comes pretty
damn close.
Rating:
4/5
SUPERMAN III (1983)
Even after the whole Donner/Lester controversy, ‘Superman
II’ did perform well both critically and commercially, so Lester ended up
directing ‘Superman III’ as well… and this is the point where the series
started to go downhill. ‘Superman III’ is not as bad as the film that would
follow, but it’s still not that good compared to the last two films. Now that
Lester has complete control, the camp level is through the roof. The filmmakers
even cast Richard Pryor in the movie for additional humor and the worst thing
about this (aside from the fact that the comedy legend’s humor did not really
shine through in this film) is that Pryor might actually be in it more than
Superman himself. There are only two good things in this movie. One is
Christopher Reeve who, despite the film’s many problems, is still very good as
Superman who, in this film, becomes corrupted by synthetic kryptonite made by
an evil multimillionaire. Superman ultimately ends up splitting into the evil
Superman and good Clark Kent. The fight scene between them in the junkyard is
the other highlight in a film that may not be the worst Superman film of all
time, but it’s clear that this is where the series started to go in the wrong
direction.
Rating:
2/5
SUPERMAN IV: THE QUEST
FOR PEACE (1987)
Oh boy… time to talk about this one. The original
Superman franchise had a run that was fairly parallel to the original Batman
franchise. The first films are regarded as the best, the second films still
received solid reviews (though not as good as their predecessors), the third
films were where both series began to go into decline, and the fourth films…
were the ones that killed their respective franchises until their eventual
reboots. Superman IV is up there with ‘Batman and Robin’ amongst the worst
superhero films of all time. Even if you excuse the fact that this film had a
troubled production where the budget was cut in half due to the production
company’s busy schedule of films, this is still a god-awful superhero film. Everything
about this movie feels cheap, right down to the horrendous special effects
(easily the worst in any superhero film). This is easily the worst Superman
film to date.
Rating:
.5/5
SUPERMAN RETURNS (2006)
Following the ‘death’ of the original Superman franchise
with Superman IV, Warner Bros brought the series back in 2006 with ‘Superman
Returns’, directed by Bryan Singer after he helmed the first two X-Men films. It
seems like Warner Bros really wanted to revive the Superman franchise the same
way they rebooted the Batman franchise a year before with ‘Batman Begins’. But,
as evident from ‘Man of Steel’, ‘Superman Returns’ did not really turn out the
way Warner Bros had hoped. For the record, it did fine at the box office and
received solid reception from critics. However, audience reception has been
pretty split. A lot of people like it and a lot of people hate it. As for me,
I’m right in the middle when it comes to this film. I don’t love it, but I
don’t think it’s as bad as those who dislike it say it is. However, it is a
missed opportunity when it came to the revival of the Superman franchise.
One of the big problems with the film is that it’s
actually kind of boring. The film is about 2.5 hours long and despite some
really good action sequences, it moves at a very slow pace. Another problem may
also be that the filmmakers tried way too hard to connect this to the first two
Superman films because this is actually supposed to be a ‘sequel’ to those
films. I can’t really say it works without the original cast and I feel that
the filmmakers should have just rebooted the franchise. It also doesn’t help
that the main leads aren’t really that compelling. I’ll give Brandon Routh some
credit in that there are times where he effectively mirrors Reeve as Superman
(apparently one of the reasons why he was cast because he looks a lot like
Reeve) to good effect, but Kate Bosworth is terrible as Lois Lane, lacking the
spunky attitude that Margot Kidder had in the original films. The rest of the
cast is fine though, including James Marsden as Lois’ fiancé Richard (tell me I’m
not the only one who thinks he would have been a really good choice for
Superman) and Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor.
All in all, Superman Returns is not the worst
Superman film of all time, but Warner Bros should have done something different
in regard to how this film turned out. If Christopher Nolan could reboot the
Batman franchise and not have it stay true to the previous Batman films, then
this film should have gone the same route instead of serving as a ‘sequel’ to
the Reeve films. Obviously, we won’t be getting a sequel (instead, we have Zack
Snyder’s ‘Man of Steel’ to look forward to), but I would have been fine with
another film. Maybe it would have allowed the two leads to flesh out their
characters a little more. As is, neither is very good in their roles and Christopher
Reeve and Margot Kidder are still the definitive Superman and Lois Lane when it
comes to the Superman movies.
Rating:
3/5
No comments:
Post a Comment