Your eyes aren’t deceiving you, folks… I’m about to review what
has easily been the most infamous film of 2019, the film adaptation of the
long-running musical, Cats. The musical made its London debut in 1981,
five years before composer Andrew Lloyd Webber unleashed his biggest smash hit
on the world, The Phantom of the Opera, and was inspired by the 1939
collection of poems titled Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats written
by T.S. Eliot. A year later, it would make its Broadway debut, and both
versions of the show ended up being massive financial hits. To date, Cats is
the fourth highest-grossing musical of all-time with a worldwide gross of over
$2.8 billion, and it is widely regarded as the first ‘mega-musical’ AKA the
theater equivalent of a cinematic blockbuster. Over the years, however, the
overall reception towards the show has varied due to its many bizarre aspects,
and sure enough, this mindset carried over to the announcement that a film
adaptation was in the works as practically every major aspect of its production
became a prime source of internet mockery. Sure, it was set to be directed by
Tom Hooper, who had previously directed 2010’s Best Picture winner The
King’s Speech and the 2012 adaptation of another legendary musical, Les Misérables,
but the overall mixed reception towards the latter and the growing criticism of
Hooper’s directorial trademarks didn’t help. And once the first trailer for the
film was released, the internet recoiled at the sight of the bizarre project that
was set to hit theaters which, when it ultimately did, was widely panned by
critics and immediately regarded as one of the most disastrous films in recent
memory. Thus, today we’ll be going over all the reasons why Cats is the utterly
fascinating mess that it ends up being.
One night, a young white kitten named Victoria (Francesca
Hayward) is abandoned by her owner on the streets of London. Immediately, she
is approached by a group of alley cats who refer to themselves as ‘Jellicle’
cats. Through them, Victoria learns that tonight happens to be the biggest
night of the year for the Jellicles, the Jellicle Ball. Every year, the
Jellicles’ wise leader, Old Deuteronomy (Judi Dench), selects one member of their
tribe who will ascend to the mythical place known as the Heaviside Layer and be
reborn. And so, Victoria and the rest of the Jellicles begin to witness some of
the most prominent members of the tribe compete for this honor, which includes
everyone from the bourgeois Bustopher Jones (James Corden) to the elderly
theater performer Gus (Ian McKellen). At the same time, however, the Jellicles
must also deal with the actions of the sinister Macavity (Idris Elba), who will
stop at nothing to ensure that he’s the one who gets chosen. And really, folks…
that’s about it for the plot. As I’m sure those in the theater community will agree,
Cats sports the very definition of a bare-bones plot that’s basically
just a series of vignettes in which new characters are introduced and they have
their big solo numbers. And while I can’t say much about how this translates to
the stage since I’ve admittedly haven’t seen Cats in its original
musical form, I have the feeling that it works a lot better there than it does
on film. Here, that kind of plot makes the whole thing quite repetitive and it
also doesn’t help that the film speeds through the story at a surprisingly rapid
pace, which means that there’s never a point where it slows down to let us properly
fathom any of its utterly bizarre moments.
But, of course, the one thing that will forever define this
film’s reputation is how it brings the story’s feline characters to life. Ever
since its debut, the musical has always relied on elaborate costuming and
makeup to accomplish this. But as for the film, it opted to go the CGI route
and utilize motion-capture to turn its cast into cats. And as you might have
guessed, this was the main reason why the film’s initial trailer ended up
becoming so notorious as many felt that its CGI designs were one of the most
blatant examples of imagery that falls into the uncanny valley. And while I personally
never found these designs ‘scary’ like the rest of the internet regards them as
(in a year which also saw that same description apply to the sight of Will
Smith’s Genie in his traditional blue form and the initial cinematic design of
Sonic the Hedgehog), even I can agree that this wasn’t the right way to go when
it came to bringing Cats to the big screen. Simply put, practically all the
big stars in the film get some incredibly unflattering CGI makeovers. And
despite all the behind-the-scenes videos that emphasized how the production
utilized some genuinely impressive larger-than-life sets, this is a very
CGI-dominated film in general, which means that the weaker effects don’t just
apply to the characters. However, given the various reports that came out after
the film’s release, this is ultimately something that you can’t really fault
the VFX artists for since it’s now been well-established that this film was
beyond rushed and they had an incredibly tense relationship with director Tom
Hooper. In fact, it was so rushed that the studio had to send out a new version
of the film to theaters (during its opening weekend, no less) to fix some
glaring visual effects errors, namely the appearance of Judi Dench’s wedding ring
on her hand in certain shots. However, from what I’ve read (and based off the
version of the film that I watched on VUDU), this ‘updated’ cut didn’t make any
noticeable changes, which means that, yes, you can still see Judi Dench’s
wedding ring on numerous occasions.
And yet, arguably the most ironic aspect of this film is
that, despite all its visual shortcomings and its strict adherence to
maintaining the overall weirdness of its source material, much of its
star-studded cast is still fully committed to the bizarre antics that they end
up partaking in. Going back to this film’s behind-the-scenes videos for a
second, the overall vibe that you get from the cast in their various testimonials
is that they genuinely wanted to be there, and as crazy as it may sound, this
enthusiasm can be seen in a lot of their performances. Legends like Judi Dench
and Ian McKellen give it their all and while she may have arguably been a bit
young for the role of the withered glamour cat Grizabella, Jennifer Hudson still
gives the musical’s most iconic number, ‘Memory’, the emotional powerhouse of a
performance it deserves. In fact, Dench’s casting as a gender-swapped Old
Deuteronomy is quite significant since she was originally cast as Grizabella in
the original London production of the musical but had to drop out at the last
minute when she tore her Achilles tendon during rehearsals. But remember what I
said earlier about how this is basically just a series of vignettes that jump from
character to character? Well, because of that, most of the characters in this
film are basically relegated to minor cameos which, in this instance, ends up applying
to the most prominent members of the ensemble such as McKellen, James Corden,
and Taylor Swift as the flirtatious Bombalurina, just to name a few. Instead,
the film tends to focus more on the story’s supporting players, namely the trio
of Munkustrap (Robbie Fairchild), Mr. Mistoffelees (Laurie Davidson), and
Victoria, whose traditionally silent role in the musical is expanded upon to
make her the main protagonist. However, the methods in which the film handles
this change are rather mediocre and, at best, she just ends up being a generally
passive audience surrogate. Thus, while I’m well aware that many have harped on
Francesca Hayward’s performance in the role, this is ultimately another case
like the VFX artists where you can’t really blame it on her since, to be
perfectly frank, she didn’t have much to work with here.
So, yeah… as you might have guessed, there’s not a lot of
positive things that I can say about this film. Now, granted, I’m not as repulsed
by this film as the rest of the internet is, but it goes without saying that Cats
is one of the strangest films to come out in recent years. Of course, a lot
of this has to do with its questionable method of bringing the titular cats to
life via CGI, especially since it’s now been made clear that the rushed
production schedule that this film ended up having resulted in its effects feeling
quite unfinished. At the same time, though, there’s also the matter of how this
film ended up taking the musical that it's based on and doing almost nothing
to try and work around its most bizarre aspects. Because of this, anybody who
isn’t familiar with the musical going in will most likely be left completely
and utterly dumbfounded by its strange and simplistic story. And yet, while
this may seem like a case where it’d be more accessible to those who are fans
of the musical, it seems like even that’s impossible (based on what I’ve heard)
because of the radical changes that this film makes to both its plot and several
of its musical numbers. It’s worth noting that the original plans for this film
adaptation were to have it be an animated feature done by Steven Spielberg’s production
company Amblin Entertainment’s animation division, Amblimation. And while this iteration
of the project ultimately went nowhere when the division was shut down in 1997,
it’s safe to say that this film probably would’ve worked a hell of a lot better
had it been animated as originally intended.
Rating: 1.5/5
No comments:
Post a Comment