Showing posts with label Cruella. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cruella. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2021

Favorite Films of Summer 2021 - As Voted By You!

When I decided to relaunch Rhode Island Movie Corner’s Annual End of Summer Fan Poll after taking a year off due to everything related to the COVID-19 pandemic, I’ll admit that I wasn’t quite sure of the kind of reaction that it would get this time. And to be clear, I don’t mean this in any sort of negative way; instead, I’m simply referring to the fact that, because COVID is still technically an issue that we’re all dealing with, not everyone has been going to see new releases at the theater. This is the reason why I decided to apply one notable loophole for this year’s event in that I would willingly accept answers from those who saw a film at their home if said film was simultaneously released in theaters and on their studio’s coinciding streaming service such as Disney+ or HBO Max. However, even after a year away, y’all came through once again to give us another great year of polling here on Rhode Island Movie Corner, with 69 votes (*cue the obvious joke from the cheekier parts of the internet*) going to 20 different films. Thus, as always, I couldn’t be more thankful for all of you who participated in this year’s event and helped to spread it around online. With all that in mind, let’s not waste any more time, especially since, given the wide array of hit releases this summer, some of you may be surprised to learn how certain films fared in this year’s poll and, more importantly, which film ended up taking this year’s crown. And so, without further ado, Rhode Island Movie Corner proudly presents the films that you, the fans, voted for as your favorite releases from the summer of 2021.

THE FOLLOWING SEVEN FILMS EARNED ONE VOTE APIECE

THE BOSS BABY: FAMILY BUSINESS

If there’s one thing that I’ve learned in the 10+ years that I’ve gone through as an online film critic, it’s that the internet tends to make a big deal about certain films. On the one hand, you have films that the internet goes utterly gaga over such as Mad Max: Fury Road and Star Wars: The Last Jedi, even if there are a few times where it feels like all the praise that these films get becomes something of a major detriment to other films. But then there are films that, even if they’re not necessarily panned by critics, become a prime source of internet mockery, which is a scenario that undoubtedly applied to DreamWorks Animation’s 2017 release, The Boss Baby. Directed by Tom McGrath (director of the Madagascar trilogy and the voice of Skipper in those films) and loosely based on a 2010 book of the same name by author Marla Frazee, the film follows a young boy who learns that his new baby brother can not only talk but is also a secret agent working for an organization that ensures that babies are the most beloved things on the planet. Upon its release, the film did incredibly well at the box office, where it managed to gross over $528 million worldwide; heck, it even managed to unseat the $1 billion grossing live-action remake of Beauty and the Beast from the top of the domestic box-office as it was entering the third week of its release. As for critics, however, they were a bit more mixed on it as they felt that the film’s script wasn’t exactly up to par with its wacky animation. But again, like I said earlier, the bigger story here is that, based on what I’ve seen online, much of film fandom has been left utterly dumbfounded by this surreal throwback to animated films of the ’50s and ’60s, especially once it managed to get nominated for Best Animated Feature at that year’s Oscars.

Nevertheless, the film’s success allowed it to become the next big DreamWorks franchise as it was soon followed by a Netflix series, Back in Business, which, at the time of this post’s publication, has been running for at least four seasons. But now we have a proper theatrically released sequel, subtitled Family Business, which was simultaneously released in theaters and via Universal’s streaming service Peacock for users operating on its paid plans. Taking place three decades after the first film, the sequel once again focuses on main protagonist Tim Templeton (now voiced by James Marsden, who replaces Tobey Maguire as the voice of the adult Tim) and his brother Ted (once again voiced by Alec Baldwin), the OG Boss Baby, who have become distant as they’ve grown into adulthood. However, when they discover that Tim’s infant daughter Tina (voiced by Amy Sedaris) is the latest to join the ‘family business’ as a member of the organization Baby Corp, the two are transformed back into their younger selves to help her deal with a diabolical plot to rid the world of all parents. Like its predecessor, Boss Baby 2 garnered a largely mixed response from critics upon its release, with most viewing it as nothing special but, at the very least, finding it to be a largely harmless affair that would satisfy younger audiences. Thus, while I’m sure that there are still some parts of the internet that are utterly befuddled by the Boss Baby franchise’s existence, it’s clear that it’s been a big hit with its target audience, especially seeing how a third film has recently been confirmed to be in the works.   

THE FOREVER PURGE

For the past decade, Universal has had one of the most popular film franchises in recent years with The Purge. Created by veteran screenwriter James DeMonaco, the Purge films take place in a dystopian future where a corrupt government enacts an annual ‘national holiday’ that allows all forms of crime, especially murder, to be made legal for one night. What started with a relatively modest home invasion thriller from 2013 has since spawned numerous sequels that have collectively grossed over $500 million worldwide and a short-lived TV series on USA Network. And so far, every installment outside of the first film has received mixed reviews from critics who feel that they’re generally entertaining but are never quite able to live up to the potential of the series’ overall premise and the surprisingly timely themes that stem from them. That latter aspect was especially relevant for this year’s fifth installment, The Forever Purge, which focuses on a group of migrants who, fresh off their efforts to cross the Mexican border, find themselves hunted by white supremacists who operate outside of the Purge’s ‘one night a year’ rules. Given recent events, many have said that this is arguably the franchise’s most socially relevant installment to date, but just like its predecessors, critics were split on how successful it was in conveying those themes. Nevertheless, The Forever Purge managed to be another hit for the franchise; sure, its $77 million worldwide gross is a series low, but to be fair, this is a COVID-era release we’re talking about. And while it was originally touted as the series’ final installment, plans have been set into motion for another film that will notably see the return of series mainstay Frank Grillo as the badass protagonist of Anarchy and Election Year, Sgt. Leo Barnes.

OLD

M. Night Shyamalan’s latest directorial outing, Old, is very much in line with his usual tendency of doing projects with supernatural plots. Based on a 2010 graphic novel named Sandcastle by Pierre Oscar Levy and Frederik Peeters, the film follows a group of people who travel to a secluded beach in the tropics but discover that, for some reason, the beach is causing them all to age rapidly. This results in plenty of solidly directed sequences that perfectly illustrate the growing tension that develops amongst the main characters as they struggle to try and escape from the seemingly inescapable beach. At the same time, though, the film also serves as a prime example of how Shyamalan can be incredibly inconsistent as a director as the overall direction feels flat, especially when it comes to the script and performances of the cast despite featuring some incredibly talented stars like Gael Garcia Bernal and Thomasin McKenzie. Ultimately, though, the film’s biggest downfall is that it suffers from some incredibly sluggish pacing, which is rather ironic for a film that’s about people who are quickly getting older. Because of all this, Old, unfortunately, ends up being another one of Shyamalan’s directorial duds. While it’s by no means his worst film, it does inevitably highlight the fact that he’s a director who’s simultaneously experienced the highest of highs… and the lowest of lows.   

STILLWATER

Stillwater is the latest directorial effort from filmmaker Tom McCarthy, who’s had a very prestigious career in the industry. After several years working as an actor, McCarthy made his directorial debut in 2003 with The Station Agent, which promptly launched the career of Tyrion Lannister himself, Peter Dinklage. This has then led to McCarthy’s involvement with other critically acclaimed projects such as Pixar’s 2009 masterpiece Up, which he had a story credit on, and his 2015 film Spotlight, which not only netted him an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay but also the big one, Best Picture. As for his latest, Stillwater stars Matt Damon as an oil-rig worker from Oklahoma who travels to France to try and clear his daughter’s (Abigail Breslin) name when she’s convicted of killing her roommate. Many have noted that the film’s plot has a lot in common with the real-life scandal in which Amanda Knox was accused of murdering her roommate Meredith Kercher, a charge that she was eventually acquitted from. And admittedly, this has garnered some controversy as Knox has publicly criticized the film for how it fictionalizes her story. Despite this, however, the film was solidly well-received upon its release as critics felt that, despite some of its script-based shortcomings, it did its job at presenting its relevant themes and boasted a strong lead performance from Matt Damon.

THE GREEN KNIGHT

Speaking of acclaimed directors, here we have the latest from director David Lowery, whose filmography has ranged from award-winning indie works such as 2013’s Ain’t Them Bodies Saints and 2017’s A Ghost Story to major studio outings like the 2016 remake of Disney’s 1977 cult classic, Pete’s Dragon. But before he tackles another major Disney live-action remake with his take on Peter Pan, titled Peter Pan & Wendy, this year gave us what is arguably his most ambitious project to date, a full-blown fantasy epic that adapts the Arthurian legend of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Just like its source material, the film follows Sir Gawain, the nephew of King Arthur, as he embarks on a quest to confront the mythical Green Knight. The film was originally set to make its debut at the 2020 SXSW Film Festival, which would’ve then been followed by a May 2020 theatrical release… before you-know-what effectively changed those plans. Surprisingly, though, this is one of those rare cases where the COVID-enforced delay ended up being helpful in the long run as it gave Lowery plenty of time to rework the film in post-production since he wasn’t exactly happy with its original cut. Sure enough, upon its release, the film proved to be another critically acclaimed hit for Lowery as critics praised it for its finely crafted modern spin on the legendary story that it was based on with strong themes, captivating visuals, and an excellent cast headlined by Dev Patel in the lead role of Gawain.

SNAKE EYES

The enduring legacy of the G.I. Joe franchise’s role in the pop-cultural zeitgeist practically speaks for itself. Not only has it been one of the most prominent franchises in the entire toy industry, but it also played a significant role in its evolution as it revolutionized the term ‘action figure’, thus helping Hasbro in the process of marketing the doll-like figures to young male audiences. Outside of the toys, the franchise has also seen a lot of success in other mediums, such as the classic animated series from the ’80s produced by Sunbow and Marvel. And in 2009, the franchise made its official live-action theatrical debut with G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, which was then followed by a sequel in 2013, G.I. Joe: Retaliation. While neither film was, admittedly, that big of a hit with critics (in other words, they fared about as well as the live-action adaptations of another popular Hasbro franchise, Transformers), they performed quite well at the box office, with both grossing over $300 million worldwide. For the longest time, though, there weren’t any major attempts to follow up on Retaliation outside of a long-rumored threequel named G.I. Joe: Ever Vigilant. But before that project could get off the ground, a different G.I. Joe film ended up pushing on through in the form of a spin-off centered on one of the franchise’s most popular characters, the mysterious ninja warrior known as ‘Snake Eyes’.

Under the direction of Robert Schwentke (Red, the last two Divergent films) and starring Crazy Rich Asians breakout star Henry Golding in the title role, Snake Eyes explores the origins of the titular hero, specifically focusing on his journey into being accepted as a member of the mythical Arashikage ninja clan. And overall, this part of the story is well-handled and decently engaging, especially when it comes to the relationship between Snake Eyes and the man who will become his greatest rival, Tommy Arashikage AKA Storm Shadow. But when it comes to the film’s efforts to tie its proceedings into the series’ primary conflict between G.I. Joe and Cobra, that’s where it starts to falter a bit as characters like Cobra operative The Baroness and G.I. Joe agent Scarlett feel incredibly extraneous within the context of the plot. But, of course, the biggest point of debate surrounding the film… is the fact that it doesn’t exactly have the best action sequences as frenetic editing and unsteady camerawork undermine the clearly dedicated efforts of the film’s stunt team. However, at the very least, Henry Golding does continue to prove himself as a naturally charismatic leading man in the title role. Thus, while it’s far from perfect, Snake Eyes is a decently entertaining attempt at relaunching the G.I. Joe film franchise, and while it was admittedly a major flop at the box-office, only grossing about $37 million worldwide on a massive $88-110 million budget, a sequel is reportedly in the works with Golding set to return.

ROADRUNNER: A FILM ABOUT ANTHONY BOURDAIN

We only had one major candidate pop up from the write-in section this year, but that doesn’t mean that the film in question isn’t noteworthy. For one thing, it’s the latest documentary from filmmaker Robert Neville, who scored big in 2018 with his Fred Rogers documentary Won’t You Be My Neighbor?, which became the highest-grossing biographical documentary of all time (it also scored big here on RIMC’s annual poll, where it earned two votes in the 2018 event). As for his newest film, it tackles the life of one of the culinary industry’s most famous ‘bad boys’, Anthony Bourdain. Whether it’s thanks to his numerous bestselling books or the many years that he spent hosting TV shows such as Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations on the Travel Channel, Bourdain was one of the industry’s most celebrated voices. Sadly, though, his story ended in tragedy as he committed suicide on June 8th, 2018; as such, it’s completely understandable if this new film wasn’t the easiest of watches for Bourdain’s friends, family, and fans. Ultimately, though, it was well-received upon its release, with critics praising Neville’s work in delivering another emotional, insightful, and openly honest documentary that, above all, genuinely celebrated the life of its subject. However, there was some controversy following the film’s release when it was revealed that Neville had utilized artificial intelligence to reproduce Bourdain’s voice for some audio clips. While Neville insisted that this was only used to bring Bourdain’s distinctive voice to writings of his that he had never stated verbally, many questioned the ethical nature of this decision, especially since it wasn’t publicly disclosed until after the film’s release. Still, with over $5.2 million at the box office, it’s clear that Robert Neville continues to be one of the most prolific documentary filmmakers in the industry.

THESE NEXT THREE FILMS EARNED TWO VOTES EACH

JUNGLE CRUISE

Outside of the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, there haven’t been a lot of attempts at producing film adaptations of iconic Disney rides. Prior to this year, the last major attempts were from back around the time that the first Pirates film came out with 2002’s The Country Bears and 2003’s The Haunted Mansion… and admittedly, both of those films were major critical duds. But now we have a film adaptation of the world-famous Jungle Cruise which, at the end of the day, clearly followed in Pirates’ footsteps when it comes to crafting a more expansive story around its source material’s simple premise of a riverboat cruise through the jungle led by a skipper known for their utterly corny puns. And just like the Pirates films, Jungle Cruise does a great job of maintaining that classic ‘old-school adventure film’ aesthetic and atmosphere even if the plot in general is rather standard as far as the genre is concerned. Still, the film benefits nicely from the excellent lead duo of Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt, and fans of the ride will undoubtedly love all the neat little nods to it… although it is rather ironic how several of these references were recently taken out of the ride to address its most dated aspects (Trader Sam, native head-hunters, etc.). Ultimately, though, while I can’t exactly say that it’s the most standout adaptation of a classic Disney Parks ride, Jungle Cruise does succeed in being a good old-fashioned popcorn flick. Plus, given the recent announcements that a sequel is in the works, it’ll be genuinely interesting to see where this new Disney film franchise goes from here.

FREE GUY

One of the many things that I feel that these annual polls have proven is that, for the most part, you can never go wrong with a good crowd-pleaser, and for many people, one of the most surprisingly effective examples of that from this year’s summer slate was director Shawn Levy’s latest, Free Guy. A full-on love letter to gaming and one of this summer’s rare non-IP blockbusters, the film stars Ryan Reynolds as the titular Guy, a good-natured bank teller who discovers that he’s a non-player character (AKA an ‘NPC’) in a massively popular open-world video game. When he learns that the game is about to be shut down by its developer in favor of a sequel, he teams up with Millie (Jodie Comer), a programmer whose vital role in the game’s creation went uncredited, to save his world and friends from being destroyed. Whether it’s the multiple cameos made by popular gamers/streamers or some pitch-perfect representations of online gaming, Free Guy clearly made a considerable amount of effort to present a significantly accurate take on the industry. But above all, the best part about this film is that it has an incredibly good heart to its proceedings with an endearing cast of main protagonists and the very definition of a feel-good ending. Case in point, this is one of the rare instances where Ryan Reynolds’ trademark brand of crude and snarky humor isn’t as prevalent as it is in something like the Deadpool films, thus showcasing the genuinely great range that Reynolds has as a comedic talent. Not only that, but he’s backed by a fun supporting cast that includes the likes of Jodie Comer, Joe Keery, and a scene-stealing Taika Waititi. And so, because of all this, Free Guy is easily one of the best ‘feel-good’ films of the summer which, if you ask me, is always great to see, especially given how utterly chaotic things have been recently.

CANDYMAN

For the past several years, Jordan Peele has been one of the most prominent creative voices in the horror genre, where he’s made a name for himself as a filmmaker known for making horror films with strong social commentary. As such, it makes perfect sense that he’d play a major role in reviving a classic horror franchise that’s similarly well-known for its significant social themes, Candyman. To be clear, though, the new Candyman is NOT a Jordan Peele directed feature as he’s only a writer/producer on it; instead, that honor goes to Nia DaCosta who, thanks to this film’s success at the box office, became the first Black female director to have a #1 stateside hit and is now hard at work on the upcoming Captain Marvel sequel. And given what we got from this film, it’s easy to see why she’s becoming a prominent player in the industry as this new Candyman fully showcases her directorial talents. Not only does she deliver some stunningly artistic horror sequences, but she also does a wonderful job of respecting the gothic atmosphere of the original Candyman film from 1992 while also finding great ways to update the story of one of the horror genre’s most famous ‘urban legend’ slashers for a new generation. Add in some strong performances from Yahya Abdul-Mateen II and Teyonah Parris as well as the emotional weight of recent racial injustice-based tragedies that clearly impacted this film’s plot and you have one of the most well-directed and thoroughly engaging horror films in recent years.

FOUR FILMS EARNED THREE VOTES EACH

PAW PATROL: THE MOVIE

In 2013, Nickelodeon debuted the latest addition to its Nick Jr. lineup, PAW Patrol, which follows a young boy named Ryder and a team of talking dogs who work together as a search and rescue unit in their hometown of Adventure Bay. Calling this show a success… would be a massive understatement. To date, there have been over 190 episodes produced (with a ninth season on the way) as well as a highly successful toy line that helped establish the series’ creators, Spin Master, as a prominent player in the toy industry. And while the show has admittedly faced a bit of controversy in recent years over its ‘positive’ portrayal of the police in the wake of recent race-related incidents, that hasn’t completely stopped it from arguably being the current flagship series of the Nick Jr. programming block, following in the footsteps of classic Nick Jr. programs such as Blue’s Clues and Dora the Explorer. Anyway, now we have the series’ first feature film, which sees Ryder and the gang travel to the nearby Adventure City to deal with its corrupt mayor, their longtime rival Mayor Humdinger. Released simultaneously in theaters and on the Paramount+ streaming service, the film managed to do quite well at the box office, where it has earned over $103 million worldwide on a modest $26 million budget. And as for the critics, many of them have agreed that, at the end of the day, the film is practically guaranteed to be a hit with those who have made the series the massive success story that it is.

WRATH OF MAN

A remake of the 2004 French thriller Cash Truck, Wrath of Man notably sees director Guy Ritchie reunite with one of his most frequent collaborators, Jason Statham. Ritchie and Statham both made their feature-length debuts with the 1998 smash hit Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. The two of them then proceeded to team up again for 2000’s Snatch and 2005’s Revolver before both going on their separate ways career-wise. But now they’re back together again, with Statham starring as an armored truck driver whose mysterious past is called into play when he thwarts a bunch of robbers. With a solid $104 million run at the box office and mostly positive reviews from critics, who felt that Ritchie’s strong direction helped the film to overcome its bare-bones plot, Wrath of Man proved to be another recent success story for Guy Ritchie. As I noted in the 2017 edition of this poll, Ritchie’s directorial career has seen both its ups and downs as he’s been responsible for major hits such as the Sherlock Holmes duology… and devastating commercial flops like King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. And yet, now that he’s fresh off a $1 billion grossing live-action Disney remake with his take on Aladdin, it seems like Ritchie’s luck has been changing as of late, especially since his recent outings have allowed him the opportunity to return to his roots as a director of slick, hard-edged crime dramas. Case in point, Ritchie and Statham will be back at it again next year with the spy thriller Five Eyes.

HITMAN’S WIFE’S BODYGUARD

In 2017, director Patrick Hughes’ action-comedy The Hitman’s Bodyguard, starring Ryan Reynolds as a professional bodyguard named Michael Bryce who finds himself forced to protect the world’s most notorious hitman, Darius Kincaid (played by Samuel L. Jackson), became an unexpected smash hit at the box-office. Sure, some of this may have been due to it being a late August release, which has often been considered a ‘dead month’ as far as summer blockbusters are concerned, but to be fair, it was also only the third film that year to be in the #1 spot at the domestic box-office for three weeks in a row. If anything, it seems like the film managed to be a genuine hit with audiences, namely due to the dynamic comedic chemistry between two of the most prominent stars in the industry; thus, it’s easy to see why a sequel was announced the following year, which ultimately came out this year as Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard. As the title suggests, this film gives Darius Kincaid’s wife Sonia (played by Salma Hayek) a more prominent role as she drags a reluctant Michael out of his self-imposed vacation to help her and her husband stop Greek shipping tycoon Aristotle Papadopoulos (Antonio Banderas) from launching a terrorist attack on Europe. Upon its release, the film admittedly didn’t do so well with critics, who felt that it was far too run-of-the-mill as an action-comedy, and it also didn’t do as well as its predecessor financially as it just missed out on matching its $70 million budget at the box-office. Still, seeing how this film managed to earn one more vote than its predecessor did in the 2017 edition of this poll, it’s safe to say that these two films clearly have their fans.

F9: THE FAST SAGA

While the Fast and Furious series has easily been one of the biggest film franchises of the past several decades… it’s also admittedly become a prime source of internet mockery, namely due to its unabashed efforts to continuously up the ante on its over-the-top action sequences with each subsequent installment. And yet, based on what I saw when I went to see F9 in IMAX (partially due to it featuring a preview of the next Jurassic World film), it’s clear to me that this series is still doing quite well with audiences as there were quite a lot of key moments in the film (namely, the return of series mainstay Sung Kang as fan-favorite Han Lue) that earned a considerable amount of applause from the crowd that I was with. To be perfectly blunt, I hadn’t seen that kind of audience reaction towards these films since 2013 when I saw Fast and Furious 6 with an incredibly enthusiastic afternoon matinee crowd. In other words, say what you will about these films and how ridiculous they can get, but overall, I do think that F9 was a pivotal return to form for the series and one that it desperately needed after some of the questionable narrative decisions that were made in 2017’s The Fate of the Furious. Much of this is thanks to the return of the series’ longest-tenured director, Justin Lin, whose strong direction helps to revitalize many of the elements that have made the franchise’s more recent outings so successful, especially the unmistakably tight-knit family dynamic that’s shared by the main protagonists. In short, yes, these films are incredibly goofy and consistently defy all sorts of logic with every new plot development… however, they’re also a lot of fun to watch for those exact same reasons. And seeing how Justin Lin is set to return for what is slated to be the last two installments of the series, I’d argue that the Fast and Furious franchise’s grand finale couldn’t be in better hands.

TIED FOR FIFTH PLACE, WITH FOUR VOTES EACH

IN THE HEIGHTS

It’s great to see that the film adaptation of In the Heights managed to do quite well in this year’s poll considering that, unfortunately, it didn’t do too hot at the box office, where it wasn’t able to make back its $55 million budget. There have been several theories as to why this happened, which range from it being a bit too obscure of a musical compared to something like Lin-Manuel Miranda’s other career-defining hit, Hamilton, to its simultaneous theatrical/HBO Max release. Heck, for all we know, the controversy that it wound up in when it was released where it was accused of lacking Afro-Latino actors could’ve potentially factored into its financial underperformance. Well, whatever the reason, I truly hope that this doesn’t end up defining the film’s legacy as it’s an effortlessly heartwarming watch. Miranda and Quiara Alegría Hudes’ love letter to the former’s old stomping grounds of Washington Heights is brilliantly translated to the big screen by director Jon M. Chu with top-notch musical numbers and a delightful cast headlined by Hamilton breakout star Anthony Ramos in the lead role that Miranda originated on Broadway. The themes that it celebrates are the very definition of universal (e.g. the strength of one’s community) and the main protagonists are so lovable that the story doesn’t even need to have any sort of antagonist. With all this in mind, this is one of those cases where, if you ask me, it’s practically impossible not to love what is easily one of the best musical adaptations to date.

THE SUICIDE SQUAD

Speaking of films that quite frankly didn’t deserve to underperform at the box office, some folks may have been a bit skeptical about the idea of doing another Suicide Squad film after the first attempted film adaptation in 2016 ended up being a considerably underwhelming disappointment despite all the hype leading up to its release. But when you watch The Suicide Squad, you’ll quickly understand why it was necessary as it once again highlights what happens when the DC Extended Universe isn’t trying so hard to be the antithesis of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Whereas the first Suicide Squad film was hindered by the same kind of tonal and visual issues that plagued many of the early DCEU films, The Suicide Squad achieves a far more consistent mix of strong emotional moments and laugh-out-loud gags in what is easily a far more visually appealing film compared to its downright ugly looking predecessor. It also does a much better job of capitalizing on the concept of a squad of supervillains sent out on missions where they aren’t expected to survive as it isn’t afraid to kill off some of its main characters and fully embraces its R rating in a way that legitimately works for a film from this genre unlike something like the ‘Snyder Cut’ of Justice League. To put it simply, The Suicide Squad is another masterpiece from writer/director James Gunn who, just like with his Guardians of the Galaxy films for the MCU, wholly succeeds in making us care about a bunch of characters who aren’t necessarily heroic by giving them excellent bits of character development.

IN FOURTH PLACE, WITH FIVE VOTES

A QUIET PLACE – PART II

The highly anticipated follow-up to John Krasinski’s critically-acclaimed horror-thriller A Quiet Place was easily one of the most prominent ‘delayed releases’ that came into play because of COVID-19. To put this all into perspective, the film was only a few weeks away from its originally intended March 18th release date last year when the situation with COVID was officially deemed a pandemic. And yet, when it was finally released this past May, a time when most theaters weren’t exactly back in full operation, it managed to be one of the most successful blockbusters of the COVID era. Its worldwide box-office gross of over $297 million isn’t that far off from its predecessor’s $350 million-plus haul and it also ended up being one of the rare cases of a sequel that managed to fare nearly as well as its predecessor did with critics, and in a lot of ways, it’s easy to see why. Outside of a few underdeveloped plot threads (e.g., the group of violent bandits that the main protagonists encounter at a marina), A Quiet Place Part II does a great job of expanding upon its post-apocalyptic world while still managing to balance all that with the strong emotional beats that gave the original a powerfully poignant narrative hook. Krasinski once again delivers some incredibly well-directed sequences of pure tension and the breakout star of the first film, Millicent Simmonds, shines even greater in the sequel, where she’s upgraded into being the main protagonist. Thus, while its script may not be as finely polished as its predecessor’s, A Quiet Place Part II is still very much a well-made horror film that showcases why strongly written characters can often be a major factor behind the genre’s greatest outings.

IN THIRD PLACE, WITH SEVEN VOTES

BLACK WIDOW

As I’ve noted in the past, MCU films always tend to do great in these annual polls of ours, which can best be summed up by Avengers: Endgame’s utter dominance of the competition in 2019. And while Marvel Studios’ sole summer release of 2021, Black Widow, didn’t end up taking the #1 spot in this year’s poll, it still did incredibly well for itself, which makes sense given that it was the first MCU theatrical release in nearly two years. Yes, like many of the other films that we’ve covered in today’s post, Black Widow was hit hard by the pandemic, which forced Marvel Studios to push back all their upcoming releases. Thankfully, the delay wasn’t a complete loss for them as they were able to kick-start Phase 4 on the best note possible with their line of well-received Disney+ shows such as WandaVision and Loki. But on July 9th, the MCU made its triumphant return to the big screen with a film that was practically a decade in the making: the long-awaited solo outing for the MCU’s original lady Avenger, Natasha Romanoff AKA Black Widow. Sure, its simultaneous release in theaters and as a Premier Access release on Disney+ may’ve led to an intense [and currently ongoing] lawsuit from Scarlett Johansson that, spoilers, we won’t be addressing any further here today, but it still managed to pull in a thoroughly decent $378 million run at the box-office and, true to franchise form, was well-received by critics.

Sure enough, Black Widow is yet another MCU film that delivers on everything that the franchise is known for, from its top-notch action sequences to the instantly quotable bits of humor that never take away from the story’s big emotional moments. Case in point, given everything that the film delves into regarding Natasha’s history with the Black Widow program, Black Widow is easily one of the darkest and most emotionally driven installments of the MCU, thus paving the way for one of its most cathartic finales where she’s able to stop it once and for all. However, there are a few minor plot-related shortcomings here and there that, if you ask me, may have been a byproduct of the film’s extended development history. In other words, things like the less significant roles that the villains play in the story (including the film’s controversial take on fan-favorite antagonist Taskmaster, even though said interpretation makes sense for this story) make this Phase 4 post-Endgame release feel like it came from the time when the MCU was overseen by its overbearing Creative Committee. And yet, as was often the case with MCU films that didn’t exactly have a standout villain a la Thanos or Killmonger, this doesn’t end up hindering the film entirely thanks to all the other great things about it, especially the addition of Florence Pugh as Natasha’s ‘sister’ and fellow Black Widow, Yelena Belova. Simply put, Pugh is one of the best additions to the MCU’s legendary ensemble in recent years as she instantly proves to be a natural fit when it comes to her handling of the franchise’s trademark humor and emotional poignancy. And so, with all that in mind, it shouldn’t be that surprising to find that Black Widow is the latest success story for a franchise whose impact on the industry is so significant that, quite frankly, it could be argued that they’re practically incapable of making a ‘bad’ film at this point.

THIS YEAR’S RUNNER-UP, WITH EIGHT VOTES

SPACE JAM: A NEW LEGACY

A lot of you might find this to be the most surprising result of this year’s poll given this film’s overall reception, but from my perspective, this all makes a lot more sense than you’d think. Speaking from experience as a Team Member working at the Universal Orlando resort, I’ve seen guests of all ages wearing clothing from this film’s merchandise line on an almost daily basis even months after its release. Thus, if you ask me, this shows that, at the end of the day, the long-awaited follow-up to the 1996 smash hit Space Jam successfully managed to win over a considerably large audience… even if it ultimately fared just as well as its predecessor did with critics (in other words, not well). Now sure, just like the original, Space Jam: A New Legacy can often go to some incredibly ludicrous lengths with its narrative; in fact, it even manages to one-up the previous film in that regard with all the crossovers that it makes with various Warner Bros. properties, including ones that aren’t exactly geared towards its target audience. And yet, also like the original Space Jam, A New Legacy is a relatively harmless watch with fun visuals that also proves that LeBron James is a genuinely solid screen presence in the wake of his breakout performance in 2015’s Trainwreck. In short, A New Legacy is one of those films that I feel has gotten a bit too harsh of a bad rap from its biggest critics. Sure, it’s far from perfect but you could say the same thing about the original Space Jam, a film that is still fondly enjoyed by many of those who grew up with it (myself included). And despite all the flak that the new film has gotten from both critics and some surly fans of the original, it’s clear that it’s managed to live up to its New Legacy subtitle by being a massive hit with its target demographic.

AND FINALLY, WE COME TO THIS YEAR’S GRAND CHAMPION, WHICH DOUBLED SPACE JAM: A NEW LEGACY’S TOTAL WITH A WHOPPING 16 VOTES. THIS PLACES IT JUST THREE VOTES SHY OF AVENGERS: ENDGAME’S 19-VOTE RECORD THAT WAS SET IN 2019 BUT ALSO PUTS IT FOUR VOTES AHEAD OF THE 12-VOTE PERFORMANCE OF THE PREVIOUS RECORD-HOLDER, 2018’S BLACKkKLANSMAN. AND WHILE I USUALLY REFER TO THESE #1 FILMS AS THE KINGS OF OUR ANNUAL POLL… WELL, THIS YEAR WE HAD OUR FIRST QUEEN…

CRUELLA

In many ways, it’s easy to see why this unique new spin on one of Disney’s most iconic villainesses proved to be such a big hit with audiences. A stylish comedic crime thriller centered around a strong female lead (as portrayed by one of the most charismatic actresses in the business), Cruella opted to go the same route that 2014’s Maleficent went by crafting a more sympathetic take on its title character rather than maintaining her traditionally villainous portrayal from previous films and media. Sure, this probably didn’t go over too well with those who haven’t been keen on Disney’s recent line of live-action re-imaginings of their animated films, but thanks to strong direction from Craig Gillespie and a Grade-A performance from Emma Stone as Cruella, it all comes together incredibly well. For starters, this new version of Cruella ends up being a natural fit for the film’s setting of 1970’s London and the punk rock movement that defined a good chunk of that era as it gives her plenty of opportunities to be the rebel that she’s known for being, albeit as more of an anti-hero in this instance. Not only that, but it’s also a lot of fun to see her go toe-to-toe with the film’s actual main antagonist, the Baroness, who’s very much the equal of the villainous incarnations of Cruella and gleefully played by Emma Thompson. Add in an equally great supporting cast, incredible costume design, and a positively rocking soundtrack and you have a thoroughly engaging crowd-pleaser that was clearly a lot of fun to work on for everyone involved. And while its $233 million run at the box-office may not seem as noteworthy compared to some of the other films from this summer (most likely due to its simultaneous theatrical and Disney+ Premier Access release), I strongly believe that it still played a considerably huge role in helping theaters get back on track this summer.

And that concludes the 2021 installment of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s Annual End of Summer Fan Poll. Once again, I want to express nothing but gratitude for everyone who helped to revitalize one of this site’s longest-standing traditions after we were sadly forced to cancel last year’s event. Case in point, whereas last year presented an unclear future for the theatergoing experience, this year has proven that it clearly isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Cruella (2021) review

We’ve seen plenty of iconic Disney villains throughout the studio’s extensive filmography, and yet, there are arguably none who are more famous than the villainess of Disney Animation’s 1961 outing, One Hundred and One Dalmatians: the fashion-obsessed heiress turned sinister dognapper Cruella de Vil. Ever since the original film’s release, Cruella has been regarded as one of the most famous villains in cinematic history and this status was thoroughly maintained in 1996 when 101 Dalmatians became one of the first Disney animated films to get a live-action remake. In said film, Cruella was portrayed by the legendary Glenn Close, and while the film itself wasn’t as well-received as its animated counterpart, Close’s performance was widely regarded as its greatest highlight, promptly earning her a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress in a Comedy/Musical. She then proceeded to reprise the role in the film’s 2000 sequel, 102 Dalmatians, and while that would basically be it for the 101 Dalmatians live-action film franchise at the time, plans were set into place for a prequel film based entirely around Cruella herself in 2013. And while this did mean that Close wasn’t going to be reprising her iconic role, she still ended up being involved with the project as an executive producer. Thus, Emma Stone took on the role for this new film, which is the latest from director Craig Gillespie who, like previous directors of the live-action 101 Dalmatians films (Stephen Herek and Kevin Lima), has done a bunch of films for Disney in the past such as 2014’s Million Dollar Arm and 2016’s The Finest Hours. And thanks to his strong direction and a top-notch lead performance from Emma Stone, Cruella is a strikingly stylish and edgy new take on the story of its titular villainess.

Growing up, Estella Miller (Emma Stone) was known for being quite the troublemaker which, in her eyes, may have made her responsible for the death of her mother Catherine (Emily Beecham) at a luxurious party hosted by ‘The Baroness’ (Emma Thompson), the owner of one of the top fashion houses in London. Now orphaned, Estella ends up taking on a life of thievery alongside her newfound friends, Jasper (Joel Fry) and Horace (Paul Walter Hauser) Badun. Eventually, her creative sensibilities manage to attract the attention of the Baroness, who promptly hires her as one of her new designers. But while Estella steadily works her way up into being one of the Baroness’ key assistants, she soon discovers that the Baroness has come into possession of a necklace that had been given to her by her mother but had been lost on the night of her death. Now realizing that the Baroness was the one responsible for her mother’s death, Estella, with the aid of Horace and Jasper, promptly embarks on a plot of revenge. Adopting an old persona of hers from childhood, she becomes the rebellious Cruella de Vil and begins to pull off a series of publicity stunts to one-up the Baroness, thus locking the two of them into an intense rivalry that only proceeds to get more complicated once Estella uncovers the Baroness’ darkest secret.

Cruella very much follows in the footsteps of 2014’s Maleficent by presenting a story where the main antagonist of one of Disney’s classic animated films is portrayed in a more sympathetic light as they enact their revenge against those who wronged them. Granted, it’s not like the film makes her a full-on protagonist or anything; in fact, I’d even argue that this one gives its title character more opportunities to be a devious renegade. But overall, the version of Cruella seen in this film doesn’t seem like she’s destined to become as villainous as she’s known for being in other films. Thus, just like Maleficent, I think it’s safe to say that this take on the character hasn’t gone over well with everybody, namely due to the attempt of trying to humanize a character who, at least in other films, wanted to kidnap puppies and kill them for their coats. However, given the context of how this story plays out, it isn’t too big of an issue in the long run because turning Cruella into a rebellious antihero fits perfectly with this story’s 1970’s London setting. And thanks to Craig Gillespie's visually-driven direction, the film excellently captures the punk rock aesthetic of the time, which is only strengthened further by other great elements such as the incredible costume design done by two-time Oscar winner Jenny Beavan and a rocking soundtrack full of classic tunes. Really, the only things that hold this film back are relatively minor at best such as it being perhaps a bit overlong at a little over two hours and some rather predictable final plot twists that reveal the true connection between Cruella and the Baroness.

As noted in the intro, Glenn Close’s performance as Cruella in the 1996 live-action 101 Dalmatians film and its 2000 sequel, 102 Dalmatians, is so iconic that she’s arguably the definitive incarnation of the character for at least one or two generations. As such, one can only imagine the pressure that Emma Stone was under to deliver a version of the character that was just as memorable by comparison… and yet, she fully succeeds in doing so thanks in large part to her indisputable on-screen charisma. She also works incredibly well with Emma Thompson, who basically serves as this film’s version of the kind of villain that Cruella is in other films as the Baroness, a role that Thompson gleefully revels in. And really, it’s simply a delight to see these two go to war with one another over the course of the film’s proceedings. The two Emmas are then backed by some terrific supporting turns from Joel Fry and Paul Walter Hauser as Cruella’s famously bumbling sidekicks, Jasper and Horace. The laid-back persona that Fry brings to Jasper makes him the most grounded member of the group and the one who keeps Cruella from going too far with her actions while Paul Walter Hauser, as is basically expected from him at this point, makes Horace one of the film’s best sources of comedic relief. And while they admittedly don’t have as much to work with by comparison, Mark Strong and Kirby Howell-Baptiste turn in solid work as well as John, the Baroness’ valet, and this film’s interpretation of the 101 Dalmatians franchise’s primary matriarch, Anita Darling.  

As we conclude this review, I should probably preface this final section of it by admitting that, regardless of my overall thoughts on the film, Cruella will always be in my good graces since it was the first film that I was able to see in a theatrical setting in more than a year after everything that happened due to the COVID-19 pandemic. That said, though, this is not just a case where I’m simply being sentimental about how I first viewed it as the film itself is a highly entertaining comedic crime adventure that prides itself on its incredibly stylish visuals and costuming and then proceeds to back it all up with a genuinely unique way of reimagining the story of one of Disney’s most iconic antagonists. Sure, it may go against the traditional ways in which Cruella de Vil has been portrayed on film before, but thanks to Emma Stone’s outstanding performance in the title role (not to mention an equally terrific supporting cast), it still works in a way that doesn’t end up betraying the source material. Simply put, the enthusiasm that the cast and crew clearly must have had for this material couldn’t be more apparent in a film that also manages to have the kind of edge to it that you normally wouldn’t get from a Disney production. With all that in mind, it’s easy to see why this has managed to be the very definition of a crowd-pleaser that was recently confirmed to be getting a sequel. And while it’s currently unclear as to what route it’ll end up taking, perhaps they can go with the suggestion that was made during an interview that the two Emmas had with Rotten Tomatoes and make it a Godfather II-style prequel/sequel that could potentially see Glenn Close returning to play an older Cruella.

Rating: 4.5/5

And don’t forget to vote for your favorite theatrically released film from the summer of 2021 by going to the link below. Voting ends September 15th!

Click Here to Vote in the 2021 installment of Rhode Island Movie Corner's Annual End of Summer Fan Vote

Friday, July 23, 2021

2021 Midyear Recap

Well, we’re halfway through 2021 and right off the bat, I’m happy to report that there are quite a lot of things to feel good about when it comes to film. The most obvious thing to take note of is the fact that, thanks to the efforts that have been made to combat the COVID-19 pandemic (I, myself, am now fully vaccinated (Hooray!)), we’re slowly but surely starting to see things return to normal. And for the world of film, this can best be summed up by the utter satisfaction of resuming the timeless practice of going to see new releases in a theatrical setting instead of having to see films forced to abandon their theatrical releases and be moved to streaming services like Netflix and Disney+. To be clear, that doesn’t mean that I think that streaming services are a ‘bad’ thing given the high-quality content that can be found on them, but at the same time, I guess you can say that I’m just an ‘old-school’ kind of film fan who loves to see the biggest blockbusters with a crowd rather than just watching them by myself at home. Case in point, in 2020, I only managed to see four films at the theater before everything shut down, and after that, the only time that I watched something in a ‘theatrical’ setting was when I went to go see Tenet at my local drive-in since that was far and away the safest moviegoing experience at the time. By comparison, I’ve been to the theater almost every week these past few months and I very much look forward to seeing more of 2021’s most anticipated releases over the next six months.

But until then, the time has come once again for one of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s longest-standing traditions, the Midyear Recap. For those who are new to this site, the title of this post speaks for itself. Simply put, today I’m going through all the new releases that I saw during the first half of 2021, whether they were via a streaming service (which, admittedly, was something that I usually didn’t cover back then but has since become a necessity for, well, obvious reasons…) or anything that I’ve seen in a theater since the end of this past May. We start off with any of the films that I didn’t like and conclude with my Current Top 5 of the year. Now, as I alluded to earlier, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in last year’s Midyear Recap being severely truncated compared to previous installments of this type of post since I only managed to see six new releases by that point: the four previously mentioned theatergoing experiences, one Disney+ release, and an On-Demand title. I’m happy to report that this isn’t the case with the 2021 installment of the Midyear Recap as I’ve seen more than double the number of new releases that I saw in the first half of 2020. That said, though, before we begin, I recognize that I’ve been considerably behind in my work here on this site since, of the 13 films that will be appearing in today’s post, I’ve only done proper reviews for 5 of them. To be clear, I will eventually have full reviews for the other 8 films done for you guys, but since I always like to have these Midyear Recaps come out around this time of the year, that is the reason why today’s post ultimately came out first. And so, with all that out of the way, I invite you all to sit back, relax, and join me in my journey through the best and worst of the first half of 2021’s cinematic releases as Rhode Island Movie Corner proudly presents the 2021 installment of its annual Midyear Recap.

WORST OF THE YEAR (SO FAR)

ZACK SNYDER’S JUSTICE LEAGUE

Oh boy… well, we’re starting off on a fun note today by undeniably putting me directly in the crosshairs of this film’s diehard fans. But I’m sorry, guys, it is what it is… I didn’t like Zack Snyder’s Justice League. To be fair, I wasn’t big on this film’s infamous theatrical cut either when it came out in 2017 but when it comes to the mythical ‘Snyder Cut’, my problems with it are a lot different than those from the theatrical cut. Thus, while I’ll fully concede that Snyder’s cut is the better-made film in every possible manner, much of that is also the reason why it’s the less appealing of the two from my personal perspective. Sure, the theatrical cut was a rushed mess of a production defined entirely by the clashing of two vastly different directorial styles… but at least that version wasn’t four frigging hours long, horrendously paced, and clearly hindered by all the backstory and characters that it needed to set up. And as much as this version of the film is far more character-based, most of its heroes are still woefully underdeveloped under Snyder’s direction. In short, this is all another clear-cut sign of how the DC Extended Universe was rushed to try and match the scope of the Marvel Cinematic Universe without the filmmakers involved realizing that the MCU got to where it is today because it took its time in setting up its world and characters. Thus, regardless of what version of Justice League you watch, it’s a vastly outdated attempt at trying to be the next Avengers; sure, it has the same epic scale of an Avengers film, but it doesn’t even come close to having the same amount of heart.

But as I’ve noted in the past, that’s not the only reason why this film doesn’t resonate with me in the slightest as the circumstances of how it got willed into existence makes it an unfortunate symbol of the deplorable toxicity that has plagued film fandom these past few years. In other words, as good as it may be to see that Zack Snyder got the chance to release his version of the film after everything that he went through during its production (especially after he was forced to leave it due to a family tragedy), that doesn’t even remotely excuse the terrible actions of his most devoted fans. I’m talking about the ones who send death threats to anyone who dares to criticize one of Snyder’s films; the ones who act like these films are indisputable masterpieces… even when they’re not even close to being that. The ones who are so keen on Snyder’s dark and grim portrayal of characters that are mainly geared towards younger audiences that they view anything that isn’t that as an ‘insult’ to the superhero genre, whether it’d be from their direct competitors in the MCU or even other DCEU films that are decidedly different in tone. Snyder himself hasn’t made things any better given his recent trend of overly abrasive (and dare I say, a bit egotistical) comments that do nothing but rehash the same old tired point of his frequent struggles with studio interference. Thus, while both Snyder and his fans have spent the past several months complaining about what could have been, I’m just one of those folks who wishes that we’d all just simply move on from all this. The DC Extended Universe has certainly moved on from its ‘SnyderVerse’ era, and to be perfectly blunt, it’s been much better as a result.  

OTHER UNDERWHELMING RELEASES

CHERRY

This was a film that I legitimately wanted to love, especially given that it was the latest from the Russo brothers after the past several years that they’ve spent giving us some of the greatest installments of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (especially Avengers: Endgame despite what MCU stans will say otherwise). And yet, while Cherry does showcase a lot of their talents as directors, it’s ultimately a bit too ambitious for its own good. Adapted from the 2018 novel of the same name by Nico Walker, both the book and film present a fictionalized spin on Walker’s time in the US Army and how the PTSD that immediately affected him afterwards resulted in a life of crime and rampant drug use. But despite the film’s commendable efforts of portraying the horrors of PTSD, with Tom Holland and Ciara Bravo doing phenomenal jobs in the lead roles, it mostly feels very unfocused as it tackles everything from the main character’s flawed relationship with his wife, who also becomes a drug user herself, to his spree of bank robberies that gradually get messier in their execution. As a result, the film suffers from some mediocre pacing that makes its hefty runtime feel even longer, and while I do understand that this is not even remotely intended to be a ‘light-hearted’ story, certain aspects of the film like its predominately crude sense of humor end up doing too good a job in making this a rather unpleasant watch at times. To be clear, though, this doesn’t mean that I think that Cherry is as bad as some critics have viewed it as; overall, it’s an admirable attempt at making a stylistic crime thriller steeped in devastating emotional poignancy but, at the same time, clearly could’ve benefitted from some additional tinkering in post-production to work out some of its flaws.

NOTEWORTHY WATCHES

ARMY OF THE DEAD

So… I wonder if all those Snyder diehards who are undoubtedly furious at me for being critical of the Snyder Cut might just lighten their tone when they learn that I was more positive towards Zack Snyder’s other 2021 release, the Vegas-set zombie heist film Army of the Dead. No? Well, I’m not surprised, that’s just their M.O. at this point. Regardless, it’s nice that Snyder got the chance to do something different for a change given that this was his first film in a decade to not have anything to do with characters from the DC Universe. It even let him return to the genre that kick-started his career after making his directorial debut with the 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead. With that in mind, Army of the Dead does feel more like the kind of film that Snyder’s best accustomed to, and sure enough, all his directorial traits are on full display here. That said, though… it also serves as a frustrating reminder of how Snyder hasn’t really evolved much as a director. Sure, Army of the Dead doesn’t hold back with its visual flair and meticulously crafted action sequences, but just like many of Snyder’s other films, it suffers from an incredibly underdeveloped script that doesn’t fully capitalize on the unique aspects of its premise. It also doesn’t help that character development is still one of Snyder’s biggest weaknesses as a director, thus stranding a genuinely solid cast that includes the likes of Dave Bautista and Tig Notaro with barely any quality material to work with. As such, I’d describe Army of the Dead as an archetypal Zack Snyder film as it highlights his best… and worst directorial attributes. And while I obviously liked it more than Justice League, it didn’t exactly wow me either.   

THE SPONGEBOB MOVIE: SPONGE ON THE RUN

The discourse surrounding SpongeBob SquarePants nowadays is… weird, to say the least, and what I mean by that is that you’d never expect a show as innocent (and often quite surreal) as SpongeBob to amass one of the most toxic factions of fandom that, no joke, can often be on par with the Snyder diehards or the Fandom Menace. Basically, to make a long story short, this mainly stems from those who are overly protective of the legacy of the show’s creator, the late Stephen Hillenburg, to the point where they cruelly attack any of its developing spin-offs such as Kamp Koral and The Patrick Star Show. In their eyes, Hillenburg would’ve never approved of any of these… even though long-time series writer Vincent Waller confirmed that Hillenburg was, at the very least, aware of Kamp Koral’s production and would’ve most likely been totally cool with it. I mean, if I were to be perfectly blunt, we live in an age now where SpongeBob is known more for the endless number of internet memes that it’s spawned rather than anything from the show itself. And while I’ll fully admit that I haven’t regularly watched the show for many years and was once amongst those who spent way too much time lamenting its decline in quality after the release of The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie, it seems like, from what I’ve heard, the show has legitimately managed to improve itself in recent years. Sadly, though, that fact has been undermined by a fandom that’s been blindly loyal to an utterly false narrative and, as a result, has resorted to attacking material that clearly isn’t marketed towards them.

In some ways, all this gatekeeping clearly must’ve had an impact on the third SpongeBob film, Sponge on the Run, especially seeing how it has several flashback sequences which show SpongeBob and his friends at the Kamp Koral summer camp which, of course, is the setting for the show’s first official spin-off. Overall, though, Sponge on the Run is another solid cinematic outing for everyone’s favorite sponge who lives in a pineapple under the sea. While it does adopt a different style of animation compared to both the show and the previous two films, the transition from 2-D animation to CGI doesn’t result in the loss of the show’s unique style and its penchant for utterly surreal imagery (Where else are you going to see sights like Keanu Reeves as an all-knowing tumbleweed?). And while the plot is incredibly straight-forward in its execution (e.g. this isn’t the first time that we’ve seen a ‘SpongeBob’s pet snail Gary goes missing’ plot), the film makes up for this by being a lot more heartfelt than the previous SpongeBob film, 2015’s Sponge Out of Water. Nothing against that film, for the record, but the scenes in this film where SpongeBob’s friends explain just how much he means to them are beautifully done and do a great job of symbolizing the best parts of a franchise that’s left a considerable impact on the pop cultural zeitgeist. Thus, while I’ll admit that there’ll probably never be another SpongeBob film that resonates with me as much as the original since it’s the one that I grew up with, Sponge on the Run isn’t even close to being the ‘dumpster fire’ that some parts of the franchise’s fandom undoubtedly view it as. Case in point, I’d argue that this film is a much better representation of the legacy of Stephen Hillenburg and his greatest creation rather than the recent actions of those who act as if they’re speaking on Hillenburg’s behalf.      

GODZILLA VS. KONG

One of the best things that I can say about Godzilla vs. Kong, the culmination of the recent MonsterVerse series of films that reimagined the titular monsters for a new generation, is that it does something that its immediate predecessor, 2019’s Godzilla: King of the Monsters, wasn’t able to do; it doesn’t take itself too seriously. In other words, it knows damn well that the main thing we’re all here to see is two of the most iconic creatures in cinematic history duking it out with each other, and with that in mind, it more than delivers on that front. Plus, unlike the Godzilla films, which mostly had its big monster set-pieces take place at night with mediocre lighting, Godzilla vs. Kong opts to be more in line with 2017’s Kong: Skull Island by featuring more daytime-set action sequences and far more visually appealing nighttime action sequences. If there’s one downside to this, however, it’s that, just like the other MonsterVerse films, all these great action sequences can’t entirely make up for a mediocre script, and while Godzilla vs. Kong goes as far as to present the franchise’s most sci-fi heavy plot to date, it’s practically an afterthought this time around. Still, as someone who wasn’t too big on King of the Monsters, where I felt that the human plot of the film was even worse than usual, I personally found some aspects of this film’s human plot (i.e. the friendship between Kong and a young native deaf girl named Jia) to be better handled by comparison even if it’s still nothing special. In a lot of ways, this mirrors my overall thoughts on the MonsterVerse franchise in general; while there’s a lot of fun to be had with these films, they also could’ve been written a lot better. For what it’s worth, though, while Godzilla vs. Kong is easily the franchise’s most narratively undemanding installment to date, I’d argue that this is what ultimately makes it work better than others.

MORTAL KOMBAT

The genre of films based on hit video games has been around for several decades now, and unfortunately, most of these adaptations have either been disappointingly underwhelming or downright terrible. In recent years, however, it seems like the genre’s consistently bad luck has managed to somewhat improve as we’ve had some genuinely solid video game film adaptations such as Pokémon: Detective Pikachu and Sonic the Hedgehog. And sure enough, that trend continued this year with the big-budget cinematic reboot of Mortal Kombat 26 years after the 1995 Mortal Kombat film managed to be one of the genre’s rare successes. But as entertaining as the 1995 film is, the new Mortal Kombat surpasses it in practically every way imaginable, especially when it comes to its action sequences. Whereas the 1995 film (and, for that matter, its infamously worse 1997 sequel Annihilation) was forced to limit the intensity of its fight sequences to maintain a PG-13 rating, this new Mortal Kombat doesn’t hold back from replicating the franchise’s notoriously graphic violence as it very much earns its R rating. Granted, it does take a bit for the film to get to those moments since it’s the very definition of a ‘franchise starter’ film that mainly serves to build up the world and its characters, especially since it centers around a film-exclusive character, Cole Young, as its main protagonist. Still, when it does get to the things that fans of the franchise want to see, I’d argue that it does them well enough to make up for any shortcomings that stemmed from the journey there. Thus, just like the original live-action Mortal Kombat film, this new cinematic spin on one of the most iconic video game franchises of all-time is another one of the better instances of a hit video game being adapted into a film. I’m genuinely interested in seeing a sequel to this, especially since it ends with a tease of the debut of franchise mainstay Johnny Cage; that said, though, if they do end up making a sequel… let’s just hope that it doesn’t turn out to be another Annihilation.

A QUIET PLACE – PART II

2018’s A Quiet Place was one of the most highly-acclaimed horror films of recent years thanks to John Krasinski’s fantastic direction and a powerful sense of emotional poignancy that helped give its story of a family struggling to survive whilst being hunted by aliens with a heightened sense of hearing its humanity. For some, including Krasinski himself, it didn’t seem like a sequel was needed despite the potential ‘sequel hook’ that the first film arguably ended on; eventually, though, Krasinski found a way to continue the story of the Abbott family and does so excellently. Now, despite what I just said, I wouldn’t quite say that A Quiet Place Part II is as tightly scripted as its predecessor as there are a few plotlines and character beats here and there that weren’t quite as developed as they probably should’ve been. Still, when it comes to the things that made the first film work as well as it did, those aspects continue to be on full display in a sequel that doesn’t go overboard with its attempts at expanding its universe. Instead, it mainly serves as another showcase of Krasinski’s strong direction with plenty of brilliantly staged and appropriately intense set-pieces such as the opening flashback that covers the exact moment when the aliens arrive on Earth. But, of course, one of the biggest selling points of these films has been the sympathetic group of protagonists who headline it, the Abbott family, and just like the first film, the indisputable star of the show is Millicent Simmonds as Regan, especially since this film promotes her into being the main protagonist. Thus, with all this in mind, while I can’t say that A Quiet Place Part II is a ‘superior sequel’, it is a sequel that manages to be just as good as its predecessor because it doesn’t lose sight of what made that first film such a success.  

F9: THE FAST SAGA

At this point, there are two distinct camps when it comes to the Fast and the Furious franchise. On one side, you have those who unabashedly love it despite all its ludicrous moments and melodramatic plots. And on the other side, you have those who can’t even remotely stand these films because of those exact reasons and spend a lot of time lamenting how they ‘symbolize the death of cinema’. As for me, I’m sure that I’ve made it clear by now that I’m in the former camp, and with that in mind, one of the first things that I can say about the series’ ninth mainline installment, F9, is that when compared to the previous film, 2017’s The Fate of the Furious, it seems like this was a much smoother production. Whereas Fate of the Furious ended up getting defined by all the intense drama that occurred behind the scenes, I’d argue that the return of series mainstay Justin Lin as F9’s director was crucial to making this film’s proceedings feel a lot livelier than some of the franchise’s most recent installments. Now, as usual, everything that I just said should still be taken with a grain of salt since this is Fast and the Furious we’re talking about, and sure enough, F9 continues the series’ recent trajectory of getting more insane with each new installment. But to go off the enthusiastic reaction that this got from the crowd that I saw it with (e.g. there was quite a lot of applause when a certain fan-favorite protagonist returned from his alleged demise), F9 manages to be, in its own unique way, a return to form for this series… even if some will argue that this isn’t really saying much given its usual reputation.

TOP 5 OF 2021 (SO FAR)

5. LUCA

To the surprise of no one, Pixar has delivered another excellent animated feature with their sole 2021 outing, Luca. Directed by Enrico Casarosa (director of La Luna, the lead-in short for Brave), Luca follows a pair of young boys who travel to an Italian town and compete in a triathlon… all while trying to keep their real identities as sea monsters secret, especially since the town that they visit is full of dedicated fishermen. What follows is a story that many have noted to have some of the lightest narrative stakes to come from a Pixar film, and yet, in an age where Pixar films tend to get scrutinized more than they should, it really should be noted that this isn’t a bad thing in this instance. Instead, Luca’s greatest strength is its effortless charm as it does a phenomenal job in immersing us within its world as seen through the eyes of its lovable main protagonists. Yes, the story is as straight-forward as you can get with clear-cut heroes and villains but that doesn’t mean that Luca can’t hit the same kind of powerful emotional beats that have become a staple of Pixar’s filmography. Simply put, Luca isn’t meant to be a thought-provoking parable a la something like Inside Out or Wall-E. Instead, it’s a pleasantly light-hearted ‘slice of life’ adventure story directly inspired by Enrico Casarosa’s own experiences living on the Italian Riviera that also pays a ton of tributes to Italian cinema and the works of the legendary Hayao Miyazaki. Because of all this (as well as Pixar’s consistently beautiful animation), Luca is an utterly delightful film that, above all else, proves a point that me and some of my peers have been making for years now in that not every Pixar film needs to be a ‘15/10 masterpiece’ to be a worthwhile addition to the studio’s legendary filmography.

4. CRUELLA

Following in the footsteps of 2014’s Maleficent, Cruella, the newest installment of Disney’s recent line of live-action re-imaginings of their animated classics, presents a story where its iconic antagonist (in this case, 101 Dalmatians’ Cruella de Vil) is portrayed as a more sympathetic protagonist. Granted, I’d argue that this film gives Cruella more of a wild side than Maleficent had in her titular films, but at the end of the day, it’s unclear if this version of the infamous dognapping fashion designer will end up going to the extreme lengths that she’s gone to in other films. Thus, just like Maleficent, I think it’s safe to say that this film’s portrayal of Cruella hasn’t gone over well with everybody; and yet, I also think that it all comes together nicely in Craig Gillespie’s stylish, edgy, and sharply directed comedic crime thriller. Obviously, much of what makes this film work as well as it does has to do with Emma Stone’s Grade-A performance in the title role. Even with the pressure of following in the footsteps of Glenn Close’s iconic turn as the character in the 1996 live-action remake of 101 Dalmatians, Stone’s natural charisma is on point throughout as she truly makes the role her own. Plus, it’s simply a delight to see her version of Cruella go toe to toe with this film’s main antagonist, the Baroness, delightfully played by Emma Thompson. Really, apart from some minor issues that stem from the runtime and some admittedly predictable plot twists, Cruella is the very definition of a crowd-pleaser. Plus, regardless of how much I enjoyed it, this film will always be in my good graces for being the first new release that I saw in a movie theater in more than a year.

3. THE MITCHELLS VS. THE MACHINES

Many have said that The Mitchells vs. the Machines, the latest release from Sony Pictures Animation (even though COVID forced them to sell the distribution rights to Netflix), is one of the best examples in recent memory of an animated film that thoroughly appeals to both kids and adults, and to put it simply, it’s easy to see why. While they’re only involved with it as producers, this film clearly benefits from the influence of the dynamic duo of Phil Lord and Chris Miller as writers/directors Mike Rianda and Jeff Rowe craft an unabashedly wacky yet wholly poignant story with strong themes. And while the film does take a lot of inspiration from modern internet culture, it doesn’t go overboard with this stuff to the point where it’s only accessible to those who are the most well-versed with it. Whereas early trailers may’ve suggested that it would largely be based around the traditional ‘technology vs. nature’ debate, the film instead focuses more on themes such as the unbreakable bond of family and the beauty of one’s individuality, especially as seen through of the eyes of its incredibly sympathetic protagonist Katie Mitchell. As a result, The Mitchells vs. the Machines is a film that successfully manages to present some of the funniest AND most emotional cinematic moments in recent years, thus making it yet another rousing success for the big-name talents who worked on it.

2. RAYA AND THE LAST DRAGON

I wouldn’t be surprised if this film’s higher placement over The Mitchells vs. the Machines may garner some backlash from animation fans, mainly by way of me potentially being accused of playing it safe and preferring the more mainstream works of Walt Disney Animation over something that’s more of a creatively unique venture. To be clear, though, these films are practically interchangeable at this point when it comes to their spots amongst my favorite films of the year and none of this is meant to be any kind of statement on their quality because they’re both fantastic. Case in point, Raya and the Last Dragon is, big surprise, another smash hit for Walt Disney Animation as directors Don Hall and Carlos Lopez Estrada create a highly entertaining action-adventure that pays full tribute to the Southeast Asian culture that inspired it. Simply put, there’s a lot to love about this film; gorgeous animation, a lovable cast of main protagonists, the fact that it made the effortlessly adorable Kelly Marie Tran the latest and greatest Disney princess heroine, etc. Ultimately, though, one of the greatest things about this film is its utterly timely themes of unity. Given that the bulk of the plot revolves around its titular heroine’s quest to reunite the five factions of her homeland of Kumandra, which has been torn apart by greed and mistrust, it goes without saying that several key moments in this film feel like they’ve been ripped straight from the real world. As a result of all this, Raya and the Last Dragon very much succeeds in being a prime example of Walt Disney Animation’s newly minted Chief Creative Officer Jennifer Lee’s goal of creating more diverse Disney stories.   

1. IN THE HEIGHTS

You ever find yourself in a situation where you’re going to see a new film and, based on what you’ve seen from the marketing, think to yourself that it’s practically guaranteed to be something that you’re going to love? Well, for me, this scenario very much applied to In the Heights, the film adaptation of the Tony-winning Broadway musical of the same name that was the first big success for the one and only Lin-Manuel Miranda several years before Hamilton made him a household name. And just like its source material, the film adaptation of In the Heights is an utterly delightful musical that celebrates universal themes such as family and the strength of one’s community. Under Jon M. Chu’s fantastic direction, the film boasts visually stunning musical numbers and features an all-star cast that’s headlined by one of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s most notable disciples, Anthony Ramos, in the starring role that Miranda originated on Broadway. Now, yes, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the fact that this film ended up attracting some negative publicity after its release for not being entirely accurate with its ethnically diverse casting (which, ironically, wouldn’t be the first time that this happened to a Jon M. Chu film as Crazy Rich Asians faced a similar controversy). However, I personally feel that this shouldn’t completely overshadow what is, at its core, a powerful feel-good drama that follows a group of lovable protagonists as they go about their daily lives in their hometown of Washington Heights. Thus, if you haven’t seen it yet (which may account for many of you given its surprisingly mediocre box-office performance), I highly recommend that you do so because, without taking that whole diversity scandal into account, I honestly can’t think of anything bad to say about it.

And that concludes the 2021 installment of Rhode Island Movie Corner’s Annual Midyear Recap. As always, I want to thank you all for joining me on this little adventure regardless of how it ultimately took me a much longer time to finish this post than it probably should’ve. As I alluded to in the intro, I know that I’ve been vastly behind schedule when it comes to the content that I’ve been publishing on this site. There are a few reasons for this that I won’t exactly get into right now (nothing bad, for the record, it’s just that there have been other things that’ve taken up a lot of my time recently), but like I said before, this doesn’t mean that I’ve stopped doing what I’ve been doing for the past decade. Case in point, proper reviews for the films in today’s post that I haven’t already covered are in the works, starting with the one that I’ve been working on for The Mitchells vs. The Machines which I’ll try to finish in the next week or so. And sure enough, there are plenty more reviews to look forward to now that new theatrical releases are starting to get back on track, from all the new MCU films coming out (and yes, that includes all the recent Disney+ shows, which I plan to cover in some kind of ‘event week’) to highly anticipated releases such as Denis Villeneuve’s Dune and, after all its delays, Daniel Craig’s final James Bond film, No Time to Die. Not only that, but if all goes well, you can look forward to the return of another RIMC tradition at the end of the summer. Simply put, words cannot describe how great it feels knowing that the cinematic experience has returned!